View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
struelle
Joined: 16 May 2003 Posts: 2372 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 1:42 pm Post subject: Re: The Sad Irony-English Speakers and Second Language Learn |
|
|
There is a very strong underlying point to Nomadders post: Native English speakers are a unique bunch, in that it's possible for us to get away with traveling the globe and being monolingual. Of course, other monolingual speakers exist, but they have an 'excuse' for not coming into contact with other cultures and tongues. Especially for North Americans, we come into contact with diversity every single day, but it's extremely unfortunate that we can get away with only English.
For those whose first tongue isn't English and contact other cultures, i.e. in business, the majority can speak another tongue, English being the most common. Hence the reason for us to get away with only one tongue if we choose!!
I didn't realize this concept until making attempts to learn Chinese overseas, which by now, is far from being fluent (I'd say funtional). But there was no pressing need to learn it, I mostly did so out of interest and a desire to escape from the 'one tongue only' prison.
At least attempting a second language is good in that helps out with teaching a lot. We can then put ourselves in the students' shoes as they attempt to learn a second or third language.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomadder

Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 709 Location: Somewherebetweenhereandthere
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lots of interesting responses here.
Last edited by nomadder on Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just to add another twist to the thread, I think the low level of interest in learning other languages reflects the low level of interest in other people and cultures, and is an indication of why so many EFL teachers are not highly regarded in the countries that they "visit".
It's very egocentric to roam the globe in search of cheap beer and cheap thrills, and leads to being a parasite--one who takes advantage of the "created need" for English and who lives off the local economy without really giving anything back to the community.
I have one of those parasites sitting a few stations down from me in this Internet cafe.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mesmerod
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
is it common for people in the EFL business to not know their host country's language....or at least attempt to learn it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, quite a few anglophones speak - or know - a second or third lingo; one of my favourite writers was Anthony Burgess; this guy spiced up his novels by writing in a foreign-influenced English as the characters in his stories were apt to speak. He had no trouble making you believe you were hearing a German English speaker, or a Russian, Malaysian, Italian; Burgess mastered 6 languages. I once saw him on the French TV 5's programme "Litterature avec Bernard Pivot".
But the general mindset of anglophones is somewhat complacent. What might be annoying about this is that if a member of a different language community refused to make an effort at communicating with an English speaker they would be perceived as "arrogant" or "unfriendly". How many times have I read/herad how "arrogant" the French are... because their English is not up to an Englishman's expectations.
Then again, the English are a bit particular about their English and often take a highly pejorative view of non-British. Wasn't it them wh put this silly term of "native English speakers" in the world?
The French are far more accommodating; anyone who can communicate in French effectively can teach it; thus you will find far more people with a truly international background in French classrooms than in English ones.
This probably leads to some unwarranted English elitism. No French would say "how grateful I am to be born a French speaker... I can teach it in a hundred countries without having to study their language..."
And, if you see who enrols at an Alliance francaise centre, you will notice that people anywhere in the world want to learn French for different reasons than they would give you for studying English. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
denise wrote: |
I think nomadder's mention of a disadvantage refers to those of us who do as our L1--if the rest of the world is studying English, it's harder for us to practice our L2. No need to mock her for making a very valid point and a very valid post. |
The term 'disadvantage' is a relative one.
The only point of comparison here can be with those people who are not Native English Speakers (hereafter NES).
Do you seriously wish to argue that NES are at a disadvantage to non-NES because the latter wish to improve their English?
2 points:
1. If it were not so we would all be out of a job, back in our own countries and and unable to travel the world just by teaching our native language (a bit like the non-NES n'est-ce pas?
2. Whilst abroad we can often choose whether or not to converse in our Native language or the local language. Most non-NES can not. They must learn English if they wish to talk to people abroad.
Being a NES at this time is a tremendous privilege and places us at a huge advantage over the RoW. Imagine being a non-NES. How 'advantaged' would you then feel? Wise up!
