|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 5:43 pm Post subject: Re: salary |
|
|
| Captain Willard wrote: |
| Please forgive me if I decline to invest in your hedge fund, Babe. |
"Babe," eh?
Sexist nonsense aside, perhaps those who choose to work for American companies do so because it looks better on their CV than having a Saudi employer listed. Either way---their choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 5:53 pm Post subject: Re: salary |
|
|
That is a false dilemma, my dear. The company doesn't need to be Saudi, just not American. That leaves many other choices for a foreign subsidiary among the nations of the world.
| nomad soul wrote: |
| [P]erhaps those who choose to work for American companies do so because it looks better on their CV than having a Saudi employer listed. Either way---their choice. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moomama
Joined: 30 May 2013 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 5:56 pm Post subject: B3H Details: The Advert Decoded |
|
|
Provided at no cost to you:
• Secure work environment at King Abdul Aziz AB, Dhahran:
This is pretty true for Saudi standards.
• Single fully furnished living quarters in an exceptionally secure, gated, guarded compound:
This is a bit skewed. This is not exceptionally secure. Then again, most Saudi compounds guarded by Saudis are rarely secure. There are manned gates and some armed guards but they are usually playing with their phones. I never felt unsafe while at the compound but I definitely was not betting on the guards or security to protect me from any attack. One recent and very serious development has been the number of teachers developing respiratory illnesses because of the mold in the building. The prevalent mold problem is undeniable. The fourth and fifth floors are not used because of mold problems. The ceilings on the 2nd floor where most of the B3H staff reside have mold stains/water stains on the ceilings. The basement’s/carpark‘s ceiling is ridiculously water damaged. Management is in denial. There is no other option for housing. If you have a sensitive respiratory system, this place is not for you.
- High speed internet service, utilities, access to gym and pool included:
The internet is pretty good but during “busy” times, it can slow down a bit. Be prepared to have colleagues who want to Skype with family members the same time you might. I never had a problem with the electricity or water. The outdoor pool is good during the warmer months. The gyms available are also pretty good. There is an indoor – bowling alley, pool, tennis court, and skating rink available. These facilities are quite nice.
- Fleet of vehicles for local transportation to include travel to the base:
This is misleading. You get assigned to a car and share it with 3 other people.
• Pre-paid airfare to and from Saudi Arabia:
As long as you finish your contract / 1 year, B3H will not charge you but every person that has left early has seen a rather large deduction from their last paychecks. B3H (and the president) is a greedy spiteful breed.
• Annual round-trip airfare to home of record:
Yup. If you work for at least six months, you get a flight home or the equivalent of it.
• Comprehensive life, health and dental insurance
Yup. Good insurance.
• In-country Defense Language Institute (DLI) training and certification:
This is tripe. They will have you sign some document that you received training. Once you receive your base pass, you will be put into the classroom.
• 25 days of paid vacation plus Saudi national holidays:
This is misleading. You do not get to choose your days off. Additionally, look up Saudi National Holidays, there aren’t many. Basically, you get 200 hours and if you finish your contract and not piss B3H off at all you will get more because of inadvertent sick days and the fact that there are more days off in a year than 200 hours covers.
B3H also offers:
• A total compensation package in excess of $90,000 USD/year (majority tax free if remaining out of the country for 330 days) consisting of the following:
$90k package? Pleeeeaaasssseee!!! Ask B3H how the breakdown works and that should be a fair assessment about the work you do and how they feel about you. The base salary is $42k.
• One year renewable contract:
B3H does not have the teaching contract at TSI guaranteed for another year. They have the contract until the end of January 2016 with the possibility of a 6 month extension.
• Overseas pay differential:
Yup. 10% of the base which is $4200 annually.
• Annual service bonus:
Yup. 8% of the base which is $3360 on your 12th paycheck. Make sure you claim exempt on that paycheck.
• Annual Cost of Living raises:
Yup. A pitiful 2% increase (not the base salary)
• Cell phone allowance and SIM card:
Yup. $50/month
• 401K with company matching contributions:
Yup. Up to 5%. First 2.5% is fully matched and the next 2.5%, B3H puts in half.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2015 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: B3H Details: The Advert Decoded |
|
|
Thank you moomama for all of the details and cutting through the B.S.
