View previous topic :: View next topic |
When it comes to sharing my lesson plans ... |
I dont. They are for me and me alone. Id tend to refuse this request. |
|
25% |
[ 9 ] |
I share some of my material and plans with my colleagues. |
|
42% |
[ 15 ] |
I share some of my plans with my colleagues and employers. |
|
28% |
[ 10 ] |
I would be unhappy to share plans with my employer or colleagues. |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
I would share with my employer, but not my colleagues. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 35 |
|
Author |
Message |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:51 pm Post subject: Sharing lesson material/plans with employers/colleagues |
|
|
Thought this might be an interesting topic.
There has been mention of lesson plans in a few threads recently. I wonder if it might also relate to the 'giving and taking' thread thats quite lively and recent.
My list of poll options isnt too long. I think Ive covered enough options, certainly ones that cover my interests. I will consider adding more options if people feel the poll needs it (assuming anyone is interested!) I generally feel that materials and plans are two very different things, but Im not splitting them for the purpose of a poll.
My personal view or option is that I share some of my materials and plans with both my colleagues and with my employer. I can be protective of them in the instance of sharing classes with a colleague ... its galling to share material or an idea with someone to then discover they use it with your students first meaning you cant use it yourself. Generally though I think Im quite accomodating and am normally very willing to help a newer or uncertain colleague as long as there is no conflict of interest.
Ditto with my employer ... as long as there is no conflict of interest I am quite willing to leave materials for my employer too. I did actually offer to compile a database for my summer school employer last year.
I get the sense Im in the minority here though? Especially when it comes to sharing with employers. Apart from the conflict of interest mentioned Im curious why people would be so protective so please feel free to add any explanation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johntpartee
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 3258
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll share anything with anybody at any time. I don't see the problem. We're all trying to help students learn English. If somebody thinks some of my ideas are good and they wanna use 'em, I feel flattered. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
^^^ Likewise, I'll share with my colleagues (I chose the second option). My colleagues are decent people and they help me out with personal and professional issues, so it's the least I could do. I also believe in the give and take.
Warm regards,
fat_chris |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hilena_westb
Joined: 13 Nov 2012 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I consider anything I write, create, etc. copyrighted, personal information and don't share it. It's all professional work product. There is a difference between providing Lesson Planning documents and providing the actual work product.
Sharing ideas is fine, but my work is my work and is what separates my professional performance from others. Why do the work for everyone else unless you get paid for it.
Making it sound like share and share alike is an old-boys-club-friendly-way-to-be is simply making the job/profession exactly the opposite, unprofessional and meaningless. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johntpartee
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 3258
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I teach at a school for students who are going to be teachers; I'm assuming that many of them are going to use some if not all of the stuff that the instructors are presenting to them.
Perhaps you could elaborate on your last sentence, hilena_westb, I don't get it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
hilena_westb wrote: |
There is a difference between providing Lesson Planning documents and providing the actual work product.
Making it sound like share and share alike is an old-boys-club-friendly-way-to-be is simply making the job/profession exactly the opposite, unprofessional and meaningless. |
This first point I agree with. I had to teach young teenagers a year or so ago (not the norm for me) and I asked my groups assigned head teacher for some support. He gave me 3 poems printed on an A4 sheet and said they worked well. To me that was useless as it was just 'material'. I had 'material', but my struggle was shaping it into a useful 'plan' that would engage that student group.
The second point Im not so sure about. Interesting to expand on that point. My teaching experience is only in EFL, and I dont think there is anything new in EFL at all ... or very rarely. If you identify a structure that needs teaching, or a pronunciation issue that needs addressing .. course book writers, material developers etc all have set lessons to address them. One may frame the target language in a listening task, the one may frame it in a text. One may focus on producing the language in an oral task, another may seek production through writing. One may have a euro-centric text for teenagers, one may have an adult text more suited to Asian students, but essentially the fundamentals remain the same right? I guess thats partly why I dont see the need to be protective. We are hardly inventing something new ... and it would be more professional to me if people did work together and share materials and plans more. Even if I believe there is 'nothing new', I do believe there are some things that engage some students more than others, shared professional knowledge and experience, as well as material would surely be a good thing?
I have heard the material issue as a criticism of employers ... many are accused of 'stealing' it. This is the interesting point to me TBH. If I started work with a new employer and he offered me access to a set of materials and plans that had been tested successfully Id see this as a good thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hilena_westb wrote: |
Making it sound like share and share alike is an old-boys-club-friendly-way-to-be is simply making the job/profession exactly the opposite, unprofessional and meaningless. |
Nope. In my realm sharing with colleagues only promotes professionalism and furthers meaningful work.
