|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dulouz
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:34 pm Post subject: $377 Rolling Stones ticket price |
|
|
$377
Rolling Stones ticket price may show you can't always afford what you want
By DAVE TIANEN
[email protected]
Posted: June 3, 2005
Paint it green.
When the Rolling Stones announced last month that they would play the Bradley Center on Sept. 8, the ticket prices were listed as $160, $95 and $60, excluding service charges.
Now it turns out there is a fourth ticket tier: $377. Those Bradley Center seats will include most of the floor seats in the front half of the arena, according to a spokeswoman for the venue.
The $377 tickets, which include service charges, will dwarf the cost of other major shows in recent Milwaukee history when they go on sale at 10 a.m. next Saturday.
To put it in context, the top ticket for the Sept. 25 U2 gig at the Bradley Center is $160 excluding service charges, and the top ticket for McCartney's October show at the Bradley is $250. When Elton John and Billy Joel played the Bradley Center in 2003, the top ticket was $197.
Top tickets at some other venues on the On Stage tour are even more expensive. At www.ticketmaster.com, reserved field seats for the Stones show Sept. 9 at Soldier Field in Chicago top out at $450. Other stadium gigs, including the tour-opening date Aug. 21 at Boston's Fenway Park, also reach $450.
Other arena dates on the tour top the Bradley's $377 seat. Floor seats for the Stones show Oct. 17 at the American Airlines Arena in Miami are listed at $400, as are seats for the Oct. 3 date at Washington's MCI Center.
"The most expensive ticket is $454 in San Francisco," says Gary Bongiovanni, editor in chief at the entertainment trade magazine Pollstar. "I think it's a new high. That's the most aggressive ticketing I've heard of, and they're getting it in many markets."
Bongiovanni is reluctant to say the Stones have set a new standard for concert pricing.
"Let's face it, how many acts are there that could even think about asking for that? You figure most people don't buy just one ticket. How many people will pay $1,000 to see the Rolling Stones? It has to be a small market."
Controversy surrounding steep prices at Rolling Stones concerts is not new. One wag dubbed the band's 1999 No Security Tour as the "Exiles on Wall Street Tour." The Stones played the Bradley Center on the No Security Tour, and prices for that show topped out at $250 - at the time the most expensive concert in Bradley Center history. That show was the band's most recent visit to Milwaukee.
When the Rolling Stones announced their 2005 On Stage tour, the media release stated, "In keeping with the band's philosophy of making their shows accessible to all fans, tickets for the show will be available in a broad range of price categories." The top price listed on the release was $160. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cthulhu
Joined: 02 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We're just going back to the good old days, when only royalty and select members of the nobility could listen to quality live music. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JongnoGuru
Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cthulhu wrote: |
We're just going back to the good old days, when only royalty and select members of the nobility could listen to quality live music. |
Those were good old days, weren't they! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
just because
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who would really pay that much....
I wouldn't pay 70 cents to see the Rolling Stones |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cthulhu wrote: |
We're just going back to the good old days, when only royalty and select members of the nobility could listen to quality live music. |
They've had an illustrious career and have written some of the world's best rock songs, but I have serious doubts that they could still be considered to be in the above category. Wanna pay $377 to watch some geriatric geezers pretend they're still in their 20s? Knock yourself out.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cthulhu
Joined: 02 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The music is quality but you're right--can't say the same about the musicians. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
funplanet
Joined: 20 Jun 2003 Location: The new Bucheon!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've paid more, no big deal...but those prices have also gottem me in for band meets, etc
I will probably spend close to 10K for this upcoming tour for some US, Euro, and Asia shows... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga
Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nobody makes people go to these ridiculously overpriced, overproduced, overamplified, overpromoted concerts. I love the Stones but I wouldn't pay anywhere near such amounts to have my ears blasted off and see Jagger from two kilometres away.
The greed of these promoters is going to catch up with them. The people seeing the concerts are boomers looking for some 60s or 70s nostalgia; most other people plain can't afford to go, or think the prices are outrageous. The industry is not cultivating a new generation of concert-goers. Or are people willing to pay $200 to see Maroon 5?
What is more likely to me is that in the future the concert scene will break apart into specialty pieces; those very rich who will pay $500 to see Pink Floyd in a small venue, and a much larger market who will only pay small amounts to see a band in a bar or as part of an outdoor festival. And many people just won't see live music at all if they can watch it online or on a DVD.
