Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

King Saud University Preparatory Year Programme in Riyadh,
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Saudi Arabia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kipling



Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 371
Location: ...Ah Mrs K peel me a grape!!!....and have one yourself!!!!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:30 pm    Post subject: Out to Lunch Reply with quote

Quote:

The US is not necessarily a place where the ordinary worker has no rights--just fewer, perhaps, than Western Europe, where people think more than 4 hours of work a day and less than 2 hours for lunch equals oppression.


We think it but we don't receive it!
Quote:

"Son, the secret to a happy career is this: discover what it is you love to do, and then find people dumb enough to pay you to do it."


O' Sainted Mr J
Send a few my way!
Gratefully Yours
As Ever Mr K
Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
7168Riyadh



Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:20 am    Post subject: KSU Bell Obeikan PYP programme Reply with quote

This thread has historical value...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wicked_Witch



Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Posts: 29
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:54 am    Post subject: Canceled Vacation Reply with quote

I�ve been following this thread about the canceled vacation.
Two questions
#1 what did the teachers do during that week while the students were on vacation?
#2 what happened to the teachers that complained?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
veiledsentiments



Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 17644
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

#1... well one can surf the net perhaps? or sit about and stare at each other...

#2... Best case they were ignored... few are the jobs where complaining will get you anything good...

VS
(no I haven't been there... this is just the common sense answer that works anywhere in the Gulf in this sort of situation...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boysfromtheblackstuff



Joined: 15 May 2010
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:57 pm    Post subject: Cancelled vacations Reply with quote

The teachers who were not taking holidays (at the last minute a compromise was reached, and if you took the whole week off, you got 3 days paid and had to take 2 out of your holiday allowance), went into work and sat around. as they did for the last 3 weeks at the end of the last semester. 8 hours a day of thumb twiddling and drinking coffee.

very motivational

And the teachers on the male campus who complained in emails - well, they were sacked.


[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grendal



Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 861
Location: Lurking in the depths of the Faisaliah Tower underground parking.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"And the teachers on the male campus who complained in emails - well, they were sacked."

I'm not surprised. You know what Saudis do with the squeaky wheel also?

They call a guy from the Philipines to supervise 2 Bangladeshi men to replace the squeaky wheel.

Even though they have oil coming out of the yin yan.

G
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killthebuddha



Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 144
Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sheikh N Bake wrote:


Good god, Chomsky is a fringe crackpot who should stick to linguistics and his debatable language organ.


Yes Sheikh N Bake,

Thanks for that. It's hard to argue with so broad and conclusory a remark, if only because such leaves us nowhere to go. As dead-ends, conclusions are enlightening: �You only �are� whenever you stop thinking. The moment you stop thinking, the inner happens.� (From Osho, another crackpot, but one who had the redeeming virtue of being an ESL instructor with a sense of humor. See �Osho: Strange Consequences� at YouTube.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6D7rWLzloOI

Swinburne was a more �peripheral visionary:�

�No sign that ever was given
To faithful or faithless eyes
Showed ever beyond clouds riven
So clear a paradise.

Earth�s creeds may be seventy times seven
And blood have defiled each creed,
But if such be the kingdom of heaven
It must be heaven indeed.�

Another conclusion, but one that allows for Chomsky AND his grievances. Gives me the warm fuzzies�And let�s not forget �the three stages of truth: ridicule; violent opposition; and acceptance.� AUM�


Sheikh N Bake wrote:
Poorly educated Arabs love to quote him because he never says anything positive about his home country, which makes Arabs feel good.


Another yes! And no doubt credit to your good ESL work in bringing �poorly educated Arabs� up to speed with the rest of the world. The fact that you�re helping �Arabs [to] feel good� is just a bonus. But why shouldn�t they feel good, especially if they�re rubbing elbows with so many distinguished others who are above their class?

�Recent research on citations in three different citation indices show that Professor Chomsky is one of the most cited individuals in works published in the past 20 years.

In fact, his 3,874 citations in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index between 1980 and 1992 make him the most cited living person in that period and the eighth most cited source overall--just behind famed psychiatrist Sigmund Freud and just ahead of philosopher Georg Hegel. Indeed, Professor Chomsky is in illustrious company. The top ten cited sources during the period were: Marx, Lenin, Shakespeare, Aristotle, the Bible, Plato, Freud, Chomsky, Hegel and Cicero.

