Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Mainland China versus Hong Kong
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Hong Kong
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Travel Zen



Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 634
Location: Good old Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:21 pm    Post subject: Mainland China versus Hong Kong Reply with quote

A vast majority of ESL teachers chose the mainland to teach, if even for one year.

Is there a reason ? Hong Kong must have better pay, and be a safer and easier place to travel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
X-Bar Theory



Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Travel Zen,

Yes, Hong Kong does offer higher pay and is safer. Nonetheless, there are two key reasons why so many more people end up in the Mainland:

1.) There are A LOT more jobs there. Hong Kong is just a dot compared to Mainland China.

2.) They are not as strict when it comes to qualification requirements. On the other hand, Hong Kong can be very picky compared to other places, usually requiring a degree in English, linguistics or education and/or teacher certification/licence/qualification and a TESOL certification. Of course, it depends on whether you're looking to work in a private language school, the NET scheme, university, or an International School, etc.

Some would probably say that they went to the Mainland to improve their Mandarin/Putonghua but, in my opinion, they would be better of going to Taiwan...at least for the money. Overall, the Mainland pays less than Hong Kong, Japan, S. Korea, and Taiwan. There is one thing to keep in mind: Although Hong Kong pays a lot more than the Mainland, the cost of living, namely housing, is also a lot more. This being said, if you decide to come to Hong Kong, make sure that you will make enough to cover housing and still be able to save, or make sure that the school provides housing or a housing allowance on top of your regular salary.


Last edited by X-Bar Theory on Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pelican_Wrath



Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 490

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Mainland China versus Hong Kong Reply with quote

Travel Zen wrote:
A vast majority of ESL teachers chose the mainland to teach, if even for one year.

Is there a reason ? Hong Kong must have better pay, and be a safer and easier place to travel.


HK doesn't have 'ESL' jobs as such. All its jobs are for qualified/certified teachers.

That said, the NET scheme does allow people who are unqualified but who have a Degree and a CELTA, to join it, but they can't get as high up the pay scales.

Still, there's no way anyone in HK would employ, say, a 19 year old just out of high school without even a Degree, as happens in the mainland, or a 55 year old alcoholic without much formal education.
even the unqualified (but Degreed) teachers who join the NET scheme must be at least passable individuals...
Etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bradley



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 235
Location: China

PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's easier to get uni jobs in mainland. I live in Shenzhen so I feel I have the best of both worlds. I can get to Hong Kong easily and make a higher salary than other places in the mainland (not higher than HK of course) but life is much cheaper here. And I am learning Mandarin. I've already lived in Taiwan. I like all three places.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
meiyoubanfa



Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Mainland will also hire you on any visa. I was there on a student visa, and no one cared. My first real job in a middle school was given to me by a top official in the city I lived in, while we were standing within a government building. No one cares about your history, or visa, or anything. That being said, you have little job protection, and people often don't get paid. The upside is there are so many jobs, I have even been approached while having a beer in a bar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scorch



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 12
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's true that Hong Kong pays a lot more than the mainland, but the mainland is a lot more fun. In Hong Kong, you suffocate, while in the mainland you can be creative.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

scorch wrote:
It's true that Hong Kong pays a lot more than the mainland, but the mainland is a lot more fun.

Anyone know a place which provides both? As for the Mainland being fun - I imagine that is sometimes true, but always? HK can be fun too, but I admit the locals are a drag.

scorch wrote:
In Hong Kong, you suffocate, while in the mainland you can be creative.

Really?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
meiyoubanfa



Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Always fun? the mainland? Marco's right, I don't know if I would bother casting it in such black and white terms. As we all know, the mainland is massive, which means im sure people have had different experiences in different places. And there are a lot more things to consider than just whether you can be creative in a classroom or not.

When I lived in the north, I met a few guys who had lived in the South of China. And they HATED The north, beijing and Shandong province in particular. It was the conservatism (lingering Confucian virtues/failngs/what have you) that made them basically begin to hate the north. And these were guys that were fluent in Chinese, lived a very native lifestyle, spent little money, etc. They claimed that even with that lifestyle they couldn't make friends, with men or women, rich or poor. Many mainland chinese there still see consorting with foreigners as something only the most desperate do.

These teachers/students loved the "south" of China for the opposite reasons. They said it was easy to make friends, people were friendlier, less conservative, etc.