The problem with the 401(k) is that it is the tax is deferred until age 59, but if one qualifies for the foreign income exclusion this money isn't taxable at all. So there is a trade-off here for a small employer contribution. It is probably still worth taking, but why not get an offer where this money comes in pocket, then put it in a Roth IRA, where the principal can always be withdrawn without penalty? [Edit to note that with the Roth IRA the earnings would accrue tax free, while with the 401(k) the earnings are taxable when withdrawn.]
| moomama wrote: |
• 401K with company matching contributions:
Yup. Up to 5%. First 2.5% is fully matched and the next 2.5%, B3H puts in half.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:36 am Post subject: Re: salary |
|
|
| Captain Willard wrote: |
Savvy in what way?
1. Money deducted for FICA is money which shouldn't be deducted if one can claim the foreign income tax exclusion. Far better to have that money in pocket than to need to ask Uncle Sam nicely to refund it. If the government claims someone owes them money, this money won't be refunded. So, why not earn interest on the money during the year, instead of letting the government hold the money for free?
2. Money deducted for Medicare is not recoverable at all. 1.45% of income has been lost to taxation here.
3. Money deducted for Social Security is 12.4%. (6.2% taxes to the employee and 6.2% taxed to the employer) As they say here collecting SS is all Insha'Allah. First, one needs to live long enough to collect the money to enjoy it, (and the government keeps raising the retirement age). Secondly, the government has to remain solvent enough to pay it at present rates. Third, the government does tax half of SSI for those in the upper brackets, and that tax may increase by retirement.
So total savings without withholding by Uncle Sam in 13.85% + lack of FICA withholding which must be requested for refund. Another person might prefer to put that money in a tax shelter like a Roth IRA, or pay off debt which is accruing interest, and thus losing money. Please forgive me if I decline to invest in your hedge fund, Babe.
C.W. |
Well... studmuffin... I see that it is a waste of my time to attempt to enlighten you. But at the least... from my good laugh at the fact that you think that "FICA" has anything to do with the foreign income exclusion let me help you here with the government definition:
| Quote: |
| Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax /ˈfaɪkə/ is a United States federal payroll (or employment) tax imposed on both employees and employers to fund Social Security and Medicare |
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hash
Joined: 17 Dec 2014 Posts: 456 Location: Wadi Jinn
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:42 am Post subject: Re: B3H Details: The Advert Decoded |
|
|
| Captain Willard wrote: |
| The problem with the 401(k) is that it is the tax is deferred until age 59, but if one qualifies for the foreign income exclusion this money isn't taxable at all. So there is a trade-off here for a small employer contribution. It is probably still worth taking, but why not get an offer where this money comes in pocket, then put it in a Roth IRA, where the principal can always be withdrawn without penalty? [Edit to note that with the Roth IRA the earnings would accrue tax free, while with the 401(k) the earnings are taxable when withdrawn.] |
If I'm reading the above quote correctly, the highlighted section is completely inaccurate and misleading. (I don't understand the non-highlighted portion of the quote. I also don't understand what the phrase "...comes in pocket...") means.
---------------------------
You cannot open an IRA (traditional or Roth) or contribute to an already established IRA based on your earned (overseas) income if this income is excluded from US income taxes. The only way to establish an IRA if you're working overseas is:
1. You decide to "revoke" your foreign earned income exclusion (and thereby pay income tax on all your overseas earnings). Why one would want to do this, I don't know, but here is the source:
http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Revocation-of-the-Foreign-Earned-Income-Exclusion
2. Your income is higher than the taxable exclusion (somewhere around $98,000 for 2014). In other words, if you earn $103,000, you exclude $98,000 leaving you with $5000 TAXABLE and you can then use that $5000 as the basis for opening an IRA.
This is not a "new" rule - it's been around for decades. Read it right from the horse's mouth (IRS Publication 17).
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch17.html
Scroll down to where you see the TIP square on the left and then a little more down to where there's a sub-category entitled: What is not compensation.
Since overseas earned income which has been excluded from US income taxes is NOT considered "compensation" for IRA purposes, that portion of your income that was excluded cannot be used as the basis for opening or contributing to an IRA.
