|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:14 am Post subject: Re: EF |
|
|
Now look who makes the errors, YOUR EF LIST Clark is rather "AMUSING". First according to “YOUR EF LIST” Noelle was to have had good experiences in EF Huizhou, and then Chris Crossley in EF Hangzhou. By the way, I have said a positive and a negative thing about EF Hangzhou, so how did I end up on “YOUR EF POSITIVES LIST there only”? Read the posts more carefully, “KEEP YOUR THUMBS DOWN WHEN READING”, and as you tend to give so many suggestions “I’D SUGGEST YOU GO BACK AND READ THE PREVIOUS POSTS/THREADS OF MANY OTHER EF-UNHAPPY PARTICIPANTS TOO”. In brief, YOUR EF LIST is highly subjective.
Here is my contribution to “YOUR EF LIST” for now.
Bad Experiences
EF English First Head Office Shanghai – Englishgibson (Recruiting unable to provide experienced/qualified staff)
EF English First Head Office Shanghai – Englishgibson (Academic Operations Manager M.R. still unqualified/disorganized), Chris Crossley (M.R. “unhelpful”)
EF Hangzhou - brsmith15
EF Huizhou - Englishgibson Director of Studies, Keath worked there, and a few others that worked there
EF Yuyao - gulam2
EF Zhuhai - Balrog, Darius
EF Hangzhou – Englishgibson (one thumb down to one self-centered DOS there)
EF Daqing – Third party report (Thanks to Englishgibson and an EF Daqing teacher)
EF Zhuhai – Third party report (Thanks to Englishgibson)
EF Changsha –
EF Fuzhou – Englishgibson (DOS/Senior Teacher/Teacher there, and 8 other teachers that left)
EF Dalian – Third party report (Thanks to Englishgibson)
EF Donguan – Third party report (Thanks to Englishgibson)
EF Xiamen – Third party report (Thanks to Englishgibson)
EF Urumqi – Tom Selleck
Good Experiences
EF Hangzhou - Englishgibson (one thumb up to one DOS there who might not even be there anymore)
EF Hefei - Third party report (Thanks to Noelle)
EF Kunming - no_exit (works there), deezy (visited the center)
EF Pudong - matador (one year experience there and then out of China)
EF Qingdao - deezy (visited? Heard from others?) tw’s “based upon location” means what Clark?
EF Suzhou - Third part report (Thanks to Noelle)
EF Weihai - deezy (DOS at that school)
EF Wuxi - Third party report (Thanks to Noelle)
EF Xi'an - Third party report (Thanks to Noelle)
clark.w.griswald wrote: |
englishgibson wrote: |
clark.w.griswald wrote: |
And no, I have absolutely no involvement with EF and don't really care either way if people do or don't choose to work there. I am merely suggesting a standard of comments about schools that would be more useful than comments of a general nature, or comments lacking specific information. |
Now, that explains it all, and why you have not provided any information about EF English First, but gone tail chasing and nail biting. However, your “SUGGESTIONS” are appreciated. |
Jumping to conclusions can be dangerous Englishgibson, as we have seen in errors in your posting when you have done this previously.
Just because I have no involvement with EF now, doesn't mean that I never had involvement with EF in the past. I may have more experience with that chain than you do, or maybe less.
|
Clark, that's hilarious! What do you really mean? Please, share your experiences with us! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:19 am Post subject: EF |
|
|
EF Changsha has not got a name of the teacher yet on "EF LIST OF CLARK" due to my current search for. I'm sorry I've been really busy lately.
Cheer and beers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: EF |
|
|
englishgibson wrote: |
Now look who makes the errors, YOUR EF LIST Clark is rather "AMUSING". First according to �YOUR EF LIST� Noelle was to have had good experiences in EF Huizhou, and then Chris Crossley in EF Hangzhou. |
Unlike yourself englishgibson, I actually appreciate the input of others and am happy to accept their comments. As I have stated all along that list is merely a synopsis of the comments about specific schools within this thread. I made notes when I was unsure of the information in that list and I appreciate Noelle and Chris for correcting the list as at the end of the day the list will be a lot more useful if it is accurate.
