|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Is an education degree necessary to teach ESL? |
| Absolutely. |
|
16% |
[ 7 ] |
| Depends on the job and/or one's other qualifications. |
|
57% |
[ 24 ] |
| No. |
|
26% |
[ 11 ] |
| Not sure. |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 42 |
|
| Author |
Message |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Teaching a foreign/second language is not like teaching a "real" subject like math, history, etc. It's not even like teaching the language to native speakers. I get the impression that most EFL/ESL teachers understand the distinction, whereas "normal" teachers do not. I do consider myself a real teacher, and I've got enough little bits of paper to back me up. Still, I know damn well that I would not be a very effective history/math/art/science teacher, because those areas are not my specialties. I also know that history/math/art/science teachers who teach in their home countries could not do my job.
Capergirl, having a degree, four years of experience, two certificates, and (most importantly?) a professional demeanor, which you've got, does make you a real teacher. I think the people who question you just don't understand that language teaching is a very specialized field.
And welcome back!
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2003
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Posts: 344 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you perform your duties successfully and earn money from doing so, you are a professional. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Atlas

Joined: 09 Jun 2003 Posts: 662 Location: By-the-Sea PRC
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Universities are exceptionally brilliant at making their product appear like the sum total of qualification one needs to obtain, and very adept at discrediting other non-systematic means. But one thing uni fails to impart is the personal factor in one's work, that may make the difference between good teachers and great teachers (or anything else).
The downside to this very appealing, simplistic, systematic, "official" reliance, is that it institutionalizes a person's thought and allows them to forget their own creativity and judgment in preference of the conventional wisdom. Teaching is more than imparting facts. It needs innovation, and the only innovators are those who are able to see beyond convention.
University likes to instill fear of action until you've had ten years of it paid education. That is utter marketing hypnosis.
That which you seek to become, you already are. Obviously Capergirl and others like her are not impostors. Maybe some of us have a lot to benefit from further education, but this in no way negates the professional competence and capacities of the person. In the end, no matter how one is labeled, one is capable of breaking all the rules and succeeding anyway.
That's something you don't learn in university. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waxwing
Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Posts: 719 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Atlas wrote: |
That which you seek to become, you already are. |
<bows>
sadhu sadhu sadhu! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chinagirl

Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 235 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 12:25 pm Post subject: goog thought |
|
|
I hadn't thought about the idea of people associating a teacher with only teaching kids, but that would explain people's attitudes. The point that you are teaching adults at a university makes you an instructor, or later on if you go for a PhD might make you a professor, and no one should have a problem with that description. It's really just semantics.
Capergirl, listen to what everyone is saying. You are indeed a teacher, and you don't need to prove it to anyone! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a lot I learned in my training which is also useful in EFL. Mostly it has to do with psychology and learning theory.
I agree with this statement. A good (or maybe even a great) teacher obviously must have some skill in the subject he or she is teaching. Whether you have a BeD or a TEFL certificate doesn't matter - - - when it comes to TEACHING THE SUBJECT. Probably people that are TEFL certified are better suited to be a FT than I.
Some things I may have that perhaps someone without an education degree does not:
1. Classroom management - - let's face it, some of my Chinese high schoolers behave much like elementary kids back home. How do I control these kids? Establishing rules, working the psychology, having proper reward/punishment systems, knowing that maybe all I have to do to calm a student is walk over and stand by his desk while conducting a lesson, or if I see a note passed - - to simply take the note while never pausing in whatever I was saying . . . . all these things and more are things that I learned in my education classes and practicuums. Naturally, some of these things can be picked up habitually by an educator (with or without the degree), but I've been able to use my knowledge from day one (or maybe day two) to achieve my goals of classroom management very quickly. Now, after saying all of that, it is still MUCH harder here due to the language barrier; and maybe I'm just blowing smoke!
2. Teaching theories - - not being foreign language certified (but I do have a degree in education along with several years of experience), I'm not sure if they teach you theories. Some of them are purely hogwash in my opinion, but some seem to have a bit of validity (the ones I remember at least). The "heirarchy of needs", for example, is one I carry with me. Are the basics taken care of? Are my kids fed, well-rested, comfortable? If so, they are likely to be more susceptible to learning. That's why I bought space heaters for my freezing classroom. A cold student is just cold and that's what he thinks about more than anything else (in my opinion). The space heaters don't provide a heck of a lot of heat, but at least there is the illusion that they do!
3. Organization - - One thing I try and do in my classroom is be organized. This is another important area that my teaching experience has taught me and also what I learned while obtaining my degree. This runs from the way a class is set up to preparing a spread sheet to record grades in my computer to having lessons prepared a week (or more) in advance. Also, do I have all the teaching materials I need and, if not, how can I get them? I'm not saying having an education degree makes one better organized in the classroom, but it can certainly help get there faster.
So, I would NEVER say I am more qualified to teach English as a foreign language. I've had my share of frustrations and disappointments while teaching in China. All I'm throwing out is that there are some areas surrounding the actual teaching part that may have been enhanced due to my experience and education. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A note to Veilledsentiments: I don't know which planet you're living on--but your blurb says USA, so I assume it's the same one I live on.
I entered university in 1962 with a math and physics scholarship, received my MA degree in 1968 and started teaching at a university that same year. I returned to graduate school in 1971 and received my last degree in 1972. At no point in my schooling did anyone mention that I should get a degree in Education because I was female.
Incidentally, law school is for AFTER you get an undergraduate degree--and I have several female friends my age or a little older who went to law school in the mid-sixties and have been practising law for many years.
Ludwig: I think I am a little sorry that you asked about TEFL certificate folks. I think maybe I should contextualize my response so that folks will understand where I am coming from, and not just think I am a snob:
I taught for 5 years at the university level in the US--only when I could afford to (most of the time I was working in business in order to have a decent income, as I was a single parent)--as well as directed the Adult and Continuing Education division of a university. When I came to Mexico more than 10 years ago, I figured I would have to return to teaching if I wanted to stay here. Which I did. I also directed a language school for several years--training approximately 25 Mexican teachers (I have talked about why I train Mexican teachers on other threads). Those teachers spent 2 months in unpaid training--and several of them were "real teachers"--that is to say they had studied in the normal schools and were teaching in either public or private schools.
The pre-service training that Harmon Hall gives is equivalent to that of a TEFL certificate course--or maybe a little more rigorous, as team teaching in regular classes in the school is required. At the moment of finishing training, one is ready to be given groups, but continues to receive training. Over the years, if one sticks with it, he/she may become a skilled teacher--or he/she may not become one--it isn't easy when one's field is limited--BUT teaching ESL or EFL is an opportunity to create a dialog and focus on content designed to open students to being conscious of the world they live in and their role in that world. If you take that opportunity you increase your chances of becoming a teacher.
The past few years I have been working in the university sector in Ecuador and Mexico, and I have had to hire ESL teachers. I have received hundreds of e-mails on the order of "I am just finishing my CELTA, and....", despite my specifying in the position announcement that we were looking for someone with a Master's degree and 5 years of teaching experience. When I receive e-mails like the one I quoted above, I hit DELETE. This is not to say that there are no "born" teachers out there, or that having a graduate degree and five years of experience guarantees good teaching.
One of the first workshops I usually give to experienced teachers begins with this question: "How do you know when you've given a complete class?" Teachers usually go into a state of shock when they hear that, and are unable to answer. That tells me they don't REALLY plan their classes, and that they don't have students apply what they've learned in EVERY class.
I suppose this is has been a very circumlocutive way of saying that having a TEFL certificate--from my perspective--is like having a ticket to get | | |