The greed of Jagger is also legendary. There's a story about the song 'Bittersweet Symphony'. The main riff is actually from a Stones song that sat around forgotten in a BBC archives for decades, apparently. The Verve used it on the song, and Jagger insisted on large royalties, almost crippling the new band. I'm not surprised they're setting records, again, on high ticket prices.
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
The greed of these promoters is going to catch up with them |
I wish I could agree, however, I believe Ticketmaster's absolute monopoly will prevail. Should we really be surprised when one company has control of all the tickets to almost every premier concert? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
Nobody makes people go to these ridiculously overpriced, overproduced, overamplified, overpromoted concerts. I love the Stones but I wouldn't pay anywhere near such amounts to have my ears blasted off and see Jagger from two kilometres away. |
I went to see David Bowie's Glass Spider Tour way way way back. This was the last stadium concert I ever went to see. And this was before ticket prices were $200. What was funny is we had "good" seats. There's Bowie, some place, on a stage. If you had binoculars, you could see him. But mostly people just watched the jumbotron. Now the funny thing was the music was not syncing to the lips of Bowie on the jumbotron. WE WERE SO FAR AWAY THE SOUND WAS TAKING PERCEPTIBLY LONGER TO REACH YOU THAN THE LIGHT.
I swore I'd never see another bloody stadium concert again and I never did.
Stadium concerts aren't for the music. You go to score drugs and meet like minded chicks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
funplanet
Joined: 20 Jun 2003 Location: The new Bucheon!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
no matter where you are in a Stones stadium show, the sound is almost always superb, clear, and sharp.....
that's the difference earning a billion here and there can make... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dulouz
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is beyond me, its not my scene anymore and hasn't been for awhile at least since Jerry Garcia died. I like much much smaller clubs. Stones or not, I can't think of calling an evening like that fun. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
funplanet
Joined: 20 Jun 2003 Location: The new Bucheon!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
nothing more religious than seeing the stones in a club or small theater |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JongnoGuru
Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
Nobody makes people go to these ridiculously overpriced, overproduced, overamplified, overpromoted concerts. I love the Stones but I wouldn't pay anywhere near such amounts to have my ears blasted off and see Jagger from two kilometres away. |
I went to see David Bowie's Glass Spider Tour way way way back. This was the last stadium concert I ever went to see. And this was before ticket prices were $200. What was funny is we had "good" seats. There's Bowie, some place, on a stage. If you had binoculars, you could see him. But mostly people just watched the jumbotron. Now the funny thing was the music was not syncing to the lips of Bowie on the jumbotron. WE WERE SO FAR AWAY THE SOUND WAS TAKING PERCEPTIBLY LONGER TO REACH YOU THAN THE LIGHT.
I swore I'd never see another bloody stadium concert again and I never did. ... |
This is... beyond freaky. I started typing my original post here, but hadn't scrolled the screen up past dulouz' & funplanet's posts. I finished my post, and then just before hitting "Submit", I happened to glance at mindemetoo's post, and realised mine was completely, utterly, 100% .... redundant. Shit, I'm freaked.
sh'yeah, the jumbotron! sh'yeah, bowie! yep, sound travels slower and exactly -- that was when I swore off stadium concerts.
this is like someone effing with my memory or something.
screw it. getting a drink.
Okay, back with the drink. I guess it's not that coincidental. Just the same performer (and the roughly similar ticket price), and that we both foreswore arena-rock gigs from that concert onward. Other than that, the experience was probably much the same for the other 100 million people who were there. Wonder how many made the same resolution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Swiss James
Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
The greed of Jagger is also legendary. There's a story about the song 'Bittersweet Symphony'. The main riff is actually from a Stones song that sat around forgotten in a BBC archives for decades, apparently. The Verve used it on the song, and Jagger insisted on large royalties, almost crippling the new band. I'm not surprised they're setting records, again, on high ticket prices.
Ken:> |
Whilst I love to see someone sticking it to Jagger, the sample was taken from an orchestral version of "The Last Time" and it wasn't cleared properly- but it was Allen Klein who got all of the money.
And I mean ALL of the money, 100% of the royalties from that song were awarded to him.
The Verve weren't a new band then either, that was their third album they'd already split up and got back together once. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|