In the course of time

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
Forgorin
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Japan

In the course of time

Post by Forgorin » Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:40 am

Just a quick question regarding the Subject.

They slowly died out in course of time. or They slowly died out in the course of time.

Which is correct and why?

Thanks,

Michael

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Thu Sep 06, 2012 5:20 pm

The first is incorrect, as the main use of 'of' is to help form noun phrases (the 'of' and the noun that follows it make a prepositional phrase postmodifying the preceding noun), which is what it is doing here. (One could also have ?They slowly died out in (the) course time, in which 'course time' is more obviously a noun yet fine without an article, and seems to be describing a truly deadly boring English course or something LOL).

If we replace the 'of' with e.g. 'in', we are left with two synonymous and therefore conflicting prepositional phrases, one of which would be redundant (a bit like saying ??in December in winter).

That's not to say that 'in (due) course', and obviously 'in time', don't individually occur without the article, but the context here is of a two-part noun phrase whose first noun needs an article/needs to be "counted" (as would 'passage', 'passing', etc).

By the way, I am not sure why you have queried Subject. The functional elements of this clause are as follows:

They=Subject
slowly=(A)dverb(ial)
died out=Verb
in the course of time=Adverbial

Anyway, FWIW maybe try out parsers like the following. :wink:
http://tomato.banatao.berkeley.edu:8080 ... arser.html
http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/
http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link/submit-sentence-4.html
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:23 am, edited 3 times in total.

Forgorin
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:40 am
Location: Japan

Post by Forgorin » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:41 pm

As usual fluffyhamster, a wonderful answer.

Thanks a whole bunch!

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:04 am

Heh, you're very welcome, Mike!

Post Reply