Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

After The Election
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 13, 14, 15  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Captain Yossarian



Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 385
Location: Dongbei

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose those who were hoping for a different result can cling to the crumbs of comfort that at least the world witnessed a great democratic moment. For the US, turnout was very high and there was, thankfully, a clear result. With the Presidency, House and Senate all in Republican hands some kind of agenda will clearly dominate domestically and internationally.

Actually, that last point isn't comforting at all!

Does anyone think Hilary Clinton could be the next Democratic nominee?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mesmerod



Joined: 19 Jul 2004
Posts: 106

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

now if hilary were elected president i WILL move out of the country!! ahhhhhhhh what a scary thought! i think the GOP will be in power for a long long time especially after Rudy wins in 2008. i am hoping Bush replaces Colin Powell with Rudy as sec. of state.....that will be awesome for foreign relations. you people need to put away the hate and accept the fact that Bush is president and stop acting childish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
kev7161



Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 5880
Location: Suzhou, China

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you people need to put away the hate and accept the fact that Bush is president and stop acting childish.

Unlike the "president" who seems to enjoy giving some people the bird (see page one of this thread). That is so much more mature.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmb



Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 8397

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As it is after the election can we stop talking about?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris_Crossley



Joined: 26 Jun 2004
Posts: 1797
Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:43 pm    Post subject: About what? Reply with quote

dmb wrote:
As it is after the election can we stop talking about?


About what, exactly?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmb



Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 8397

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:29 pm    Post subject: Re: About what? Reply with quote

Chris_Crossley wrote:
dmb wrote:
As it is after the election can we stop talking about?


About what, exactly?!


Embarassed I was on a ten minute break and in a rush. I seem to have missed out the object before the question mark. The missing object is
the US election
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seth



Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Posts: 575
Location: in exile

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Captain Yossarian wrote:
I suppose those who were hoping for a different result can cling to the crumbs of comfort that at least the world witnessed a great democratic moment. For the US, turnout was very high and there was, thankfully, a clear result. With the Presidency, House and Senate all in Republican hands some kind of agenda will clearly dominate domestically and internationally.

Actually, that last point isn't comforting at all!

Does anyone think Hilary Clinton could be the next Democratic nominee?


don't forget about the supreme court, that will shift right, as well. i think we now have the most right wing government we've ever had, or at least in the top 3. hopefully 9/11 won't turn into america's reichstag.

as far as 2008, keep your eyes on barak obama although i'm not sure the US is ready for a black president.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
delacosta



Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 325
Location: zipolte beach

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Republican Party emblem

The Republican National Committee announced today
that the Republican Party is changing its emblem from
an elephant to a condom.
The committee chairman explained that the condom more
clearly reflects the party's stance today, because a
condom accepts inflation, halts production, destroys
the next generation, protects a bunch of pricks, and
gives you a sense of security while you're actually
getting screwed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
XXX



Joined: 14 Feb 2003
Posts: 174
Location: Where ever people wish to learn English

PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who is GW flipping off? 1) that moron Moore 2) the frogs 3) Soros 4) CBS
5) Osama 6) most people in California, Mass and New York 6) Moonraven and finally, Kerry and all others of his ilk. Don't mess with Texas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
extoere



Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 543

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:11 am    Post subject: After the Election Reply with quote

The US election is over. So, too, is the "6-Hour Kerry Presidency" which the pollsters conferred after cursory examination of exit polls. That such a miscalculation could have taken place --- even in the highly respected Zogby Poll --- should be of some concern to students of politics. But of whatever significance is divined from those mistakes, the polling was generally accurate throughout the final weeks. Quite a feat.

Kerry gave what I thought was an extraordinarily gracious concession speech. It is manifestly to his personal credit, and I'll remember this sense of grace in a moment of sustaining this heartbreaking loss. It surely accrues as a credit to his political future, and already, I'm willing to take a fresh look at him for next time.

For those of you who are tempted to be disenchanted with the U.S. electorate, you shouldn't be. Our system works, and it works just fine, thank you. The three-percent margin of victory was more than most of us could have expected and spoke quite loudly in its dismissal of valid challenges to the process.

Your bitterness is understandable, but it's no substitute for getting on with your lives. Those of you who are fortunate enough to hold U.S. passports in a country like China should see all around you the reasons to be grateful for your citizenship. As English teachers, you serve a valuable function. Not in the "spread of Imperialism," as the old 60s doctrine goes, but in helping those who want to learn one of the valuable "languages of the international marketplace," as you should know by now. It isn't necessary to spread democracy or capitalism; in helping Chinese students acquire English skills, and in being good citizens abroad, you're a valuable asset to your own country as well as to China.

