Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Scam Warning - More websites and Recruiters
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only)
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
clark.w.griswald



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:07 am    Post subject: Re: Why are we here? Reply with quote

Double post!

Last edited by clark.w.griswald on Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:09 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clark.w.griswald



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:08 am    Post subject: Re: Why are we here? Reply with quote

bearcanada wrote:
Let's try to remember that the origin of these posts is to protect teachers, especially the new, young and inexperienced, from the dispiriting, empty, and sometimes almost tragic consequences of dealing with the unscrupulous.


How does passing off misinformation as some form of fact serve to help teachers? Surely if your aim is really to protect teachers then the onus is on you to research topics before you post. You have clearly failed to do that in the case of the buxiban site, which is probably the easiest of all the references to research as there are foreigners involved and extensive information on that site. This really calls into question the validity of your other posts in my opinion as the Chinese recruiters that you refer to wuld be a lot more difficult to research other than a quick scan of any notice board.

So I am curious as to what level of research you have conducted to ensure that the rest of the information you have presented is based upon fact and not misinformation.

No one is arguing that information can't help newbies to protect themselves, but misinformation presented as fact is likely to undo any good that is acheived.

bearcanada wrote:
In a context like this where thousands of trusting individuals have been cheated and treated badly, excessive caution is not a mistake.


Don't forget the tens of thousands who didn't encounter any serious problems and went away happy.

I think it highly likely that every teacher who comes to work in China is going to have some disappointments during their time here. That is probably pretty close to fact. Sometimes these disappointments are due to lack of preparation by the teacher, sometimes due to a lack of integrity by schools or recruiters, and probably most often of all due to genuine misunderstandings and cultural differences.

I will question the following points not because I want to have a protracted argument with you, but simply because I think that there are a lot of things that you haven't considered.

bearcanada wrote:
Stay away from recruiters


Why? Because some of them should be avoided doesn't mean they all should. If you, or anyone else chooses not to deal with a recruiter but decides to put in the leg work themself then fine. But don't knock the fact that recruiters can provide a valuable service to those who would never consider arriving in China without any leads. I can't blame these people. China is a bog foreign land and if you don't speak Chinese it gets even bigger. Having someone to point you in the right direction can be helpful, but you need to protect yourself by ensuring that this person is actually helping you and not just helping themselves.

I would also like to ask you for a suggested alternative. Saying don't use recruiters full stop doesn't really protect teachers as it creates a brickwall to finding work here. So teachers will either write your comments off as alarmist and then end up dealing with a crummy recruiter; or they will find no alternative way to find work so go elsewhere. So if teachers should follow your advice and not consider recruiters, then how else can they find work in China? I don't think the job sites host enough positions for everyone so I am curious as to how you expect these people to get placements?

Surely the middle ground is the answer. Identify recruiters that have good track records and promote those, while exposing the recruiters that have less honorable reputations. Don't lump them all in together.

bearcanada wrote:
Avoid 'private' schools


By this do you mean private after school and after work institutes, or do you mean private mainstream schools at elementary and high school level? Also, why should teachers avoid these schools?

bearcanada wrote:
Don't go to an unlicensed school


How do you know if a school is licensed or not? For the average foreigner researching positions from overseas, the above statement isn't likely to be terribly helpful as they have absolutely no way to determine if a school maintains the appropriate licences.

I think it more helpful to suggest that teachers research the background of schools as much as they can, and speak with foreign teachers who are or have worked at the school to ensure that the appropriate documentation was provided in a timely manner.

bearcanada wrote:
Check references of recruiters


I thought that you suggested above for teachers not to deal with recruiters.

bearcanada wrote:
Check references of schools


Agreed.

bearcanada wrote:
Get your "Z" visa before you leave


There are two trains of thought on this subject and I certainly wouldn't dictate to anyone which method is better.

Get the Z visa before you arrive - the obvious advantage is that you know you will be legal. The downside is that you will need to commit to a school that you may have never been to, in a city you may never has visited, and work with people and students that you have never met. Also any misunderstanding or deception will basically be forced upon you as there is next to nothing that you could do about it. There is no turning back if you go this route.

Arrive first and get your Z visa later - the obvious downside is cases where a school promises you a Z visa but fails to deliver on this promise. Despite the inconvenience this would cause, in the worst case scenario you could speak to the authorities and basically walk away. The upside to arriving first is that you can check everything out prior to making a final commitment. If everything is not as promised then you can walk and find another school.

bearcanada wrote:
Have your airfare paid before you leave or on arrival.


