|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
whhels22
Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| for those who asked the interview was in Lithuania. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
biffinbridge
Joined: 05 May 2003 Posts: 701 Location: Frank's Wild Years
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 10:57 am Post subject: well in that case |
|
|
| They were checking your response as the school's probably a front for the mafia,money laundering and vice.Where is it exactly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gtidey
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ha lithuania. thats a whole new kettle of fish then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:36 am Post subject: Re: well in that case |
|
|
| biffinbridge wrote: |
| They were checking your response as the school's probably a front for the mafia,money laundering and vice.Where is it exactly? |
I guess he/she should answer yes to the drug question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gtidey
Joined: 18 May 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Yeah, i can sort you out if you want, must be difficult to get good stuff here eh? whaddya fancy; ket, billy, coke, beans, jane?"
might be the most appropriate answer for lithuania |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
whhels22
Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The school is Located in Vilnius. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"i read in the paper today that a high school - one that you dont pay for, mind you, just a normal school like you and i went to - are doing random drug tests on kids between 11 (yes, eleven) and 16. if they fail theyre booted out the school. WHAT HARM CAN COME FROM HAVING A BIT OF REEFER AFTER SCHOOL? they arent even paying to go to school, its mandatory for kids to go to school, now theyre kicking them out because of what they do outside of school. "
Are you serious about this? I don't think " . . . a bit of reefer after school" is what most schools are worried about. You have kids shooting up heroin in the john (loo, toilet, etc.), smoking crack in the PE locker rooms, zoning out on hallucinatory drugs on the bus coming to school. Not only are the drugs bad for them physically, it really messes up their minds. Some kid whacked out on dope becomes aggressive, paranoid, and violent. Before you know it, you have another Columbine on your hands (for those of you that don't know about this . . . this is one (of several) incidences where kids took matters into their own hands and killed several other students before turning their guns on themselves. See Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" for the grisly details). Oh yeah, there's also the matter of these 15, 16, and 17 year old kids getting behind the wheel of their shiny new cars and taking themselves out - - along with their three or four friends that came along for the joyride.
And don't even think that 11 and 12 year olds are not doing drugs. They are and many times their bodies are not physically mature enough to handle it and they can easily OD on whatever stuff they are "experimenting" with. Not only are their bodies not equipped to handle it, but their minds certainly don't have the mental capacity to understand the potential outcomes of drug usage. You are right, the kids don't pay to go to school. Their parents pay for this honor (it's called TAXES). Kids are in school more than they are home (not counting sleeping hours) and parents can't be there to discipline and police their children. Sadly, it is the responsibility of the schools to do it. In the USA, drug usage has spiraled way out of control, so it was only a matter of time before it came to random drug testing in the schools. As a teacher, I, for one, applaud it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Round de Bloc
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1946
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gtidey wrote: |
was the interview in america?
its fu.cking ridiculous. there are very few things which get me as angry as drug tests/questions. i mean maaaaaaaaad.
i read in the paper today that a high school - one that you dont pay for, mind you, just a normal school like you and i went to - are doing random drug tests on kids between 11 (yes, eleven) and 16. if they fail theyre booted out the school. WHAT HARM CAN COME FROM HAVING A BIT OF REEFER AFTER SCHOOL? they arent even paying to go to school, its mandatory for kids to go to school, now theyre kicking them out because of what they do outside of school. |
First of all, I don't think you're going to find too many 11-year-olds in high schools, at least not in "america."
Secondly, if you've ever tried teaching in a school where students were into using illegal drugs -- or some of your fellow teachers were -- you might see some value to drug testing and booting out students -- or firing teachers -- who were into using illegal drugs.
It saddens me when I think of the number of students I've taught who had the potential to do some really great things . . . but their "bit of reefer after school" turned into "bigger and better" drugs, destroyed their chances of success, caused great hardship for themselves and their families, and made them a burden on society. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bindair Dundat
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 6:52 pm Post subject: Re: Semper Fi |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
John - USMC (1963 - 1967) |
Ah, Mr. Slat. Now I'm beginning to understand the reference you made to 1966 in another thread.
BD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bindair Dundat
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 7:06 pm Post subject: No harm at all, if you're the teacher. ;-) |
|
|
| gtidey wrote: |
| WHAT HARM CAN COME FROM HAVING A BIT OF REEFER AFTER SCHOOL? |
Kids don't generally have the judgement to know where to draw the line. (Adults often don't, either, but that's another story.) I certainly don't think anybody should be kicked out of school for getting high, but they should be discouraged in some way. Pot affects memory, motivation, and reading ability; you need all three to get into and through a decent college.
