Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why is: Perhaps we can get started. in the present tense?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JN



Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 214

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:55 am    Post subject: Why is: Perhaps we can get started. in the present tense? Reply with quote

The title says it all. This is what a student asked me. She knows "started" to be past tense. I have searched and just couldn't find anything that satisfied me. Perhaps she will be satisfied to know that "get started" just means begin.

I was reading that "started" is the past participle of the intransitive verb "start," but my student wouldn't understand that anyway. Someone also wrote it was a phrasal verb. These things would be of interest to me, but is there a simple way I could explain it to my student if she is not satisfied with me telling her it means begin? She already understands what the sentence means.

Maybe I could just tell her "because I said so." Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Only the first verb in a verb phrase or row of verbs can be tensed (or rather, finite). It's just the knock-on effect of form dictating what follows.

So you could compare the original example with Let's start/begin (in which there is no 'get' taking the first spot), and point out the adjectival nature of the 'started' in the original (cf. Let's get silly, naked, drunk; Let's be serious for a second; etc).

Technically it looks similar to the "get-passive" (but that's a problematic term, as often there is little that passive about get-passives compared to the be-passive). But this might help the student understand things in purely structural terms, by possible structural analogy with the be-passive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear fluffyhamster,

What say you?

"Get Passive Look-Alikes
"As with be passives, sentences that look like get passives may actually be active sentences. In the main type of look-alike, get means 'become' and is followed by a participial adjective.

"Sentence (46) looks like a short get passive, but it is in fact an active sentence in which the past participle form complicated is an adjective.

(46) His explanation is getting complicated.

Here the verb get expresses the idea of becoming or of coming into a state or condition. Sentence (46) may, for instance, be paraphrased as in (47).

(47) His explanation is becoming complicated.

However, get passives can also express events that have no adverse implication, as in (41a), (41b), and (41c), as well as actions that benefit the subject, as in (41d).

(41a) Fred got examined by a specialist.
(41b) The mail gets delivered every day.
(41c) My letter to the editor got published in the Sunday Times.
(41d) Janice got promoted last week.

Get passives cannot occur with verbs that describe cognition (e.g. comprehend, know, understand, etc.)"
(Ron Cowan, The Teacher's Grammar of English: A Course Book and Reference Guide. Cambridge University Press, 2008)"

This seems to say (to me, anyway) that "get started" is a "get passive."

The "look-alikes" are descriptive - adjectival; the "get passive" speaks of an action.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JN



Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 214

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still remain rather confused myself, but I'll use the comparison with "be serious," etc. and see if that helps her. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sashadroogie



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 11061
Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just tell the student 'started' is like an adjective, and move on.

No phrasal verbs in sight...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Sasha,

How is "started" like an adjective? Is it describing "us?" Or is it conveying the idea of an action?

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sashadroogie



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 11061
Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Johnslat

Coz ir functions like an adjective here. As in 'let's get physical/ready/bolshie/ ahead of the pack/ thee behind me devil/ hammered/ plastered/ sloshed/ suited and booted....

The list goes ever on.... hic!


With Communist greetings

Sasha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Sasha,

So, "started" is adjectival, describing "us," then? Or would it be adverbial, modifying "get?"

Sorry, but I still see it as conveying an action, not a description, as all the examples in your list do.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sashadroogie



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 11061
Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Johnslat

If you want to get bogged down in that with low level students, go for it. Easy just to tell 'em it is like and adjective.


With Communist greetings

Sasha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, wouldn't "start" be called ambitransitive rather than intransitive? Come to think on it, could the past participle of a strictly intransitive verb ever be used with "get?" With the "passiveness" that's implied, I think not.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I go away for a few hours to cook a tikka, and come back to find enough to stop me ol' ticker! (BTW I'll try to get around to thinking of something to add to the 'He is one of the students, who was/were praised'-related thread, but I think you guys pretty much covered everything).

Oops I changed the Perhaps we can get started to Let's..., but all my above points still follow(ed).

@Johnslat re. Cowan's grammar: I think applying the label passive to any 'get' is a bit of a non-starter, unless they are clearly "adversative" and/or unremarkably replaceable by 'be' (but I'm sure there'd still be a few "overlaps" going either way). Cf: ??Let's be started. I'd thus be more inclined to call this particular instance simply a linking rather than auxiliary verb, and the OALD(6) and COBUILD seem to agree with me (you'll probably need the paper versions to see the grammar codes). Cowan seems to be saying the same thing too (his get-passive look-alikes aren't actually get-passives, the key phrase being 'into a state or condition'). So I'm not sure where you're getting your 'This seems to say (to me, anyway) that "get started" is a "get passive"' (I think you've read things wrong or are trying to draw your own, different conclusions). And you did follow that with 'The "look-alikes" are descriptive - adjectival; the "get passive" speaks of an action'. Sooo, just to be clear, I only mentioned "get(~be) passives" for surface-structural rather than deeper semantic reasons, and I doubt actually that they will help JN's student LOL.


Quote:
Dear Sasha,

How is "started" like an adjective? Is it describing "us?" Or is it conveying the idea of an action?

It's saying "Let's get into the state of having started" LOL. More "action-packed" would be 'Let's start' (or 'Let's begin').

It might be worth reading guys like Willis, and Carter & McCarthy, for their thoughts on passives and passive-like items. I'll try to dig their stuff out, and might post some of it if there are any particularly good turns of phrase.

Ultimately I'm not sure about Cowan's book after reading the following review:
http://www.amazon.com/review/R26KUI7LKO0052/
(Mind you, I've always seen participles as a bit gerundy myself - e.g. I am literally that thing called typing right now, so why not She caught the whole following event~factoid of: "him breaking into her car" (this last might beat the dreaded Z element of Systemic-Functional Grammar, anyway!)).

Then, there are several critical posts on the 'English, Jack' blog ( http://english-jack.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=cowan ), but it's been a while since I read those.

I'll need to have a think about your last couple of posts, John. TTFN, GTG Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gerund or Participle ? Who cares ? Gall it the -ing form and there is no problem !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear scot47

It don't mean a thing if you ain't got that -ing.

However, since we're discussing the past participle form (-ed), the suggestion regarding the present participle form (-ing) does seem somewhat irrelevant. Cool

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you so smart how come you aint rich ?

Actually old bean I was referring to the reviews of that book on Amazon where some schoolmarm was getting her knickers twisted about the distinction between gerund and present participle.

Excuse me - I have to go and poach some of the Laird's deer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sashadroogie



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 11061
Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise

PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twisted knickers? Uraaaaaa! Happy May Day to you al!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China