But that isn't all.

From 1972 to 1992, Professor Chomsky was cited 7,449 times in the Social Science Citation Index-likely the greatest number of times for a living person there as well, although the research into those numbers isn't complete. In addition, from 1974 to 1992 he was cited 1,619 times in the Science Citation Index.

�What it means is that he is very widely read across disciplines and that his work is used by researchers across disciplines,� said Theresa A. Tobin, the Humanities Librarian who checked the numbers.

�In fact,� she added, �it seems that you can't write a paper without citing Noam Chomsky.��

What are you Sheikh N Bake, some kinda miracle-worker?

--ktb


Last edited by killthebuddha on Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:43 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear ktb,

Aha - notice the company he's in:

Marx, Lenin - Commies; Hegel - proto-Commie; Aristotle, Plato - dead Greeks who had their heads in the clouds (Aristotle thought earth, air, wind, and fire were the constitutive elements of the world, that the heart was the organ where thought originated, that women had smaller brains and fewer teeth than men, that women were "mutilated men" in fact, that the leader of a hive was the "king bee", etc., etc. - and Plato's "Republic" HA! What a joke); Shakespeare - a scribbler who didn't even know proper grammar: There really is no excuse for writing "more strong," "more strange," and "more sweet" in some plays and "more fitter," "more corrupter," and "most poorest" in others. And while we can forgive Shakespeare for not attending Oxford or Cambridge, can we ever forgive him for not knowing the distinction between "who" and "whom": "Who wouldst thou serve?"; "To who, my lord?" (King Lear l.iv.24, V.iii. 249); "Who does he accuse?" (Antony and Cleopatra Ill.vi.23); The Bible - yikes, don't get me started on the Bible; and Freud - well, a sex-obsessed charlatan.

Illustrious indeed (tee-hee)

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killthebuddha



Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 144
Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

johnslat wrote:
Dear ktb,

Aha - notice the company he's in:

Marx, Lenin - Commies; Hegel - proto-Commie; Aristotle, Plato - dead Greeks who had their heads in the clouds (Aristotle thought earth, air, wind, and fire were the constitutive elements of the world, that the heart was the organ where thought originated, that women had smaller brains and fewer teeth than men, that women were "mutilated men" in fact, that the leader of a hive was the "king bee", etc., etc. - and Plato's "Republic" HA! What a joke); Shakespeare - a scribbler who didn't even know proper grammar: There really is no excuse for writing "more strong," "more strange," and "more sweet" in some plays and "more fitter," "more corrupter," and "most poorest" in others. And while we can forgive Shakespeare for not attending Oxford or Cambridge, can we ever forgive him for not knowing the distinction between "who" and "whom": "Who wouldst thou serve?"; "To who, my lord?" (King Lear l.iv.24, V.iii. 249); "Who does he accuse?" (Antony and Cleopatra Ill.vi.23); The Bible - yikes, don't get me started on the Bible; and Freud - well, a sex-obsessed charlatan.

Illustrious indeed (tee-hee)

Regards,
John


Sorry johnslat,

It pains me to bring to your attention the fact that your premise is an association fallacy, "an inductive informal fallacy of the type of hasty generalization or red herring which asserts that qualities of one thing are inherently qualities of another, merely by an irrelevant association. The two types are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association. Association fallacies are a special case of red herring, and can be based on an appeal to emotion."

In this case, the only �quality� shared amongst those you reference is the irrelevant number of times each has been cited throughout history. If you wish to imply further that Chomsky is somehow �the same as� the others by some more �substantial� association, then you run up against an ad hominem fallacy (e.g., �if the argument attacks a person because of the similarity between the views of someone making an argument and other proponents of the argument,� such as, �Social justice is a philosophy shared by Nazis and Communists, therefore churches that teach social justice are equivalent to Marxists and Fascists�).

