View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:03 pm Post subject: Canada is not part of the UK any longer?! |
|
|
stillnosheep wrote: |
What! Canada is no longer part of the UK?  |
"A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away..." Perhaps the Trade Federation is based in Canada?
I happen to know that Newfoundland and Labrador were part of the UK until 1949!
(So when's Canada gonna take St Pierre and Miquelon?! ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:11 pm Post subject: Re: Canada is not part of the UK any longer?! |
|
|
Chris_Crossley wrote: |
I happen to know that Newfoundland and Labrador were part of the UK until 1949!
|
I happen to know that Newfoundlands and Labradors are lovely dogs - tho' maybe not as intelligent as your Border Collie.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:15 pm Post subject: Border collies and labradors |
|
|
stillnosheep wrote: |
Chris_Crossley wrote: |
I happen to know that Newfoundland and Labrador were part of the UK until 1949!
|
I happen to know that Newfoundlands and Labradors are lovely dogs - tho' maybe not as intelligent as your Border Collie. |
Believe it or not, there actually are Border collies in Wuhan. My wife is thinking of buying one for our new home!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great dogs! But can be a little nippy if not trained well when young. Avoid Collie/Retriever crosses. Although in theory you could end up with a dog with the family-friendliness of a Retriever and the brains of a Collie all too often you get a mutt with the instincts of a Collie and the brains of a Retriever. And they chew everything in sight! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matttheboy

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Posts: 854 Location: Valparaiso, Chile
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Lemon wrote: |
merlin wrote: |
Quote: |
This [EU] is the only area in the world, so far that does this though there are specific schools that ask for only British or Brit/Aus/NZ or only N.American. |
Just plain misinformed. Many countries like Brunei, Malasia, Singapore and a whole slew of others don't recognize North American teaching credentials. To get a teaching visa to these countries you need a British Teaching Degree. |
Speaking of misinformed. There are hundreds (thousands?) of non-Brits teaching in Brunei public schoolsi, both on CfBT and direct-hire contracts. Many of them have Canadian teaching degrees. |
Yep, because Commonwealth countries often recognise each others' education degrees and many other qualifications. They give preference to workers from, in particular, 'first world' members like canada, the uk, australia and south africa. http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=39504
As for Border Collies..they're the best dogs in the world but unless you're able to take it out for at least 2 long walks (off the lead) a day then don't get one...they need a lot of exercise, trust me... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
grahamb

Joined: 30 Apr 2003 Posts: 1945
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:23 am Post subject: Ashes to Ashes |
|
|
England's post-Ashes dinner menu:
Humble pie with hard cheese, followed by sour grapes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris_Crossley

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1797 Location: Still in the centre of Furnace City, PRC, after eight years!!!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:29 am Post subject: Re: Ashes to Ashes |
|
|
grahamb wrote: |
England's post-Ashes dinner menu:
Humble pie with hard cheese, followed by sour grapes. |
I think some countries in the EU wouldn't give a hang for England's continued woes in Test cricket against Australia. They have sporting problems of their own!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
merlin