Caveat: Of course, the reader is strongly urged to seek professional advice on tax matters for his own specific case and not rely on non-professional comments he may encounter on the internet or any other place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:13 pm Post subject: Re: salary |
|
|
This proves my point about the tax liability trade-off for the 401(k) likely out weighs the benefit of the employer contribution.
| hash wrote: |
You cannot open an IRA (traditional or Roth) or contribute to an already established IRA based on your earned (overseas) income if this income is excluded from US income taxes. The only way to establish an IRA if you're working overseas is:
1. You decide to "revoke" your foreign earned income exclusion (and thereby pay income tax on all your overseas earnings). Why one would want to do this, I don't know, but here is the source:
http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Revocation-of-the-Foreign-Earned-Income-Exclusion
2. Your income is higher than the taxable exclusion (somewhere around $98,000 for 2014). In other words, if you earn $103,000, you exclude $98,000 leaving you with $5000 TAXABLE and you can then use that $5000 as the basis for opening an IRA. |
It is probably better to read IRS publication 590, since that deals explicitly with IRA's. The definition for compensation is quite broad, and includes self-employment income, but as you rightly note, foreign income excluded does not qualify for IRA contributions. So, be sure to declare income from visits to the U.S. and use that income for Roth IRA contributions. Since the maximum Roth IRA contribution ($5500 or $6500 depending on age) is below the level where it might be taxed, ($10,150 from the 2014 1040 EZ), it shouldn't be a problem. (For those who don't understand this point, I shan't explain it.) Otherwise, as I read it, there could be a penalty of 6% for over funding it. That penalty would still likely be cheaper than paying tax on all foreign income which is lawfully excluded from taxation. Also, remember that IRA contributions are legally protected from creditors, so there could be an added benefit for having one, even if a funding penalty applies.
I certainly wasn't trying to mislead anyone. Thank you raising the point and engaging in intelligent discussion.
Yes, dear reader, please seek professional guidance on any and all legal or financial matters at issue.
| hash wrote: |
This is not a "new" rule - it's been around for decades. Read it right from the horse's mouth (IRS Publication 17).
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p17/ch17.html
Scroll down to where you see the TIP square on the left and then a little more down to where there's a sub-category entitled: What is not compensation.
Since overseas earned income which has been excluded from US income taxes is NOT considered "compensation" for IRA purposes, that portion of your income that was excluded cannot be used as the basis for opening or contributing to an IRA.
Caveat: Of course, the reader is strongly urged to seek professional advice on tax matters for his own specific case and not rely on non-professional comments he may encounter on the internet or any other place. |
For me as an expat, one of the great benefits of working in the Gulf is legally not paying taxes, especially to fund things with which I do not agree. Ah, yes, since I don't see these deductions on my paycheck, I confused federal income tax withholding with the FICA deductions which were accurately stated in terms of the percentages for taxation. [I have since edited the post.] None of that detracts from the math related to how much Uncle Sam will keep if employed with the company. Such pedantry may have availed you as an English teacher, and might be of benefit for a secretary, but it does nothing to advance the debate on this employer. Personally, I laugh all of the way to the bank when I work in the Gulf. Again, I will not be investing in your hedge fund.
As Sonny and Cher used to sing it, “I got you, Babe”.
C. W.
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
Well... studmuffin... I see that it is a waste of my time to attempt to enlighten you. But at the least... from my good laugh at the fact that you think that "FICA" has anything to do with the foreign income exclusion let me help you here with the government definition:
| Quote: |
| Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax /ˈfaɪkə/ is a United States federal payroll (or employment) tax imposed on both employees and employers to fund Social Security and Medicare |
VS |
Last edited by Captain Willard on Mon Feb 09, 2015 7:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Captain Willard,
"I confused federal income tax withholding with the FICA deductions . . ."
That's rather a glaring, basic error, which, to my mind at least, somewhat tarnishes your claims of being well-studied in this area.
But let every poster decide for him/herself.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johnny, me old son,
If not working for an American company, there is no difference as NOTHING is deducted for Uncle Sam, which was my main point.
Taking a quote out of context is always great fun, eh?
As you are not here in the Gulf at present, and presumably retired, every poster can decide about the merit of your contribution as well.
