View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kiwiboy_nz_99
Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
When I read it I just thought , "My God, how very Korean, using a matchmaker, and going to a noraebang as foreplay!"
|
Exactly! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I'm curious what you really know about swinging ( wife-swapping being only a small subset of this rather large cultur in america ). Usually it's the male partner that initiates it, but usually it's the female partner that wants to go back. Women are far more in demand at the events and usually have a damn good time once they let their inhibitions go |
Fair enough. As I say, the analysis was cribbed largely from a sociology textbook written in 1984(which basically treated wife-swapping and swinging as synonomous) plus a few other things I've read on the topic. The textbook was written from a marxist perspective and was by no means morally conservative, but if others have reached different conclusions based on their own experience or study, I'm certainly not going to say they're wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
qwunk89
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay . . , i just read that all the couples involved won't face any charges because they are all married and consented to it; but, the article said the man was going to face charges for running an obscene/unappropriate business. And I suppose jujums, anmas, and especially red-light districts are fine? Where's the logic here? What I also thought was funny, is that i heard some of the partakers were doctors and university professours . Nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|