Tomorrow, the world will get on with its business, just as you will get on with yours. And despite the present international hostilities; despite the personal animosities, it matters far less what happens in the White House than what happens in your own house. You have control of your own lives, and you can, in your own way, contribute to improving the lives of numerous Chinese students and others in your own sphere. I urge you to think of ways you can accomplish this.

And to those who voted in the winning column, remember how you would have felt if your candidate had lost. Chill out.

Best wishes to all,
ex
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mcNug



Joined: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 83
Location: HK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stop the presses!

The downfall of the world will have to be put on hold for this Yahoo! News Front page story

Laura Bush to get puppy for Birthday

If you don't believe me have a look at www.yahoo.com

The world is going to hell and this is front page news

*sigh* Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bdawg



Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 526
Location: Nanjing

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'll also be emailing all the "liberals" I know and mocking them for placing their hopes on an elitist, clueless liar. Laugh all you want lefties about what a "moron" Bush is, he pounded your guy like Fallujah is getting pounded tonight.


Quote:
Sure as shooting, my country (Canada) has enough of your lazy punk good-for-nothing carcasses, we don't need any more.


Goddammit. Why do so many people have to use such tired and old labels such as "lefties" and "liberals" and "righties".
If someone has ONE or TWO opinions which leans a little left...all of a sudden they are a 'liberal' or a 'lefty'...same goes for those who have several right leaning views.

I f*cking hate this ignorant and stereotyped labelling. I f*cking HATE it. It's all over the place...on every message board, every newspaper, every radio and television show. It is disgraceful.

Nothing says idiot more than a person who resorts to such words. And dude (chiangjiang) watch the stereotypes...you are embarrassing other Canadians like myself who believe that having a mixture of views and opinions increases a nations intellectual capacity and ingenuity to develop and implement solutions to complex problems. It is called diversity, maybe you are not familiar with it. The presence of diversity increases the resilience of a system (in this context, a country) against external and internal stresses.

My day has been sh*tty, and reading that post was the last straw...I aplogize for my language.


Last edited by bdawg on Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
bdawg



Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Posts: 526
Location: Nanjing

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'll also be emailing all the "liberals" I know and mocking them for placing their hopes on an elitist, clueless liar. Laugh all you want lefties about what a "moron" Bush is, he pounded your guy like Fallujah is getting pounded tonight.


Quote:
Sure as shooting, my country (Canada) has enough of your lazy punk good-for-nothing carcasses, we don't need any more.


Goddammit. Why do so many people have to use such tired and old labels such as "lefties" and "liberals" and "righties".
If someone has ONE or TWO opinions which leans a little left...all of a sudden they are a 'liberal' or a 'lefty'...same goes for those who have several right leaning views.

I f*cking hate this ignorant and stereotyped labelling. I f*cking HATE it. It's all over the place...on every message board, every newspaper, every radio and television show. It is disgraceful.

Nothing says idiot more than a person who resorts to such words. And dude (chiangjiang) watch the stereotypes...you are embarrassing other Canadians like myself who believe that having a mixture of views and opinions increases a nations intellectual capacity and ingenuity to develop and implement solutions to complex problems. It is called diversity, maybe you are not familiar with it. The presence of diversity increases the resilience of a system (in this context, a country) against external and internal stresses.

My day has been sh*tty, and reading that post was the last straw...I aplogize for my language.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
ChinaEFLteacher



Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 104
Location: China

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bdawg, don't apologize for the words as they are appropriate and someone should have said them earlier.

extoere, thank you for your thoughtful post. i only wish i could have your perspective and insight. i respect what you say.
but i cannot just let it go. although taking care of oneself should be of primary importance, those of us who are citizens in a participatory democracy should pay head to the workings of the wider world. we know that the election has been decided and we should get on with our lives, and we will. but we also know that the current leader has chosen to create an environment that has created a vast rift between the different ideologies in our countries. the fact that one side won should not deter us from voicing our opinions, just as we shouldn't keep quiet when we cannot bear something in our own household. although the formal election is over, we should continue to fight for the ideas we want to represent our country and govern how we can live and act in the wider world. we must do this if our democracy is to have any meaning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atomic_donut



Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 34
Location: Melbourne

PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2004 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This article appeared in TomPaine.com...is history always doomed to repeat itself or is it another whine about 4 more years of George Jr?


