|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
TW is this speculation or are you answering the question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edwinagirl
Joined: 05 Jul 2004 Posts: 68 Location: beijing
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
To answer the OPs original question, no, you won't be discriminated against for being a woman. EF is a Scandanavian outfit, so they are not sexist in their approach.
Working at EF has its advantages - if you are young, and resilient, you can learn a lot. Overall, however, I must be honest, it is not a rewarding experience. The EF approach is to exploit teachers for every hour they can squeeze out of them. As a DOS, this puts you in a very difficult position - by being loyal to the job description, you automatically conflict with the teachers, who often feel exploited. Add to this the experience of a first-time job in China, and you have a huge challenge on your hands. Nor is the pay particularly good. I say, look at the options. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tw
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 3898
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
cj750 wrote: |
TW is this speculation or are you answering the question. |
Sorry, pure speculation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tw
Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 3898
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
edwinagirl wrote: |
As a DOS, this puts you in a very difficult position - by being loyal to the job description, you automatically conflict with the teachers, who often feel exploited. Add to this the experience of a first-time job in China, and you have a huge challenge on your hands. |
That is scarey. It's one thing teaching without any training and experience, it's another thing being put into management position in an educational (for what it's worth) environment when you have absolutely no idea how things work because you have no prior experience working in a TEFL environment. As someone else said once, you are unappreciated by the owners, and you are despised by your fellow foreigners. I really feel for newbies suckered into DOS positions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tony lee
Joined: 03 Apr 2004 Posts: 79 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Tony, I am curious about something. When you say that you advised teachers not to accept certain parts of their contracts, and you expect to lose an odd commission, but you will gain loyal clients in the end. Most FTs are not here on a career basis and therefore will not be continued clients.
I thought by the very nature of your business that the school/compay is your client. |
Most recruiters work on the basis of getting a certain fee paid say 30 days after the teacher starts work and since that is the end of the money, for all the recruiters that people complain about, that also signals the end of the service to both teacher and school -- and really I don't see anything too wrong with that. The recruiter has done the advertising and written the necessary emails and the goods have arrived so payment is due. End of transaction. From the teachers angle, the recruiter has got the teacher the position as promised. End of that transaction too. No recruiter will dare guarantee that the teacher will absolutely love the school or vv. Whatever happens afterwards is either the teacher's fault or the school's or more likely both. Why blame the long-gone recruiter?
However some recruiters do try to provide ongoing services to both parties, but obviously that can only be done until the money paid by the school runs out because recruiters don't suck blood as commonly claimed - they have to buy food, pay the rent and the internet bill just like everyone else. My associate in Beijing is currently arranging for a teacher she recruited months ago to get her airconditioner fixed in the apartment she helped the teacher arrange after the teacher decided to move off campus. Lots of time spent but no payment asked or offered. Part of the service. She has signed up through us for next year too. Now a loyal customer despite some ongoing difficulties with the school
Yes the school pays but we want both teacher and school to be our clients. Yes, most teachers do only stay for one year, but they have friends and also a happy teacher usually means a happy school and that makes it easier to get the next teacher because good reports are available. We will try to debrief the teachers and the schools part way through the first semester and recommend changes if required. Everyone complains how inflexible the Chinese system is -- and they are right to a certain extent. The schools have similarly stereotyped opinions of the teachers and they are also partly correct. Neither party can be changed overnight but they can be changed incrementally so that the little hassles DON'T become big hassles and things stay on a reasonable basis all the time. The only way this can be done is for an interested third party to be involved. You can't leave that up to two parties who both consider they are in the right.
Anyway, it is all a nice theory at the moment and it is something that will take years to fully implement, but it is the reason why a westerner and a Chines are working together to try and get it going -- and I can assure you that the hardest part has been and will continue to be because the two of us are still very prone to selective communications with each other. We ignore direct questions because we don't see them as being worth answering -- etc etc, just as between the teacher and the school.
Why would I deliberately put a teacher off by pointing out crappy clauses in a contract? Because the teacher will trust me a little more and the teacher will ask that the contract be amended and hopefully accept the amended offer and then he will not end up hating me for landing him in a poor situation. The school will benefit too because the contract will be fairer and so less likely to cause disputes. So really I don't put the teacher off and even if he rejects that offer, he will be happy to consider another proposal.
Teachers say don't trust recruiters. Teachers say schools are ... watta watta watta. Schools say teachers are ... blah blah blah.
'bout time for a change.
Anyway, I'm not stupid. That system worked when I was in retail sales and the system has worked well in my private recruiting for a few years now and I hope we can get it working in the new situation. If it is any consolation, I fought and whinged and complained and yelled with the best of them in China and of course most of us will go through the same course, but hopefully the shouting will be a little softer and the complaints a little less strident |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nolefan

Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 1458 Location: on the run
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very well said, Tony!
Most people just think that all recruiters are out to get them and take away a part of their salary when that is seldom the case.
Yes, there are some snakes out there who have no office, no licence and no conscience either. They promise the moon and the stars and when anything bad happens, they're nowhere to be found; The cell phones are turned off, emails are no longer answered etc...
Remember that folks like Buckland, New Times International and Yakup deal with hundreds of schools and teachers a year and they do have quite a bit to put up with sometimes. They give you a place to stay, they feed you, you always have the option to come back if things don't work out for you at the school... geez, not every "teacher" can be 100% happy no matter how hard they try. And some of them do try pretty hard!