In other words, and in either case, your appeal, if you had one, would more properly be made to those who cited Chomsky, Marx, Lenin, Hegel, Aristotle, Plato, Shakespeare, Freud, and the Bible, and in finding fault with each instance on some substantial, non-fallacious ground. (And I�d suggest you begin with something more relevant than, �Never mind. You�re dead. That goes for you too, Papa.� But whatever your criteria, good luck with that.) As an aside, and for your consideration and amusement, complaints against Shakespeare might more properly be grieved against the 17th Earl of Oxford, if it would make you feel any better.

http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/

But you already knew all this. Good on ya, and on Sheikh N Bake, for playin' the straight man.
Wink

--ktb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear ktb,

Umm, much as I hate to bring this up, you're the one who started it with "illustriousness by association"

"Indeed, Professor Chomsky is in illustrious (well known and very distinguished; eminent) company." Very Happy

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killthebuddha



Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 144
Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

johnslat wrote:
Dear ktb,

Umm, much as I hate to bring this up, you're the one who started it with "illustriousness by association"

"Indeed, Professor Chomsky is in illustrious (well known and very distinguished; eminent) company." Very Happy

Regards,
John


Not I, johnslat!

But MIT, from whom the quote was lifted. (That's what those little eyelash-looking thingamajigs are for. Note where they begin and end, especially the pretty three-haired one. It should have been a block quote, but how to do that here?) But yes, you're absolutely right--it's a logical fallacy even more insidious, and I'm going to fire off a copy of this to them. There ya go. "The experts are ruining the world." And do you know, not a single MIT student or board member will bat a(n) eyelash/quotation mark at MIT's "faux pas," because they can't afford to.

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1992/citation-0415.html

However, this is an inverse case of your "guilt by association." Examples of "honor by association," where one claims that someone or something must be reputable because of the people or organizations that are related to it or otherwise support it, are legion. To wit:

"The entire advertising business heavily uses the principle of honor by association. For example, a beautiful woman says with an attractive voice that a certain laundry detergent is good. Her attractiveness gives the laundry detergent good associations."

But education being big business, maybe we should let MIT off the hook? (I just can't let it go, so NO.) In any event, I'm pleading the 5th against self-recrimination (Yogi Berra anyone?) because I am not guilty by association (for merely quoting them), and you don't want to be committing inverse violations of the most abject sort or, worse still, making Chomsky's points for him (e.g., perpetuating the propagandist fallacies of big business, inversely or otherwise). Ah, the ironies! And to think that "stardust" should come to this. Laughing

--ktb

p.s. I'm new here, and new to forums generally. I came to the Saudi Arabia forum because I'm considering a move there, and in reading the many posts I got a little excited by the exuberance and erudition of the veterans. I've also come across the term "troll" here and there, and after doing a search I've discovered that I may be one. Crying or Very sad

"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

I'll try to pick my spots better.

p.p.s Did you notice the subject-verb agreement error in the MIT quote?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grendal



Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 861
Location: Lurking in the depths of the Faisaliah Tower underground parking.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Markzists, Lemonists, Cubans, North Koreans, PRC, anymore other forms of governances and social systems?

Well Chompers is one of my many over-read understood Arthurs too but wow man. Weeza gawna awfa tha trak. phew. KSU....... Hmmmmmm.

What was that I heard in the background? KSU. Ok I think it was KSU.

Any news?

Thanks guys?

Grendal

ps. troll? me? but seriously now, do I look like a troll? Don't answer that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oreally



Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So getting back on the topic of the KSU Preparatory Year Project (PYP)��.It is so much like the Sergio Leone classic, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. In case you don�t know this film, it is set in a desert with 3 characters whose lives are unusually intertwined and their union ends tragically with one of them killed, another one in a precarious position and the 3rd is riding into the sunset with all the gold. It is up to you which one is Obeikan, Bell and KSU. The Good, The Bad and The Ugly is also a poignant way to discuss the PYP itself. There will be / have been a lot of reoccurring themes when people post. I will attempt to offer something different. While I do editorialize, It is all based on fact. So with no further delay��

The Good
1.A respectable salary
2.Health Insurance
3.Allowing some teachers to transfer to other jobs
4.A laptop is provided
5.A vast and abundant resource room
6.Interactive smart board and e-podium in all classrooms
7.Across the street from a supermarket
8.Experience in a dynamic environment
9.Room for Professional Development
10.Reasonable class size

The Bad

WAITING IN VAIN

When you are hired, Bell will tell you to drop everything and be ready to fly at a moment�s notice. People are informed it will take a maximum of 2 weeks. Some people wait 5 days and some have waited as long as 5 months. Bell informs prospective teachers they will be compensated for the time they were not employed. But in post, Obeikan went from waiting as long as possible to pay out, to not paying at all. When you tell them what Bell communicated to you before you came, they won�t deny it is the case, they will simply tell you that they are not going to pay.

