|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nomad soul
Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 3:15 am Post subject: Unraveling myths about ELT & language acquisition |
|
|
No more fairy tales
EL Gazette | April 2018
Source: http://digital.elgazette.com/april-2018/no-more-fairytales.html
(Excerpt)
IATEFL Special Interest Group (SIG) representatives and EFL specialists question unproven assumptions that underpin many of our methodological beliefs.
In 1878, Maximilian Berlitz hired Nicholas Joly to teach French at his college in the US. According to the Berlitz website, Maximilian fell ill for six weeks and when he recovered, he found that Joly’s class ‘were engaging in lively question-and-answer exchanges with their teacher, in elegantly accented French.’ Berlitz argued that the Direct Method, as it came to be known, is a much better way to learn a language than grammar translation.
On one level, this story represents the early beginnings of communicative language learning. But it introduces the following three myths:
• that native speakers are always better,
• that the target language should always be used in the classroom, and
• that we don’t need to teach phonology because all students will simply acquire it effortlessly.
Chair of IATEFL Pronunciation SIG Wayne Rimmer takes on the myth that learners will pick up ‘elegantly accented’ English simply by being asked to listen and repeat. The neuroscience supports him, at least for adult language learners. Research in Finland suggests that only multilingual adults who started learning languages at a young age retain the ability to perceive and remember foreign sounds; the rest of us do not even hear them.
Harry Kuchah concurs that only the target language should be used in the classroom and points out that in large under-resourced classes of multi-lingual children, the best resource a teacher has is the existing linguistic ability of the students. He also questions the myth that children naturally acquire a language faster than adults.
(End of excerpt) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RedLightning
Joined: 08 Aug 2015 Posts: 137 Location: United States
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 6:18 am Post subject: Re: Unraveling myths about ELT & language acquisition |
|
|
nomad soul wrote: |
On one level, this story represents the early beginnings of communicative language learning. But it introduces the following three myths:
[list]• that native speakers are always better,
• that the target language should always be used in the classroom, and
• that we don’t need to teach phonology because all students will simply acquire it effortlessly. |
The term 'myth' is used a little too loosely here.
-Of course native speakers are not 'always' better, but when all else is equal, they almost always are(I would be so bold as to argue this is common sense). I would also add students need as much exposure to the target language as possible and that most language is indeed acquired rather than learned.
nomad soul wrote: |
He also questions the myth that children naturally acquire a language faster than adults. |
Given what we know about the cognitive development of children, is it such an absurd notion to believe that they may indeed have a mental edge in language acquisition? Even if they don't, the affective filter plays a much larger role for adults. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scot47
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alas, these myths about foreign language acquisition are now widespread. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffytwo
Joined: 24 Sep 2016 Posts: 139
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2018 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
If Joly were using anything like the "dialogues" that Sauveur (a contemporary with his own methods teaching in nearby Boston, whom Howatt in his A History of ELT hypothesizes had directly or indirectly been a possible influence on Joly) employed, then one has to take those claims of 'lively question-and-answer exchanges with their teacher' with a pinch of salt:
Quote: |
Here is the finger. Look. Here is the forefinger, here is the middle finger, here is the ring-finger, here is the little finger, and here is the thumb. Do you see the finger, madame? Yes, you see the finger and I see the finger. Do you see the finger, monsieur? - Yes, I see the finger. - Do you see the forefinger, madame? - Yes, I see the forefinger. - And you, monsieur? etc.
Let us return to the parts of the body. We have two ears, one on each side of the head. The ear is the organ of hearing. Can you hear? Yes, I can hear. We are very fortunate to be able to hear. The deaf cannot hear, they are unfortunate. Are they unhappy? I don't know. Right, the unfortunate are not necessarily unhappy. Can old people hear? Yes, more or less: some old people are almost deaf. Others are completely deaf. |
Berlitz's method such as it was by 1895 is best described in an article written that year by Pakscher, director of the Dresden branch, and summarized well in Howatt, who notes that Pakscher had hesitated to take up the post (though he became convinced of the method's value) due to the popular view that Berlitz schools taught in a 'mechanical and superficial' manner. Similar charges of 'trivialization' can be found in other accounts then, and since. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scot47
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Among the myths which continue in the Middle East
1. A competent teacher never sits down
2. A competent teacher never uses the students' first language
3. A competent teacher always respects authority
4. A competent teacher follows the syllabus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|