| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bud Powell
Joined: 11 Jul 2013 Posts: 1736
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
True but for someone sitting at home thinking of making the leap it might be enough for them to send it to recruiter and if the recruiter isnt legit could be end of conversation and lucky escape for newbie |
Any recruiter (legitimate or not) and any FAO who received that letter or any permutation would relegate the applicant's resume to the circular file.
Would you send a similar letter to a prospective employer in your home country? How do you think it would be received? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander.Mark
Joined: 29 Jun 2013 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bud Powell wrote: |
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
True but for someone sitting at home thinking of making the leap it might be enough for them to send it to recruiter and if the recruiter isnt legit could be end of conversation and lucky escape for newbie |
Any recruiter (legitimate or not) and any FAO who received that letter or any permutation would relegate the applicant's resume to the circular file.
Would you send a similar letter to a prospective employer in your home country? How do you think it would be received? |
Well if thats the case so be it, the search goes on
We are talking about recruiters here not a direct employer. If I was to use a recruiter I probably wouldnt ask for such information because I have confidence that the system is transparent in my country. However in a country where there are many illegal operations and many pit falls I would use every tool at my disposal to try to best protect my interests |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alien abductee
Joined: 08 Jun 2014 Posts: 527 Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
As far as tools go this form is about as useful as a ball peen hammer when you need to tighten a screw.
There are better ways to figure things out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander.Mark
Joined: 29 Jun 2013 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alien abductee wrote: |
As far as tools go this form is about as useful as a ball peen hammer when you need to tighten a screw.
There are better ways to figure things out. |
Yep... I dont recall saying there were no better ways to figure it out
All I am doing is making a suggestion some may find useful (I would of felt more confident with some sort of recruiter verification) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buravirgil
Joined: 23 Jan 2014 Posts: 967 Location: Jiangxi Province, China
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
| (I would of felt more confident with some sort of recruiter verification) |
would of in place of would have is practically a demographic marker and some argue an issue of learning style. Did you graduate highschool after 2000? I ask because I maintain a pet theory that every educational reform implemented by curriculum designers makes gains, but losses as well. Even a focus can produce regressions. Past modals receive so much attention, and yet your error is common. Every generation of learners has these. This one attracts a lot of attention; Check out this search. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
likwid_777

Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 411 Location: NA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, the problem is that most people pronounce "would have" in a lazy manner, which sounds exactly like "would of". Indeed it is extremely common, and from what I have seen on social media, "would of" is probably more common than the correct way of penning it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AndrewRgr806
Joined: 05 Jun 2014 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| buravirgil wrote: |
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
| (I would of felt more confident with some sort of recruiter verification) |
would of in place of would have is practically a demographic marker and some argue an issue of learning style. Did you graduate highschool after 2000? I ask because I maintain a pet theory that every educational reform implemented by curriculum designers makes gains, but losses as well. Even a focus can produce regressions. Past modals receive so much attention, and yet your error is common. Every generation of learners has these. This one attracts a lot of attention; Check out this search. |
You have a pet theory? Most people are happy with a cat, dog, or perhaps a goldfish. Do you need a licence for that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buravirgil
Joined: 23 Jan 2014 Posts: 967 Location: Jiangxi Province, China
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AndrewRgr806 wrote: |
| You have a pet theory? |
Okay...a protracted set of qualms.
Cha cha cha |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Buckeye Bob
Joined: 11 Aug 2014 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bud Powell wrote: |
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
True but for someone sitting at home thinking of making the leap it might be enough for them to send it to recruiter and if the recruiter isnt legit could be end of conversation and lucky escape for newbie |
Any recruiter (legitimate or not) and any FAO who received that letter or any permutation would relegate the applicant's resume to the circular file.
Would you send a similar letter to a prospective employer in your home country? How do you think it would be received? |
Hmmm... after perusing this letter I think it is damn good idea that needs to be toned down a bit. Most recruiters must know by now that they are not trusted, so the chance to prove their legitimacy would be welcomed by those that are licensed and operating in an ethical fashion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The_Kong
Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 349
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Buckeye Bob wrote: |
| Bud Powell wrote: |
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
True but for someone sitting at home thinking of making the leap it might be enough for them to send it to recruiter and if the recruiter isnt legit could be end of conversation and lucky escape for newbie |
Any recruiter (legitimate or not) and any FAO who received that letter or any permutation would relegate the applicant's resume to the circular file.
