|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mandrews1985
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:44 am Post subject: SATs.... Critical reading and writing....? |
|
|
As someone who graduated from the UK, I have no real knowledge of SATs. However, I have an interview with a school that want me to teach this, specifically critical reading and writing.
Can someone give me some advice? What is it? How do I teach it? What should I do? I have a demo class and I'm unsure what to do.
If anyone has any links to useful websites that may help me to improve my knowledge of the subject, would be greatly appreciated.
The school knows that I am English, and that I don't have SAT experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newb
Joined: 27 Aug 2012 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Look up "SAT" in Google. Read and study on it. They must be hiring base on your looks.
Good luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mandrews1985
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, well thanks. I do know what SATs are of course, just unsure of what they consist of. I have researched the reading and writing aspect of it.
I guess the ambiguity of it comes from teaching the class.
I have to do a 15 minute demo and would like some advice on what to do here. I am completely at ease with lesson planning and building my own material, but I have no experience with SATs and prepping for them.
So if anyone can suggest a basic lesson plan that I can build on, or a topic to start with, I would greatly appreciate it.
Parents, students and other teachers will be observing this demo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barca2121
Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vocab is important for the reading section so devote some time to that. Then maybe go through a test and explain why a is definitely wrong because of this reason, b is wrong because of this reason, and even if c and d are so close that you don't know which one is right guess one of them because you get a point for a correct answer and only lose a .25 for a wrong one. Then go over the little nuance that made c incorrect. Then it's on you. Writing section is all grammar so have fun. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newb
Joined: 27 Aug 2012 Location: Korea
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Benjamino
Joined: 21 Apr 2012 Location: Jinju
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Started using these during winter camp for the 'top' students. The book isn't so bad at all. Fairly easy to work through and you're effectively just a page ahead of the students.
I was given the book first thing Monday and was told to teach it at 11.30 am.
Some of the texts are a bit dated and dull. So you'll have to explain some of the older words and context of the set texts.
I'm from the UK too so the idea of SATS is an alien concept to me but you'll be ok. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robot
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Honestly, it'll take you at least a couple years of experience before you can be an effective SAT teacher.
If you're following a professionally set curriculum that helps somewhat, but if not you'll likely be fumbling through the first year. If you're engaging, a keen prepper, and an all-around nice guy, the kids (who have much at stake and need expert help) will possibly overlook the fact that you can't fully explain an answer or provide the depth of strategy that the pros can. A warning: the higher-level students will be less forgiving, and won't hesitate to bail at the first sign of teacher weakness.
Being simply one page ahead is half-assing it. I winced when I heard that.
In my books, it's half-assing it even if you have a tons of authentic tests and know them inside and out but simply walk through full tests explaining answers rather than doing focused prep.
The real score boosts come when the Writing and Math sections are deconstructed into question types and sub-types that the teacher can individually target with an arsenal of exercises; when the CR has been similarly gamed, with the teacher able to show the underlying patterns generally governing the composition of passages, answer choices, and vocab; and when the essay is classified into major themes that are pre-planned on and attacked with highly burnished templates & example banks. And that's just for starters.
Now, how to take this post from slightly snobby rant to helpful advice? For absolute basics, get yourself the Blue Book (Official SAT tests, available at any major bookstore) and a good vocab book (Direct Hits I & II are now selling in Korea; try that series first. Word Smart is also okay-ish). For basic CR/W strategy, check out Erica Meltzer's site, thecriticalreader.com (she's also got a couple of decent books... three now, I believe). For M, check out Mike McClenathan's blog.pwnthesat.com.
Personally I like to write my own SAT material as I've never found anything comprehensive and on-point enough out there, but some of my colleagues in Gangnam seem to get by on not much more than these basics (simply repackaging them with their school's logo), so they should serve you well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mandrews1985
Joined: 12 Sep 2011
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
robot wrote: |
Honestly, it'll take you at least a couple years of experience before you can be an effective SAT teacher.
If you're following a professionally set curriculum that helps somewhat, but if not you'll likely be fumbling through the first year. If you're engaging, a keen prepper, and an all-around nice guy, the kids (who have much at stake and need expert help) will possibly overlook the fact that you can't fully explain an answer or provide the depth of strategy that the pros can. A warning: the higher-level students will be less forgiving, and won't hesitate to bail at the first sign of teacher weakness.
Being simply one page ahead is half-assing it. I winced when I heard that.
In my books, it's half-assing it even if you have a tons of authentic tests and know them inside and out but simply walk through full tests explaining answers rather than doing focused prep.
