Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why has U.S. been spared?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Al Qadia would get more press from an attack in the US than an attack in Iraq.

They would never turn down a chance to hit the US homeland.

The Patriot act probably is the reason the US hasn't been hit.

It will probably be attacked again but were it not for the Patriot act the US probably would have already been hit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:20 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Wow. Quite an interesting stew to pick through.

I don't normally agree with Les about most anything, but his point about the usage of "agenda" is correct, and Yata's use of the "reading comprehension" defense ought to be considered expired. It is very convenient to put oneself above others because of your superior analytical skills, but it is another thing to actually defend one's position as such. See Gord. Yata, you also hold no right to such a position. I vehemently disagree with a great many people on this board, but I think they by and large comprehend my posts, and I theirs.

I'm not trying to put myself above you. All I'm saying is let their be no gods here.

Now, without insulting his reading skills, let's take Joo's post to support the Patriot Act.

The evidence: No attack since 9/11
His reason: Patriot Act

His argument: The Patriot Act has made us safer.

The counter-arguments:

There were no attacks after the first WTC bombing for over 8 years.

Because of the Patriot Act? No.

There wasn't a Patriot Act.

Does the "peace" (like that of last weekend.NOT) mean the Patriot Act is working?

No.


Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure how Arar fits in with the Patriot Act.
He's not a US citizen.
Wouldn't what happened to him could have happened regardless of whether the Patriot Act legislation had passed or not? (Not a rhetorical question, I really don't know but suspect the answer is 'yes'.)
Canadians are concerned about Arar, but from the American viewpoint it's pretty much a non-issue.
He's a household name in Canada but I'd be surprised if 1 in 10 Americans knew who he was, and why should they?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, never heard of the dude and I am more informed than your avg. american.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:25 am    Post subject: Re: ... Reply with quote

Nowhere Man wrote:
Wow. Quite an interesting stew to pick through.

I don't normally agree with Les about most anything, but his point about the usage of "agenda" is correct, and Yata's use of the "reading comprehension" defense ought to be considered expired. It is very convenient to put oneself above others because of your superior analytical skills, but it is another thing to actually defend one's position as such. See Gord. Yata, you also hold no right to such a position. I vehemently disagree with a great many people on this board, but I think they by and large comprehend my posts, and I theirs.

I'm not trying to put myself above you. All I'm saying is let their be no gods here.

Now, without insulting his reading skills, let's take Joo's post to support the Patriot Act.

The evidence: No attack since 9/11
His reason: Patriot Act

His argument: The Patriot Act has made us safer.

The counter-arguments:

There were no attacks after the first WTC bombing for over 8 years.

Because of the Patriot Act? No.

There wasn't a Patriot Act.

Does the "peace" (like that of last weekend.NOT) mean the Patriot Act is working?

No.


Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Arar?
Arar?


There is circumstantial evidence that the Patriot act helps.


does anyone think that Al Qaida wouldn't hit the US if they had the chance?

They get much more press when they hit the US then they do when they hit England.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khyber



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction

PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i wonder how many charges and and conviction have been found based on the patriot act?
Anyone care to google that?
nooo......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

not many but they have gotten several people on lesser charges.

That is what the director of homeland security said anyway.

But it is an obstacle in the way of the those who want to terrorize the US.

I can't say for certain that it has made the US safer but it seems it has.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khyber



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction

PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

I can't say for certain that it has made the US safer but it seems it has.
i don't know how "it seems it has". Just because their haven't been attacks since 9/11 the default answer is that it must be the PATRIOT act?
Quote:
They get much more press when they hit the US then they do when they hit England.

That could be slightly more complicated than a matter of just more press.
I wouldn't compare 9/11 to the london bombings.

Not only that but let's not forget about the American news and how they LOOOOOOVE to speculate; much more so than canadian news sources (though i couldn't prove that with anything more than what i've seen on tv and such).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:28 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

I'm not saying that Arar was a part of the Patriot Act. Rather, he is a very good, largely unknown example of how the very principles upon which America was founded are being violated in the name of protecting our "peace".

Arar is circumstantial evidence that evil things are afoot in the US.

In a nutshell:

A Canadian of Middle Eastern descent is flying back to the Middle East for a visit. From Canada, he has a stopover at JFK airport. While at JFK, he is removed from the plane, allegedly given an injection and interrogated. From there, he is (not allegedly, but for certain) flown to Jordan, put in a van and driven to SYRIA, where he is put in a shallow grave for a prison and tortured for months.

Why? Because he signed a rental agreement in Canada with someone allegedly linked to Bin Laden/Al Quaeda.

Then what happens? With the help of family, friends, and the Canadian government, he is returned to Canada without charge!!!

This is the most f-ed up thing that I know of happening in the past 5 years. Who knows about it? NO ONE except for Canadians.

Why is there no coverage of this in America and the rest of the world?

That's the screwed thing about it.

As for no attacks since 9/11, how many attacks were there after the '93 bombing of the WTC? None until 9/11. Did the Patriot Act prevent such attacks? NO.

So why hasn't the US been attacked? The author of the article claims it is because of the Patriot Act, but we might also attribute it to the fact Kelly Clarkson won American Idol. It could have been due to the Paris Hilton video. I personally believe it was the Rock's performance in The Scorpion King.

All of this occured post-9/11.

Ted Kennedy was put on a "no-fly" list (no-fly list="patriotic" harassment).

But, hey, we gotta keep America safe.

How to do it?
Say White House leaks are hunk-dory, as long as they're "patriotic".
Say White House leaks are a "non-story".

Is Arar a "non-story"?
No, it remains a story waiting to happen.
Let it wait
and wait
and wait
and wait.
ZERO CHANCE the White House doesn't know about it.
It's the "liberal media" ignoring this.

To sum up, the US has no business deporting prisoners for torture to a country they openly hold in contempt for human rights violations.

That is not only un-patriotic. It is criminal.

Lawyers for Saddam Hussein are already planning on citing US war crimes that have gone untried.

Not that that should exonerate him, but there is a need for parity, which doesn't exist.

But, as long as few know, I'll repeat it.

Arar
Arar
Arar
ARAR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does what happened with Anar mean the whole patriot act should be tossed out?

Besides 9-11 happened when there was no Patriot act.

Since the US has had the Patriot act there have been no attacks in the US.

What is the reason? Do you think Al Qaida would rather hit Europe than the US?

I also favor a national ID that would have not affected the Anar case either way why is such a thing not a good idea?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:17 am    Post subject: .... Reply with quote

Quote:
Since the US has had the Patriot act there have been no attacks in the US.


Since the US has had the Patriot Act, the US has had 2 Star Wars sequels. My prediction is that they would've attacked us after "Attack of the Clones".

Why? Nothing happened until Yoda said, in the closing moments, The Clone Wars have begun. Lame. I think they were about to attack the US until George Lucas proved that he wouldn't make another movie that involved Ewoks. Clearly. Bin Laden slept well that night.

Cheers to the Patriot Act.

Clearly, though, Krispy Kreme came out with "glazed donut soda", an obvious throwing down of the gauntlet to terrorists far and wide.

Good thing they didn't do that back in '93. We would've had no Patriot Act to protect ourselves. After all, the Patriot Act is only second to our noble, patriotic mission to
a) free the world of Saddam Hussein
b) spread peace to the Middle East
c) stop WMD (that don't exist)
d) have a base to "project influence" into the region
e) have a "whipping boy" that a RETARDED president could wage war on with impunity, irregardless of the results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International