I am quite happy with the way things are coming together. We are getting some good information about EF schools, and this is going to help potential teachers make an informed decision about whether or not to work there. Surely that should be our aim.
englishgibson wrote: |
By the way, I have said a positive and a negative thing about EF Hangzhou, so how did I end up on �YOUR EF POSITIVES LIST there only�? |
I didn't see your negative comments about Hangzhou, but please feel free to point out to me where these comments are and I will add them to the list. I have added all of the negative and positive comments that I could gleen from this thread, and have always invited new additions.
englishgibson wrote: |
�I�D SUGGEST YOU GO BACK AND READ THE PREVIOUS POSTS/THREADS OF MANY OTHER EF-UNHAPPY PARTICIPANTS TOO�. |
You promised us all in an earlier post that you would do this yourself and provide us all with specific examples about specific schools. We are still waiting for this and when the information is forthcoming I will certainly add it to the list.
As to your contributions to the list I would be happy to add these if you could either provide more details about the schools that you refer to or ask those teachers you refer to to post about their experiences themselves. I accepted Noelle's comments at face value as that person has a proven track record for legitimate posts. Once I see what the problems were with those particular schools I would be happy to add them to the list also.
As I have stated before I have no intention of getting into a 'mine is better than yours' conversation and therefore I ask you once again to concentrate on the posts not the person making the posts. If what I post is incorrect then please correct me and I will be happy to accept that and make the necessary changes. To date though you haven't done this, you have just jumped from attempted insult to attempted insult. I am afraid that I won't be drawn into that Englishgibson, so lets just stick to the topic of this thread which is EF - not Clark and not you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 2:03 pm Post subject: EF |
|
|
Clark, GIVE US ALL a break, speak for yourself, and make your tail-chasing posts more accurate, more efficient and more truthful in fact. And above all, let us know about that EF experience of yours, will ya? With all due respect, you sound like that "blind referee" on this thread.
Cheers and beers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mike w
Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 1071 Location: Beijing building site
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TIME OUT !!
I thought this was supposed to be a thread about EF. How wrong could I be?
'Tis nought but a mud-slinging match between two people attacking each others credibility and integrity. Get a life guys! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In an effort to get this thread back on track I have taken some time to go through past posts about EF. Considering that EF has employed so many teachers over the years I was certainly surprised at the relative scarcity of reports. We all know that EF is a much talked about school, but many of the comments made about EF are actually made by a handful of posters on this forum.
There is certainly a lot of negativity out there which is no surprise to anyone, but I noticed a few patterns in this negativity:
a) many of the negative comments came from about four individuals on this forum. These individuals may have had legitimate problems with EF, but it is likely that their personal experiences were limited to one or two EF schools.
b) many of the negative comments that are made are very vague and largely personality based. There are very few details given in the negative complaints on a whole. I did see one quite legitimate complaint about problems with a Z visa and failure to pay wages at one particular branch.
c) It seems that a lot of people are critical of the wage offered for the high workload required. I can understand this and I can�t suggest that a 40 hour week would be a good thing, but it does seem to me that it is EF�s right to require that workload, and the individual teachers right to either accept or refuse those hours. I don�t see that it is grounds for complaint.
When it comes to positive posts, it was very clear that the moment someone posted anything positive about their experiences with EF they were almost instantly greeted with scorn from those posters whose names are synonymous with EF bashing. I would certainly not be surprised if this discouraged people with positive words about EF, and resulted in these people choosing to keep silent.
I have listed what seem to be relevant comments about specific schools in the EF chain below. I didn�t include general comments. I only included comments about specific schools in the chain. I didn�t include comments about friends or friends, I tried to only include comments from individuals with personal experiences at those schools. Finally, I have not listed comments from the Job Information Journal as that is an area of the site that teachers tend to post on when they don�t want people to reply to their posts.
So here is the list. Please don�t complain about comments that aren�t on the list as really anyone could have compiled this list but it seems that nobody wanted to. If you feel that there is a valid comment that should be added to the list then please let me know and I will add it. Additionally, this might be a good chance for people to post about their personal experiences at particular schools, be they good or bad.
EF Shengyang � Question raised about a scandal (Bertrand), suggested by (Xiaoyu) that no such scandal existed based upon reports from friends who worked there.