Is this advice even practical? Does anyone know of any schools that actually do this - arrange a Z visa and pay your airfare to you while you are overseas and before they even meet you? What would stop you from accepting the airfare and working somewhere else? I personally would be skeptical of any school that was offering this upfront as it is not standard and would possibly indicate desperation. They can't get anyone locallly (possibly because the school or city has a bad reputation) so they basically bribe a teacher from overseas!

The general process is to sign an agreement about when the airfare repayment will be made and the amount of this reimbursement. The teacher foots the cost upfront, and gets reimbursed according to that agreement. If a school renigs then take action. If a teacher can't afford the cost of the ticket to even get to China then they may want to reconsider their decision to come here.

So as I say, I am not trying to be overcritical of this advice, but I do feel that it is a bit oversimplistic!


Last edited by clark.w.griswald on Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YearOfTheDog



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was going to post about some of the same the same things...But I don't need to now...Thanks Clark.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clark.w.griswald



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, online at the same time Shocked

Just wait for the suggestions that we must be the same person Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YearOfTheDog



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That has to be the funniest thing I have read all day...

I am online to burn sometime before my night class.

We could be the same person though...Do you live in Rural Eastern Inner Mongolia??? lol.. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bearcanada



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roger, I repeat my earlier comment that your post is nonsense. In the first breath you say you are 'owed' a rational explanation, then in the next breath you provide it yourself. That qualifies as nonsense.

What is source of your observation that, "you are making nothing but blanket statements based entirely on your prejudices including, it would appear, against me."

I made no widespread 'blanket' comments about any subject; it was instead one simple, specific item. If you have contradictory information based on the valid experience of a mature adult, please refer to it.

You are guilty of precisely that fault - making "blanket statements based entirely on your prejudices including, it would appear, against me."

And what is the point of your comment, "Engage in some real adult talk, can you?" I'm sorry, but it seems to me this kind of puerile personal attack should be directed to its author. Slinging insults is a sign of neither intelligence nor maturity.

Cheers,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bearcanada



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:19 am    Post subject: Re: Why are we here? Reply with quote

This is sounding like disagreement for its own sake.

[quote="clark.w.griswald"]Don't forget the tens of thousands who didn't encounter any serious problems and went away happy.[/quote]

Well, good for them, but I'm interested in helping those who DID have serious problems and to prevent others from having them.

[quote="clark.w.griswald"]I think it highly likely that every teacher who comes to work in China is going to have some disappointments during their time here.[/quote]

That may be, but my purpose is to help prevent the deliberate cheating by scammers, not to save the world from every possible disappointment.

You objected to my recommendation to avoid recruiters because that would "create a brick wall." That's nonsense. It isn't all that difficult to find direct school postings, nor to visit schools if one is already in China. You know that.

The first-timers will have little ability to distinguish good from bad, so the simplest way to avoid the problem is by going direct. And in most cases they will earn more money by doing so. They can also ask the opinion of learned and experienced people like yourself and make posts on all the teachers' ESL boards.

You objected to my suggestion to avoid 'private' schools; you asked why, and what kind. Because this is where most of the deception takes place. The reasons are all on my website; if you're interested, have a look.

I advised teachers to avoid unlicensed schools. Your comment: [quote="clark.w.griswald"]How do you know if a school is licensed or not?[/quote]

Well, first off, you ask. Then you confirm. The details are all posted. We aren't talking about "researching the background of schools" or learning whether "appropriate documentation was provided in a timely manner"; we're talking about whether they have a license to hire foreign professionals or plan to make you an illegal alien. Period.

Your comment: [quote="clark.w.griswald"]I thought that you suggested above for teachers not to deal with recruiters.[/quote]

I did, but for those who do it anyway (and some will), a check of references is a must. How can you possibly object to that?

I recommended that teachers get their "Z" visa before they leave. Your comments:

[quote="clark.w.griswald"]".... downside is that .... any misunderstanding or deception will basically be forced upon you as there is next to nothing that you could do about it. There is no turning back if you go this route.[/quote]

You seem to be confusing a contract with a visa. Are you sufficiently familiar with Chinese law to know that one is beholden to a visa issuer?

You also said that without a visa, [quote="clark.w.griswald"]".... If everything is not as promised then you can walk and find another school.[/quote]

You can walk away WITH a visa too, and in fact you can walk away even with a contract if you insist on the insertion of appropriate articles about misrepresentation. But much of the point is that if a school can and does issue a visa beforehand, a teacher's confidence can be much higher and many problems can be avoided.

And in any case, the issuance of a visa is a good test of legitimacy and worthy on that count alone.

You objection to my advice to try to have airfare paid before leaving or on arrival is astonishing.

[quote="clark.w.griswald"]I personally would be skeptical of any school that was offering this upfront as it is not standard and would possibly indicate desperation. [/quote]

You would be 'skeptical' of a school that gives you a contract, arranges your visa and pays your airfare up front?