C. W.
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear Captain Willard,
"I confused federal income tax withholding with the FICA deductions . . ."
That's rather a glaring, basic error, which, to my mind at least, somewhat tarnishes your claims of being well-studied in this area.
But let every poster decide for him/herself.
Regards,
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Captain Willard,
"As you are not here in the Gulf at present, and presumably retired, every poster can decide about the merit of your contribution as well. "
Retired? Not at all. I'm currently the coordinator of the ESL Program at Santa Fe Community College.
I don't see, however, how my being or not being in Saudi Arabia is relevant to your not knowing what FICA meant, but I'm quite willing to let other posters decide.
Regards,
John - not your son, by the way, but admittedly old. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johnny, me old son,
If not working for an American company, there is no difference as NOTHING is deducted for Uncle Sam, which was my main point.
Taking a quote out of context is always great fun, eh?
As you are not here in the Gulf at present, and presumably retired, every poster can decide about the merit of your contribution as well.
C. W.
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear Captain Willard,
"I confused federal income tax withholding with the FICA deductions . . ."
That's rather a glaring, basic error, which, to my mind at least, somewhat tarnishes your claims of being well-studied in this area.
But let every poster decide for him/herself.
Regards,
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Captain Willard,
"As you are not here in the Gulf at present, and presumably retired, every poster can decide about the merit of your contribution as well. "
Retired? Not at all. I'm currently the coordinator of the ESL Program at Santa Fe Community College.
I don't see, however, how my being or not being in Saudi Arabia is relevant to your not knowing what FICA meant, but I'm quite willing to let other posters decide. Smile
Regards,
John - not your son, by the way, but admittedly old. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Johnny, me old son,
So when you were in the Gulf, did you work for an American company and pay taxes (general withholding or FICA) to Uncle Sam?
Riddle me this, if you are admittedly old, (a Vietnam veteran), but still working, why should anyone follow your advise on investing for retirement?
Maybe financial planning is actually about crunching the numbers, and not lexis?
C. W.
ROTFLMAO!
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear Captain Willard,
"As you are not here in the Gulf at present, and presumably retired, every poster can decide about the merit of your contribution as well. "
Retired? Not at all. I'm currently the coordinator of the ESL Program at Santa Fe Community College.
I don't see, however, how my being or not being in Saudi Arabia is relevant to your not knowing what FICA meant, but I'm quite willing to let other posters decide. Smile
Regards,
John - not your son, by the way, but admittedly old. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Captain Willard,
But I am not advising about investing for retirement; I cautioned that taking advice about such matters from someone who didn't even know what FICA is seemed a bit risky to me.
No, I didn't work for an American company in Saudi, but I have paid taxes in the US.
As for my still working, it isn't at all out of necessity; it's because I very much enjoy what I do.
When that's the case, why would anyone want to stop doing that?
Maybe financial planning involves knowing the basics about the IRS.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now Johnny, me old son,
I saw a video clip of Senator McCain talking about the crisis in Ukraine. He misspoke and said we should give weapons to Russia when he meant to say Ukriane. Now someone could use that quote to twist his clear meaning around from the rest of the interview, but that person would be considered something less than credible. I knew exactly what the FICA deductions were, and they were accurately stated by percentage. Are you questioning those numbers?
Still no contribution from you about the contract on offer from this company, just an admission that you never took a similar contract or worked for an American employer in the Gulf and paid these taxes yourself, whatever they are labeled. The fact that you are still paying taxes in the U.S. in your present job doesn't address this situation. I and another contributor have made it clear that readers should seek qualified professional advice on financial matters.
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear Captain Willard,
But I am not advising about investing for retirement; I cautioned that taking advice about such matters from someone who didn't even know what FICA is seemed a bit risky to me.
No, I didn't work for an American company in Saudi, but I have paid taxes in the US. |
John loves paying taxes.
| johnslat wrote: |
As for my still working, it isn't at all out of necessity; it's because I very much enjoy what I do.
When that's the case, why would anyone want to stop doing that? |
Maybe an English teacher should know that a question ends with a question mark?
| johnslat wrote: |
Maybe financial planning involves knowing the basics about the IRS.
Regards,
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|