|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nomad soul
Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 6:05 pm Post subject: UK curriculum to exclude US authors |
|
|
UK education revamp leaves US authors on the shelf
By Jill Lawless, Associated Press | 30 May 2014
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/uk-education-revamp-leaves-us-authors-shelf-131401827.html
LONDON (AP) — Britain's education minister says he has not killed a mockingbird, but many literature-lovers don't believe him.
Michael Gove has outraged some readers and academics with his campaign to put the basics — and Britishness — back into schools. Longtime American favorites including John Steinbeck's "Of Mice and Men" and Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird" are off the syllabus for a major high school English qualification under new guidelines that focus almost exclusively on writers from Britain and Ireland.
Some educators fear that could lead to the narrowing of British minds. "The idea of cutting out American books because they are not British is crazy," said John Carey, a literary critic and emeritus professor at Oxford University.
Exam boards in England and Wales — which set school syllabuses in line with government rules — on Friday finished releasing their new book lists for the English Literature GCSE, an exam taken by 16-year-olds after a two-year course of study.
Gone are Lee, Steinbeck, Arthur Miller's play "The Crucible" and the autobiography of Maya Angelou, who died this week. Gone, too, are African and Asian writers including Haruki Murakami, Chinua Achebe and Chimamanda Ngozi Adiche. The purge of Americans and others is the product — though not, the government says, the goal — of an attempt to make the school curriculum more rigorous. New government rules say GCSE pupils must study "high quality, intellectually challenging, and substantial" works, including a 19th-century novel, a selection of poetry, a play by William Shakespeare and post-1914 fiction or drama "from the British Isles." (Previous rules mentioned "contemporary writers" without reference to nationality). A requirement to study authors from different cultures has been dropped.
Gove strongly denied that his goal was to banish non-British authors. "I have not banned anything," he wrote in the Daily Telegraph. "All we are doing is asking exam boards to broaden — not narrow — the books young people study for GCSE." The education department says the guidelines represent the minimum students are required to learn, and that those who read more widely — and internationally — will do better on the exams. It also says pupils are required to study "seminal world literature" — including American classics — between the ages of 11 and 14.
Critics of the new English rules say they will have a restrictive, rather than broadening, effect. "Michael Gove wants everybody studying traditional literature, and he wants it to be British," said Bethan Marshall, chair of the National Association for the Teaching of English. "I think that's a bit of a mistake."
This is not the first time Gove, who has been education secretary in Britain's Conservative-led government since 2010, has faced strong opposition to his plans. His overhaul of primary education was called "neo-Victorian" by a Cambridge University professor, and his proposal to make history lessons more British in focus was condemned by many academics. Some educators welcomed Gove's attempts to raise standards. Jonathan Bate, an English professor at Oxford who advised on the latest curriculum changes, said he had been discouraged to discover that many pupils studied no British novels for their GCSE course. "I think there are so many riches in the last century's literature in these islands that all pupils should have some acquaintance with it," Bate said.
The new book lists include a wide sample of modern British literature and drama, from George Orwell's "Animal Farm" and William Golding's "Lord of the Flies" to Kazuo Ishiguro's" novel "Never Let Me Go," Alan Bennett's play "The History Boys" and "Anita and Me," a coming-of-age novel by comedian and author Meera Syal. The 19th-century novels on offer include Dickens' "Great Expectations," Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice" and Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein."
But debate on the changes has focused on the loss of "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "Of Mice and Men," which several generations of Britons remember — mostly fondly — from their schooldays. Few commentators had anything negative to say about Lee's beloved tale of a girl learning about racism and justice in the American South. Outraged fans of the book even got the hashtag "Mockingbird" trending on Twitter after Gove's changes were announced.
Steinbeck's novella about the friendship between two migrant workers during the Great Depression proved more divisive. Times newspaper columnist Janice Turner welcomed the removal of Steinbeck's book, which she said was studied for all the wrong reasons — "because it is short, simple and has a didactic 'message': bullying is bad."