BD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laura C
Joined: 14 Oct 2003 Posts: 211 Location: Saitama
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 4:50 am Post subject: Re: No harm at all, if you're the teacher. ;-) |
|
|
| gtidey wrote: |
| WHAT HARM CAN COME FROM HAVING A BIT OF REEFER AFTER SCHOOL? |
Well said gtidey. Although I knew as soon as I read your post that someone would start mentioning heroin and the gateway theory. As usual when drugs are talked about, the wildly exaggerated examples of kids on heroin soon surface.
You have kids shooting up heroin in the john (loo, toilet, etc.), smoking crack in the PE locker rooms, zoning out on hallucinatory drugs on the bus coming to school.
Gtidey is talking about kids getting thrown out of school for smoking 'a bit of reefer'. He/she didn't say anything about, or condone, using other drugs.
quote: Oh yeah, there's also the matter of these 15, 16, and 17 year old kids getting behind the wheel of their shiny new cars and taking themselves out - - along with their three or four friends that came along for the joyride.
I think any car crashes involving teenagers are more likely to be due to alcohol rather than other, illegal, drugs. Do you have any stats on pot-caused car deaths?
Also, I don't actually remember from Bowling to Columbine that the kids responsible were smoking pot, and I'm certain that no link was made between drugs and the shootings. The whole point made in that section of the film was that the last thing these 2 did was go bowling. As MM said, why not then blame bowling rather than rock music or pot?
There are more important things to worry about than a 15 year old haivng a spliff.
L |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rj

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 5:19 am Post subject: Re: No harm at all, if you're the teacher. ;-) |
|
|
| Laura C wrote: |
I think any car crashes involving teenagers are more likely to be due to alcohol rather than other, illegal, drugs. Do you have any stats on pot-caused car deaths?
|
I have no stats or facts, just my own observations here! Every teenager I've known since I was a teen has preferred alcohol to drugs (pot being the most common). However, it is much easier to get pot than to get alcohol so they're more likely to be high than drunk.
I'm not saying that they are more likely to have a car accident while high, just that when they are looking to be under the influence of something they have greater access to pot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TEAM_PAPUA

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 1679 Location: HOLE
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 10:50 am Post subject: * |
|
|
There should be two questions:
1. Have you ever used drugs?
2. Are you a liar?
No way around that one  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, Laura C., are you saying you approve of teens smoking pot and getting high? And are you saying that teens DON'T experiment with other drugs (Ecstasy is VERY popular these days, by the way)? I'm assuming you are a teacher and you are okay with this? From what I've read about marijuana, it does affect your brain cells and it does slow reaction time and it "could" lead to other, heavier drugs. So, smoking pot and getting behind the wheel of a car (or smoking pot WHILE actually being behind the wheel), may not seem as dangerous as alcohol (a liquid drug, in my opinion) but even when reaction time is slowed by a couple of seconds, those seconds could spell the difference between life and death. Would you risk it? Have you risked it?
Have you ever worked in an inner city school? In reality, drug use there is probably less than the "white" middle-class suburban schools. And it really, really is not just pot-smoking. There are some deadly drugs floating around out there Laura C. I don't need to cite sources here, just do a google search on drugs and teenagers and you will have days and days of reading materials. And I don't care if it is a "bit of reefer" or crack or something else, it doesn't belong in the schools. If they are doing it AFTER school in the privacy of their neighborhood playground, then that is their own risk. But they are doing random drug tests DURING school hours to make sure the kids aren't high (or drunk) while in school or don't come to school already buzzed. This can and has led to violence and property damage, not to mention the illegal selling of drugs on school grounds.
As for the reference to "Bowling for Columbine", I didn't mean to imply that those murdering boys were high when they caused the violence, I was just using it as a reference to school violence. For most people in America (and Canada?), Columbine now equals school violence (sadly, for that city). Sorry about the confusion.
"There are more important things to worry about than a 15 year old haivng a spliff"
Really? Like what? My guess is you enjoy a doobie from time to time and, as a 'responsible' adult, that is your choice. Drinking and drug use (including marijuana smoking) among teens can lead and have led to: teenage pregnancies, lower grades/drop-outs, teen/school violence, property destruction, traffic fatalities, depression, suicide, and a host of other things (due to people's altered state-of-mind when using).
If a TEACHER is saying marijuana use is okay (even occasional recreational use) for teenagers, then I'm a little worried about what else he or she may shrug their shoulders about!
(Now I will get off my soapbox) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the early 1970's Nixon had a large scale investigation done into marijuana, the purpose was to prove that it was a gateway drug. The investigation was done by scientists, doctors, sociologists, and pychologists. After two years the report concluded that there is no evidence that marijuana use leads to harder drugs. It did find that people are likely to use harder drugs because marijuana users were forced to interact in the drug community because marijuana was illegal. In effect it was saying that marijauna laws were the gateway into the use of harder drugs. Nixon's reaction to the report: "I can't tell the American people this." The report was shelved.
My source is a teacher I did my student teaching with. He was not pro-drug in any way. The professor he did his masters in sociology with was one or the specialists involved in the report. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|