|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Atlas

Joined: 09 Jun 2003 Posts: 662 Location: By-the-Sea PRC
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
the term Racism is being bandied about rather loosely here, as a convenient catch-all that automatically exposes the target to utter vilification, as well as all those who are associated with them. But
it's really not such a clearly defined issue, nor does responding with
hate solve anything.
Why are we here in China teaching English at all? They have Chinese teachers who can do that, who understand grammar as well as any
native speaker (let's face it, on average, they probably know more
about the rules of grammar than the average ESL monkey, myself included). Nationality is our marketing advantage (native speaking
ability, hopefully not race). We are exploiting the Chinese demand for native speakers as a way to polish their abilities and boost their economic power. Otherwise they would be content to pay crap wages to
qualified local teachers.
I hate racism but I'm trying to survive. I'm not going to quit my job because someone gets their boxers twisted over being discriminated against in the world's most populous, "homogenous" country. What did you
expect? There was never any Chinese Emancipation Proclamation ("Sorry, I don't listen to hip hop!"). These people are alread oppressed,
so an agitated foreigner really provide much except entertainment (except as it pertains to investment. You want to be treated with respect? Drop 500,000 RMB into a joint venture).
The very idea that China should adopt western values by virtue of their democratic principles is simplistic and pollyanic. Righteous indignation means nothing in a place without morals as you know them. PS ass kicking? Who is the one filled with hate?
And if you want to really debate race, who is keeping the N word alive?
Studies have shown that subordinate groups are the ones keeping the fences up. Not the superordinate groups. My point is, it's easy to call someone racist, and it's easy to wrap yourself in that flag and go to war. But it's not easy spotting the enemy. First look in the mirror. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
myesl

Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Posts: 307 Location: Luckily not in China.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Atlas wrote: |
| Psychologically speaking, the biases are in favor of the beautiful people in the west. Attractiveness interacts with perceptions of intelligence, honesty, skill, and all the rest. The system is far from value-free. Can't even guarantee equal pay between the sexes! And racism is alive and well everywhere. |
1) I think the bias in favor of beauty is much stronger in East Asia -- where they require a photo with your resume; this is true for locals, too.
2) Equal pay? College educated women earn MORE than college educated men in the US. Didn't hear John Kerry talking about that one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laodeng
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 481
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Atlas wrote: |
Why are we here in China teaching English at all? They have Chinese teachers who can do that, who understand grammar as well as any
native speaker (let's face it, on average, they probably know more
about the rules of grammar than the average ESL monkey, myself included).
|
Atlas, I have the greatest respect for your opinions and always look forward to your postings. But here you are perpetuating a myth . . . the myth that Chinese teachers really understand English grammar and are superior to most native speakers in this regard.
In my five years' experience in Chinese universities, it has been demonstrated to me that Chinese teachers think they understand English grammar. But their questions to me indicate that all they have learned is the letter rather than the spirit. They can cite rules . . . but they have usually no conception of the exceptions to these rules, or of usage, idioms, and, especially, the pragmatics of English. Try the experiment of using ordinary colloquial English with the best of them--not regional usage, just ordinary, non-academic English. Watch as their eyes start to dart, then glaze over.
I think the myth is useful for Chinese administrators. It helps them justify the employment as "oral English" teachers of native speakers who are otherwise academically unqualified, abusing them, and then discarding them. Unfortunately, it doesn't explain the phenomenon of their hiring Caucasians who are not native speakers to serve as models for spoken English. But this is the subject of another posting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:02 am Post subject: oiboy |
|
|
i'm with you. at my last school, the teacher in charge of hiring foreigners asked me to review a couple of resumes for him, for future hirings. i came across one from cameroon, and it indicated that the guy also spoke french. i was asked if this meant he was from canada, i said no, cameroon.
"where's that" i was asked. "africa" i say.
