|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
big dog
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If this policy is against the law how does Nova enforce it??? Dont they get there asses sued all the time
I am new to Nova and Japan and was wondering about the whole health care issue that is now being talked about on all the boards. Will NOva fire me if I ask for it(as they pay 50/50)
I hear about Novas union on the internet but at work I have never heard anybody talk about it. Does the union have any power?? Also does nova find out if a join. I am on probation and would not want to be fired
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| big dog wrote: |
If this policy is against the law how does Nova enforce it??? Dont they get there asses sued all the time
|
There is actually no law against it but a legal association in Osaka managed to get some job firings withdrawn because of union protest. They know they can do it as very few NOVA teachers belong to a union, they quit their jobs rather than fight injustice and NOVA knows the teacher will quit in 6 months anyway.
NOVA has been threatened with lawsuits but very few have actually reached the litigation stage. Many cases are settled out of court.
To discriminate against only foreign staff is unconstitutional (a Japanese judge has said so) but I dont think they have paid any fines over it though. The law has no teeth.
It is extremely expensive and time consuming (the average court case will take 3-4 years) to bring a case to court, by which time the original teachers have left, so many NOVA teachers either quit or give up. The union will fight the case on behalf of its members but its not a case of you holding their coat while they do the dirty work.
| big dog wrote: |
I am new to Nova and Japan and was wondering about the whole health care issue that is now being talked about on all the boards. Will NOva fire me if I ask for it(as they pay 50/50)
|
Japanese companies are required by law to pay 50% of the premiums for health and pension insurance for its full time employees (employees the other 50%). Foreigners at NOVA are treated as part timers and as such ineligible for national health insurance cover by their employers, while the Japanese staff are all covered.
All employees are required by law to have some kind of health insurance in Japan. National health is expensive, and most teachers want to avoid paying into the national plan becuase of the high monthly premiums and 'lack' of return (10% of monthly income will go into NHI in your second year) yet the union is trying to get the company to do what it is required to do by law.
NOVA has over 4000 teachers and at 20-30,000 yen a month in premiums that is an insurance bill of over 10 million yen or a month or 120 million (1.2 million dollars) yen in premiums which they dont want to pay on their employees. 99% of the foreign employees wont be in Japan after 25 years to collect their pension anyway. Thats money that comes out of student tuition and other income. I dont work for NOVA but I think the company is probably swimming in red ink as they are getting less students, the rents on their schools are stratospheric and they are trying to cut costs. Legally paying into the NHI is the right thing to do but itmeans they have to cut cost somewhere else, but hiring less teachers, or paying lower salaries, or making teacher work more for less.
NOVA will not fire you as the union is trying to get workers what they are entitled to, but what NOVA does is look for loopholes in the law, and the government here does not penalise them for not obeying the law.
The latest ploy is reduce your income by the exact amount they have to pay in premiums. NOVA is free to pay what it likes in salaries and there is no minimum award wage in Japan. Legal but totally unethical and it means teachers have to live here on less money (about 220,000 yen a month is the starting salary nowadays)
| big dog wrote: |
I hear about Novas union on the internet but at work I have never heard anybody talk about it. Does the union have any power?? Also does nova find out if a join. I am on probation and would not want to be fired
Thanks |
Unions in Japan are very strong. The General Union in Osaka and the Tokyo Union of General workers have hundreds of members and are afifilated with Japanese unions. Many of the current reforms at NOVA are a result of union negotiation and pressure and NOVA teachers can and do go on strike.
Joining a union is completely legal in Japan and an employer can not harass you or prevent you joining a union. Many NOVA employees belong to a union and NOVA is required to negotiate with them, but does not have to negotiate with individual teachers. Many big companies even have their own in-house unions to negotiate with management but those are fairly ineffectual. Joining the General Union is a better idea IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Question: My employer has not paid me nor has he given me the holidays promised before I came to Japan. We haven't reached an agreement yet despite several discussions. I'd like to organize a labor union to better negotiate with the company for foreign colleagues as well as myself. What do I have to do to organize a labor union ?