A lot of that, for some strange reason, ties into a lot of stereotypes between Northern and Southern Chinese which they perpetuate themselves.

For example, many people I knew loved the north for the benefits that come with the stifling conservatism in the North. They rarely got people trying to rip them off (unless in Beijing), or steal their luggage, phone, etc. There were people who had that happen to them in the South, like having taxi drivers drive off with your bags, etc. So these people preferred the north of china, where that kind of thing seems to rarely happen. But a lot of those people were only interested in meeting other foreigners, not making friends with actual Chinese.

As for my own experience, I would say that the worst thing about being anywhere in the mainland is their lack of standards for almost anything. Everyday things can be dangerous. Bottled water is dangerous (could be fake and full of Hep B. etc if bought from a street vendor), food can give you worms that can make you sick for weeks, the pollution can be so bad as to make you lose your appetite/vomit. Not my idea of fun.

And they hire ANYONE to teach, and there are many extremes. Even guys you might meet who are over 40 but dating an 18 year old Chinese girl (cause she hopes to escape China with him or learn English) but he has a wife at home, sitting in a bar drinking and taking drugs while at the same time shooting up on insulin cause he also happens to be diabetic--all of which gives them the aura of having a death wish. That is a worst case example, sadly it is a real person that I met. Others are watered down versions of that, but you get the idea. Anyway, having so many teachers who are variations on that theme can wear on one's psyche after a while.

Of course, I am not saying that all people are like that in the mainland, there are some decent and often wonderful people.

1. But if you don't need to save money and are there simply for the cheap "wine, women, and song" like so many are then yes I guess the mainland WOULD be the place to be.

2. If you don't need to save but are interested in seeing a modernizing country with vast separation between the rich and poor, can handle seeing that difference everyday, not take advantage of it as much as possible, then the mainland would also be a good place to go. There is a lot of culture to experience.

But are living conditions this bad in Hong Kong?
Will you find AS MANY debauched teachers like the example above in Hong Kong?

I find it hard to believe Hong Kong could be worse, or even equal to those negative examples above.

If anything from what I have heard its similar to Korea, where things are fairly safe and outright debauchery (excessive drinking, etc) is confined to specific areas, the worst thing you have to deal with is some racism/nationalism/ethnocentrism in the workplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RiverMystic



Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 1986

PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are plenty of decent folks in ESL in the mainland, but an awful lot of dregs too. The Chinese tend to praise them to their faces, and behind their backs say, "He is sh*t in his own country." Harsh, but I have heard this more than once.

As for China vs HK, the fact is that the vast majority of ESL teachers who work in mainland China - good or bad - have no option - they are simply not qualified to work in Hong Kong. i.e. Most are not teacher qualified.

China is a good place for people who dislike work or having standards imposed from above - and this is a fair proportion of long-termers in China - some of whom complain about working 20 hours a week! China is good for these folks - a place where you earn honorifics/social status for nothing more than the colour of your butt. You get lots of attention for doing little more than standing upright.

It is not surprising that many of the kinds of "low class" foreigners you refer to live and work in China. They have few options anywhere else, and receive rewards way out of proportion to the effort they put in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get the general sense that China is a bit like the wild west. Good fun if you like a bit of rape and pillage, but maybe not the best place if you don't like surprises ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RiverMystic



Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 1986

PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, the wild west analogy has been made many times. So it is more exciting, uncertain, less organised and controlled (ironically, since it is a Communist State). In HK, people are very conservative, and have a low tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty (the fifth lowest in the world, according to a survey - Singapore was last!). China wasn't on that list, but I suspect that given the huge degrees of change in the mainland in the last 30 years, they'd be more tolerant of uncertainty.

However the essence of Confucian culture was "harmony", and that entailed social control through tight regulation of education and information. Particularly towards the end of the Ming Dynasty (fifteenth century), scholars/public servants had to regurgitate the classics, no empirical science was developed, and the concept of an hypothesis was never developed. Not surprisingly, this is the precise period when China stagnated and declined. Despite the many changes, there are still strong influences of that system in mainland China today (and HK). e.g. much of the regurgitation/rote learning, focus upon the test, unwillingness to speak up and be individuaistic etc.

I understand both those who prefer HK, and those who prefer the mainland. I enjoy the change when I move from one to the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pelican_Wrath



Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 490

PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RiverMystic wrote:
There are plenty of decent folks in ESL in the mainland, but an awful lot of dregs too. The Chinese tend to praise them to their faces, and behind their backs say, "He is sh*t in his own country." Harsh, but I have heard this more than once.