BIG FISH, SMALL POND

The people with authority at the PYP are more interested in the trappings of power than using it beneficially. If you are looking to be constantly dictated to and sent in many directions, this is the place for you. Rules and policy change all the time or are just made up out of thin air. Everything is last minute and needs to be done NOW. Days before leaving, they ask us to write class reports for the semester. The books have been handed in, the test graded and the students are not a fresh memory. But they expect detailed and accurate data NOW. And to add a bit of pressure (as all control freaks do) we were not allowed to go home or know our employment status for the upcoming year until it was completed it. Why? Because �someone� from the university wanted it��NOW!

HANDS ON
One of the more controversial control measures was the electronic attendance system. There is an unused system in every classroom to take biometric attendance. It DOES work but KSU is not interested in the students being accountable and responsible. However, the teacher is to a fault. If we are late by even a minute, wages will be garnished. How do Obeikan know this? Because they have installed a separate biometric attendance system for people they are responsible for. Obeikan�s insistence that the university requested the device flies in the face of fact as other contractors in the English department do not have one.

SPEAK NO EVIL
Obeikan, unsurprisingly, try to control the flow of outward information. Early into the 2009-2010 contract, they issued a �secrecy� amendment to the contract. All property, procedures, policies and methods are trademark and releasing this information will have �consequences�. In other words, tell people on the ESL cafe all the crap things they are doing, and you will be fired. But this opened Obeikan to ridicule as they asked us to amend a contract most of us were still waiting to sign.

DON'T MOVE
Obeikan are also obsessed with controlling your freedom of movement. They do not want to issue multiple exit/re-entry visas. First they claimed it was some government problem, but then it came out they just did not want staff having access to such a liberating item. Even when they will let you get away, they play games and do not want to give you your documents until the 11th hour. People have been known to miss seminars and holidays that Obeikan knew of weeks in advance with the excuse being they were �busy� and could not get the visa. This is a bold face lie as it takes 45 seconds to go into the government website and print one out. They must be afraid that people will go away and not want to come back.

SAFE KEEPING

And of course your passport seizure is part of their method of control so you really have no avenue of escape (Bell never tell you this will happen in the interview). There is no country in the world where a non-government entity has the right to seize your documents. It is not written ANY where in the laws of Saudi Arabia that you cannot have your passport and Iqama on your person. I personally went down to the Ministry of Labor to confirm this (I would love to share with you the labor code in English as promised to me by the Ministry of Labor, but would it be Saudi if they kept the promise of emailing it to me?). There are people in the PYP building who have both of those items with them as well as multiple exit/re-entry visas. The truth is passport seizure is unstated Obeikan company policy designed to remind you without saying any words that the sponsor is your master and you are subservient to him. Obeikan are so unprofessional, they think it is acceptable to run a business by edicts and innuendo and thus cannot provide you with any documentation when their policies are queried. And even if they did have these documents, the people you need to see are �sick� or on �vacation� when you want to get things sorted. This is exactly what happened with the Obeikan HR manager at the end of 2009-2010 academic year. With everything that happened, and all the bad feelings, how is it anything but incompetent to take your holiday during the time the contracts are ending and people are trying to go home and settle up? There is no accountability.

SHOW ME THE MONEY
When all else fails, they will try to control you with your money. There were several times when we were not paid on time and there would be deductions that would be explained �later�. When your contract is over, you will not receive the monies owed to you. That�s right, after you are on the plane and gone, they will send your final settlement. Unlike Obeikan insists, it is NOT standard business practice to wait for the physical end of contract to pay people. Most of the time the monies arrive later than they tell you. You can count on the bank transfer fee being taken from your settlement. I wonder if Obeikan own the remittance service they send the salary to you from? Any how, many times the number is wrong and it is not unheard off for them to simply not pay you at all.

SO WHO IS IN CHARGE?
Compounding all these issues, the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. A perfect example is the CELTA debacle. After changing work requirements about the CELTA and several teachers requesting to have one on-site in the summer, this idea was declined earlier in the year by people on-site (Obeikan). Teachers made plans, booked tickets and prepared to travel far and wide to take the CELTA. Then days before the school year ends, Bell was actively trying to set up an on-site course over the summer! Classic PYP.

