| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Michellekj
Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 6
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:00 am Post subject: Standard orthogrphy vs phonetic alphabet. |
 |
|
| Why do linguists use a phonetic alphabet as opposed to standard orthography? What would be a variety of answers in this forum? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sally Olsen
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 1295
Location: Canada,France, Brazil, Japan, Mongolia, Greenland, Canada, Mongolia, Ethiopia next
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Seems quite obvious that a phonetic alphabet can describe many languages with the same orthography to be compared and accurately understood by many people who know that phonetic alphabet. Why are you interested? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fluffyhamster
Joined: 26 Oct 2004
Posts: 2993
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| As Sally says, you can transcribe any language regardless of its orthography if you use IPA instead. IPA is also a good way of showing the pronunciation of words that may have a difficult or ambiguous pronunciation e.g. I read a book everyday - Past or present tense for the 'read'? IPA would disambiguate which context. IPA is also a fallback for learners, especially when no native speakers are available - the learner can look words up in dictionaries and find out how to pronounce words from the transcriptions provided. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
