|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| A 'typo' results from a misplaced finger on the keyboard. Those aren't 'typos'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:35 am Post subject: EF |
|
|
Dear Henry Cowell and Clark W Griswald,
I have noticed that you come on the EF thread often, read its posts and even participate in lately.
Would you be so kind to share your EF English First organization’s experiences with the forum participants, please?
Otherwise, peace!
Cheers and beers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 10:34 am Post subject: Re: EF |
|
|
Englishgibson - As the instigator of the wealth of discussion about EF on this board, and as the one who feels justified in attempting to suggest that 'all EF schools are bad', I am surprised at how long it is taking you to come up with the evidence that you promised us all in an earlier post.
You stated that the problems were more widespread than the list that I have composed in an earlier thread, and that you would provide information about these schools. Unfortunately we (the users of this forum) are still waiting for this information that you promised.
I suggest that if you want to add validity to your claims that you actually support your own arguments, considering you are the one who brought these to this forum. Don't waste time trying to discredit those who have raised legitimate questions.
It's a simple question englishgibson, and one that you promised us an answer to previously. Which schools within the EF school chain warrant us all avoiding, and why?
Judging by the PM's I have received since becoming involved in this thread, I am sure that I am not the only one who looks forward to your answer.
I can't speak for anyone else here, but as to your question about which schools in the EF chain I may have worked at, I have no intention of discussing this with you as it is irrelevant to this discussion. Invalidate what I say on this forum if you can, but please be mature enough to concentrate on the topic rather than the people taking part in the discussion! At this stage your last ditch effort to attempt to discredit those who have raised valid questions about your posts really doesn't say much about your own credibility, nor the credibility of your posts here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 6:36 pm Post subject: Re: EF |
|
|
| englishgibson wrote: |
| Otherwise, peace! |
Does that mean we should "shut the f_ck up"?
Cheers and schnapps! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gulam2
Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 137
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is always interesting to see what charaters are on the thread/s.
I am sure that many would type cast me as a whiner and complainer (and in fact this is partially true). If one reads a number of contributions from one person one starts to get a picture. For instance Aristotle and Clark Griswald (on the Taiwan forum) now I get the picture that Aristotle comes up with some serious stuff also some stuff that is unsubstantiated ( so what!!) But he is cut to ribbons. Aristotle has nothing to gain, Clark (and his lists do). In the same vein this guy moves over to the China lists and starts harping on about "generalizations" "generalizations" nonsense.
Let me state it quite clearly it is my opinion (and I do not NEED to substantiate it) based on my 3 years experience in China that there are few good EF schools in China and that there are very many bad ones.
THis is an OPINION you as the reader can take it or leave it.
It is further my opinion that any system that gives stars to grade schools
(I worked and taught in the Hospitality Industry for over 20 years)
is flawed and misleading. This is also an opinion. You as the reader can take it or leave it. I do not, now or ever, need to substantiate my opinion
to the Clark Griswalds of this world who often argue for the sake of arguing.
I am, as I have stated before, extremely greatful for daveeslcafe for giving me the opportuinity to state my OPINION. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Considering gulam2 and Englishgibsons constant complaints about how this thread was being derailed from it's purpose as a discussion about EF, I find their most recent posts quite amusing.
Guys, if you have something to say about specific schools in the EF chain then say it. If all you are going to do is throw around unsubstantiated accusations about the whole chain of schools, as well as those who question you about your comments, then you run the risk of degrading the value of this thread even more.
As to a resonse to gulam2's post above, well I certainly don't think that one is warranted as it is afterall his opinion and we have all seen how extreme his opinions can be.
Now, can I suggest again that we get back on track and see some of this evidence about specific schools that you have both suggested exists. I am starting to wonder whether any additional information apart from that already stated in this thread does exist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Midlothian Mapleheart
Joined: 26 May 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I just don't quite understand you HC and CG. EG and Gulam2 stated on Page One of this thread exactly which EF franchises they had trouble with, Huizhou and Zhejiang. They also were quite clear about their grievances and their personalities, which may have something to do with the rough ride. If you get food poisoning at McD's, it's quite likely that you'll have a low opinion of any place with that burger clown. I don't think documentation is required to state an opinion.
I also understand that Buxiban and other similar sites are set up with the best of intentions and must vet their info carefully. So, I think that HC and CG should just allow EG and G2's comments on EF to go unchallenged, and that EG and G2 should let Buxiban do their thing without comment unless they are willing to provide the details that site requires to set its ratings as they see fit.