Negative Experiences
EF Huizhou � No details (Bertrand), extensive details (Keath), (englishgibson)
EF Yiwu � No details (yvechina)
EF Nanchang � detailed post (bgreytalk)
EF Wuhan � detailed post (J9)
EF Wuhan (Hankou) � bad management (Chris Crossley)
EF Urumuqi � detailed post (tifanjo), (tom selleck)
EF Hangzhou � detailed post (Alani), (brsmith15)
EF Yuyao � gulam2
EF Zhuhai � balrog, darius
Good Experiences
EF Dalian � (deezy)
EF Hangzhou � detailed post (Noelle)
EF Hefei � third party report (Noelle)
EF Kunming � (no_exit), (deezy)
EF Pudong � (matador)
EF Qingdao � based on location (tw), (deezy)
EF Suzhou � third party report (Noelle)
EF Urumuqi � detailed report (CathB)
EF Weihai � (deezy)
EF Wuhan � detailed post (J9), (gulam2), (englishgibson)
EF Wuhan (Hankou) � good teaching experience (Chris Crossley)
EF Wuxi � third party report (Noelle), (babala)
EF Xi�an � third party report (Noelle)
EF Xiaoshan � detailed post (dreaming_saturn)
EF Zhuhai - positive comment by PM (Keath)
The most interesting thread of all was this one:
englishgibson wrote: |
Why are some people so quick to post negative comments on some topics on the site, and why are they not so quick to post positive comments? Do you really believe that every EF Englih First in China or elsewhere is so bad? Ohh, if you say yes, could you please explain why? Cheers |
From all of the above it does seem that yes there are some bad EF schools out there, and some of them should be avoided. But there are also a lot of good schools that can offer good opportunities for those who are interested in working for a school such as EF. So I can't see any validity in a broad claim that all EF schools should be avoided.
July 29: I have added some comments about Huizhou and Zhuhai schools.
Last edited by clark.w.griswald on Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:16 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Clark, this is truly an amazing project that you've undertaken!!
The only EF 'experience' that I have is training some teachers who had already completed contracts as EF instructors. Some had decent skills, but most of them came to us with the skills of a typical college student with average grammar knowledge. My impression (and it was only an impression) was that EF doesn't really take the time to work with inexperienced teachers to make them significantly better. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes I would certainly agree that English First is far from the pinnacle of what a good English school should be. Sure, it is a good program for those who have never taught before as expectations are low - you do the hours, you get the pay. In most cases you know that you will be taken care of legally, and you know that you are very unlikely to get ripped off. Another plus would be that I believe the majority of centers are downtown, so teachers can develop and maintain an active social life. As such it can be a good starting point for newbies wanting to enter the teaching market in China.
The trade off is that the hour requirement is high for the pay rate offered. Another downside is that the teacher quality can be low in some places even to the degree of accepting teachers that should probably be studying the language rather than teaching it. Additionally anyone with teaching experience, or teaching qualifications, may find it difficult to take direction from a DOS who possibly knows less than the teachers working under them.
While I believe that the above are all valid comments about the school, I don't see them as being a reason that potential teachers should avoid the chain altogether. It seems to me that all of the above will be seen differently by different teachers, each of which will see different aspects as being positive or negative. I think that it is great that people talk of their experiences regarding the above, but I don't see that calls for all teachers to avoid all schools are valid.
For me I would consider that problems such as withheld pay, promised Z visas that never materialize, abusive treatment, cancelling of employment contracts prematurely without good reason etc. to be the sorts of problems that we should be warning teachers about. These problems are unlikely to be acceptable to any teacher, and from my own research I can see that these problems have been experienced in at least one EF school.
As I have been saying since one of my first posts on this subject, in my opinion information about specific schools is vital to ensuring that teachers avoid those schools while supporting the good ones in the chain. That in my opinion is the best way to improve the bad schools and encourage the good. I hope that others agree with this, and I hope that current or past teachers from EF will post about their experiences with particular schools. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Babala

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 1303 Location: Henan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just for the record, I will second Noelle on the Wuxi EF. I knew quite a few of their teachers and they had positive comments to say about their school. This was about a year ago though, so I don't know if things have changed.