FYI, this is how the expat business community has always worked. NO manager or accountant or IT professional or anyone else I can imagine would ever consider going to another country on his own dime without these things in place.

I have never heard of people in any industry paying their own way to a job 12,000 miles away that may not exist with a salary that may not be paid.

And yes, to answer your questions, the advice is practical, I do know of schools that do this, and many teachers have made posts on ESL boards testifying to it. How much research have you done?

To suggest that a school who pays your airfare up front may be desperate or dishonest is insulting and foolish. As is your statement that a teacher who can't afford the airfare shouldn't come.

Your statement about "the general process" may be accurate, but it is not a process that should exist. And in any case, if a teacher appears on a doorstep to begin duties, that is the time to reimburse the expense.

It is also a significant measure of self-protection because the shady schools inevitably refuse to pay it at the end of the term; the 'private' ones often dismiss a teacher just to avoid it.

My recommendations are sound advice for new teachers to protect themselves from the unscrupulous. If it makes them excessively cautious, that's not a sin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
clark.w.griswald



Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yearofthedog - Phew! We could not possibly be the same person as I have never even been to the neck of the woods you now live in Wink

BearCanada, it seems that the more you say here, the further you move away from protecting teachers and more to protecting himself.

bearcanada wrote:
Well, good for them, but I'm interested in helping those who DID have serious problems and to prevent others from having them.


What you were doing was concentrating on the negative side of things and ignoring the positive side as the positive side of all of this does not fit within your agenda. This is what I see as being the biggest flaw in what you are trying to do. I accept that your intentions were no doubt good, but you have really not done anyone any favors in promoting the misinformation and bias that you promote.

There are of course two sides to every story yet you choose to only espouse the side of the story that fits within your agenda. This clearly does not help teachers protect themselves as they are only hearing one side of the story. You should not take the higher position yourself and tell teachers what they should or shouldn't do, but instead provide them with the information that they need to provide an informed decision. That is one or our aims over at the site that I am involved with, and I think that we acheive this very well.

I mean honestly, who are you to be telling people that you don't know what is best for them? I don't mean this as an insult but as a question. What makes you think that you are qualified or experienced in all of this to be making decisions on behalf of other people?

At the back of mind will always be the knowledge that you got things completely wrong in regards to the site that I work with, and certainly in my mind this will always give me cause to question anything that you write. Not for any other reason than it could also be wrong!

bearcanada wrote:
That may be, but my purpose is to help prevent the deliberate cheating by scammers, not to save the world from every possible disappointment.


That may well be your aim, but are you truely achieving that aim by putting out misinformation. If you really want to help people then you need to accept when you make mistakes and then provide a correction so that at the end of the day readers will know the truth. I mean that is what this is all about, the truth. Nobody really cares about whether you are right or wrong, they just want to know that what they are reading is fact.

So why don't you start by accepting that you failed to research the buxiban site before you commented on it, and that you have no evidence to suggest than it is anything other than what it purports to be i.e. a source of information for teachers researching positions in China.

I note that no one has yet responded to state that they have received any unsolicited contact after registering on that site, which doesn't surprise me as I know that it doesn't happen, but it certainly does seem to vindicate my position that BearCanada is wrong.

bearcanada wrote:
You objected to my recommendation to avoid recruiters because that would "create a brick wall." That's nonsense. It isn't all that difficult to find direct school postings, nor to visit schools if one is already in China. You know that.


I didn't object I merely called into question the logic behind such a statement.

The fact is that anyone who followed your advice as it stands would not deal with any recruiter fullstop. They would not refer to the buxiban site which to my knowledge has the greatest single list of direct contacts for schools in China.

Therefore teachers following your advice would have to rely upon job posting boards alone. This is not a bad thing, but it would funnel all teachers to a single place and therefore job competition for those positions would be a lot higher. This could send the wrong message to schools in that there is an oversupply of teachers which could act to the detriment of wages and conditions being offered.

Also bear in mind, that any teacher following your advice would believe that all recruiters are bad but all schools are good as you don't have a bad thing to say about schools. Therefore these teachers may naievely accept a position with a school without doing an appropriate level of research.

This again is due to your apparent bias against recruiters. Clearly you have been burned, but surely you are not suggesting that you have been burned by every recruiter in China. Why don't you do what most people would do and just post about your own personal experiences, rather than attempt to extrapolate these limited experiences as being representative of a whole industry.

bearcanada wrote:
The first-timers will have little ability to distinguish good from bad, so the simplest way to avoid the problem is by going direct.