Would you send a similar letter to a prospective employer in your home country? How do you think it would be received? |
Hmmm... after perusing this letter I think it is damn good idea that needs to be toned down a bit. Most recruiters must know by now that they are not trusted, so the chance to prove their legitimacy would be welcomed by those that are licensed and operating in an ethical fashion. |
You are so far from reality Juice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Buckeye Bob
Joined: 11 Aug 2014 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Kong wrote: |
| Buckeye Bob wrote: |
| Bud Powell wrote: |
| Highlander.Mark wrote: |
True but for someone sitting at home thinking of making the leap it might be enough for them to send it to recruiter and if the recruiter isnt legit could be end of conversation and lucky escape for newbie |
Any recruiter (legitimate or not) and any FAO who received that letter or any permutation would relegate the applicant's resume to the circular file.
Would you send a similar letter to a prospective employer in your home country? How do you think it would be received? |
Hmmm... after perusing this letter I think it is damn good idea that needs to be toned down a bit. Most recruiters must know by now that they are not trusted, so the chance to prove their legitimacy would be welcomed by those that are licensed and operating in an ethical fashion. |
You are so far from reality Juice. |
Okay Kong, if YOU had to use a recruiter or agent, what is the quicker more effective way YOU would check their legitimacy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Powell
Joined: 11 Jul 2013 Posts: 1736
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Buckeye Bob wrote: |
Okay Kong, if YOU had to use a recruiter or agent, what is the quicker more effective way YOU would check their legitimacy? |
I'm not Kong, but I did stay in a LaQuinta a few months ago.
If one does his homework, reads the various agents' websites, reads several forums, reads the CHINESE CONSULATE PAGE ABOUT VISAS, and subscribes to recruiting services, he gets a pretty good idea of how some of these operations work.
There's no formula for intuition and no substitute for doing one's homework.
Some people won't take a bus to the next city in their home countries to investigate a job until they call and get answers to their questions (if they ask or go at all), yet they'll sign a contract to work a job in a foreign country whose culture is VERY foreign from their own, ask few questions regarding the legality of their work status, then complain when they get burned when they get there.
Ain't that sumpin' ?
This thread needs to be flushed too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The_Kong
Joined: 15 Apr 2014 Posts: 349
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bud Powell wrote: |
| Buckeye Bob wrote: |
Okay Kong, if YOU had to use a recruiter or agent, what is the quicker more effective way YOU would check their legitimacy? |
I'm not Kong, but I did stay in a LaQuinta a few months ago.
If one does his homework, reads the various agents' websites, reads several forums, reads the CHINESE CONSULATE PAGE ABOUT VISAS, and subscribes to recruiting services, he gets a pretty good idea of how some of these operations work.
There's no formula for intuition and no substitute for doing one's homework.
Some people won't take a bus to the next city in their home countries to investigate a job until they call and get answers to their questions (if they ask or go at all), yet they'll sign a contract to work a job in a foreign country whose culture is VERY foreign from their own, ask few questions regarding the legality of their work status, then complain when they get burned when they get there.
Ain't that sumpin' ?
This thread needs to be flushed too. |
Yup, that's what I'd do if I were to use a recruiter. I would heavily advise against someone using a recruiter if they can avoid it.
Contacting schools directly would be my first choice, although I did use a great recruiting agency my first year. Footprints recruiting from Canada. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Buckeye Bob
Joined: 11 Aug 2014 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Kong wrote: |
| Bud Powell wrote: |
| Buckeye Bob wrote: |
Okay Kong, if YOU had to use a recruiter or agent, what is the quicker more effective way YOU would check their legitimacy? |
I'm not Kong, but I did stay in a LaQuinta a few months ago.
If one does his homework, reads the various agents' websites, reads several forums, reads the CHINESE CONSULATE PAGE ABOUT VISAS, and subscribes to recruiting services, he gets a pretty good idea of how some of these operations work.
There's no formula for intuition and no substitute for doing one's homework.
Some people won't take a bus to the next city in their home countries to investigate a job until they call and get answers to their questions (if they ask or go at all), yet they'll sign a contract to work a job in a foreign country whose culture is VERY foreign from their own, ask few questions regarding the legality of their work status, then complain when they get burned when they get there.
Ain't that sumpin' ?
This thread needs to be flushed too. |
Yup, that's what I'd do if I were to use a recruiter. I would heavily advise against someone using a recruiter if they can avoid it.
Contacting schools directly would be my first choice, although I did use a great recruiting agency my first year. Footprints recruiting from Canada. |
Hot damn! We finally agree on something here. Recruiters are not needed at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Powell
Joined: 11 Jul 2013 Posts: 1736
|
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Buckeye Bob wrote: |
Hot damn! We finally agree on something here. Recruiters are not needed at all. |
Bucky,
Schools lie too.
Been there. Done that.
Recruiters have their place and use.
One can get into big trouble if the school lies and says that you don't need a Z visa or that it'll supply one upon your arrival.
'Nuff said.
This is a very worn-out subject that should be flushed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|