Answer: Even foreign employees have the right to organize a labor union, bargain collectively and go on strike. These rights are guaranteed by the Constitution of Japan for every employee, regardless of nationality. In addition, the Labor Unions Law safeguards against unfair labor practices and provides a labor committee system to affirm the rights of workers. It also provides for the requirements of a labor union that can be protected by the law.
According to the law, a labor union shall be; an organization formed substantially by employees, / independent of the employer, and an organization that operates in a democratic manner (in terms of the operation of the union itself as well).
If such requirements are properly met, a labor union can make its presence known, and there is no need to be authorized by any civil authority or report thereto. A labor union as such shall have at least two members. Most Japanese labor unions are company ones, but there are no legal regulations outlining how a labor union may be formed. Consequently, employees may organize a labor union by region, occupation, or by affiliated companies. A labor union shall have the right to bargain collectively with the company for which its members work, regardless of the number of members. There is no system in Japan like the exclusive negotiation representative system in the United States of America (where only a labor union that has a majority of employees is endowed with the right to bargain collectively).
Labor Unions Law (Labor Unions)
Article 2. Labor unions under the present law shall be those organizations, or federations thereof, formed autonomously and substantially by employees for the main purpose of maintaining and improving working conditions and for raising the economic status of employees.
Question: I am a student at a Japanese language school. I work at a restaurant almost every day to supplement my income. My hourly payment was initially \800, and the employer promised to give me a raise sooner or later, but he has not raised my salary at all so far. I was not able to discuss it well with my employer because I could not make myself understood in Japanese. Although this concerns only me, would I be able to get any support from a labor union ?
Answer: Although you are staying in Japan with a "student" resident status, as long as you work, you are, of course, under the protection of the labor laws, and you can expect support from a labor union.The simplest way is to join a joint labor union, which you can join as an individual, and negotiate with your employer through the union. There are not many joint labor unions in Japan now, but it is not unusual for a joint labor union to provide a labor advisory service to an individual who does not belong to the union, and find a solution to the problem together after he/she joins the union.
If you need more detailed information, please go to a joint labor union for a consultation. As mentioned earlier, a labor union has the right to bargain collectively with the company for which a union mender is working, regardless of the number of members.
This means that even if you are the sole member of your company who belongs to the labor union, the union can bargain collectively with the company for you. If this is the case, a company is legally obliged to satisfy a request for collective bargaining from the union. If the company refuses without any fair and appropriate reason, it will constitute an unfair labor practice by the employer. This will be more favorable to the employee than if he/she negotiates with the company by himself/herself. If an employer treats an employee disadvantageously by dismissal or reducing his/her wages because the employee has joined a labor union, this also constitutes an unfair labor practice. If an employer commits an unfair labor practice like this, the labor union or a member employee will be entitled to complain against such an unfair labor practice to the Labor Relations Commission. The Labor Relations Commission will then make inquiries into, and consider the matter. If the commission finds the labor practices in question to be unfair, it will issue an order to protect the employee. In addition to this, the labor committee is supposed to act positively as a third party to solve labor disputes by reconciliation, mediation or arbitration.
Labor Unions Law (Unfair Labor Practice)
Article 7. An employer shall be forbidden to carry out the following practices;
to discharge or discriminate against an employee by reason of his/her being a member of a labor union, having tried to join or organize a labor union, or having performed official acts of a labor union; or to make it a condition of employment that the employee must not join or must withdraw from a labor union; (A provisory clause is omitted.)
