| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
arizonawildcat
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 1 Location: Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 4:05 am Post subject: Quick Survey: Bunched "r" or Retroflex "r&quo |
|
|
Quick informal survey for a paper I'm currently writing:
When teaching the American English "r" sound to non-native students, do you typically use the bunched version or retroflex version?
(The bunched version is with the tongue pulled deep to the back of the mouth. The retroflex leaves the tongue more or less in place, but tilts the tongue upwards.)
My research has shown that most Americans use bunched "r". I was curious to know if a good portion of ESL/EFL teachers out there are teaching the bunched or retroflex version.
Thanks for your time!
B. Meadows (arizonawildcat) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 1358 Location: San Francisco, California
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I teach "bunched". I have seen bad results with students who have read about a "retroflex r" and don't keep their tongue against their top back teeth when they retroflex. Since I don't retroflex my tongue myself, I don't teach it. (I was sure surprised the first time I read about the retroflex in an ESL book and then figured out my tongue actually pointed down. This is the first I've heard of someone actually paying attention to it. Hurray for you .
(I've had some luck with them starting with an "/i/" sound and sliding their tongues back.)
Lorikeet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Metamorfose
Joined: 21 Jul 2003 Posts: 345 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My local variant of Portuguese has a retroflex /r/ that more or less matches the American retroflexed /r/, so most teachers here teach the retrolflex /r/.
José |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
revel
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 532
|
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:10 am Post subject: Visual interference |
|
|
Good morning.
I have to face the visual interference of the written symbol here in Spain, where the "r" has a specific sound value (a rolled "arrrrr") which is not appropriate for ESL. I begin the teaching of an acceptable "r" sound with "w" exercises:
woo woo woo woo
then oo-rr oo-rr oo-rr
pointing out that with the "oo" the tongue makes a tubular sound that is projected into infinity, while pulling the lips back a bit, curling the tip of the tongue up a bit, transforms this same sound into a ball of energy that floats in front of the the face, held in place by a concentrated effort to visualize that sound.
I've used this "r" instruction for many years with many different nationalities of learners and for many other reasons than simply visual interference stemming from shared alphabetic graphic symbols with different sound values. It comes in part from living in two different parts of the US and having my own "r" sound criticized for being "different" from the one in use wherever I was at the time.
peace,
revel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|