I wonder if these sets are both possible. If so, do both mean the same thing?
1-1. an astonishing 50 years
1-2. 50 astonishing years
2-1. an additional five years
2-2. five additional years
3-1. an extra 10 doctors
3-2. 10 extra doctors
4-1. a full five minutes
4-2. five full minutes
5-1. an entire 24 hours
5-2. 24 entire hours
6-1. a staggering four million jobs
6-2. four million staggering jobs
7-1. a remarkable 50 people
7-2. 50 remarkable people
Thank you very much.
a(n) + plural noun
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
1-1. an astonishing 50 years (That's certainly a/one looong period of time!)
1-2. 50 astonishing years (Each and every year of those 50 was astonishing - something incredible was happening literally every second) Hmm, I don't know though, maybe they are interchangeable?
2-1. an additional five years
2-2. five additional years
Little discernible difference in meaning to me between 2-1 and 2-2. What would be more worthwhile studying is the extra cotext (>context) with either (e.g. there'd no difference if they both were inserted into 'It took...to complete').
3-1. an extra 10 doctors
3-2. 10 extra doctors
Again, can't see much difference myself.
4-1. a full five minutes
4-2. five full minutes
Similar to the first pair of sentences. The meaning of 'full' in 'Five full minutes' will be much more varied (depending on the context) than a mere 'length of time measured' (4-1).
5-1. an entire 24 hours
5-2. 24 entire hours (Probably less usual than 5-1, or indeed '24 hours'...yup, Google gets me 831 hits versus 49 respectively).
6-1. a staggering four million jobs (That sure is a lot of jobs!)
6-2. four million staggering jobs ( Not quite sure what a 'staggering job' is...sounds like it could be unpleasantly hard work!)
7-1. a remarkable 50 people (A fair number to turn up for a housewarming party for a Stimpson C. Cat)
7-2. 50 remarkable people (I wonder if Chomsky is counted among them?)
1-2. 50 astonishing years (Each and every year of those 50 was astonishing - something incredible was happening literally every second) Hmm, I don't know though, maybe they are interchangeable?
2-1. an additional five years
2-2. five additional years
Little discernible difference in meaning to me between 2-1 and 2-2. What would be more worthwhile studying is the extra cotext (>context) with either (e.g. there'd no difference if they both were inserted into 'It took...to complete').
3-1. an extra 10 doctors
3-2. 10 extra doctors
Again, can't see much difference myself.
4-1. a full five minutes
4-2. five full minutes
Similar to the first pair of sentences. The meaning of 'full' in 'Five full minutes' will be much more varied (depending on the context) than a mere 'length of time measured' (4-1).
5-1. an entire 24 hours
5-2. 24 entire hours (Probably less usual than 5-1, or indeed '24 hours'...yup, Google gets me 831 hits versus 49 respectively).
6-1. a staggering four million jobs (That sure is a lot of jobs!)
6-2. four million staggering jobs ( Not quite sure what a 'staggering job' is...sounds like it could be unpleasantly hard work!)
7-1. a remarkable 50 people (A fair number to turn up for a housewarming party for a Stimpson C. Cat)
7-2. 50 remarkable people (I wonder if Chomsky is counted among them?)
unification of plurals
Thank you very much, fluffyhamster.