|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:06 pm Post subject: Confused about the CIA leak case? Start here. |
 |
|
The Christian science Monitor continues its tradition of informative and exemplary journalism; Here is their primer on the Plame affair (emphasis is mine):
| Quote: |
Confused about the CIA leak case? Start here.
For almost two years, special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has led an investigation to determine whether anyone acted illegally when the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame was made public. After hearing testimony from some of Washington's most powerful figures, a grand jury is expected to issue indictments as soon as Friday. The Monitor's White House correspondent, Linda Feldmann, answers key questions about the case.
Q. How did this affair begin?
At its heart lie questions about the Bush administration's case for war against Iraq. On Jan. 28, 2003, in his State of the Union address, President Bush included these 16 words: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
The implication was that Iraq was developing a nuclear-weapons program. But US intelligence officials had by then - and have since - expressed doubts about that claim. In July 2003, Joseph Wilson, a former ambassador to two African countries and Iraq, wrote an op-ed in The New York Times disputing Mr. Bush's statement.
The CIA, he wrote, sent him to Niger in 2002 to determine if Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Africa. He concluded no. One week after Mr. Wilson's op-ed, syndicated columnist Robert Novak reported that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, worked as "an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction."
At issue is whether Mr. Novak's government sources blew her cover as a CIA agent, in violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.
That law aims to protect the identities of "certain United States undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources." Mr. Wilson has claimed that White House officials leaked his wife's CIA role to the press as revenge for his criticism of the president's case against Iraq. Other observers say the sources were merely steering journalists away from Wilson's allegations.
Q. Why have two senior White House officials - Bush's top adviser, Karl Rove, and Vice Presidential Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby - faced such intense scrutiny?
In grand jury testimony, several journalists revealed that one or both men had spoken to them about Wilson's wife and her employment.
Toward the end of the investigation, it has become clear that Mr. Fitzgerald has focused more on possible charges of obstruction of justice, perjury, and making false statements, rather than on laws prohibiting public revelation of a CIA official's undercover status. Mr. Rove testified four times and Mr. Libby twice.
Q. How wide was the investigation?
As special prosecutor, Fitzgerald was tasked with investigating the alleged unauthorized disclosure of a CIA employee's identity. The Department of Justice later clarified that he had authority to investigate any crimes committed in the course of the inquiry, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses.
In all, some three dozen people either appeared before the grand jury or were interviewed by the FBI or Fitzgerald. The special prosecutor interviewed both Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney last year, but not under oath.
Key individuals who testified late in the process include two aides to Mr. Cheney: John Hannah, an expert on weapons of mass destruction, and David Wurmser, a Middle East adviser.
Among the press, Matt Cooper of Time magazine, Judith Miller of The New York Times, Glenn Kessler of The Washington Post, and Tim Russert of NBC News all testified. Novak is widely assumed to have cooperated with prosecutors, though he has not commented publicly on the case.
Q. What was Cheney's role?
Libby learned about Wilson's wife from his boss, the vice president, before her identity had been made public, according to notes Libby took during the conversation and which were described to The New York Times by lawyers involved in the case.
It is not illegal for Libby and Cheney to discuss classified information; they both have security clearance. But the Libby-Cheney conversation contradicts reports of Libby's testimony, in which he is said to have stated that he first learned of Wilson's wife, and her employment, from reporters.
Timeline of the CIA leak case
2002
February The CIA sends Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate whether Iraq tried to purchase yellowcake uranium. He concludes it did not.
September The British government asserts that Saddam Hussein had attempted to buy uranium from an African country.
2003
January President Bush mentions the British claim in his State of the Union address.
March Mr. Bush orders the invasion of Iraq.
July Mr. Wilson disputes Bush's claim about the Iraq-Africa uranium connection.
CIA Director George Tenet and other White House officials say Bush's reference to African uranium should not have been included in his State of the Union address.
Columnist Robert Novak names Valerie Plame as a CIA operative.
September The Washington Post reports that at least six journalists had been told of the Plame story before Novak's column appeared.
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says that "[i]f anyone in this administration is involved in [the leak], they would no longer be in this administration."
The Justice Department launches a probe of the leak.
December Patrick Fitzgerald is named special prosecutor in the case.
2004
January A grand jury begins hearing testimony. Dozens of powerful government and media figures testify over the next 22 months. White House aide Karl Rove appears before the grand jury four times.