Carey said he sympathized with Gove's efforts to get students reading literary classics, but regretted the loss of the two American books. "It's true ... 'Of Mice and Men' is set just because it's short, but it is nonetheless a marvelous book for teaching," Carey said. "It's a wonderful book, deeply human. I think the same about 'To Kill a Mockingbird' — a book that can transform the way you think."
(End of article) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Shroob
Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A good read's a good read... does it matter where it was written? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sashadroogie
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just out of vague curiosity, how many British, Irish, Australian, or New Zealander writers are on high school courses in the US? I'd imagine there'd be a heavier emphasis on homegrown literature, wouldn't there?
Not too much wrong with that in many ways... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rostom
Joined: 16 Apr 2014 Posts: 102 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The good news is that Michael Gove is Scottish and George Orwell is British! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sparks
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 632
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Generally, Animal Farm and 1984 figure heavily into American highschool English courses, at least when I was there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sparks
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 632
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, Lord of the Flies as well, I don't think you can escape the Am. school system without reading it. Well, actually, nowadays you probably can. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nomad soul
Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sashadroogie wrote: |
Just out of vague curiosity, how many British, Irish, Australian, or New Zealander writers are on high school courses in the US? I'd imagine there'd be a heavier emphasis on homegrown literature, wouldn't there? |
Many US schools are teaching world literature, which covers authors from throughout the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
btsmrtfan
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Posts: 193 Location: GPS Not Working
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is but another example of a manifest inferiority complex resulting in a stupid decision. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HLJHLJ
Joined: 06 Oct 2009 Posts: 1218 Location: Ecuador
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stupid idea, implemented for stupid reasons.
But... I'll be glad to see 'Of Mice and Men' off the syllabus. Not that it's not a good novel but it was done to death decades ago and yet they are still flogging it. It's only remained popular because it's short, and that surely shouldn't be the prime concern in an English literature qualification. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
damn_my_eyes
Joined: 13 Jul 2013 Posts: 225
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed that it is a stupid idea but the trouble with a lot of the books in the curriculum is that they bore your average teenager to tears, regardless of where the author was born.
I'm sure a lot of people have been put off reading by being forced to plough through the likes of Sense and Sensibility or a Tale of Two Cities at school.
Seems a shame when there's so much engaging contemporary and classic literature from around the world to go at. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wonderingjoesmith
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 910 Location: Guangzhou
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
nomad soul wrote: |
Sashadroogie wrote: |
Just out of vague curiosity, how many British, Irish, Australian, or New Zealander writers are on high school courses in the US? I'd imagine there'd be a heavier emphasis on homegrown literature, wouldn't there? |
Many US schools are teaching world literature, which covers authors from throughout the world. |
I'd love to see stats on this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nomad soul
Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
wonderingjoesmith wrote: |
nomad soul wrote: |
Many US schools are teaching world literature, which covers authors from throughout the world. |
I'd love to see stats on this. |
Start by simply entering world literature curriculum on Google. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Javelin of Radiance
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1187 Location: The West
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
sparks wrote: |
Oh, Lord of the Flies as well, I don't think you can escape the Am. school system without reading it. Well, actually, nowadays you probably can. |
Sure can. Schools have probably substituted Season 4 Episode 1 of the Simpsons, Kamp Krusty, in place of the novel. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnslat
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear HLJHLJ,
"Not that it's not a good novel but it was done to death decades ago and yet they are still flogging it."
I'm a bit puzzled how it could be "done to death" for students who almost certainly have never heard of it.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dedicated
Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 972 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gove's critics need to get their facts straight before casting him as a bogeyman.
In fact To Kill a Mocking Bird and Of Mice and Men have not been "banned". The new GCSE syllabus from September 2014 allows pupils to roam more widely, not stipulating books they must study as part of the GCSE course.
The reason for the misunderstanding is because the GCSE texts have to include one Shakespeare play, some Romantic poetry, a 19th century novel and some fiction or drama written in the British Isles since 1918.
Beyond this, they can immerse themselves in any literary work.
Either Gove has made English Literature an optional extra or he is insisting that all pupils study William Wordsworth and Charles Dickens in preference to Harper Lee or John Steinbeck. But he can't logically do both.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/27/michael-gove[/url] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|