Warm regards,
fat_chris |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kungfuman
Joined: 31 May 2012 Posts: 1749 Location: In My Own Private Idaho
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I taught a business class and had 2 different classes for the same subject. Another ft had the same subject with 2 other classes. We shared exam material - other than that we did our own thing but held communial exams. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wonderingjoesmith
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 910 Location: Guangzhou
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would NOT share my lesson plans with either colleagues or employers; however, I would put forward my advice on how to approach the academic program or certain problematic parts of it. If called on, I would also reach out in areas of classroom management.
My view is that most teachers and students are NOT alike, and so one teacher�s lesson plan may be a guide to failure for another. A plan of one teacher, which probably favors his/her style in one classroom, may in fact have a detrimental effect on the other teacher in another classroom. Furthermore, providing lesson plans to educators may just take the academic freedom away and encourage uniformity that is seemingly so recommended in this country.
Professionalism in education is about a balance in between the schools� programs and their teachers� skills and talent. It is about independence and creativity. In a professional environment, teachers are in charge of what they teach as well as they are responsible for general societal values their students learn.
Educational institutions with clear academic programs/goals, appropriate recruiting, inductions and professional development workshops do not need stockpiles of lesson plans from previous teachers. Directions from previous or other current teachers of a school may be useful in a case of weak curriculum, support or management. Lesson plans filing may also be beneficial to schools that want to restrict, or perhaps control, teachers and their students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"wonderingjoesmith"
My view is that most teachers and students are NOT alike, and so one teacher�s lesson plan may be a guide to failure for another. A plan of one teacher, which probably favors his/her style in one classroom, may in fact have a detrimental effect on the other teacher in another classroom. |
Ive been spending a lot of time thinking about this. I was course tutor on a generic CELTA type course last year and feel I may have let my trainees down a little by asking them to teach my material. This tended to my stuff that was road-tested, had clear goals and manageable stages, so was easy for me to grade and monitor as a trainer, but my trainees often struggled. A guide to failure for another springs to mind. I need to think more about my approach there methinks.
Quote: |
Educational institutions with clear academic programs/goals, appropriate recruiting, inductions and professional development workshops do not need stockpiles of lesson plans from previous teachers. Directions from previous or other current teachers of a school may be useful in a case of weak curriculum, support or management. |
Thats a pretty good point too. As much as I enjoy working for my two main employers ... not sure either would fit in as described above. Good post joe - much clearer for me to have an understanding of your teaching 'ethos'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hilena_westb wrote: |
I consider anything I write, create, etc. copyrighted, personal information and don't share it. It's all professional work product. There is a difference between providing Lesson Planning documents and providing the actual work product.
Sharing ideas is fine, but my work is my work and is what separates my professional performance from others. Why do the work for everyone else unless you get paid for it.
Making it sound like share and share alike is an old-boys-club-friendly-way-to-be is simply making the job/profession exactly the opposite, unprofessional and meaningless. |
I agree with this.
As a senior teacher, I shared my personally-developed student progress monitoring materials with a junior teacher who was struggling with her 50+ student classes.
Was somewhat miffed to see her passing the documentation on to other newbies, without either permission or attribution. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
it'snotmyfault
Joined: 14 May 2012 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Denim-Maniac wrote: |
I was course tutor on a generic CELTA type course last year |
How much did the students pay for this generic CELTA type course?
Is this CELTA type course inernationally recognized?
Did the students know that the trainers had no qualifications other than a CELTA/degree and a few years on the job experience?
Sounds like a case for chinesescambusters. I'm glad I did my CELTA with a reputable school where the trainers all had masters degrees and years of teacher training experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roadwalker

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 1750 Location: Ch
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I share with whoever asks. I have some idea about what works for me, but another teacher might struggle with the same material or approach. Hell I sometimes struggle with a second or third class with a lesson that worked great previously. With new teachers my material or plan gives them another option. They still have to convert it to their own style. And I'm always open to ideas or materials from colleagues as well. Just trying to help students learn. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
it'snotmyfault wrote: |
Denim-Maniac wrote: |
I was course tutor on a generic CELTA type course last year |
How much did the students pay for this generic CELTA type course?
Is this CELTA type course inernationally recognized?
Did the students know that the trainers had no qualifications other than a CELTA/degree and a few years on the job experience?
Sounds like a case for chinesescambusters. I'm glad I did my CELTA with a reputable school where the trainers all had masters degrees and years of teacher training experience. |
Way off topic so Ill PM you. If you want to call me out on the forum start a thread about course options in China and Ill answer there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kungfuman
Joined: 31 May 2012 Posts: 1749 Location: In My Own Private Idaho
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To share a little more insight into my feelings about this topic:
The school I work for used to hire an outside company to come teach IELTS twice a week to my students. One of the better IELTS schools in Suzhou.
After the first semester they stopped the contract with this school and started having one of their ta's teach the IELTS to the students - using IELTS school's book.
The ta does a pretty poor job teaching this subject.
AND I hold my school in pretty high regard. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|