Joined: 10 May 2004 Posts: 582 Location: Somewhere between Camelot and NeverNeverLand
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Speaking of misinformed. There are hundreds (thousands?) of non-Brits teaching in Brunei public schoolsi, both on CfBT and direct-hire contracts. Many of them have Canadian teaching degrees. |
"The Lemon" read my post out of context it seems.
I was stating that the idea that the EU is the ONLY govenrnment that "discriminates" against people from the US was misinformed. My mentioning Brunei, Singapore and Malasia was to give examples of other places where people from the US find it difficult to find work as teachers. Primarily due to the big difference between UK-style teaching certification and US teaching certifications. New Zeland, Australia, South Africa and all those other former colonies have educational qualifications that are comparabel or the same as the UK so yes, they can also find jobs where teachers from the US can't.
"The Lemon" - make sure you read a post in the context of the post immediately before and of the whole thread rather than just latching onto isolated sentences and trying to spark a debate on a non-issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1) Freedom of movement for labour has been a fundamental part of the treaty of Rome. It never was so for NAFTA.
2) Joining the EU does not mean that it will become harder for a non EU member to get a visa in theory. But in practice it will for these two linked reasons.
a) Whereas before an employer had to prove that the position he filled with his foreign hire could not be done by a national of his country, he now has to prove it can't be done by a national of the EC, which is more difficult.
b) The Brit or Irish guy won't require any paperwork; the non-EU guy will.
3) In fact until recently many countries in the EU applied indirect restrictive practices that made it impossible for non-nationals to fill many positions. This particulary affected government employment which is what most educational jobs are. This was not fixed until the early 90s. This is the reason you won't find many British or Irish teaching in French or German classrooms, and not because they don't need them, as Roger erroneously asserted. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
counpk39
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 17 Location: New York State
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:15 am Post subject: One thing that we need to remember coming from the US... |
|
|
...is that we are often seeing the argument through our own American perceptions. Employment discrimination based on national origin is against the US law. That is basic Title 7 of the Civil Rights act of 64. We also have the Immigration Reform and Control act of 86 which states (among other things), "Employers who impose citizenship requirements or give preferences to U.S. citizens in hiring or employment opportunities also may violate IRCA." So as long as an immigrant or foreign national has the paperwork, they have all the labor rights of a citizen.
The EU places its emphasis on ethnic origin. Discrimination by ethnic origin against a citizen is against the law. According to the Racial Equality Directive and the Employment Equality Directive, citizens have "a common minimum level of protection against discrimination." If you are not a citizen of an EU country, you will have to assume the risks of de jure discrimination and no labor rights.
I am optimistic that with time and more international cooperation, perhaps all of the borders which keep all of humanity separated will come down.
Almost forgot to ad...as a post script, our profession tends to favor those of us who speak English as a first language--maybe we should call for an end of this form of discrimination as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apples and oranges I'm afraid.
The US law says that one may be in violation of US law if one's employment practices discriminate against legal US residents on the basis iof country of origin or citizenship.
The EU law mentions common protection against discrimination on the basis of country of EU citizenship (NOT ethnic origin) for all EU citizens. It doers not mention non EU citizens as it is not relevant to them.
In any case the OP was referring to US citizens who are NOT legally resident in the EU and have NO rights to work there. THe US law relates to foreign citizens who already have the right to live and work in the US.
If a US citizen can satisfy the requirements to obtain permission to work in the EU (eg is suitably qualified for a job for which there are no suitably qualified local (EU) candidates) then s/he can get the job. If an EU citizen can satisfy the requirements to obtain permission to work in the US, (eg is suitably qualified for a job for which there are no suitably qualified local (US) candidates) then s/he can get the job.
The mistake that some people are making is in comparing the EU to a continent (such as North America). Europe is a continent. The EU is a political and economic union, which is more like a collection of states coming together to form one confederation.
If the EU is viewed (for employment purposes) rather as being one nation (such as the US) then any sense of unfairness as to why US nationals find it just as hard to obtain visas to teach English in the EU as EU citizens do to obtain visas to teach English in the US simply disappears. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We have now accumulated 7 pages of posts about a matter which is completely out of the control of persons posting on this board.
What was the point? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
counpk39
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 17 Location: New York State
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stillnosheep wrote: |
Apples and oranges I'm afraid.
The US law says that one may be in violation of US law if one's employment practices discriminate against legal US residents on the basis iof country of origin or citizenship.
The EU law mentions common protection against discrimination on the basis of country of EU citizenship (NOT ethnic origin) for all EU citizens. It doers not mention non EU citizens as it is not relevant to them.
In any case the OP was referring to US citizens who are NOT legally resident in the EU and have NO rights to work there. THe US law relates to foreign citizens who already have the right to live and work in the US.
. |
As I said, the two entities have separate laws pertaining to discrimination. Therefore, one may say that the comparison is like apples and oranges. What I was clarifying was that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the ICRA of 1986 prohibits discrimination based on one's citizenship. An employer or landlord cannot explicitly refuse to serve ir hire someone because they are foreign nationals. The EU laws only pertain to its citizens. If you are a citizen of a Non-EU country who legally resides in the EU, there are no laws protecting you from discrimination.
It's a sad fact for some, but it's a fact. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chasgul
Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 168 Location: BG
|
Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moonraven - b1tching makes a lot of people feel better. And remember that a problem shared is a problem doubled... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
merlin

Joined: 10 May 2004 Posts: 582 Location: Somewhere between Camelot and NeverNeverLand
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What was the point? |
Umm .... to discuss it maybe?
I think if you're interested in actually solving anything or coming to any kind of universal consensus this is the wrong medium.
It's very usual in these forums to find three to four pages of less-valuable contributios and then a kernel of wisdom on page 8.
The traditional ways of thinking, commuicating and problems solving are dying, moonraven. Embrace the chaos. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|