Kerry Won. . .
Greg Palast
November 04, 2004


Bush won Ohio by 136,483 votes. In the United States, about 3 percent of votes cast are voided�known as �spoilage� in election jargon�because the ballots cast are inconclusive. Drawing on what happened in Florida and studies of elections past, Palast argues that if Ohio�s discarded ballots were counted, Kerry would have won the state. Today, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports there are a total of 247,672 votes not counted in Ohio, if you add the 92,672 discarded votes plus the 155,000 provisional ballots. So far there's no indication that Palast's hypothesis will be tested because only the provisional ballots are being counted.

Greg Palast, contributing editor to Harper's magazine, investigated the manipulation of the vote for BBC Television's Newsnight. The documentary, "Bush Family Fortunes," based on his New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, has been released this month on DVD .

Kerry won. Here are the facts.

I know you don't want to hear it. You can't face one more hung chad. But I don't have a choice. As a journalist examining that messy sausage called American democracy, it's my job to tell you who got the most votes in the deciding states. Tuesday, in Ohio and New Mexico, it was John Kerry.

Most voters in Ohio thought they were voting for Kerry. At 1:05 a.m. Wednesday morning, CNN's exit poll showed Kerry beating Bush among Ohio women by 53 percent to 47 percent. The exit polls were later combined with�and therefore contaminated by�the tabulated results, ultimately becoming a mirror of the apparent actual vote. [To read about the skewing of exit polls to conform to official results, click here .] Kerry also defeated Bush among Ohio's male voters 51 percent to 49 percent. Unless a third gender voted in Ohio, Kerry took the state.

So what's going on here? Answer: the exit polls are accurate. Pollsters ask, "Who did you vote for?" Unfortunately, they don't ask the crucial, question, "Was your vote counted?" The voters don't know.

Here's why. Although the exit polls show that most voters in Ohio punched cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands of these votes were simply not recorded. This was predictable and it was predicted. [See TomPaine.com, "An Election Spoiled Rotten," November 1.]

Once again, at the heart of the Ohio uncounted vote game are, I'm sorry to report, hanging chads and pregnant chads, plus some other ballot tricks old and new.

The election in Ohio was not decided by the voters but by something called "spoilage." Typically in the United States, about 3 percent of the vote is voided, just thrown away, not recorded. When the bobble-head boobs on the tube tell you Ohio or any state was won by 51 percent to 49 percent, don't you believe it ... it has never happened in the United States, because the total never reaches a neat 100 percent. The television totals simply subtract out the spoiled vote.

Whose Votes Are Discarded?

And not all votes spoil equally. Most of those votes, say every official report, come from African-American and minority precincts. (To learn more, click here.)

We saw this in Florida in 2000. Exit polls showed Gore with a plurality of at least 50,000, but it didn't match the official count. That's because the official, Secretary of State Katherine Harris, excluded 179,855 spoiled votes. In Florida, as in Ohio, most of these votes lost were cast on punch cards where the hole wasn't punched through completely�leaving a 'hanging chad,'�or was punched extra times. Whose cards were discarded? Expert statisticians investigating spoilage for the government calculated that 54 percent of the ballots thrown in the dumpster were cast by black folks. (To read the report from the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, click here .)

And here's the key: Florida is terribly typical. The majority of ballots thrown out (there will be nearly 2 million tossed out from Tuesday's election) will have been cast by African American and other minority citizens.

So here we go again. Or, here we don't go again. Because unlike last time, Democrats aren't even asking Ohio to count these cards with the not-quite-punched holes (called "undervotes" in the voting biz). Nor are they demanding we look at the "overvotes" where voter intent may be discerned.

Ohio is one of the last states in America to still use the vote-spoiling punch-card machines. And the Secretary of State of Ohio, J. Kenneth Blackwell, wrote before the election, �the possibility of a close election with punch cards as the state�s primary voting device invites a Florida-like calamity.�

But this week, Blackwell, a rabidly partisan Republican, has warmed up to the result of sticking with machines that have a habit of eating Democratic votes. When asked if he feared being this year's Katherine Harris, Blackwell noted that Ms. Fix-it's efforts landed her a seat in Congress.

Exactly how many votes were lost to spoilage this time? Blackwell's office, notably, won't say, though the law requires it be reported. Hmm. But we know that last time, the total of Ohio votes discarded reached a democracy-damaging 1.96 percent. The machines produced their typical loss�that's 110,000 votes�overwhelmingly Democratic.