"i don't like black people, i don't trust them"
there you go. from that moment on, i lost all respect i had for this guy. up until that point we actually got along.
here in china, if i'm in a foul mood for whatever reason, i find it's better for me to stay at home. because when i get stared at non-stop, especially by some slack-jawed gawker that CAN'T turn their eyes away for even a second, i get a bit aggressive. might have bad consequences in the end....
best of luck in getting a new job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spiderman Too
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 Posts: 732 Location: Caught in my own web
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| They can cite rules . . . but they have usually no conception of the exceptions to these rules, or of usage, idioms, and, especially, the pragmatics of English. Try the experiment of using ordinary colloquial English with the best of them--not regional usage, just ordinary, non-academic English. Watch as their eyes start to dart, then glaze over. |
On a Friday evening 2 weeks ago I went along to the monthly Foreign Language Department teacher's get-together at a local hotel. All of the female teachers sat at 2 tables and the male teachers sat at 2 seperate tables; but that's another story.
I left the hotel at 8:00 pm at which time the Chinese teachers were heading 'downstairs' to a Karaoke Lounge.
Jump to 7:50 am the following Monday morning; walking to my classroom and one of the Chinese English teachers bids me a good morning:-
Him, "Did you enjoy supper on Friday night?"
Me, "Yes, it was quite good. What time did you get home?"
Him, "Oh no, I didn't go home."
Me, "Well, where did you go when you left the Karaoke Lounge?"
Him, "I went back to my apartment." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laodeng,
thanks for your pointed stance on Chinese English teachers' grasp of English grammar! I really want the powers-that-be to know that the majority of Chinese teachers have deplorably poor teaching skills and a lacklustre grasp of the architectural underpinnings that support an English text or speech, and that includes GRAMMAR AND SYNTAX.
Not one of my 120 university students who knows that proper names have to be written with CAPITAL initials! Not even "chinese" is written with a capital 'C' although everyone does write 'English" with a big 'E'... What goes wrong?
And, who puts such ungrammatical English into the brains of Chinese as "I means that..."?
I shouldn't rant too much about my Chinese colleagues; I have rubbed shoulders with quite a few nice ones. A minority are in fact totally competent at English - but they seldom have the respect they deserve because their underachieving peers set the standards, and those who want to teach do so because they have failed to get a well-paying job in the private sector. Teaching is for slackers, really - they are, after all, civil servants, and you know what 'civil servants' in a socialist community means - they are lording it over society at large.
There should be a fundamental change - foreign teachers who teach grammar, writing and other subjects, and who set new standards!
Standards that cannot be modified by principals under pressure from wealthy parents! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laodeng
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 481
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roger,
Many thanks for the kind comments. It's nice to feel validated.
But I'm not particularly bullish about the prospects of either principals or parents seeing the light before I finally hang it up. There are just too many people with a vested interest in keeping things exactly the way they are.
When I touch on a point of grammar in the classroom, I feel more like a deprogrammer than a teacher . . . in short, I must
unteach them. Damned near impossible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ymmv
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| laodeng wrote: |
I feel more like a deprogrammer than a teacher . . . |
A Classic Line! Make it a sticky.
That's the most apt and succinct description of what we do here that I have ever seen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tamil_Tiger
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 105 Location: Witness Protection Program
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To clarify Atlas, I wasn't trying to vilify anyone or project hate on to anyone with my previous post in this thread.
To me it seems there are 2 choices for dealing with discrimination.
1. Move on, try to go somewhere and create a good reputation of non-white foreigners in china and they'll likely be more employable in the future. I read a post on an expat job site from a school in Anhui province that wanted Indian teachers as they had good experiences with them in the past.
2. Fight the system. 2 options here.
a. try to appeal to the conscience of fellow esl teachers and try to get them not to work at that school
b. If you can't win em over by appeals , and you feel reckless, make an example of one, to scare people away.
