|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Denim-Maniac
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 1238
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
China has thousands, possibly millions, of its own native speakers who graduate each year with qualifications to teach English. Those non-native speakers also have an advantage in that they are able to use Chinese as a tool to teach with. Many may have sound English skills and a sound knowledge of teaching methodology.
So I would suggest that China already has an ample and well-qualified source of non-native English teachers and certainly doesnt have a need for 'Foreign Expert Residency' visas to be issued to other equally qualified non-native speakers from around the world, especially considering they dont have the advantage of local L1.
I really dont see it being discriminatory at all. And if you know anything about law in China, you would know its frequently broken, bent or adjusted to maintain 'social harmony'. A well skilled and qualifed teacher of English, who had the advantage of an education in an English speaking country would have ample opportunity to find work in China. We have all known and worked with such people.
I stick by my earlier post questioning the validity of the question, and feel there are other far more useful questions to ask. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igamich
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, although I find this conversation very interesting, that was not the point of it.
I ask such questions because I am simply interested in this subject. There is no point in judging whether they are valid/ useful or whatever. It is my study and I would like to investigate this issue.
And what is more I think there is now a huge misunderstanding that I am trying to prove that the situation is bad, that it should not be like this. Even if that is my own, personal opinion and I would like to fight against it (whether somebody likes it or not) the aim of my study is just to investigate another teacher's opinion. Nothing else. I do not provide them with any assumptions neither will try to suggest their responses because I see no point in it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Denim-Maniac wrote: |
China has thousands, possibly millions, of its own native speakers who graduate each year with qualifications to teach English. Those non-native speakers also have an advantage in that they are able to use Chinese as a tool to teach with. Many may have sound English skills and a sound knowledge of teaching methodology.
So I would suggest that China already has an ample and well-qualified source of non-native English teachers and certainly doesnt have a need for 'Foreign Expert Residency' visas to be issued to other equally qualified non-native speakers from around the world, especially considering they dont have the advantage of local L1.
I really dont see it being discriminatory at all. And if you know anything about law in China, you would know its frequently broken, bent or adjusted to maintain 'social harmony'. A well skilled and qualifed teacher of English, who had the advantage of an education in an English speaking country would have ample opportunity to find work in China. We have all known and worked with such people.
I stick by my earlier post questioning the validity of the question, and feel there are other far more useful questions to ask. |
This is an interesting angle. That is, non-native speakers who are non-Chinese are competing against local English-speaking Chinese.
As Denim states, China isn't a country for logic. Why then if local speakers of English are available, foreign non-native speakers are hired?
In our countries public opinion would be crying out that 'foreigners are taking our jobs' and rightly so.
I suspect that somewhere, some high-up national-level education bureaucrat has decreed that the ration of students to FTs should be x:y.
Non native speaking FTs can be hired if the standard FT cannot be found.
Further evidence (if true) that we are a commodity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IvanaShaanxi
Joined: 18 Jun 2012 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, I am a non-native English teacher in China, have been working here for three years. As far as my experience goes, and I think its fairly representative, as long as you are white (and "foreign-looking" as much as possible) your chances of getting a job are high. I come from Serbia , which still counts as Europe, so upon learning the fact The Chinese assume in advance that you speak good English- a result that automatically comes from living in a developed region, I guess
Our English skills are never gauged.
GGenerally speaking, looks and appearance are very important for the Chinese and thats what they base their opinion on in the first place. Of course, your skills and personality will eventually shine through, but longer periods of time might fly before that finally happens |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IvanaShaanxi
Joined: 18 Jun 2012 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| As one of my aquintances put it, a relatively attractive white person with blond hair has 80% chance of getting a job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|