Last edited by stillnosheep on Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Clearly, being able to travel the world and make a living only based on being a Native English Speaker is a very privileged position--it certainly beats selling shoes in a strip mall in one's home country in the style of who was that guy--Al Bundy! The problem is that the Bundys of this world are not very desirable as teachers, yet they think that in whatever corner of the world (mostly Third) they find themselves, the people who live there should be rolling out the red carpet for them.
Learn the language----naaw. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomadder

Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 709 Location: Somewherebetweenhereandthere
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by nomadder on Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote]No French would say "how grateful I am to be born a French speaker... I can teach it in a hundred countries without having to study their language..." [/quote]
The French have no desire to teach in a hundred countries. They are only interested in teaching in those where the cooking is up to par.
It is well known that the first and last question a Brit asks about a foreign country is "Is the beer cheap?", whilst for a Frenchman it is "C'est bien la bouffe?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nomadder,
Since the grammar of any language sets the infrastructure of the way its speakers see the world and react to it, mastering other languages goes way beyond broadening one's mind and opening up other cultures. It is tantamount to giving yourself more lives. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="stillnosheep"]
denise wrote: |
I think nomadder's mention of a
1. If it were not so we would all be out of a job, back in our own countries and and unable to travel the world just by teaching our native language (a bit like the non-NES n'est-ce pas?
2. Whilst abroad we can often choose whether or not to converse in our Native language or the local language. Most non-NES can not. They must learn English if they wish to talk to people abroad.
Being a NES at this time is a tremendous privilege and places us at a huge advantage over the RoW. Imagine being a non-NES. How 'advantaged' would you then feel? Wise up! |
To your point 1:
Are you insinuating that English teaching jobs have been invented for the purpose of hiring native English teachers on a jaunt across SE Asia?
That would be demeaning to you and your likes, wouldn't it?
If it were your opinion, then by all means, you should get back to your own country anious kind of work because local teachers might be better suited to do what they already are doing, plus the job you took away from one of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just to clarify--
Roger, although my name appeared in your post, the words quoted are not mine.
d |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The G-stringed Avenger
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 746 Location: Lost in rhyme infinity
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm fluent in Japanese - not perfect, but I can have a deep conversation and express myself, although my listening is rather weak. It is surprising to many people I meet that I, a native English speaker, can ACTUALLY SPEAK ANOTHER LANGUAGE!!!!!
In any case, I did find it a little difficult to practice at times as many Japanese people I met only wanted to speak English with me. A few were downright rude and would bark "Speak English!" like I was just some trained English animal set to respond to their demands. A few got pissed off and would abruptly terminate the conversation by walking away if I spoke Japanese. I even had a man tell me "I can't understand your Japanese - speak English." Too bad his non-English-speaking friends could understand me perfectly!
It's such an alien culture.... so hard to relate to people comfortably. I didn't like it, so I left. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nomadder wrote: |
And now we have an English Elitist in the mix. |
English Elitist! Are you really such a moron? (don't bother answering, the question's rhetorical, I've read a couple of your posts).
There's nothing elitist about reminding a couple of old whiners ("Oh, Oh, it's so terrible: I'm at a disadvantage because I speak English and some of the damn natives want to speak english with me instead of providing me with free Japanese lessons ") that they are in an advantaged position compared to those that don't have the same opportunities.
Moron.
Last edited by stillnosheep on Tue Sep 21, 2004 9:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Roger wrote: |
[Are you insinuating that English teaching jobs have been invented for the purpose of hiring native English teachers on a jaunt across SE Asia?
|
No, I am insinuating nothing of the kind. In response to Nomadder's view that "[w]ith English so widespread in the world it seems to me that we are at a disadvantage" I stated that we are at nothing of the sort. If we were native speakers of any other language our skills would be less sort after and we would have less opportunity to teach our native language abroad.
You are the only person to mention jaunts across SE Asia.
And how could jobs be invented for the purpose of hiring employees unless in some kind of global Keynesian sense?
And what does "you and your likes" mean?
You are not making much sense Roger. Time for beddybyes methinks.
Last edited by stillnosheep on Tue Sep 21, 2004 9:47 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|