|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You obviously have absolutely nothing to say here Sasha other than "defending yourself", so trot/hop/ooze along on stumps now, there's a good disabled "knight" errant. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sashadroogie
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glad you found a friend, Fluffy. But I fear he knows as little about observations as you do. Mewl away all you want. Doesn't change the problem that your arguments against observation and the teaching clip are extremely weak. Starting up this thread with your attemped analysis of the videoed lesson should surely have been done with some constructive goal in mind. Instead all you've done is try to defend your beleaguered position. But at least you've gained a happy friend : )
Hope it all works out splendidly for you! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Believe it or not, Happyinshangqiu's appearances always come as a surprise to me too. I think he's just calling it like he sees it, and I was simply picking up on the Python reference. I feel it's a bit disingenuous of you though to say that I know nothing about observations when you're the one who's failed to explain exactly what makes that clip so "supermethod", but then, you've never been one to offer much analysis of even the IYHO bad clips you've posted (such as here: http://forums.eslcafe.com/job/viewtopic.php?p=1079716#1079716 ), which should be easier to note umpteen things about. (Oh, but that's what I just did with the Rolf clip too isn't it, saved you quite a job again eh! Albeit this time in a reverse sort of way - can find plenty to criticize=can't find much to praise, right?).
Anyway, glad to hear that you still have your spirits despite having just become a quadruple amputee (beleaguered indeed!), let's hope it doesn't become a quintuple or worse!
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Fri May 15, 2015 10:31 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sashadroogie
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fluff, I've already contributed enough about observations and methodology on this thread. The issue is you just don't like what is seen as standard and conventional by leading experts in the feild. You claim to know better. Presumably this is all as a result of being bullied on your Ctefla all this years ago. Pity you cannot support your claims, or provide evidence of your supermethod - the term refers to your preferred way of teaching, not the clips.
Still, if it's all about bullying then you've really got it made with Mr Happy : )
And I think you may be giving a little too much credit to happiness' Python awareness. Incidentally, don't those animals swallow hamsters whole as a light snack? Please be careful... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe I certainly know better than you and Rolf regarding grammar (and functions, yadda yadda), yes. And sure, all that is no thanks to my cert or any advice offered since by trainer types, who would have me trust them rather than my own brain (but then, they need to try to justify their existence, don't they!). Either way, one soon develops a nose for iffy exemplars (assuming one has any sense). One's classes are ultimately one's own responsibility to teach as well as possible.
Anyway, you haven't contributed anything regarding the teaching of reduced relative clauses ("or something" - Something, Something, Something, Dark Side?), so the onus is actually on you to say something about how you'd approach that area (or would you just copy Rolf? That'd be rather unimaginative, to say the least!). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sashadroogie
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As opposed to your contribution?
Let's see your video clips. All these months later, and still nothing.
By the way, what makes you think you're better at grammar than any one else here? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't say I was better at grammar than anyone else here, merely (given this particular context, certainly) better than you and Rolf, and until you give my analysis (you know, as laid out in each of those non-trivial contributions on pages 12 and 13, that you skated right over) the attention it deserves, the shakiness of Rolf's approach will remain an apparent mystery to you. (But not to others. At least six people that I know of, four of them Dave's members, have by all accounts actually read what I've written and found nothing objectionable about it, quite the reverse in fact, so you're clearly the odd man out here).
As for videos, nice try, but:
- Spiral gave a good list of reasons back on page 4 about why taking videos to post online could be a no-no from the go-go, to which I can only add:
- there's a difference between seeking or pushing for universal uncritical blanket recommendation (as the establishment does for its products, and you did with those clips, "because" they're "Harmer's" or "Scrivener's" or "OK just a teacher's rather than an EFL sleb's, but he's at Waffwaff School of English, I'll have you know, now gasp and swoon accordingly"), which necessarily invites inspection and presumably welcomes constructive feedback (like I've given), versus simply getting on with what works for oneself personally. A good many of my posts are not so much about "how" to teach "whatever" but about the linguistic what's to teach (and why!), so I'm more interested in bottom-up research and preparation than execution (fun though it is to sometimes "reverse engineer" by observing others, especially their fuzzy or fudgy selections)
- it should be possible to "forward engineer" from detailed descriptions on the page (which may give far more reasons and rationales than long slow rather uneventful lessons in real time (and editing them isn't always ideal, begs yet more questions, as we have seen)), and the fact that you don't ever seem able to is your problem, not mine
- much as you'd like to be the judge of my actual classes wherever, I've seen little reason to believe you have the necessary qualities to give impartial, constructive, and detailed-enough feedback, so I'll spare myself the "honour".