Now you guys are just getting into tail-chasing and back-biting. If you are a Buxiban mod or an EF DOS, you should let people know your ID so we can get a clearer picture of this fracas. Just my 2 mao.
Middy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Middy - No one is questioning the validity of these posters comments about the schools they actually worked at. Have a read back through my posts which start on page 6 and you will see that. I am sure that the experiences they outlined here are very valid.
My questioning comes about as to their continued insistance that based upon the experiences they had at the schools they posted about, that all schools in the EF chain should be avoided.
So my question is - Why should all schools in the EF chain be avoided? And wouldn't it be more useful for everyone to actually name the schools that they have problems with rather than making generalizations about all schools in the EF chain?
And no, I have absolutely no involvement with EF and don't really care either way if people do or don't choose to work there. I am merely suggesting a standard of comments about schools that would be more useful than comments of a general nature, or comments lacking specific information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deezy
Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 307 Location: China and Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
clark griswold:
| Quote: |
| So my question is - Why should all schools in the EF chain be avoided? And wouldn't it be more useful for everyone to actually name the schools that they have problems with rather than making generalizations about all schools in the EF chain? |
I totally agree with you! There are good EFs, really good ones! I visited the EF at Kunming, it's run well, they have a good relationship with the teachers, and the Chinese management are really clued up. I've also visited the EF in Qingdao, again a happy crew. The EF Weihai team is also happy (I'm DoS there). And there are many others. It's down to good managment, both Chinese and DoS, it's down to good people skills, building a team, getting ON with each other, being open, keeping people informed, being fair, being honest, dealing with molehills before them become mountains, all these things and others. THIS is where any school succeeds or fails. If you get a DoS who is 'up him/self', inexperienced, and there are few of them! ... it fails. If you get a CM who is autocratic, secretive, dishonest, etc., ... it fails. Teaching quality goes down when teachers are bitter, overworked, unhappy. Funny that! It's simple.
I know there are bad schools. I have a teacher here who came from one and I'm horrified when he tells me some of the situations the teachers and DoS there had to deal with. I'm so glad he joined us... he's a top class teacher, and my job has been much easier since he's been with us. We are a small team, everyone counts, we, both Chinese and laowei, really do get on, we have fun, we work hard and play hard.
And I'm not saying all is perfect here... we have our problems as do all schools, but we work through them, and learn more about each other as we do so. I have arguments with my CM, and sometimes I have to accept a decision which I disagree with... that's life at any school, surely? We've just had a change of CM, and oh god I thought after a year of mentoring the previous CM, who was inexperienced, do I have to do this again? But the new CM has more teaching and marketing experience, so it's working out really well.
Please don't tar all EFs with the same brush! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:35 pm Post subject: EF |
|
|
Deezy, teachers should avoid the EF centers in China, because of the highly dangerous management techniques, standards and procedures that the EF English First Head Office practices in China. The good centers could turn BAD in no time. I worked at EF Fuzhou that from 200 students came down to only 50 students in a flash. You can take my word for it that it was not because of the slow business there. First four months at EF Fuzhou, I had a great time, which turned to a HELL later. The worst on this is that the EF English First Head Office in Shanghai knowingly has ignored the EF centers’ issues and assisted the employers/investors only. When the EF Huizhou dismissed a highly qualified teacher (referred by at that time the AOM himself Alex Chevrolee) due to his statement about his ambitiously compliant Director of Studies: “You are a dyke” neither the center provided a warning prior to the teacher’s dismissal nor the center consulted properly the EF Head Office in Shanghai to dismiss that teacher.
Of course that teacher was brushed off by the Head Office when complaining then. When the “EF Huizhou secret clone” was about to open (in two weeks time), I called the Academic Operations Manager Mark Rendell to inform him. His response: “Fax me the advertising leaflets, but don’t tell anyone you have spoken to me” put me in a situation to support EF Huizhou’s illegal clone and fax secretly the documentation compromising my Director of Studies position there. Those are some of the reasons that “ALL EF CENTERS IN CHINA” shall be watched out for.
If the locomotive conductor is not up to the job, the sixty-wagon train will be bound for a rough ride and the five or so nice wagons will not make a difference.
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
And no, I have absolutely no involvement with EF and don't really care either way if people do or don't choose to work there. I am merely suggesting a standard of comments about schools that would be more useful than comments of a general nature, or comments lacking specific information. |
Now, that explains it all, and why you have not provided any information about EF English First, but gone tail chasing and nail biting. However, your “SUGGESTIONS” are appreciated.
Henry C NOOOO! Keep on participating! Thanks for your "schnapps"!