My ex-boyfriend actually attended EF. He wasn't pleased with the teaching materials and the instructor was constantly calling in sick and cancelling classes. He said he wouldn't go back. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:42 am Post subject: Genuinely ill or not? I don't care - you will teach as usual |
|
|
Babala wrote: |
My ex-boyfriend actually attended EF. He wasn't pleased with the teaching materials and the instructor was constantly calling in sick and cancelling classes. He said he wouldn't go back. |
Sounded like the "instructor" (since when are teachers at EF English First called "instructors"?!) was either a malingerer or else someone who might not have been able to cope with the stress of either teaching classes or else pressure being put on teachers by the management.
It was amazing to me that I never heard of a single case of someone just cancelling classes for days (if I have interpreted the wording in the post correctly) during the two years that I was at EF Wuhan (Hankou). Yes, there were the occasional cancellations due to genuine illness, although I will say that, during my early days, the sycophantic center manager kept telling me and my colleague, "If we cancel the classes, the students will be very angry." Not knowing any better, I wondered how it could be that the students could have so little understanding of anybody who is genuinely ill, especially if they could barely speak.
It was only later on that I twigged that what that sycophant meant was that the big investor man, who sponsored his appointment, would be very angry if classes were to be cancelled. For the big man, cancelled classes signalled disaster, and he and his puppet cared not a jot if teachers were in the classroom barely able to speak. Looking back on it, that sycophant behaved in a totally callous, uncaring manner. I was glad when he was eventually fired. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Babala

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 1303 Location: Henan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
First off, why I called the teacher an instructor I have no idea. Let's put it down to the weather conditions outside
My ex enrolled in EF for 2 months. The classes were scheduled on Wednesday and Friday nights from 6.30 - 8.30pm. In this 2 month period, his classes were cancelled at least 4 times that I know of. In such a short time period, I would call this alot. I am not saying that all EF have this problem, I just thought since everyone is discussing EF that it may be interesting to give one student's opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:00 am Post subject: A student's opinion is very rare on this forum |
|
|
Babala wrote: |
I just thought since everyone is discussing EF that it may be interesting to give one student's opinion. |
Indeed. In fact, it is quite rare that we have the opinion of an ex-student on this forum, even if, as it says at the top of each page, Dave's is "the internet's meeting place for ESL/EFL students and teachers from around the world". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:17 pm Post subject: EF |
|
|
Speaking of negative comments of teachers, they are not limited to “one or two centers”, are they? Teachers have commented on many EF centers in many locations of China.
Speaking of vague or personal comments according to Mr. Clark W Griswald, some teachers have made fairly clear reports on what happened in their respective EF centers and if that is not enough then my large reports on two EF centers in China and the EF Head Office in Shanghai shall give a clear understanding of the problem, shan’t they? If that is not enough, then the ones that do not believe those reports shall join one of their centers themselves.
Mr. Clark W Griswald, you have done YOUR search and I must say that quite a good one considering that “YOU JUST CAME ON THIS THREAD FROM PAGE SIX” as you have said. You have really looked for those positive EF posts AS HARD AS YOU COULD.
EF Quindao’s comment of tw “based on location” what does that mean? He’s never worked for an EF center.
With all due respect to Noelle and her short “few months” EF English First experience in China, I would say that that would not be enough to comment to such extend on so many EF centers in China, would it? Her Hangzhou’s comment: “If you love getting drunk and spending your days hangover come to EF Hangzhou!” is indeed “AS IN YOUR WORDS VAGUE and PERSONAL”, isn’t it?
With all due respect to Deezy and her hard work at one EF center where she hasn’t even finished her FIRST YEAR EF CONTRACT, she could not have gotten to know those many centers in such a short time so well, could she?
With regards to my negative posts about a few schools/EF Head Office that you quickly took off the negative list as well as Keath’s name on EF Huizhou and so on, it looks like you are ON A MISSION, aren’t you?
You’ve done your number with Noelle-EF Huizhou (never) and Chris Crossley EF Hangzhou (never) on YOUR EF LIST previously.
There is no room for manipulating the public opinion here. This is not a fight of who is wrong or who is right. This is a fight for the FOREIGN TEACHERS’ RIGHTS and for IMROVING THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT in the EF English First in China.
Many of us have had horrifying experiences with EF English First in China. Some of us have been intimidated and some threatened and that is how far this organization goes.
