Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Neo-Soviet Propaganda.
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Russia & C.I.S.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GabeKessel



Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 150

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:10 am    Post subject: Neo-Soviet Propaganda. Reply with quote

This is an interesting site:

Here are some Neo-Soviet propaganda articles about the US- sorry, they are in Russian. Propaganda in their case is obvious, it means exaggerating small things in the opponent and inflating them to look big and scary. while minimizing good things in the same. At the same time, one minimizes bad things about one's country and maximizes its good things. Simple. Hopefully, it helps to understand why some of the people you meet there have such a distorted picture of the country they have never been to. This is the stuff they have been fed for decades.

Look at the title page- This is the "Dark Side of America".

http://usatruth.by.ru/

"Life in America"- below, after the pictures of "living conditions in the US", you will see what they call "Leisure in America and other Western Countries". The one below that says "This is not Chechnya or Beirut but South Bronx".

http://usatruth.by.ru/amerikagallery.htm

Here is a potrait of what they call " American Occupiers in Russia". Yes, the US did support the White Army in 1917, but they were not occupiers- they were basically helping the Monarchists. This is not how they see it.

http://usatruth.by.ru/c4.files/1917russiagallery.htm

Here are some anti-American posters and it says below the headline: " some things do not lose their appropriateness even now".

"Behave Yourself!"

http://usatruth.by.ru/pics2/cold_war_sov23.jpg

We- (Soviets- European and Asian) turn deserts into a blooming country.

They ( Americans) turn cities and villages- into desert.

http://usatruth.by.ru/pics2/pic_341ee91beb6dccac1d4c363d62da246b.jpg

Here are some more:

http://usatruth.by.ru/c2.files/pjatyjletnijplan.jpg

It says:" Five Year Economic Plan"- the yellow industrialist represents America, and he says: "Fantasy, Delirium, Utopia".

"Helping the Starving the American Way".

http://usatruth.by.ru/c1.files/pic_f475de36d7aaeb289f01a683290f136c.jpg

An American being carried by his "slaves":

South Africa, Israel, Rhodesia, etc.

http://usatruth.by.ru/pics2/poster-12.jpg

This is how they see America:

http://usatruth.by.ru/c3.files/0320.jpg

http://usatruth.by.ru/pics2/210.jpg

It says "Business Built on Misery and Blood".

And on this one, the placard on the vulture says : "I am a Dove".

http://usatruth.by.ru/pics2/012.jpg

Here is the full list of propaganda posters.

http://usatruth.by.ru/sovpropaganda.htm

It is interesting to see the other side always.


Last edited by GabeKessel on Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:51 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Denham



Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Location: Utah, USA

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great post, although some of the links did not work because they were abbreviated with elipses (...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GabeKessel



Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 150

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Problem fixed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coledavis



Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1838

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Britain, we have some cartoons about George Bush, gas-guzzling and religious maniacs. We call it satire rather than propaganda.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnosheep



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2068
Location: eslcafe

PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Neo-conservative propaganda Reply with quote

Thank you for the propoganda Gabekessel (and the definition). As you rightly say:

GabeKessel wrote:
Propaganda ... is obvious, it means exaggerating small things in the opponent and inflating them to look big and scary. while minimizing good things in the same. At the same time, one minimizes bad things about one's country and maximizes its good things. Simple. Hopefully, it helps to understand why some of the people you meet there have such a distorted picture of the country they have never been to. This is the stuff they have been fed for decades.

...

"Life in America"- below, after the pictures of "living conditions in the US" ... The one below that says "This is not Chechnya or Beirut but South Bronx".

http://usatruth.by.ru/amerikagallery.htm

Here is a potrait of what they call " American Occupiers in Russia". Yes, the US did support the White Army in 1917, but they were not occupiers- they were basically helping the Monarchists. This is not how they see it.

http://usatruth.by.ru/c4.files/1917russiagallery.htm

This is not how anyone else sees it either, except of course those who have been "fed such stuff ["a distorted picture"] for decades"

ps. The pictures of the Bronx are genuine. Oh, and the US was attempting to impose a government acceptable to the US upon a people who preferred to fight for the right to decide their own fate without such US ("No, no. Of course we are not here to impose our will on you, permanently station US bases on your soil to ensure your subservience and exploit your natural resources for the benefit of our chums in big business. We are here to help you") 'intervention'.

Sound familiar anyone?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
coledavis



Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1838

PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, I was just having a little fun. Those cartoons are more scurrilous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GabeKessel



Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 150

PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, the White Army was obviously quite happy that the US was helping them.

And on another note, while the propaganda articles talk about the US intervention, they conveniently omit that their own country did the same-in Afghanistan, Czechoslovakia, Hungary; not to mention annexing countries such as Chechnya, kicking out Circassians from their lands so that Russia could have Sochi, occupying Muslim countries of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and other 'Stans' and incorporating them into USSR because of their own 'Manifest Destiny' doctrine and numerous other forays into foreign lands which are now part of the Russian Federation. I admit that 'et tu quoque" may not be a good logical argument, but while the Americans often repent about their past deeds and question them, the Russians have very few qualms or even mention about how much suffering, occupation and intervention their own country has effectuated upon millions of people who had never asked them to come. No guilt, no remorse, no apology. Sounds familiar? Kind of like Japan. That is why most former Soviet republics hate Russia with passion. Just like so many Asian countries hate Japan.

