Do test-taking skills count a lot in language learning?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Maggie Bai
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:34 am

Do test-taking skills count a lot in language learning?

Post by Maggie Bai » Wed May 21, 2008 3:49 am

I am a university student who majors in English Education. In my class, one student is very good at taking English exams, especially in written tests. But her oral performance and language competence are not considered the best in our class. So, I wondered, do test-taking skills really count a lot in learning a language? Are students who are good at taking exams good learners? Thank you!

Jennywuzhezhe
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:21 am

my opinion

Post by Jennywuzhezhe » Wed May 21, 2008 3:55 am

dear, i think it's not that necessary to take that kind of tests. :lol:

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Wed May 21, 2008 4:08 am

Depends on the test. Lots of students like to pretend that failing tests doesn't mean much, but not every test is a multiple choice grammar quiz. Some are good all-round measuring devices.

Writing tests are obviously not that great at measuring speaking ability.

Maybe it would be fair to say that nerves can have a bigger negative affect in language exams, compared to some other kinds. I know that when I can't understand a listening question and the tape moves relentlessly on to the next question, I can get very stressed and unable to focus.

And that's just when I'm the teacher :lol:

Michael D. Castro
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Test Taking Skills vs Language Skills

Post by Michael D. Castro » Tue May 27, 2008 1:14 am

Right now in Puerto Rico a law has been passed that awards teachers that have graduated with with a high grade in their specialty the privilege to skip turns when new positions are available in the Department of Education. Now experience doesn't count. I have openly rejected it because of the fact that many years of experience have taught me that a teacher is not made in the University (although I have my BA degree) but in the classroom. And I also pointed the fact that many students become "expert test takers" being able to take test and pass them as long as they are multiple choice. Now if you give the same student a performance test or an oral exam the situation changes completely.

The problem is that professors prefer to give multiple choice tests because they are easier to tab.

It is experience and performance what counts. I myself prefer to give oral tests as they require the student to actually remember and produce information.

Maggie Bai
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:34 am

Re: Test Taking Skills vs Language Skills

Post by Maggie Bai » Wed May 28, 2008 2:31 am

Michael D. Castro wrote:Right now in Puerto Rico a law has been passed that awards teachers that have graduated with with a high grade in their specialty the privilege to skip turns when new positions are available in the Department of Education. Now experience doesn't count. I have openly rejected it because of the fact that many years of experience have taught me that a teacher is not made in the University (although I have my BA degree) but in the classroom. And I also pointed the fact that many students become "expert test takers" being able to take test and pass them as long as they are multiple choice. Now if you give the same student a performance test or an oral exam the situation changes completely.

The problem is that professors prefer to give multiple choice tests because they are easier to tab.

It is experience and performance what counts. I myself prefer to give oral tests as they require the student to actually remember and produce information.

Thank you for the information. However, in China, experience does count a lot. Most schools would require three-year woking experience, which makes it very hard to find a job as a teacher for university students.
As far as I am concerned, a good student should be a good learner, a good speaker and a good test-taker, because these three are what a good student is supposed to be. However, it is just so hard to become a student like that.

Michael D. Castro
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Mybe the problem is in the extremes

Post by Michael D. Castro » Wed May 28, 2008 2:44 am

The info you provide me tells me that there has to be a medium point one where experience and academic achievement count equally. Regarding being good test taker i believe we have to be careful of not making test taking an end in itself, learning should be the main goal.

Betty Li
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:21 am

Post by Betty Li » Wed May 28, 2008 2:54 am

I think it depents on what kind of the test. When it is a big and important exam, test-taking skills really count a lot. But as EFL learners, we learn English mainly for daily use, not for taking exams.
In my opinion, oral performance is far more important than test-taking skills in learn English.

Maggie Bai
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:34 am

Re: Mybe the problem is in the extremes

Post by Maggie Bai » Wed May 28, 2008 3:07 am

Michael D. Castro wrote:The info you provide me tells me that there has to be a medium point one where experience and academic achievement count equally. Regarding being good test taker i believe we have to be careful of not making test taking an end in itself, learning should be the main goal.

Yes, I totally agree with you on that test is just a tool, not the utimate goal. But the fact is that a student with high marks is considered a good student in most cases. And learning has been long evaluated by testing. It really counts a lot.
I think education in all the countries is limited by tests to some or great extent.

Macavity
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:41 pm

Post by Macavity » Thu May 29, 2008 10:17 pm

The thing about tests is that the result is only an indication of the level of ability on the day the test was taken. I can`t remember even being at uni let alone what I learnt there, if anything really :D

Michael D. Castro
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Post by Michael D. Castro » Thu May 29, 2008 10:57 pm

Macaviti:

But I'm sure you clearly remember your last day at school and what you learned there.

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Thu May 29, 2008 11:42 pm

It's a British thing Mike. We are attached to those t's, though they are fading away a bit under NA influence.

Michael D. Castro
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

NA Influence

Post by Michael D. Castro » Thu May 29, 2008 11:55 pm

NA influence is not a good influence at all. Believe me the trend in this side of the world is one of glorifying tests and encouraging test takers. This encouraging has been reflected in a decrease in real learning. I am currently trying to balance my teaching between test taking skills and language learning but giving language learning a more favorable role. If at any moment I sense that a student is having difficulties with test taking I offer that student an alternate way to show me his or her true learning. Oral tests are now my favorite.

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Thu May 29, 2008 11:58 pm

Actually, I mean learnt. In Britain we say "learnt". Sometimes.

Test takers, yes. But the main problem to my mind is relying on tests a great deal and yet not bothering to use decent tests. However, recently things have improved for English a little bit.

Macavity
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:41 pm

Post by Macavity » Fri May 30, 2008 9:37 pm

Hey Mikey,
you wrote:

But I'm sure you clearly remember your last day at school and what you learned there.


No, I had tonsilitis that week!

I usually take the irregular verb form where it's available because it feels more natural to me; as Woodcutter says, a British thing.

Perhaps the reason that I don't really see the value of tests is because my own school days were made miserable by them. I went to primary school in the seventies, and, as unbelievable as it sounds now, we were regularly subjected to corporal punishment for failing tests - and I am no great shakes at taking tests. So I don't give tests unless specifically asked to, and then only under duress! That doesn't mean to say that I don't keep a check on or track my students' progress, though.

Michael D. Castro
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

I think like Macavity

Post by Michael D. Castro » Fri May 30, 2008 11:54 pm

I like to experiment in my classes. Next semester I plan to work with oral tests micro tests and a combination of both. I think like you Macavity. It's good to see that there are people who think alike.

Post Reply