|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jonniboy
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 751 Location: Panama City, Panama
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Countries like Latvia would still be options in the EU for non-EU citizens as there's a lack of native speakers there and companies would therefore go through the visa process. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sashadroogie wrote: |
| How hard would it be for me to become a citizen of the US? Do you think Johnslat is right and my political background might be working against me? |
Easy. Just get married  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Does that automatically confer citizenship on me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
choudoufu

Joined: 25 May 2010 Posts: 3325 Location: Mao-berry, PRC
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sashadroogie wrote: |
| How hard would it be for me to become a citizen of the US? |
easy! enlist in the military, branch of your choice.
fight for truth, justice and the american way!
go to exotic places.....(you know the rest). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Sasha (and naturegirl):
I'm terribly sorry to report that, just as in Europe, it's more difficult than just marrying a citizen.
You must also meet other conditions.
To the best of my knowledge, the US process is:
Move to the US with spouse and live together at least 5 years before application. During this time you have a right to work, but it is limited to jobs that accept citizens of other countries (so if you're an Air Traffic Controller or government employee, or police or military or security expert, you'll be flipping burgers for the duration).
Fill out paperwork, multiple times, at great length.
Endure unexpected home visit(s) to ensure that said marraige is 'real.'
Learn lots of stuff about US history so that you can pass the citizenship tests.
Take vows.
Ultimately get the passport!!
There are also issues of mandatory military service in many countries, along with language tests and etc, etc. Some countries don't allow dual citizenship (the US does) but depending on the laws of 'your' new country, you may have to officially renounce your original citizenship.
Not an undertaking to be considered lightly, overall!!
Best regards,
spiral |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Sasha,
Umm - not so easy:
"Eligibility Requirements
Normally, a non-citizen wishing to become a United States Citizen must have five years of legal permanent residency in the U.S. to apply. Non-citizens married to a U.S. citizen for at least three years can apply after three years of residency.
However, special provisions apply for members of the Armed Forces:
In order for a non-citizen to enlist in the military, he/she must first be a legal immigrant (with a green card), permamently residing in the United States. It's important to note that the military cannot and will not assist in the immigration process. One must immigrate first, using normal immigration quotas and procedures, and -- once they've established an address in the United States -- they can find a recruiter's office and apply for enlistment.
Peacetime Military Service: Under INA Section 328, persons who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces (including active duty, reserves, or national guard), can file for Naturalization based on their current or prior U.S. military service. The requirements for eligibility are that the applicant must have served honorably or have separated from the service under honorable conditions, have completed one year or more of military service, and be a legal permanent resident at the time of his or her examination by USCIS on the Form N-400, Application for Naturalization. This used to be three years, but Congress changed it to one year in 2002. Filing for naturalization under this provision of the law, Section 328 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (INA), excuses the applicant from any specific period of residence or physical presence within the United States, so long as the application is filed while the applicant is still serving with the military or within 6 months of an honorable discharge.
Service During Hostilities : By Executive Order Number 13269, dated July 3, 2002, President Bush declared that all those persons serving honorably in active-duty status in the Armed Forces of the United States at any time on or after September 11, 2001 until a date to be announced, are eligible to apply for naturalization in accordance with the service during hostilities statutory exception in Section 329 of the INA to the naturalization requirements. This means that individuals with even one day of honorable active duty service can apply for citizenship, regardless of how long they have been a resident. Note: Under this provision, individuals who apply for citizenship after discharge must present a DD Form 214, with service characterized as "Honorable," or "General." Those with other characterizations (including Entry Level Separation), are not eligible."
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You mean I can't just marry my Russian girlfriend and waltz into the States and secure a top TEFL job? What sort of Fascist visa regime is this?
Bring on the withering away of the State! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Sasha,
You can't "waltz," but you could emulate many others and do the "Australian crawl," "the sidestroke," "the butterfly," "the backstroke" or the "breaststroke."
But you'd better hurry - the International Boundary and Water Commission has made a decision to soon release millions of gallons of water into the Rio Grande River system to Mexico.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I suppose it is true that I could swim to the US: I can see Alaska from my dacha! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qaaolchoura
Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Posts: 539 Location: 21 miles from the Syrian border
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a comment:
The Brits and Irishmen have it better than Americans, Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders in that there's a lot of countries in the EU where people don't speak English natively (though over half a dozen where they learn it in primary school). There aren't really many TEFL jobs in countries where most people speak English natively for some reason. (There are a few, but they require a lot of experience and/or an MA Ed.)
What I want to know is why, if Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland joined the Schengen Agreement, the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand can't. Sad thing is that I bet the Europeans would agree to allow Canada and/or the US join (as long as we didn't try to bust into the EU while we were at it) but Ottawa can't try it alone as Canada can't afford to tighten border controls with the US; and there's no way the American people would agree to such an erosion of our national sovereignty.
~Q |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd imagine it has to do with neither the US or Canada being in anyway geographically related to Europe. Same goes for Australia and New Zealand. How Iceland managed to be classified as European I still don't understand though... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still, I would like to register my displeasure at being discriminated against by the US authorities. It's just not fair that I can't set up shop and teach over there... : (
I'm going to have to crack open my third bottle now, so upset am I. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xie Lin

Joined: 21 Oct 2011 Posts: 731
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qaaolchoura wrote: |
Just a comment:
The Brits and Irishmen have it better than Americans, Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders in that there's a lot of countries in the EU where people don't speak English natively (though over half a dozen where they learn it in primary school). There aren't really many TEFL jobs in countries where most people speak English natively for some reason. (There are a few, but they require a lot of experience and/or an MA Ed.)
What I want to know is why, if Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland joined the Schengen Agreement, the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand can't. Sad thing is that I bet the Europeans would agree to allow Canada and/or the US join (as long as we didn't try to bust into the EU while we were at it) but Ottawa can't try it alone as Canada can't afford to tighten border controls with the US; and there's no way the American people would agree to such an erosion of our national sovereignty.
~Q |
Q, I just have to say that you are an "outside the box" kind of thinker!
. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hee hee! Outside the Zone thinker... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| What I want to know is why, if Norway, Iceland, and Switzerland joined the Schengen Agreement, the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand can't. |
The Schengen agreements are not only about right-to-work.
One important principle of the zone is absolute minimal border control between the member countries. As Sasha points out, some geographical proximity is necessary for this to work out. Further, there is NO way that any of the non-member countries you name above would allow free travel by all Schengen zone citizens into their borders.
You realise you'd be suggesting that Czechs and Poles and Germans and Italians and Spanish and Portugese, etc. - and even Irish citizens would not be stopped at the border of the US or Canada for an id check??
Never going to happen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|