View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mikeylikesit114
Joined: 21 Dec 2007 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 2:38 am Post subject: Five Year Rule |
|
|
My employer just yesterday informed me that beginning this year, all foreign experts in Qingdao that have been in China for 5 years or more will not have their visas renewed. They must return to their country of origin for two years before returning to China.
This law is selectively applied in some Chinese cities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
teenoso
Joined: 18 Sep 2013 Posts: 365 Location: south china
|
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
This rule has been around a long time , and is selectively applied, as you say . There are plenty on this forum who defy the rule (legally) , presumably because their local PSB or provincial office ignores it.
What your employer seems to suggest is that Qingdao is introducing this rule , this year. But of course anyone there caught by it could simply move to another city or province that does not apply the rule. They would not have to 'leave China for 2 years' or repatriate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Powell
Joined: 11 Jul 2013 Posts: 1736
|
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
My observation is that the 5 year rule is rarely invoked as is the age 60 rule. I've seen these rules invoked when the school wants to dump a teacher or several teachers and doesn't want to confront a problem.
If I were the teacher(s) in question I'd go looking for another school. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mikeylikesit114
Joined: 21 Dec 2007 Posts: 129
|
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not too concerned that the school is trying to dump me, as they are currently applying for my visa in another city, with the intention of bringing me back to Qingdao.
I have no reason to doubt them. They would be in a very desperate situation if I were to leave when my current visa expires. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
choudoufu

Joined: 25 May 2010 Posts: 3325 Location: Mao-berry, PRC
|
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mikeylikesit114 wrote: |
....they are currently applying for my visa in another city, with the intention of bringing me back to Qingdao..... |
you have a plan B?
if QD is getting stricterer with their interpretation of the 5-year guideline,
then i'd assume they will also become more stricterer with teachers
working illegalful on RP's (they be renewing your residence permit, right?)
from other cities/provinces.
be prepared for when the police come to your school to check your papers.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chinatimes
Joined: 27 May 2012 Posts: 478
|
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
they will also become more stricterer with teachers |
And then we will be more "worrier" than before.
I wonder what they do with someone who has been in Beijing or Shanghai for 6 years and then wants to go to Qingdao. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fanyi
Joined: 01 Nov 2011 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:26 pm Post subject: Second |
|
|
I second the above poster in that I would be very hesitant about working in a city with a residence permit booked in another. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bharrell
Joined: 25 Oct 2008 Posts: 102
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe this rule is a good idea. I've been here almost exactly 5 years and am leaving next week. Not legally forced out, but it's time to go. I just loved it here for the first 3 years; now I nod in agreement when I hear other pacific rim country citizens talk bad about the Chinese. Familiarity has bred contempt. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wonderingjoesmith
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 910 Location: Guangzhou
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The rule, which clearly goes against the experienced, seems to favor novice. A prentice over a venerable is a shrewd practice and thought-provoking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lack
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is this really an issue? People actually want to stay here more than 5 years?
5 months and I was ready to leave...
Anyway, I have heard of the 5 year rule, but since it is China, it will likely just be enforced selectively. Just like everything else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mike w
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 1071 Location: Beijing building site
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know ayone who has been hit by this 'rule'. I think it is more a tool to be used to get rid of unwanted teachers, or for schools to use to ensure a turnover of fresh faces.
If it were ever to become an evenly applied rule (I think unlikely ot ever happen), I, along with many others could have a serious problem. It means I've already 'overstayed' three times over  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NoBillyNO

Joined: 11 Jun 2012 Posts: 1762
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Is this really an issue? People actually want to stay here more than 5 years? Shocked
5 months and I was ready to leave... |
I just returned and couldn't wait to get back.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mambawamba
Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK this may well be another Qingdao by the book thing.
Asked around and several of the big International schools have also been forced to comply over the last few years. However this has happened once and not again. May be a quota somewhere that needs to be filled, not all schools at all times, but some schools at some times.
Other big companies have also been hit. Not just an education rule. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2014 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
NoBillyNO wrote: |
Quote: |
Is this really an issue? People actually want to stay here more than 5 years? Shocked
5 months and I was ready to leave... |
I just returned and couldn't wait to get back.... |
Seconded. I spent two weeks in Cambodia, which was nice, but I am more of a Northeast Asia kinda guy, and I was eager to get back after the two weeks.
China can be good.
Rumor has it that Sichuan may be one of the provinces that more heavily enforces the five-year rule (I personally like the five-second rule) but I am planning on making a move out of Sichuan after this summer, so that may be a moot point for the fat_one.
I think mike w has something there with the idea that this rule may be unevenly enforced to make excuses to push people out.
Warm regards,
fat_chris |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
amlee1
Joined: 26 Feb 2010 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can anyone tell me whether the five year rule mentioned here is the same as the five year tax rule? (http://maxxelli-blog.com/2013/11/the-5-year-rule/)
I've been hearing some rumors this year in my city (Tianjin) about a five year rule being implemented for foreign workers. My uni told a co-worker who is in his 5th year now and is planning to leave anyway that it's a good thing he's leaving because they wouldn't have been able to renew his visa since they are now required to implement this 5-year thing.
I've been working for them for 3 years now and am wondering what is "supposed" to be done after 5 years. I know, I know, it's China and you can get around stuff, but I'd just like to know what the official policy says. I haven't been able to find anything online about it, other than tax-related things.
Is it simply that expats need to leave for 30 days each year, in accordance with the 5 year tax rule, as the blog I referenced above says?
If this is a different 5 year rule that Qingdao and Tianjin seem to be newly implementing, can foreigners in cities following this 5 year rule just change employers at least every 5 years, but remain in the city without repatriating?
Any China law blogs or other links you can point me to that discuss this issue? I'd like to know more details about it now so I can figure out what to do if I do reach my 5 year limit Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|