I don't think option b is really worth it (I personally don't think that a job here is worth it enough to take risks and pull something like this. Maybe if my livelihood depended on it I would) , but I think if someone did it and didn't get caught, then it would be fairly successful tactically speaking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laodeng
Joined: 07 Feb 2004 Posts: 481
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ymmv, many thanks. A little less than classic, but from the heart. And born of despair. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oiboy
Joined: 05 Mar 2004 Posts: 142 Location: Middle China
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ialsofind that in China teachers use a very linear approach to teaching instead of focusing on meta-cognitive development as we do in North America. Creativity is shunned. Students loose interests. We step in and teach these classes. What a positive environment! I have seen quite a few teachers though who are breaking the "mold" of drill instructor here. They are actually willing to try new things and evoke thought from the students. A very powering thing here, as its not usually expected here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Atlas

Joined: 09 Jun 2003 Posts: 662 Location: By-the-Sea PRC
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Myesl wrote:
| Quote: |
1) I think the bias in favor of beauty is much stronger in East Asia -- where they require a photo with your resume; this is true for locals, too.
2) Equal pay? College educated women earn MORE than college educated men in the US. Didn't hear John Kerry talking about that one. |
1. Too true. Problem is they don't usually see anything wrong with it.
2. All I know is, there were no scholarships for being a white American male when I went to college. Goodness knows I could have used one when my father lost his job and I was compelled to join the workforce at eighteen. Mind you, I could have played my race (I'm over 1/3 Portuguese) as a minority-scholastic advantage but frankly didn't care for that route.
Laodeng wrote:
| Quote: |
Atlas, I have the greatest respect for your opinions and always look forward to your postings. But here you are perpetuating a myth . . . the myth that Chinese teachers really understand English grammar and are superior to most native speakers in this regard.
In my five years' experience in Chinese universities, it has been demonstrated to me that Chinese teachers think they understand English grammar. But their questions to me indicate that all they have learned is the letter rather than the spirit. They can cite rules . . . but they have usually no conception of the exceptions to these rules, or of usage, idioms, and, especially, the pragmatics of English. Try the experiment of using ordinary colloquial English with the best of them--not regional usage, just ordinary, non-academic English. Watch as their eyes start to dart, then glaze over.
I think the myth is useful for Chinese administrators. It helps them justify the employment as "oral English" teachers of native speakers who are otherwise academically unqualified, abusing them, and then discarding them. Unfortunately, it doesn't explain the phenomenon of their hiring Caucasians who are not native speakers to serve as models for spoken English. But this is the subject of another posting. |
You are absolutely right, and thanks for calling me on it. Now, I never cease to be amazed at how such a poorly-speaking student has a rather good grasp of grammar conventions; but there is definitely a tendency to overestimate the efficacy of the education system (and everything else). Ask a student what they do and the reply is "study study study"; but how many times, in the class room, do you actually get that kind of participation from the young? It's BS. The real answer is usually "pretend to study". In this way the efficacy of the educators is overestimated. Hence, when you ask your student to tell you the BIGGEST lie they can, they bleat out, "there's a hole in your pants" or "I woke up at 8 this morning". Something is being inhibited there.
Tamil_Tiger, I apologize for the curmudgeonly nature of my post. In no way do I advocate giving up or accepting being discriminated against. Clearly there is racism in China, including the hiring of non-native white speakers instead of dark-skinned native-speakers. Are we teachers also benefitting from the discrimination? In one class, my students were so proud of how white they were; I didn't have the heart to tell them they were in fact a deeper color. It meant so much to them. In another class, all they could talk about was my body shape. That's not germaine to anyone other than adolescents, in an adult business class.
PS dont fight in China. The legal system is not transparent or mature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peterpaul
Joined: 02 Jun 2004 Posts: 36 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 2:44 pm Post subject: For the Record |
|
|
Just a minor interjection and clarification:.
Web International is a franchise, and the PuDong school is owned and operated from a different set of investors than the corporate headquarters in XuJiaHui. I cannot comment on the PuDong school's policies based on hearsay. However, I can state that I have seen little, if any, evidence of racism in terms of hiring at this location. The Xu Jia Hui center currently employs an African American as a full time teacher and a North African as an occasional English Corner host.
Nuff' Said... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|