The South Bronx pictures are genuine, but why not show West Hollywood just for balance? Or some normal middle class US neighborhood?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnosheep



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2068
Location: eslcafe

PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The USSR only ever occupied countries with whom it, or a country it had already occupied, shared a border. Most of the "stans" you mentioned had been part of the Russian Empire since the days of the Tsar. Yes that Tsar, the US supported scumbag the defence of whom was the pretence for the dispatch of US troops in an attempt to thwart the will of the Russian people - who, it must be added in the interests of historical accuracy, gave said US troops a right good kicking.

I'm not sure quite which borders the good ol' USofArse shares/shared with Panama, Grenada, South Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq....

Like it or lump it, while some people resent Russia because of its past, and many asian people mistrust and fear Japan, there is no country on this planet that generates a tiny proportion of the loathing as does the good ol' USA; and no country with anything like the dismal record of attempted, mostly failed, interventions into the affairs of other sovereign nations.

Your crude attempts at propaganda notwithstanding it is not Russia or Japan that the world most fears and mistrusts but the US; rightly so given its abysmal record of foreign invasions and occupations in the last 50 yrs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Scott Denham



Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Location: Utah, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grow up. The OP was just posting some interesting posters that I find sometimes shocking, sometimes hilarious, sometimes truthful, and sometimes innane. We all know a lot of people hate the US and some hate Russia, but I don't thing anything the OP said warranted such a discussion. If you have something constructive to say about the nature of Russian propaganda, then that would be great, but if you're just going to US bash (justified or not) you should find one of the thousands of political boards on the net and not one devoted to ESL and the discussion of the cultures in which ESL takes place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpvanderwerf2001



Joined: 02 Oct 2003
Posts: 1117
Location: New York

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would just like to say thank you for that post, Scott Denham.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GabeKessel



Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 150

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The USSR only ever occupied countries with whom it, or a country it had already occupied, shared a border.


Is it supposed to make all those occupied peoples feel better, then? And/or make such occupation more legit? Occupation is bad, period. Does occupying countries around you constitute a lesser offense than occupying countries far away from you? So, the US invasion of Mexico and annexation of the Southwest was less of a crime than the invasion of the Philippines? If the US invades Canada tomorrow, will it be more justifiable than invading Granada?

So, you mean when the Germans marched into Poland, it was OK, then or less of a crime than if they marched into Russia bypassing Poland?

Quote:
Most of the "stans" you mentioned had been part of the Russian Empire since the days of the Tsar.


And it makes it legit, then? To the Uzbeks, Russian occupiers who came to their country are still occupiers. They have no right to be there except that it was annexed by the Czars? So what? Does that fact make it any easier for all those peoples who do not want to be under the Russians now? Russians are not wanted in Uzbekistan, the Baltic States, parts of Ukraine, etc. Americans are much more welcome everywhere they go.


Quote:
Yes that Tsar, the US supported scumbag



The icons of that 'scumbag" are now all over the country. So many people worship him like a God still today.

Quote:
the defence of whom was the pretence for the dispatch of US troops in an attempt to thwart the will of the Russian people



The will of Communists, you mean. Look at how the Russian people worship their Tzar now. You can see the 'will' of the people in it.

Quote:
- who, it must be added in the interests of historical accuracy, gave said US troops a right good kicking.


But it was not a war of Russians vs. the US. It was Bolsheviks who gave the Monarchists and their supporters a good kicking.

Quote:
I'm not sure quite which borders the good ol' USofArse shares/shared with Panama, Grenada, South Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq....


It did not admittedly, but:

1) These countries were not incorporated into the US. ( expect Hawaii)
2) If you count the number of countries that the US intervened in, would the number really be greater than all those "republics' who were living their normal lives until the Russians came and annexed them? And would the number of the dead be any less when you add up the millions who died in Stalin's camps- the Lithuanian nationalist, the Latvians, and also those millions who died in the Great Famine in Ukraine?

Quote:
Like it or lump it, while some people resent Russia because of its past,


Some? I would say Russia has very few friends or people who admire it or its culture, and most of the world does not like it. Many Russians are fleeing the former republics because life is being made impossible for them. They are hardly welcome anywhere. The only countries that like them are Serbia, Bulgaria and Greece.

Americans on the other hand, can get visas to go about anywhere, can make friends with many people in foreign countries, are usually welcome at many homes and an American spouse is an incredible boon to many people around the world. Most people like and admire the American lifestyle. It means money and progress. And that is what people like.