So, no thanks.
Still waiting for YOUR answers, "by the way". And I'm not going to bother answering any more of your questions (mere futile distractions that they are) until you deign to answer. I've been more than fair and patient given your endless smoke n mirrors delaying tactics.
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Fri May 15, 2015 10:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sashadroogie
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fluffy, do you really think that your meandering postings get read, let alone responded to?
When was the last time you were observed, or observed another? Just out of vague curiosity, and an attempt to get this resurrected thread back on topic... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You posted a clip, it got thoroughly observed. More than enough on topic, I'd say. So, and I say this for the Nth and final time, quit stalling. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sashadroogie
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, you have had no professional development observations since the 90s? Sheesh! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2015 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A more pertinent question might be if some people are actually capable of giving a professional observation. (There, how'd you like that avoidance? Comin' right back at ya! ). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xie Lin
Joined: 21 Oct 2011 Posts: 731
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmmmm. . . I hesitate to enter this fray for fear of getting rotten tomatoes thrown at me from both sides. But I will say this much:
I frequently find myself disagreeing with Fluffy's point of view, particularly his entrenched ideas about observation and training. (While my own notions about observation and training are equally entrenched, that's okay, because they're right: ) Also, in the past I have found many of his posts to be densely incomprehensible, rambling, and long-winded, with a maniacal bushel of brackets that obfuscated more than it clarified.
Now comes the "however."
Even so, I find his contributions much more interesting than the majority of what gets posted on the forum, so much of which is just pointless squabbling. What I find interesting is that his posts have actual content, usually about language, and that he poses questions about language. I find this enjoyable and refreshing. I sometimes take note of a long, dense post to return to when I have more time--unfortunately, I rarely do have time to engage in a detailed grammar analysis discussion here, but I do love reading them. I am always disappointed when they degenerate into snark. For those who find these discussions tedious and annoying, it seems simple enough to avoid them. (Just leave them for the tedious and pedantic types among us! )
Now, I have noticed over the past couple of years that Fluffy's writing has become much more organized and readable, with fewer brackets sprinkled promiscuously about. No idea why, but it has become much easier to follow. I STILL may disagree, or find some of his ideas incredibly annoying, but I respect the unusual degree of effort, seriousness, and ambition of many of his posts. Whether I agree or disagree with his ideas, he is obviously thinking about language and about how to best teach it.
A dissident voice is not such a bad thing to have.
Okay, ducking now!
.
Last edited by Xie Lin on Sat May 16, 2015 1:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
happyinshangqiu
Joined: 20 Jan 2015 Posts: 279 Location: Has specialist qualifications AND local contacts.
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sashadroogie wrote: |
So, you have had no professional development observations since the 90s? Sheesh! |
10512 posts = man with no life, sheesh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
happyinshangqiu
Joined: 20 Jan 2015 Posts: 279 Location: Has specialist qualifications AND local contacts.
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sashadroogie wrote: |
Still, if it's all about bullying then you've really got it made with Mr Happy : )
|
Talk about projection! You and your buddy, the organ grinder have been at it for years. You just don't like some of your medicine back at you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for that, Xie Lin. I agree with everything you said, the good and the bad. I must admit to having picked at this example a bit more than most for the not entirely incidental bonus that it might (note I am not saying definitively would, interpretations and analyses may vary) cast a bit more doubt on the training establishment, but it still seems a problematic example to me even if we can overlook who did what and why and in which classroom, and I would hope that the opportunity to think about the language involved here and in whatever other lessons is the most important thing to take away from this.
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Sat May 16, 2015 1:35 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|