The real score boosts come when the Writing and Math sections are deconstructed into question types and sub-types that the teacher can individually target with an arsenal of exercises; when the CR has been similarly gamed, with the teacher able to show the underlying patterns generally governing the composition of passages, answer choices, and vocab; and when the essay is classified into major themes that are pre-planned on and attacked with highly burnished templates & example banks. And that's just for starters.
Now, how to take this post from slightly snobby rant to helpful advice? For absolute basics, get yourself the Blue Book (Official SAT tests, available at any major bookstore) and a good vocab book (Direct Hits I & II are now selling in Korea; try that series first. Word Smart is also okay-ish). For basic CR/W strategy, check out Erica Meltzer's site, thecriticalreader.com (she's also got a couple of decent books... three now, I believe). For M, check out Mike McClenathan's blog.pwnthesat.com.
Personally I like to write my own SAT material as I've never found anything comprehensive and on-point enough out there, but some of my colleagues in Gangnam seem to get by on not much more than these basics (simply repackaging them with their school's logo), so they should serve you well. |
Thanks guys, I really appreciate the feedback. I've taught TOEFL speaking and writing to a very high standard for the last 2 years and that is what's got me this interview.
I'm not someone that can go into a job without knowing the material, but it's too good of an opportunity to shy away from. I'll be looking to pick up these books tomorrow and work out a basic class from that.
Robot, I really appreciate you putting in the time to respond to this and you have the right to rant. I don't feel that I know enough to teach this well yet it's a challenge for me. I feel I am what you outlined above so I should survive and later come into my own once I know it inside out. I will be as prepared as someone can be with a week to prepare and no previous experience of the subject but I do know that is not enough for me as a teacher. I normally plan the whole semester in advance.
Cheers! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Benjamino
Joined: 21 Apr 2012 Location: Jinju
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
robot wrote: |
Honestly, it'll take you at least a couple years of experience before you can be an effective SAT teacher.
If you're following a professionally set curriculum that helps somewhat, but if not you'll likely be fumbling through the first year. If you're engaging, a keen prepper, and an all-around nice guy, the kids (who have much at stake and need expert help) will possibly overlook the fact that you can't fully explain an answer or provide the depth of strategy that the pros can. A warning: the higher-level students will be less forgiving, and won't hesitate to bail at the first sign of teacher weakness.
Being simply one page ahead is half-assing it. I winced when I heard that.
In my books, it's half-assing it even if you have a tons of authentic tests and know them inside and out but simply walk through full tests explaining answers rather than doing focused prep.
The real score boosts come when the Writing and Math sections are deconstructed into question types and sub-types that the teacher can individually target with an arsenal of exercises; when the CR has been similarly gamed, with the teacher able to show the underlying patterns generally governing the composition of passages, answer choices, and vocab; and when the essay is classified into major themes that are pre-planned on and attacked with highly burnished templates & example banks. And that's just for starters.
Now, how to take this post from slightly snobby rant to helpful advice? For absolute basics, get yourself the Blue Book (Official SAT tests, available at any major bookstore) and a good vocab book (Direct Hits I & II are now selling in Korea; try that series first. Word Smart is also okay-ish). For basic CR/W strategy, check out Erica Meltzer's site, thecriticalreader.com (she's also got a couple of decent books... three now, I believe). For M, check out Mike McClenathan's blog.pwnthesat.com.
Personally I like to write my own SAT material as I've never found anything comprehensive and on-point enough out there, but some of my colleagues in Gangnam seem to get by on not much more than these basics (simply repackaging them with their school's logo), so they should serve you well. |
Did you read my post? I was given two hours to prepare the lesson so that's why I was 'a page ahead' . I'd never seen the book before that day and had only heard of SATs in passing.
I won't be teaching SATs for the new semester as I'm not qualified to do so and I'm leaving anyway. I was asked to fill in for someone during winter camp that's all.
What I did do was adapt the set reading into some papers with exam style discussion questions. This brought the material back into something that I'm comfortable with teaching rather than blagging my way through a book.
Not exactly half assing dear chap as I spent hours of lesson prep on each chapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robot
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@Benjamino: Alright, clarified. The way you've worded things it seems like you're offering general advice to be just a page ahead of the students, but I get that you're saying that was your experience. And anyone who spends hours prepping for a single class gets my full respect.
@mandrews1985: TOEFL teaching is good prep for SAT instruction. In my estimation, a good iBT teacher could be a great SAT teacher as the former is a far more boring test, so you learn to step up your game by being especially engaging in delivering material. Ideally this happens without resorting to games or conversation based on the content of the passages -- content is not the focus, solving the questions is, and if you can effectively impart the best strategies (eg. for S/W, a universal template for point-by-point structured integrated essays, or highly burnished phrases and response time breakdown for the #4 Gen/Specific Speaking question) the kids should be eyes open, pencils scribbling in rapt attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|