July The British and US governments publish separate reviews of prewar intelligence estimates. The reports express skepticism about the credibility of some aspects of prewar intelligence assessments, and they note that some of the evidence used to allege an Iraq-Africa uranium connection relied on Italian documents that later proved to be forgeries. However, the British and US reports generally support the reasonableness of Bush's claim at the time that he made it.
[Bulsajo's note: There is at least one Italian journalist and a couple of IAEA officals who dispute the 'reasonableness' of Bush's claim in the given timeframe]
2005
June US Supreme Court refuses to hear appeals from Ms. Miller and Time magazine's Matt Cooper to avoid testifying before the grand jury.
July Mr. Cooper testifies before the grand jury, after his source releases him from a confidentiality pledge.
New York Times reporter Judith Miller goes to jail to protect the identity of source(s) who leaked Plame's name to her.
September 29 Miller is released from jail and testifies before the grand jury.
October 28 The grand jury was scheduled to expire Friday. |
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1028/p03s01-uspo.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
desultude
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Location: Dangling my toes in the Persian Gulf
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for the primer. It is good to see the whole thing put together on one page.
Having lived through Watergate, I can tell you that what is going on is not good for anyone, even if it does undo this administration. Beyond the momentary frisson of pleasure to be taken with "I told you so's", with a war going on, a political quagmire in D.C. is just not such a good thing.
When I talk with my newshound sister in L.A., I am so happy to be here in Korea without 100 24 hour news channels, ad nauseum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| desultude wrote: |
| Having lived through Watergate, I can tell you that what is going on is not good for anyone, even if it does undo this administration. Beyond the momentary frisson of pleasure to be taken with "I told you so's", with a war going on, a political quagmire in D.C. is just not such a good thing. |
Au contraire! There are certain junctures in history when chaos/rebirth is a good thing. And change doesn't typically happen when systems are in balance; it's an inherently chaotic process. This may well be one of those times.
The excesses of the Rebublican Party of the last 12 or so years need to be laid bare. The two party system needs to be opened up. The Electoral College needs to be abolished. Americans need to develop a global understaning of our place in world affairs and a more objective sense of just what the government (as opposed to the people) has done in our name.... etc., etc.
Bring on the chaos, says I. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Primer part 2:
Rove's part in the leak
| Quote: |
Rove's legal problems stem in part from the fact that he failed to tell prosecutors about a conversation in which he told Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper that Plame worked for the CIA. The president's top political adviser says the conversation slipped his mind.
Fitzgerald's office found out about the Rove-Cooper contact last year when Rove's lawyer discovered an e-mail that the prosecutor had not previously requested. The e-mail memorialized the Rove-Cooper phone call.
As late as this week, Fitzgerald was still hunting for witnesses who could undercut Rove's assertion that he had forgotten about the conversation.
Rove's legal team is making contingency plans and consulting with former Justice Department official Mark Corallo about what defenses could be mounted in court and in public.
Fitzgerald met with Rove attorney Robert Luskin at a private law firm office Tuesday, heightening White House fears for Rove's future.
According to Cooper's testimony, Rove told him of Plame's CIA status in a conversation about Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson on July 11, 2003. That conversation came five days after Wilson had accused the Bush administration of twisting prewar intelligence to exaggerate the Iraqi threat. |
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1257876&page=2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
The excesses of the Rebublican Party of the last 12 or so years need to be laid bare. The two party system needs to be opened up. The Electoral College needs to be abolished. Americans need to develop a global understaning of our place in world affairs and a more objective sense of just what the government (as opposed to the people) has done in our name.... etc., etc.
Bring on the chaos, says I. |
Whatever....
Our government has deposed two of the world's most heinous regimes in our name.
And I for one am very proud of that.
And to think that they have managed to do it despite the protestations of career East Coast couples like Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson makes me even prouder.
History (and I'm talking way after we are all dead) will be the judge. And generations from now, young Iraqis and Afghans will learn how their nation's freedom started during the Bush presidency. Of course, they will be free to ignore that role that Americans played in their freedom just as young Koreans and Frenchman do today. But no sweat. As long as our planet gets freer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| And to think that they have managed to do it despite the protestations of career East Coast couples like Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson makes me even prouder. |
I shudder to think about the opinions you must hold on Watergate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