JUST TELL US UP FRONT
The PYP management is (unsurprisingly) very cliquish and power hungry. This affects ALL the HR decisions. Summer school 2010 has been a sad manifestation of this. They knew weeks in advance the majority of who would and would not be invited to return for 2010-2011 academic year, and thus who they would �reward� with summer school. Despite the teachers looking for clarity as to how to move on with their life, management strung us along until mere days before the summer school started. They said it was because they did not want people to be vindictive and not fulfill their work duties. But it is the Obeikan/Bell/ KSU team that have proven to be vindictive time and time again.

Several clever people saw the relationship as only having diminishing returns and did not stick around. This led to there not being enough �in favor� teachers and it was necessary to ask if those available could do both sessions of the summer school, an unthinkable inquiry previously. But this need for teachers did not stop management from being spiteful. When they found out some of the summer school teachers decided not to come back for 2010-2011 academic year, the more power hungry members of management tried to have them removed from the summer program altogether, even though they needed the people. Professional to the last.

INMATES RUNNING THE ASYLUM
If the students complain, you are assumed guilty. You are just done at that job if students complain about you. If a class goes through 3 teachers, is it the class or the instructor where the problem lay? If the students say their teacher is not good at English because they don�t �look� like they speak English, is it the correct move to reward the students� racism by removing the instructor? There is no recovering from a student�s complaint against you. There is no due process and you are not permitted to face your accuser, as they are worried that you could give lower marks to the students as retribution.

The Ugly

WATCH WHAT YOU SAY
The main thing that makes daily existence at the PYP so difficult is tone. Because of the disorganization, laziness and (to be honest) inability of the locals who are at the top of the pyramid, there is a lot of wasted energy showered down. Instead of trying to raise their game, the locals deflect by barking edicts and berating the non-local middle management. Middle management then pass it down to the teachers. The Jordanian chair of the English department is infamous for this. When it cascades down to the teachers, it manifests as an air of constant threat over sometimes serious, but mostly trivial things to keep the staff in line.

*Taking home your attendance sheet is �a dismissible offence�
*If you do not �surrender� your passport to master they �will conduct a disciplinary meeting with you�.
*Sending students to the relevant authorities for problems you can�t handle �could result in suspension�
*Not signing an amendment to the contract (before even receiving the contract) could result in �termination�.
* AND THE EMAIL AND NOTICES THAT ARE SENT/HANDED TO YOU WITH THIS INFORMATION ARE DONE IN BOLD UNDERLINED AND CAPITALISED FONTS SO YOU ARE AWARE THAT THE LATEST EDICT IS BEING YELLED AT YOU!*

Tone is the heart of the carte blanche, cavalier attitude that the Saudis have over their serfs which is the core of the Ugly problems. With this in mind, there were three really unfortunate events this attitude precipitated.

YOU DON�T HAVE TO GO HOME BUT YOU HAVE TO LEAVE
The retention process for the academic year ending 2008-2009 cannot even be called sophomoric. Instead of informing the teachers privately who would not be retained, Obeikan/Bell/KSU posted the names of those who would be asked back on the main notice wall. This caused great embarrassment and humiliation for those not on the wall. But�

�this list meant nothing. After people had made housing, vehicle and school arrangements in the knowledge they would be returning, KSU made amendments to the eligibility criteria AFTER contracts were signed and intent to return was made. This left several people in the lurch and Obeikan/Bell/ KSU asking people to come back to Saudi Arabia so they could be fired.

That draconian situation was not to be repeated for the most recent retention period. This does not mean that their actions were much improved. Obeikan/Bell/KSU waited until 14 days before the end of the contract to give a sample contract for 2010-2011 for those who were interested in returning. Some had to wait as long as four days before the contract ended to know if they would be asked back. After communicating to staff how important it was to the project to retain teachers, they turn around and offered several of those potential returnees longer hours and lower pay. They do this knowing that many of the other jobs have been taken by this point ( late July) and you are forced to stay with them. Not a case of the devil you know being better than the devil you don�t.

MO MONEY, MO PROBLEMS
The all staff meeting is usually when they drop something heavy. Towards the end of the 2008-2009 academic year, we had a meeting where it was mentioned in passing by the HR representative that there would be no annual increase in the salary. One of the teachers immediately went online to the project website and showed the HR representative that the documents online showing something different. He claimed ignorance of this information. That is a bit curious since he made a point of telling us that salaries had been lowered throughout KSA. Below is the email sent to us a day later.