As for China vs HK, the fact is that the vast majority of ESL teachers who work in mainland China - good or bad - have no option - they are simply not qualified to work in Hong Kong. i.e. Most are not teacher qualified.


This isn't quite true though, is it?

I mean, the NET scheme accepts people who are not teacher qualified (but who have a Degree in something else), albeit that they can't get as high up the pay scale.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Yes Sir I Can Bogey



Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 201

PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's only the PNET scheme, Pelican, the unqualified hordes cannot get onto the SNET scheme, and so cannot get anywhere near the HK$50,000 to HK$60,000 monthly salary range. I think the most they can ever earn on the PNET scheme sans QTS is around HK$35,000 a month � pure chicken feed in Hong Kong these days, and unrealistic for a person with a family.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed that an expat might have a hard time raising a family on 35K a month, though it's far from impossible, especially when you consider the average salary in HK is 11.5K. Anyway, 35K certainly isn't chicken feed! I know many TEFLers in the private schools sector who would regard that sort of money with envy - they earn around 20K a month, or not much more.

As for the NET scheme having a lot of non-QTS teachers, as Bogey says that seems in reality to apply mostly to PNET, and the majority still have QTS in any case. As for having a generic arts degree rather than an English major - does that really make any difference to someone's ability to teach English language? Methinks not. For the EdB it's simply a way of reducing the number of applicants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yes Sir I Can Bogey



Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 201

PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marcoregano wrote:
Agreed that an expat might have a hard time raising a family on 35K a month, though it's far from impossible, especially when you consider the average salary in HK is 11.5K.

The average (median) salary in Hong Kong according to the latest figures I have is HK$15,000; not HK$11,500 (though if there are more up-to-date figures available then please do supply the source). Anyway, it's all academic as locals are eligible for a whole host of benefits - such as (albeit limited) social security and, more importantly, public housing. Don't forget that some 50% of the local populace lives in such government supplied housing, and it is dirt cheap. Ex-pats on the other hand have to rent. Besides, even if ex-pats were eligible for public housing, how many would ever want to live in such accommodation? Remember also that even locals who don't live in public housing mostly still live with their parents, even after getting married (for the few that do ever get married), so again, either way, they are largely relieved of the burden of housing costs.

And sorry, but maybe we move in different circles, or maybe we lead radically different lifestyles, but I actually try to live a very simple, plain life, and HK$35,000 a month to me is chicken feed. My fixed monthly outgoings total in excess of HK$25,000 a month, and that is without savings, pension contributions, etc., not to mention entertainment and whatnot. As an ex-pat it is nigh on impossible to enrol your kids at a local school (and who would want to?) and so you have tuition fees (ESF secondary section is HK$8,000 a month per child, many international schools charge much more). And that is just for monthly tuition. Add to this foreign travel fees for school trips, uniform fees, etc., and it soon adds up. Also, as ex-pats typically need to work, one requires a maid, which is another HK$3,600 a month, plus her annual flights back home, plus the pension after a set period of time, etc.

Also Marco, I am not being funny, but how are "TEFLers in the private schools sector" who you say "would regard that sort of money with envy" at all relevant? If they take some sort of poxy TEFL post that pays peanuts (presumably as that is the only employment they can attract and secure) then that is their look out.

As regards your comments regarding one's major at university, I can only say I shake my head in sorrow. To see such comments stem from the keyboard of what is quite obviously an intelligent poster makes me very, very sad, and I would aver that you may have been in Hong Kong too long and have perhaps 'accommodated' local, blas�, views. With such an amateur, one size fits all attitude towards the teaching of English as a second or foreign language then it is no wonder ESL/EFL in Hong Kong is in such a sorry state. Thus it is no wonder that employers reliably complain of low English skills of their prospective employees. After all, after some six years of daily exposure to English at primary level, five at secondary, another two at sixth form, and then three at university, many still cannot pick up the phone and answer in English or reply to a simple English-language email. So I would submit that it matters very much that someone whose major was not in English, education, or linguistics was employed to teach English, and I think it makes a considerable difference in their ability to teach the subject. Would you say the same about physics, maths, PE, or any other subject? Would you pay someone with no training in education and/or English to teach your offspring?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Hong Kong All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China