So Mr. Clark W Griswald, since you spend so much of your own time on this thread recently and since you have not replied to my inquiry whether you have worked for an EF center and we know only that you are “involved in Buxiban site”, ARE YOU TELLING US THAT YOU ARE PARTICIPATING HERE TO WRITE UP A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE EF LIST ONLY? If you have more EF experience than I, would you please share it?
Cheers and beers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Noelle
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 361 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A good point made in the post above.
EG does seem to have more experience with EF whereas my experience was pretty limited. I guess I just hoped my positive comments would count for something on a forum where there seem to be so many complaints.
It would be nice to see more satisfied teachers participating here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 8:14 am Post subject: Re: EF |
|
|
Englishgibson I have invited you (and anyone else) to add information about specific schools that could be added to the list. You haven't done this so please stop complaining about that.
You seem to allude to this information being available, yet you haven't offered it. You even stated in a previous post that you would bring this information to everyones attention, but you never did this. I got sick of waiting for you to come through on your promise and therefore I did it myself. If you haven't offered certain information, then it can't be added to the list. If you don't want to take the time to prove your point and add information to the list then don't complain that it is not there.
Other posters have indicated that they are sick of the back and forth between us, and I can't blame them for this. I strongly suggest that you forget about who I am, and concentrate on arguing my posts, as your attempts at derailing the discussion are extremely transparent.
englishgibson wrote: |
With regards to my negative posts about a few schools/EF Head Office that you quickly took off the negative list as well as Keath�s name on EF Huizhou and so on, it looks like you are ON A MISSION, aren�t you? |
I haven't taken any of your negative comments off the list. Your comments about Huizhou are the only comments that were on the list that I wrote up, and these are still listed. I have not listed any comments about head office as I don't consider that to be a school. As to your comments about other schools in the chain, well I welcome you again to outline your concerns with those schools and then I can add those to the list to. I am not going to add names to the list just because someone who is a very vocal critic of EF says that the school sucks. Explain why that particular school sucks and I will gladly add it.
As to Keaths experiences, well these were never listed on my list so I couldn't have taken them off. You added these to your 'quasi-list' and I have no knowledge of his experiences. I however welcome him to post about his experiences here and I will add them. In fact, I have just sent a PM to Keath asking if he has anything to add to this thread.
englishgibson wrote: |
There is no room for manipulating the public opinion here. This is not a fight of who is wrong or who is right. This is a fight for the FOREIGN TEACHERS� RIGHTS and for IMROVING THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT in the EF English First in China. |
I believe that the information I have posted above is a good first step in improving conditions for foreign teachers at EF schools. If we can identify which particular schools are a problem then we will know which schools should be avoided, and EF will know which schools they need to improve.
As you are critical of these efforts, I'd be interested in knowing how exactly your involvement in this thread has improved the working environment for teachers at EF or protected the rights of foreign teachers in general? Please answer this as it would be interesting to see your answer.
englishgibson wrote: |
Many of us have had horrifying experiences with EF English First in China. Some of us have been intimidated and some threatened and that is how far this organization goes. |
The above is an unsupported exaggeration. The fact is that some people have had bad experiences with some EF schools. Some people have had wonderful experiences at EF schools. The rest of the people just did their jobs, got paid, and then moved on happily to other positions.
englishgibson wrote: |
So Mr. Clark W Griswald, since you spend so much of your own time on this thread recently and since you have not replied to my inquiry whether you have worked for an EF center and we know only that you are �involved in Buxiban site�, ARE YOU TELLING US THAT YOU ARE PARTICIPATING HERE TO WRITE UP A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE EF LIST ONLY? If you have more EF experience than I, would you please share it? |
I have replied to this question each time you ask it and will again.
Whether or not I have worked at EF has absolutely no relevance to this discussion. I am not purporting to be an expert on EF. You are the one who is purporting to be an expert on EF, despite the fact that your personal experiences are limited to involvement at a couple of schools, and discussions with head office. I have never purported to be an expert on EF, nor do I believe that I am. I am merely questioning your suggestions that you attempt to present here as being fact, and doing my best to bring together the information that is available about EF. If you want to add to this information then please do so.
Once again I suggest that you argue the points not the person making the points, as at the end of the day it doesn't matter who I or you are, it only matters about whether or not EF is a good or bad place to work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|