Quote:

and many asian people mistrust and fear Japan, there is no country on this planet that generates a tiny proportion of the loathing as does the good ol' USA;


The USA generates loathing but it also generates great admiration. So many women around the world want to marry an American. So many people want to come and live in the USA. The US gets some 40,000,000 tourists a year because people would love to go and see America- it is so famous. Russia can barely get 3,000,000 tourists. Few people want to go there. American movies, fashion and culture dominate the world in so many ways. And people accept them readily. Common people, that is. Even in US territories such as Puerto Rico, they gave people a chance to vote if they wanted to become independent. They chose to remain a US territory. Time after time.

America means 'becoming rich' to people. It means big cars; it means education leading to good jobs. It means great movies. People wear jeans everywhere on Earth. People want to study English. No country generates so much influence and admiration. Where do the rich of the world send their children to study and get education? Russia? I do not think so. America and Britain. It means prestige.

Russia to the rest of the world means poverty, empty idealism, cold and hopelessness. Nothing worth of imitating. Russia is seen around the world as a bleak, indigent, somber and unpopular loser country that only a few aficionados want to go to.

Quote:
and no country with anything like the dismal record of attempted, mostly failed, interventions into the affairs of other sovereign nations.


We will have to tally up what the Russians did and compare. Russians were in Angola, they were in VN and Laos. They bombed the Hmong with chemical weapons. And what they did to the countries around them is horrible. And most of all, they brought very little progress.

Quote:
Your crude attempts at propaganda notwithstanding it is not Russia or Japan that the world most fears and mistrusts but the US;


But also, no one sees hope in any other country more so than in the US.
US embassies are virtually besieged daily by people trying to get a visa to go there. In the Philippines alone the backlog is 16 years long. Some people wait decades to go to the US. Some resentment that is!

Quote:
rightly so given its abysmal record of foreign invasions and occupations in the last 50 yrs.


But having said that, there is guilt, self-retrospection and some kind of "
we were so bad in VN, we did all these bad things to Japanese Americans, we treated our Indians so badly, we hurt so many people" message that is seen daily in US media, movies, etc.

Where are the Russian movies about what their government did in Ukraine and Chechnya with the message of regret? Where is their movie about how they invaded Czechoslovakia and how they crushed people there with their tanks? Where is there any mention about what they did to their ethnic German population during WWII? It would make what happened to Japanese Americans a kid camp.

In the US there is always guilt, remorse and regret about the past misdeeds, and there is always some kind of effort or movement not to do it again. But almost no Russians, officially or unofficially express any guilt at all.


Last edited by GabeKessel on Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:22 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coledavis



Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1838

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whoops, I'm sorry I helped to stir things up. With regard to Russian conquests: I think one can reconcile the two opposing points of view. A lot of the Russian invasions to the west and south belonged to a kill or be killed strategy; the Swedes and Poles are obvious examples. The colonisation of Siberia and the Far East were akin to the American 'manifest destiny' even if the migrations had different spurs. The post WW2 sway in central Europe, although over the top, was understandable: many of the occupied nations had joined Hitler's invasion of Russia. On the other hand, the Russians have committed atrocities - still are doing so in Chechnya - and their government (of whatever stripe) has never been particularly attuned to the sensitivity of conquered nations. Ordinary Russians, as with the citizens of other countries, have differing feelings about their country as culprit or saviour. The latter does tend to be a virulent idea in Russia.

Americans. Apologetic? I think this rare and usually only when they have been hurt politically. At the same time, although they have done many deeply cynical things, their actions aren't all inexplicable, let alone evil. I would say misguided would be a better description. I think that the name-calling by one respondent was a bit unnecessary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GabeKessel



Joined: 27 Sep 2004
Posts: 150

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In relative terms Americans are much more apologetic than the Russians.
One only needs to watch a few movies condemning the war in VN, showing an ugly white racist turturing a black man who is usually shown as gentle and polite, showing the Japanese Americans being interned and clearly being portrayed as innocent victims, and listen to todays' modern politically correct talk. The US gov't has Affirmative Action, brings children of GIs from VN, pays compensation to Japanese Americans, gives American Indians special stipends, etcetera. The mood is often to correct past wrongs, to reconciliate with the ugly past, etc. Not all Americans are like that, but the ones who are not are often labeled "rednecks", "bigots", "lowlives", "racists", etc.

Nothing like that is happening in Russia. If anything, the government is becoming less apologetic ( if it was ever apologetic at all) and more reactionary, and an average person will almost never feel guilty or be politically correct. If anything, the new mood is to get rid of people who are different and make the country "great" again. For the Russian nation, that is.

BTW, A Chinese-American friend of mind recently returned from there and he said that in Moscow quite a few real estate agencies now have a policy not to rent to non-white people. And not many gov't organs will help you if you file a complaint.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
coledavis



Joined: 21 Jun 2003
Posts: 1838

PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I concede your point with regards to the attitude of the two countries, Gabekessel. As far as which foreign policy is the most harmful, I think there's still a debate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stillnosheep



Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 2068
Location: eslcafe

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Double post.

Last edited by stillnosheep on Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:05 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Russia & C.I.S. All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China