We make it a point to talk about all the so-called bad schools and bad agencies but we tend to forget that there are quite a few rotten apples in the teaching community that make it hard for everyone else. Those are the teachers that skip town because they found a better offer after they signed a contract, teachers that show up to class drunk or late, teachers that are here for reasons other than teaching....... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jencoyle
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 4 Location: spain
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the advice folks. Seems there's quite a mixed bag of opinions out there regarding EF. As it seems to vary such alot between specific schools, I guess I'll take my chances. All the best  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tony lee
Joined: 03 Apr 2004 Posts: 79 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"No matter how deep a study you make, what you really have to rely on is your own intuition, and when it comes down to it, you really don't know what's going to happen until you do it." Konosuke Mat su sh ita
Have a go Jen. The biggest factor in your success or otherwise is how you yourself will react to the situations and no advise or comment from us can prdict how that will turn out.
[What's this "beep" thing Dave -- is M-a-t-s-u-s-h-i-t-a a rude word |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gulam2
Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 137
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Lady,
Yes "have a go"
But maybe you could promise me that once the bad experience is over
you will return and thank all the contributors to this thread by WARNING
future teachers?
gulam2 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tony lee
Joined: 03 Apr 2004 Posts: 79 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
give it a rest Colin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zero Hero
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 944
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
edwinagirl wrote: |
To answer the OPs original question, no, you won't be discriminated against for being a woman. EF is a Scandanavian outfit, so they are not sexist in their approach. |
I don't understand this. First, EF is not "a Scandinavian outfit" (note spelling), but is a vast network of companies which inter-relate to various degrees (a conglomerate of Education First and English First), but all ultimately registered in Switzerland (there is also EF Travel, EF Au Pair, EF Year Abroad, etc.). Bertil Hult is Swedish, it is true, but are you seriously suggesting that, as the firm's owner stems from Scandinavia, therefore all staff in EF � even Mainland Chinese in China � are free of sexism and typically Scandinavian in their outlook and dealings with others? That is a clear non sequitur. What happens? Does this Scandinavian worldview magically transfer itself from person to person telepathically?
You may as well claim that as Bertil Hult is Swedish all EF employees are blond-haired and blue-eyed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:45 am Post subject: Calling all female DoSs |
|
|
Zero Hero, I like your point of view above.
The bottom line here is that the EF franchiser's influence on the EF English First centers in China is ridiculously minimal. So, anyone suggesting here that the founder is Scandinavian and so are the EF standards in China is preposterous.
"Calling all female DoSs" and now is your time ladies again.
Cheers and beers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zero Hero
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 944
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:55 am Post subject: Don't be so naive! |
|
|
edwinagirl wrote: |
EF is a Scandanavian outfit, so they are not sexist in their approach. |
This is, I have to say, one of the most naive (= "naivest"?) comments that I have ever read on this forum.
It does not matter a jot where it actually started: it could have started in any country you care to name, even the Vatican City State!
The fact is that EF is, as has been drummed into people's heads many a time, a franchised operation. In China, where EF has a considerable presence, it means that FTs can be subject to any kind of BS from the Chinese management, including sex discrimination (though I myself never saw that happen in the two years that I worked for EF in the Hankou area of Wuhan).
If a female FT or DOS feels that she is being sexually discriminated in some way by the backward and sexist attitude of Chinese center managers who do not believe that a woman has any "right" to a position of power, there is nothing that she can do about it. The so-called "academic operations managers" (AOMs) at Head Office in Shanghai will do nothing, because they undoubtedly have strict orders not to do anything to rattle the cages of the Chinese. If anything, it is the locals who call the shots and we either end up dodging them or else being shot altogether (proverbially speaking, of course).
Saying something like "But EF is Scandinavian!" does just as much good as saying that Santa Claus is. So what? That means nothing to the Chinese. On the other hand, money means everything, and that is what franchising is all about - money. Morality does not play a part in Chinese business thinking and strategy - guanxi does. If you have any guanxi with local Chinese businessmen, then they may "have a gentle word" with the offender. Otherwise, you have to swallow the annoyance and move on. If the worst comes to the worst, you can always leave the evening before a summer or winter school is due to start!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:46 pm Post subject: Calling all female DoSs |
|
|
Yes Chris, MONEY and CONNECTIONS mean everything to franchising and there is no exception in EF English First, more over there is a huge need for both of the above there. The EF marketing strategy in China is to prey on those retired high ranked military officers and other retired government officers that were in high positions previously. I would like to add that franchising is also taking CONTROL of the market and that�s what they are trying to do in China. Foreigners are increasingly getting into the Chinese market, although there is a lot of attempt to have them under some kind of a CONTROL and the retired military/government officers might as well provide that CONTROL, MONEY, and CONNECTIONS never mind the education aspect of the business (poor English learners), otherwise the EF English First would not exist in China. Who would really pay 2,000 000 RMB for an EF franchised center with obligations of 10 % royalty fees and with that �promise� of the return on the investment in �just three years�.
Chris_Crossley wrote: |
The so-called "academic operations managers" (AOMs) at Head Office in Shanghai will do nothing, because they undoubtedly have strict orders not to do anything to rattle the cages of the Chinese. If anything, it is the locals who call the shots and we either end up dodging them or else being shot altogether (proverbially speaking, of course). |
That is VERY TRUE and VERY UNFORTUNATELY TRUE.
The ironical and scary part on those �cages� is that foreigners franchise them and provide them with the workforce to �carry those cages�. Sorry to have put it this way Chris and have it taken out of your contest, although I see a tremendous connection between what you have said and what I have experienced in the position of EF Director of Studies there.
Where would you think that those �strict orders� for the farce EF AOM (Head of all academic staff in China) come from?
Cheers and beers
P.S. There is an interesting EF connection between Poland and China and the AOM in China can not only speak a bit of Polish, but he also has worked there previously. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|