Dear All,
In yesterdays staff meeting some of you raised an objection to the news that there would not be an increment for returning teachers next year. In particular you told me that there was a policy document on the website that clearly states that returning teachers would get a Sr500 increment.

I told you at the time I was not aware of such a document and would look into it.

I can now confirm that the document in question was put on the website during the first semester. At that time there was some confusion amongst teachers as to the scale used when recruiting for 2008/2009, so for that reason the document was put out in order to remove any confusion.

I hope this clarifies your concerns and as a side point all the documents on the web site will be updated shortly.

Axxxxxxxxn



In other words, even though we were told there would be a yearly raise in the initial interview and the project website corroborates this, Obeikan are just not going to pay it. One of the more vocal teachers challenged the HR manager via email.


In response to your post on increment/s, please find my comment below:

Yesterday in the meeting I alerted you to the fact that there was/is a pay policy document on our Bell/PYP internal website. I am astonished that you were not aware of the existence of this document. The document in question forms the basis of pay negotiation.

In a recent email, Ricxxxd Lxxt informed us that terms and conditions of employment would remain unchanged next academic year. The pay policy is a very important part of those terms of employment. Those of us who joined the project did so on the basis of that pay policy, which logically applies to 2009/10 for those who joined in 2008. To change the policy retroactively is an extraordinary action, one that you have not satisfactorily explained.

In the meeting yesterday, you stated that a Sr500 increment was available to those taking professional development certificates. Those of us at the top of the qualifications table, and those who underwent training in February, also expect a Sr500 pay increment--this was always a part of the bargain, and that bargain should be kept.

Xxxy Xxxxh


And in the all too familiar carte blanche, cavalier attitude of management��

Xxxy,

I'm afraid that your astonishment, that you refer to, needs to be attributed to your misunderstanding about the policy document you were referring to. It should certainly not have been because in the meeting I said I was not aware of the document that you were referring to.

I have clarified in an earlier post the history and intent of that document so I won't go through it again. The purpose of this egroup is to share information, a place for people to listen and reflect on each other's views. Can I suggest that all of us would benefit from pausing before posting.

Axxxxxxxxn


The wording could not have been more clear. �Returning for second/subsequent year +SAR 500�. Just like the topic of the salary increase, the e-group was killed soon after this dust up.

HAVE A BREAK
The salary debate pales in comparison to the handling of Spring Break for 2010. The first slight was despite classes ended on January 24th, the break was scheduled to start on February 10th. But denying teachers those 16 days was not enough. Instead of letting people go on holiday, Obeikan /Bell/KSU canceled the entire break with just 2 weeks notice. This break had been on the Academic calendar since September and they knew people had made plans with this information in mind. Obeikan/KSU say we have no leg to stand on as it is written in the contract the Holidays are at the schools discretion. That is true. The contract also says that the housing allowance will be paid in two installments and without notice or explanation Obeikan made it three. So the contract is not really a hard document for them is it? Bell stayed quiet on the whole matter. This arrogant, dismissive behavior caused nothing short of a rebellion. All the resentment and loss of faith could no longer be bottled up. A forum was made. Things were said. People were suspended and fired for breaking code and ethics which were in a handbook that was never produced. But there was a silver lining. The �benevolent� nature of Obeikan /Bell/ KSU came to the fore as we were granted a partially paid holiday as a compromise. Or was there compromise? The underhanded way management operates, they appear to be setting a precedent for offering the holidays as unpaid leave, and letting Obeikan keep more money. What else could the following email be about?

Dear All,
Thank you for your patience in waiting for the contract for next year. Attached to this email is a sample version of the contract for you to read through. Should you have any questions then please email [email protected] and we will respond to your queries. We are currently finalizing retention details with KSU and will be in contact regarding this matter shortly.
With regards to vacation during the mid-semester break next year, we are continuing to discuss this with the university, but teachers wishing to leave during this period will be able to do so and days will be deducted from annual leave balance.
Kind Regards,
Bell-Obeikan team


