|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Fanyi
Joined: 01 Nov 2011 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:32 pm Post subject: Great website for teaching Shakespeare or not? |
|
|
Run a literature English Corner once a week during lunch for my students here in Xiamen. Last week we went over Shakespeare's Sonnet 29, however, was stumped by one of my students who asked me to put the whole poem into meter (look online, the poem is mostly iambic pentameter but has some lines that stray from this).
Had some time tonight, did some research, and found what looks like a fantastic site for learning/teaching Shakespeare and other poets: http://prosody.lib.virginia.edu/materials/poems/sonnet-29/#reference_scansion . The site provides an interactive copy of each poem, and above each line you can mark stressed/unstressed syllables by clicking your mouse. First click= '/' (stressed), second click = 'u' (unstressed) . To check whether your stress is correct, you click the little up-down arrow next to the line.There's also a more thorough explanation of how all this works under 'Instructions', accessed from the same page.
However... I've completely failed at putting the first line of the sonnet into meter! Either I don't understand the line's meter correctly, or this website has some serious problems. Iambic pentameter should be lines split up into 10 syllables, which are further divided into 5 unstressed-stressed groups of 2 syllables (feet) (tell me if I'm wrong) . So according to my understanding (with caps indicating stress), the first line should read "when IN disGRACE with FORtune AND men's EYES" . The website gives me a yellow arrow for this, which apparently means something like 'technically right, but with interpretative errors.' Have tried different combinations for an hour for this first line, and have yet to find the right one.
Big thanks to anyone who can figure out how the site would like this line's stress to be written or who know for sure that this problem a site error. So that you know, the site does give me a green (correct) arrow for the second line (i ALL aLONE beWEEP my OUTcast STATE), so the site is definitely not completely broken.
In a similar vein, anybody else run a similar kind of English Corner/elective class? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I take it that your students are English majors.
If so great.
When I've taught English majors the school has shown no interest at all in involving FTs in the literature side.
In fact in my first year I didn't know that the English majors studied literature, until one student asked me about Shylock. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cps82856
Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try this Power Point, esp. slides 10-12. (The author's main website here). Looks to me like you've scanned it correctly.
I've done The Sonnets before, starting with an intro to Bill S. class then a class or two on the elements of poetry/sonnets. (The dancing and banging on desks part went well.) Then I had a random draw and each student had to memorize one sonnet to recite. Then they were given a couple of weeks to write their own. The first time I did it was for a class of sophomores. They worked really hard on it, but I think they were a bit overwhelmed. I'm at a different uni and have juniors this year and am thinking of trying it again. Their level seems higher and they are a lot more mature.
Others may disagree, but I think, for English majors, having at least a shaking-hands acquaintance with The Bard is as vital as learning about Confucius would be for anyone studying Chinese culture. So, good on you for giving them that exposure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fanyi
Joined: 01 Nov 2011 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:00 pm Post subject: Thanks! |
|
|
Thanks for the .ppt link! Looks like a great tool, AND slide 10 clears up why the U Virginia website indicated problems with the way I scanned Lines 5 and 6. However, still trying to figure out line 1, I'm assuming that there's a reason why the U Virginia site I listed in the OP does not accept my scan of line 1?
I'm doing these poems with high school kids- have set up a literature English Corner during lunch time once a week. Teach about 600 kids in oral English classes, and usually 5-10 of the more motivated kids show up each week for literature English Corner. Some of them can handle these poems/sonnets really well (one of them has already scored a 109 on the TOEFL), but others obviously struggle with them more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
cps82856 wrote: |
Others may disagree, but I think, for English majors, having at least a shaking-hands acquaintance with The Bard is as vital as learning about Confucius would be for anyone studying Chinese culture. So, good on you for giving them that exposure. |
Ive been watching this thread, waiting to see if anyone else comments.
I disagree strongly. And I am rather puzzled as well if truth be told.
Ive been involved in numerous threads where the majority of respondents suggest that teaching or using grammar in their classes is beyond their remit and not their job. They also stress that their students often have such mixed, and generally low abilities, that getting them just to talk, engage with English, and perhaps even have fun ... is enough. Im sure if someone had posted a link to a grammar site and said is this useful for teaching my high school class / university class, people would have commented that it wouldnt be needed and grammar should be avoided in favour of oral tasks (although I would argue you cant split them).
I would really find it very hard to justify and accept any justification of teaching Shakespears sonnets to the overwhelming majority of Chinese students as I find it very hard to see the linguistic value in it. And to put the teaching of archaic language in the form of poetry over (for example) controlled and free practice of a target structure like present perfect is just nuts ... surely?
The majority of students I work with have been through the university system. I have never encountered a student that had a need to be more familiar with Shakespeare ... but I also encounter students that need a better understanding of grammatical structures and how to use them, a greater familiarity of register and how it applies to suitable vocabulary etc etc.
If I was learning Chinese culture, then learning Confucius would make sense. If I am studying the Chinese language, then a study of Confucius would not be an expected part of my syllabus IMO. (in fact, it wasnt. I studied an excellent course with the UK's Open University via distance learning for 9 months. Whilst they did have culture reference pages, these made up just 1% of the course)
(apologies for drifting slightly off the main topic, which is how useful is the website posted ... my post is more geared toward how useful is old literature in teaching new language ... maybe it deserves its own thread) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FreakingTea

Joined: 09 Jan 2013 Posts: 167
|
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I would really find it very hard to justify and accept any justification of teaching Shakespears sonnets to the overwhelming majority of Chinese students as I find it very hard to see the linguistic value in it. And to put the teaching of archaic language in the form of poetry over (for example) controlled and free practice of a target structure like present perfect is just nuts ... surely? |
I do think there is linguistic value in archaic language, and it's only the most motivated coming to this lesson, but overall I agree with you. A fluent speaker could gain insights into English grammar and etymology and come to appreciate the language more deeply, but there's no reason to teach this if other skills are being neglected.
I guess it would depend on how the main class is being taught. If the students are learning grammar and progressing, maybe a Shakespeare extracurricular is okay. If there isn't much grammar being taught, then perhaps the Shakespeare ought to make room for more useful stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|