|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mike_2007
Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 349 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There's a great radio show by Stephen Fry on how English is almost entirely idiomatic if you examine the literal (non-idiomatic) meaning of most of the words we use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear Demin-Maniac,
You seem to be saying that since ALL idioms are not phrasal verbs, no phrasal can be an idiom.
|
I'll bow down to the greater knowledge of forum members and the Owl, but yeah ... In my classroom, idioms and phrasal verbs will always be different constructions. (I tend to work in the lower echolons of TEFL and it makes things simple for my students) It would appear easier for my students to understand that approach, not that I have ever placed them side by side and issued 'The Denim-Maniac Approach to PV/Idioms'.
The sentence I have quoted above sums it up for me really. Of course, PV's can work idiomatically, but the clear difference in construction and usage means I can separate them in my class (and my mind).
Linguistically/grammatically and strictly speaking ... I may be wrong. For ease of use and teaching .... Ill stick to my guns on this one  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
Phrasals have literal and figurative meanings:
E.G. I picked my suitcase up and left. My taxi picked me up at 8.
It's the figurative meanings that are idiomatic |
A better example might be 'pick sb up (in a bar)' or 'pick up a language informally' than a car picking sb up, or giving sb a lift etc (that is, the car-as-mover doesn't seem so less literal than sb picking up a suitcase). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LongShiKong
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 1082 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I needed a good pick me up... another thread of mine vanished.
Would the above qualify as both an idiom and phrasal verb? And what's the difference between an idiom, a figure of speech, and a colloquialism? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear LongShiKong
"Would the above qualify as both an idiom and phrasal verb?"
It'd be hard to qualify as a verb when it's being used as a noun. Or here, as an adjective: Do you know any good pick-up lines?
"And what's the difference between an idiom, a figure of speech, and a colloquialism?"
I'd say that "figure of speech" would be the most general term.
Idioms are one type of figures of speech.
Phrasal verbs (the figurative meanings) are one kind of idiom, and a colloquialism is a local or regional informal dialectical expression which can involve a figure of speech ("Colloquialisms include words (such as y'all, gonna, and wanna), phrases - such as old as the hills, raining cats and dogs, and dead as a doornail - and aphorisms (such as There's more than one way to skin a cat)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloquialism#Examples
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LongShiKong
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 1082 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| spiral78 wrote: |
| I'm going to come across as a spoiler, but I want to question the focus on teaching idioms to EFL students... why waste valuable class time on them, when there are so many other more useful things to do? |
I thought so too when handed Slangman years back in Canada and assigned a class of visiting teens. I assume the course and text choice were an afterthought by someone who needed to create a full-time course load for int'l students. I quickly reasoned that in addition to the meaning, to be of value such a course should provide:
a) the social function of such language;
b) equivalent (neutral) expressions;
d) how widespread the expression is geographically/socially/historically.
However, phrasal verbs and idioms are far more pervasive than you might think, Spiral.
As others have said, many books already exist but do they present the best way of actually learning idioms? Despite recent efforts by a certain company named after a fruit, education in general (along with ELT) is still largely print-bound. The more culturally/emotionally loaded the language, the more I feel the need to use video clips to provide that essential context.
As for phrasal verb practice, I prefer substitution along the lines of: http://busyteacher.org/10019-phrasal-verb-equivalents-1.html
Last edited by LongShiKong on Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| However, phrasal verbs and idioms are far more pervasive than you might think, Spiral. |
Without both of us providing empirical evidence, it's not really possible for you to make such a statement. Firstly, you clearly can't know exactly how pervasive I've found idioms to be in my 15 years in the field.
Phrasal verbs are an entirely different issue in terms of how common they are in the language, and I did not address them in any way in my original statement. The OP was focused solely on idioms, and I did not expand the discussion.
Last edited by spiral78 on Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my opinion, with phrasals, the meanings are the most important item. Of course there IS a grammar component, but the major aspect of that is whether the phrasal is separable or non-separable. And that can't really be "taught" since there's no rule. The only way students can get it is by acquiring a "smart eye" (reading) and a "smart ear" (listening).
Whether a phrase is a phrasal (2 or 3 word verb) or simply a verb and a proposition may be interesting to linguists but is, I'd say, irrelevant to almost all students.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LongShiKong
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 1082 Location: China
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="johnslat"...with phrasals, the meanings are the most important[/quote]
Agreed. That's why I prefer among other things, simple substitution practice although I haven't spent nor intend to spend a lot of time teaching them.
@Spiral: As for the prevalence of idioms, I was referring to the language in general, not to how prevalent they are in language teaching contexts. But you're right, there's far more important things to teach than to spend valuable class time on them. That's why I was surprised to find myself teaching them to a class of intermediate teens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|