THE FINAL CREDITS
The question is why. Why does a place with unlimited resources, and a stated aim of being the best fail so horrifically? Al-Jazeera had a documentary about the plight of migrant workers. You can watch it from this link http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/general/2007/08/2008525185333546126.html . Teachers are just better paid migrant workers. Slavery was abolished (not ended) in Saudi Arabia in 1962. Someone forgot to tell the leaders of KSA they would have to prepare a domestic workforce. Since the majority of Saudis have not been prepared to participate in the modern world, treating all hired hands poorly bumps of their low self esteem. You can�t even get a drivers permit without the signature of your master. This attitude is omnipresent at the failings of the PYP.
To wrap it up, try and stay away from the BELL/ Obeikan/ KSU PYP project. It has been painful to watch the decline of a program with so much potential. Even now in the doldrums, it would not take that much to improve the situation. Maintaining the e-podiums, paying people on time, stopping this demeaning passport seizure and having a handbook with clearly defined rules and regulations would be easy and immediate steps to implement. But as things are now, even the former Bell executive that Obeikan brought in to tighten up the entire organization only stayed for a year. KSA has moved forward with infrastructure and its presence on the world stage, but the way people think is still in the 10th century. Everything is in place for the PYP program to change this except the willingness of KSU/Obeikan/Bell to do a good job. They prefer collecting monies and passing the problems on to the next generation. There are worse jobs, but it is not a race to the bottom.

OR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
veiledsentiments



Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 17644
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sugarydonkey wrote:
Er, it's fairly standard practice across the middle East and north Africa for companies to keep a hold of passports. Where Iguamas are issued, it's legally necessitated. You are a flat out liar in this case.

Not true... I have worked in Egypt, the UAE, Oman (2 contracts), and Kuwait. Only one employer held passports and it fortunately wasn't a problem as the management (all locals) were very organized and easy to deal with... all one needed to do was ask, and they handed it to you in the time it took them to walk across the room.

It has only been commonly done in Saudi (since I have been involved with the Middle East since 1985). In Oman and the UAE, it is just a few small private colleges that did it.

Sugarydonkey wrote:
Absolutely everything, without exception, else you mentioned is par for the course in TEFL.

Excuse me? This too is complete bull. I have never had an employer change my contract or change the pay or refuse holidays or not provide timely notice of renewals or revoke previously reported raises or punish teachers for taking attendance reports home or or or

Sugarydonkey wrote:
TEFL is not really challenging, it requires next to no talent and frankly only people who take themselves far too seriously could come up with the egotistical drivel you just spent the last four hours concocting.

I'm sure that is an accurate self-description, but you are speaking for yourself here. Apparently your lack of education in the field and skills have meant that you had to work for only the bottom feeder employers and is why your experiences have been similar to the above.

If this is your attitude, you need to move on to another field and discussion board.

VS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oreally



Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well sugary donkey, your handle implies your demeanor:) . I am impressed you came out swinging and that you used egotistical, drivel and concocting in one sentence. That requires talent. The chair you are sitting in at the PYP must be comfortable to allow your thoughts to flow so well. In spite of your herculean efforts to make me feel bad, your very large and spiteful words don�t hurt me. It just reflects the entrenched attitude and miss management that fill the PYP. No one likes to see an ugly reflection in the mirror. Don�t break the mirror���fix the face!

Calling me a racist to shut me down? That is just not gonna get it done. You disrespect your own intellect with that sophomoric rhetoric. You can call my post drivel, you can call it therapy you can call it what you like except untrue. The behavior at the PYP is �Par for the course in TEFL�? Well thank you for that. Anyone with any doubt about the PYP will surely have them exercised now. And since you say the job requires no talent, why should professionals go anyway?

I do dislike having my documents seized. If I had been told it happens, then I would never have gone. Don�t try to act as if it is not mental control. Freedom of movement is a comfortable thing. Being able to confirm your identify at your embassy if you need their help is a comfortable thing. Keeping you uncomfortable is a Kafeel thing. And it is just not legal. Lets see if these rumors that exit-reentry permits will not be issued till the end of the contract become a fact. That will give you plenty of time to go to the Ministry Of Labor and check yourself on the legality of document seizer.

And just to let you know, I took 2+ hours to type that. I did it while watching the football. Us banal, dull, diatribing, racist, self aggrandizing patronizing people are not that slow. Thank you for making my last post about the PYP memorable. Thank you for putting a smile on my face sugary donkey. You are a sweet ass. Goodbye and good luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Saudi Arabia All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China