Cheers and beers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:02 am Post subject: Re: EF |
|
|
| englishgibson wrote: |
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
And no, I have absolutely no involvement with EF and don't really care either way if people do or don't choose to work there. I am merely suggesting a standard of comments about schools that would be more useful than comments of a general nature, or comments lacking specific information. |
Now, that explains it all, and why you have not provided any information about EF English First, but gone tail chasing and nail biting. However, your �SUGGESTIONS� are appreciated. |
Jumping to conclusions can be dangerous Englishgibson, as we have seen in errors in your posting when you have done this previously.
Just because I have no involvement with EF now, doesn't mean that I never had involvement with EF in the past. I may have more experience with that chain than you do, or maybe less. The fact is that it doesn't matter. If what I post is incorrect, then correct it. Stop worrying about who I am, concentrate on what I post. I posted the above in answer to the question as to whether I currently had a vested interest in my posting about EF, which I don't.
| englishgibson wrote: |
| ...teachers should avoid the EF centers in China, because of the highly dangerous management techniques, standards and procedures that the EF English First Head Office practices in China. |
I'd be interested in what these dangerous management techniques are, and what impact they have upon the average EF teacher.
It seems to me that the majority of EF teachers are happy. They do their job and get their pay for the work that they do. They get the facilities that they are promised. They therefore do the job that they are employed to do, and live their life in China quite happily.
It seems to me that you (Englishgibson) are entitled to dislike the company as you didn't enjoy your time there. That's fine, and nobody is trying to take away from your complaint at the school that you worked for, nor the fact that you feel that head office in Shanghai was unsupportive of your needs. You are entitled to your opinion, you are entitled to express your opinion in public, and you have done this. Please accept however that others have opposing opinions that equally as valid.
| englishgibson wrote: |
| The good centers could turn BAD in no time. |
Yes they could, just as any English school could turn bad at any time if you wish to assume the worst. So why do you restrict your warnings only to the EF chain. If you truely believe that all schools are bad, but some just put on a good face, then surely your warnings should be about every school in China regardless of the brand name.
This is ultimately why I have spent so much time questioning yourself and gulam2. It seems pretty obvious to me that you do not have the welfare of other teachers in mind, and that your agenda is trying to soil the name of every EF school based upon your experiences and disappointments with one school and head office. I see that as being unjust and unhelpful. It is unjust that you are trying to suggest that all EF schools are bad when you don't know that for a fact. It is unhelpful that you are essentially watering down the value of boards such as this as people simply don't believe that all schools in EF are bad. It seems to me that teachers benefit far more from specific information about specific schools, and the bad schools themselves are far more likely to mend their ways if they are isolated from the group. By attempting to punish the whole group, and grouping good schools in with bad, you are essentially removing the reasons for good schools to remain good. And removing the incentive for the minority of bad schools to try harder.
| englishgibson wrote: |
| The worst on this is that the EF English First Head Office in Shanghai knowingly has ignored the EF centers� issues and assisted the employers/investors only. |
This is interesting and could have wide implications for teachers.
Do you care to elaborate on what those issues are and what impact they have upon the teachers in the schools?
| englishgibson wrote: |
| Those are some of the reasons that �ALL EF CENTERS IN CHINA� shall be watched out for. |
Most of what you wrote related to your individual experiences at the school you worked at (EF Huizhou) and your contact with head office in Shanghai.
I am still unclear as to how those specific experiences are a reason that all EF centers in China should be watched out for.
| englishgibson wrote: |
| If the locomotive conductor is not up to the job, the sixty-wagon train will be bound for a rough ride and the five or so nice wagons will not make a difference. |
From my experience with franchise schools over the past decade, I cannot agree with the above.
The fact is that franchise schools are individually run and owned. If the school fails then it is the individual owner that loses his or her money, not head office. Although the individual franchises will receive direction from head office on certain issues, it is the schools that is responsible for the day to day operations of the school and the teachers in that school. It is the school that pays the teacher, not head office. It is the school that gets the Z visa for the teacher, not head office. It is the school that decides upon the hours for the teacher, not head office.
If an individual EF franchise school is well run then it is very much independant from the chain and the behavior of other schools in the chain. The reverse is also true, and therefore the behavior of bad schools is not necessarily indicative of all schools in the chain.
Assuming though that your analogy of the locomotive is correct however, and according to my post on page 7 of this thread, your point of view would seem flawed anyway.