The Impact Of Challenges

First and foremost, Kerry was had by chads. But the Democrat wasn't punched out by punch cards alone. There were also the 'challenges.' That's a polite word for the Republican Party of Ohio's use of an old Ku Klux Klan technique: the attempt to block thousands of voters of color at the polls. In Ohio, Wisconsin and Florida, the GOP laid plans for poll workers to ambush citizens under arcane laws�almost never used�allowing party-designated poll watchers to finger individual voters and demand they be denied a ballot. The Ohio courts were horrified and federal law prohibits targeting of voters where race is a factor in the challenge. But our Supreme Court was prepared to let Republicans stand in the voting booth door.

In the end, the challenges were not overwhelming, but they were there. Many apparently resulted in voters getting these funky "provisional" ballots�a kind of voting placebo�which may or may not be counted. Blackwell estimates there were 175,000; Democrats say 250,000. Pick your number. But as challenges were aimed at minorities, no one doubts these are, again, overwhelmingly Democratic. Count them up, add in the spoiled punch cards (easy to tally with the human eye in a recount), and the totals begin to match the exit polls; and, golly, you've got yourself a new president. Remember, Bush won by 136,483 votes in Ohio.

Enchanted State's Enchanted Vote

Now, on to New Mexico, where a Kerry plurality�if all votes are counted�is more obvious still. Before the election, in TomPaine.com, I wrote, "John Kerry is down by several thousand votes in New Mexico, though not one ballot has yet been counted."

How did that happen? It's the spoilage, stupid; and the provisional ballots.

CNN said George Bush took New Mexico by 11,620 votes. Again, the network total added up to that miraculous, and non-existent, '100 percent' of ballots cast.

New Mexico reported in the last race a spoilage rate of 2.68 percent, votes lost almost entirely in Hispanic, Native American and poor precincts�Democratic turf. From Tuesday's vote, assuming the same ballot-loss rate, we can expect to see 18,000 ballots in the spoilage bin.

Spoilage has a very Democratic look in New Mexico. Hispanic voters in the Enchanted State, who voted more than two to one for Kerry, are five times as likely to have their vote spoil as a white voter. Counting these uncounted votes would easily overtake the Bush 'plurality.'

Already, the election-bending effects of spoilage are popping up in the election stats, exactly where we'd expect them: in heavily Hispanic areas controlled by Republican elections officials. Chaves County, in the "Little Texas" area of New Mexico, has a 44 percent Hispanic population, plus African Americans and Native Americans, yet George Bush "won" there 68 percent to 31 percent.

I spoke with Chaves' Republican county clerk before the election, and he told me that this huge spoilage rate among Hispanics simply indicated that such people simply can't make up their minds on the choice of candidate for president. Oddly, these brown people drive across the desert to register their indecision in a voting booth.

Now, let's add in the effect on the New Mexico tally of provisional ballots.

"They were handing them out like candy," Albuquerque journalist Renee Blake reported of provisional ballots. About 20,000 were given out. Who got them?

Santiago Juarez who ran the "Faithful Citizenship" program for the Catholic Archdiocese in New Mexico, told me that "his" voters, poor Hispanics, whom he identified as solid Kerry supporters, were handed the iffy provisional ballots. Hispanics were given provisional ballots, rather than the countable kind "almost religiously," he said, at polling stations when there was the least question about a voter's identification. Some voters, Santiago said, were simply turned away.

Your Kerry Victory Party

So we can call Ohio and New Mexico for John Kerry�if we count all the votes.

But that won't happen. Despite the Democratic Party's pledge, the leadership this time gave in to racial disenfranchisement once again. Why? No doubt, the Democrats know darn well that counting all the spoiled and provisional ballots will require the cooperation of Ohio's Secretary of State, Blackwell. He will ultimately decide which spoiled and provisional ballots get tallied. Blackwell, hankering to step into Kate Harris' political pumps, is unlikely to permit anything close to a full count. Also, Democratic leadership knows darn well the media would punish the party for demanding a full count.

What now? Kerry won, so hold your victory party. But make sure the shades are down: it may be become illegal to demand a full vote count under PATRIOT Act III.

I used to write a column for the Guardian papers in London. Several friends have asked me if I will again leave the country. In light of the failure�a second time�to count all the votes, that won't be necessary. My country has left me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 13, 14, 15  Next
Page 3 of 15

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China