Site Search:
 

Banner

Teacher Discussion Forums Forum Index Teacher Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Authentic Language/Direct Grammar Instruction

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Teacher Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Adult Education
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
andrewgessman



Joined: 01 Nov 2011
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:36 pm    Post subject: Authentic Language/Direct Grammar Instruction Reply with quote

I'm very supportive of direct grammar instruction in adult ESL classrooms, but it can be difficult to discern how much is appropriate, for what age levels, ability levels, etc. I'm a teacher in training and have limited experience actually using direct grammar instruction myself. I have read of great examples of ESL teachers using direct grammar instruction, especially to clear up consistent student errors. I think there is some pushback against direct grammar instruction though by innovators who are concerned at it undercuts the goal of using "authentic language" in the classroom. Of course I support using "authentic language", as everyone does. But am I right in assuming from my perch of relative inexperience that direct grammar instruction and "authentic language" can be taught together? They need not be mutually exclusive, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iain



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 30
Location: italy

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolutely. And anyway, useful 'inauthentic' language (ie created by an authentic person with authentic words and grammar but not captured from someone's authentic spontaneous experience) is not harmful!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
fluffyhamster



Joined: 26 Oct 2004
Posts: 2974
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2012 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nowadays there are so many sources of real or realistic examples (the web, corpora, dictionaries, reasonably clear and straightforward grammar practice books like Murphy's Grammar in Use series, Thornbury's Natural Grammar etc etc) to help flesh out and illustrate structures, that there really is no reason or excuse for grammar teaching and practice to be at all inauthentic. And one of the most important skills that a good teacher develops is an ability to extrapolate from general tendencies observed in the language as a whole (whilst noting suitable contexts), to fashioning examples tailored to fit their specific classes, yet without starting to sound made up (thanks in no small part to the preparatory research). Basically, strive for a balance between "telling" (generalizing~waffling on, on the basis of limited examples) and "showing" (letting a sufficiently large number of examples speak for themselves), with the best order surely showing before telling (with any telling then often just a matter of pointing out, noting, noticing such-and-such a textual fact or relationship).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Teacher Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Adult Education All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT

This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2011 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group