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
Bad Experiences
EF Hangzhou - brsmith15
EF Huizhou - Englishgibson
EF Yuyao - gulam2
EF Zhuhai - Balrog, Darius
Good Experiences
EF Hangzhou - Chris Crossley (I think); gulam2 and Englishgibson (both gave their thumbs up to the DOS there)
EF Hefei - Third party report (Thanks to Noelle)
EF Kunming - no_exit, deezy
EF Pudong - matador
EF Qingdao - tw (based upon location), deezy
EF Suzhou - Third part report (Thanks to Noelle)
EF Weihai - deezy (DOS at that school)
EF Wuxi - Third party report (Thanks to Noelle)
EF Xi'an - Third party report (Thanks to Noelle)
Anyone else care to add to this list with specific comments about specific schools in the chain? |
As you can see there are five reports about bad experiences at EF schools, and 13 reports about positive experiences at EF schools. Bear in mind that people tend to complain far more than they do compliment, and these numbers become even more interesting.
From your analogy you suggest that the few wagons that are different from the majority of wagons would not make a difference to the overall running of the train. So it would seem that the locomotive and the majority of wagons are heading on course, and the few 'bad wagons' are not having an impact upon the positive course that the train is taking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 7:24 am Post subject: EF Wuhan (Hankou), not EF Hangzhou |
|
|
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
Good Experiences
EF Hangzhou - Chris Crossley (I think); gulam2 and Englishgibson (both gave their thumbs up to the DOS there) |
This is incorrect: I worked for EF Wuhan (Hankou) for two years, not EF Hangzhou (in fact, I have never even been to Hangzhou).
Since I left (in October 2003), another branch has opened in the Wuchang district of Wuhan, but I have never worked there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 7:33 am Post subject: Re: EF Wuhan (Hankou), not EF Hangzhou |
|
|
| Chris_Crossley wrote: |
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
Good Experiences
EF Hangzhou - Chris Crossley (I think); gulam2 and Englishgibson (both gave their thumbs up to the DOS there) |
This is incorrect: I worked for EF Wuhan (Hankou) for two years, not EF Hangzhou (in fact, I have never even been to Hangzhou).
Since I left (in October 2003), another branch has opened in the Wuchang district of Wuhan, but I have never worked there. |
Thanks for correcting this. I got the information from an earlier post of yours in this thread and wasn't sure about it so that's why I put the words 'I think' down next to your name. I have updated the original post.
As far your experience at EF Wuhan (Hankou). Would you say that it was a positive or negative experience? I would like to add this to the list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:01 am Post subject: Positive and negative experiences about EF Wuhan (Hankou) |
|
|
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
| As far your experience at EF Wuhan (Hankou). Would you say that it was a positive or negative experience? I would like to add this to the list. |
I would say both, though I would separate these into two distinct areas:
Positive: The teaching experience was great, and I hardly ever had any negative experience to speak of, either with adults or with young learners, over the two years I spent there. It gave me a good grounding in perfecting my teaching techniques, and I certainly learned a lot from how to interact with Chinese students and how to encourage them, based on both my experiences and their experiences, in the latter case with the Chinese educational system. That experience prepared me well for teaching at the primary school where I would spend a full year before moving on to my current school.
Negative: The management: firstly, the crazy DoS and the sycophantic manager - I have dealt with them in an earlier post. The sycophantic manager eventually got fired over the numerous complaints made to the president of the school (based in Beijing), including his handling of the "Crazy DoS affair". One of my ex-colleagues described the crazy guy as "pure evil". The second manager turned out to be a control freak. Though he promoted me to acting DoS, I sense that he deliberately kept me as "acting" in order to keep more power for himself. He basically wanted to run the whole show by himself, and he sometimes made decisions of an academic nature without consulting me, thus totally undermining my authority.
The worst was when he persuaded me to overload teachers during the peak summer months; in one case, he had one teacher teaching 38 HOURS in one week in the classroom. This was utterly shocking, yet he was the one who wielded the power. Believe me, I was glad when my time was up after 11 months of what was essentially a non-job, even if my hours were less and my pay was more than what other teachers got: small consolation.
Now that guy runs both this school and the other school, which I mentioned in my previous post. He was the one who rang me up one day (more than a year after I had left) to offer me a part-time job teaching young learners on the weekend - before telling me that he was concerned about what I was writing about EF here on Dave's. Thus, he revealed his true motive for offering me the job: he basically wanted to "gag" me. Well, all I will say is that I just never replied to his so-called "offer". Happily, I have not heard from him since. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Now that's a good school review. Thanks for the further information Chris and sorry for the earlier misunderstanding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|