to refuse collective bargaining with the representative of an employee or employees by an employer without fair and appropriate reason;
to control or interfere with the formation or management of a labor union by employees or to give financial support thereto in defraying the labor union's operational expenditure. (A provisory clause is omitted.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rorschach
Joined: 25 Mar 2004 Posts: 130 Location: Osaka
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PAULH wrote: |
| I know one NOVA teacher was fired last year in Osaka as he was drinking chu-hais (an alcoholic fermented fizzy drink) in class, had alcohol on his breath and was asking female students for email addresses. This was in the MM and other students were listening. AFAIK the MM classes in Osaka are monitored by the office staff. |
I saw this go down. He started drinking at the beginning of his shift (3pm in the afternoon) and continued to drink throughout the day. From what I heard he even went into LS during the beginning of the shift to offer them a drink. The staff knew he was drinking but chose not to do anything about it, they just told him to stop it and get back to work. Needless to say he didn't and continued to drink after his lunchbreak when he started to become abusive towards some of the French instructors (no names, but he was an English instructor). He taught another 3 lessons before someone took notice. I'm a little hazy on what happened next but I think he ditched a lesson to go drink in the smoking room. A blue tag (admin staff) and a green tag (trainer) came down and found him then escorted him off the teacher floor. He dried out in a meeting room where he was giving his marching orders (hard as it is to get fired from Nova, even they have their limits).
Technically staff have to tell you when they are observing your lesson but I have found that CS does it randomly to check quality of lessons or keep an eye on teachers with a lot of complaints against them. Probably 25% of instructors at Nova are decent teachers who care about what they are doing and do a good job of it. I have an ESL background so I have an idea about how to teach foreign students but most instructors at Nova only have the training Nova provides (which is pretty mediocre).
Recently Nova changed its lesson plans to reflect the move towards conversational English. In a way the lessons are good, they read like a script - you teach the students phrases and how to use them in a particular situation. They are also extremely easy to follow, a trained monkey could do it. I think Nova dumbed down their lessons to accomodate both their low level students and the kind of people they hire from other countries. However, when I use these lessons I don't feel like I am teaching English, I feel like I am conditioning people for a certain response. The lessons even have stupid subtitles like "Language Input" (practice) and "Tune In" (pronunciation). Now it's on the instructor to include grammar in the lesson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Iwantmyrightsnow
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johanne wrote: |
| The only sticky point is if you are living in a NOVA apartment, as being fired also means being homeless if you can't line something else up pretty quickly. |
But this is something people shouldn't be worried about. Tennants have very strong rights Japan which NOva is starting to realize. You can't just fire someone and evict them. You are entitles to stay there for at least 6 months........Exact details of how to do it are involved but this is the kind of advice members can get from the union. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Iwantmyrightsnow wrote: |
| johanne wrote: |
| The only sticky point is if you are living in a NOVA apartment, as being fired also means being homeless if you can't line something else up pretty quickly. |
. |
NOVA can not evict you as they are required to give 6 months notice if you are a tenant
Question: I was fired over a dispute about working conditions. Although I have not agreed with being dismissed this way, my employer also told me to move out of the apartment provided by the company, as required by the contract. Do I have to leave the apartment now ? If so, I will have to find another place. What should I do ?
Answer: When an apartment is contracted by a company, the civil laws are applied differently depending on whether it is provided free or is leased.
Normally, the former cases is covered by the provisions in Article 593 of Civil Law, and the latter by Article 601 of the Civil Law. However, if the rent is extremely low, there will be some question as to whether the latter case applies.
If you have a rent-free apartment, you are required under the terms of worker-as-tenant to give up the apartment on the day specified in the contract (Article 597,Civil Law).
The employer has demanded that you move out of the apartment at the time of your dismissal. If you do not comply with that demand, your employer could possibly take to matter to court.
On the other hand, a lease contract with a company is governed by Article 28 of the Land and Building Act. According to the act, in order to end a lease relationship, an employer as a landlord is required to give notice to an employee, with a justifiable reason.When the lease has a specified period, the landlord should give advance notice of 6 months to one year and should clearly tell the employee that he/she does not intend to renew the lease contract.
Also, with a lease that has no specified duration, advance notice to vacate the property of at least 6 months is required. Therefore, even if it is stated in a contract that the employee shall move out immediately upon dismissal, such requirement is totally contrary to the Land and Building Act (Article 30, Land and Building Act, or Article 6, former Land and Building Act). The landlord can never make a tenant leave by force. In the case of a company house, the argument often turns on whether it is provided free or is leased. The court rules that each case should be carefully considered under its own merits. Since the situation that arise are not always typical, the right decision is not easily reached. Therefore, it is recommended that further discussion is needed between you and your employer and that your landlord should wait until you find another place to live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|