Fortunately sites like buxiban.com enable them to distinguish good from bad. So what you are suggesting people need, is the very thing that you are critical of! This is what I can't work out about what you are trying to achieve. With every step you take forward you seem to take two steps back!

bearcanada wrote:
And in most cases they will earn more money by doing so. They can also ask the opinion of learned and experienced people like yourself and make posts on all the teachers' ESL boards.


Exactly. They can search the board here at Daves or post a query. They can head over to buxiban and view comments from past teachers. All of this is available.

This does not mean that all recruiters should be avoided. It just means that whatever position a teacher wants to accept they should do an appropriate level of research.

bearcanada wrote:
You objected to my suggestion to avoid 'private' schools; you asked why, and what kind. Because this is where most of the deception takes place. The reasons are all on my website; if you're interested, have a look.


Again I didn't object. I merely questioned what you were referring to when you say 'private schools' as to my mind there are two possibilities. I then asked why you feel they should be avoided.

It seems to me that most people choose to work at private institutions as the pay and conditions are generally better there than public institutions. Also, I bet that there are more private schools now than public, as far as English teaching goes. So therefore it seems logical that there would be more complaints coming in from private schools as there are more teachers teaching in private schools. This seems logical.

What is not logical however is to extrapolate this across as suggesting that private schools are more dangerous and should be avoided. What you need to look at is whether there are certain schools that are getting a lions share of the complaints, and identify schools that have had serious complaints made about them. This is what buxiban.com does, but you fail to do, and this is what sets us aside.

Another thing that you have failed to consider is that most public school positions are in fact offered through recruitment firms, and seldom do these positions appear on message boards.

So once again any teacher who follows your advice would find it next to impossible to find a teaching position in China. I suppose that this is the ultimate way to protect teachers in China though as they can't get burned by schools or recruiters in China if they don't even come for lack of positions!


bearcanada wrote:
I advised teachers to avoid unlicensed schools. Your comment:
clark.w.griswald wrote:
How do you know if a school is licensed or not?


Well, first off, you ask. Then you confirm. The details are all posted.


Yeah that's gonna be real helpful. Just ask them.

Have you ever considered that they may just say 'yes' if you ask them if they are licensed even though they may not be?!!!

So you need to confirm this right! So how do you confirm that a school is licensed? That was my original question and it still stands.

bearcanada wrote:
We aren't talking about "researching the background of schools" or learning whether "appropriate documentation was provided in a timely manner"; we're talking about whether they have a license to hire foreign professionals or plan to make you an illegal alien. Period.


Anyone who has any dealings here in China would know how difficult, in fact impossible, it would be for a foreigner who doesn't speak Chinese, has never been to China, and is researching jobs from overseas, to find out if a school has the appropriate licences. You just can't do it reliably.

So the solution is to find out the answer in a round about way. Don't ask the school, ask the other foreign teachers at the school. That is just logical. If the school is legit, then the teachers will have had no trouble obtaining the appropriate paperwork to work legally in China. Why make things more difficult than they already are?

bearcanada wrote:
Your comment:
clark.w.griswald wrote:
I thought that you suggested above for teachers not to deal with recruiters.


I did, but for those who do it anyway (and some will), a check of references is a must. How can you possibly object to that?


Again I didn't object to it, I questioned you on it.

So from the above you seem to understand that teachers will still choose to go with recruiters no matter what you or anyone else might say. So why is so difficult for you to accept a system that helps teachers identify the better recruiters so that they have a better chance of finding work without difficult. I mean if people are going to ignore this part of your advice then doesn't it call into question the practicality of your advice? I think it does.

bearcanada wrote:
You seem to be confusing a contract with a visa. Are you sufficiently familiar with Chinese law to know that one is beholden to a visa issuer?


I can assure you that I understand the difference between a visa and a contract.

What you say above exactly reinforces my point about arriving here on a Z visa. If you do then you are pretty much commited to that employer for the contract year (in that the visa is based upon the contract) which can be a negative in some cases.

bearcanada wrote:
You also said that without a visa,
clark.w.griswald wrote:
".... If everything is not as promised then you can walk and find another school.


You can walk away WITH a visa too, and in fact you can walk away even with a contract if you insist on the insertion of appropriate articles about misrepresentation.


The only way that you could walk away if you arrive on a Z visa would be with either the schools permission (by way of a release letter), or the governments position (by way of a ruling that the contract or employment conditions are illegal). Either way this is going to be difficult to achieve, time consuming, and costly.

In all practical terms if you arrive on a Z visa then you should probably be expected to be committed to that school for at least a few months as that is how long it would take to resolve the issue unless the school just chose to cut you loose and give you a release letter so that you can find another job. I can't see that happening though, and even if it did you could be sure that there would be costs involved.

bearcanada wrote:
But much of the point is that if a school can and does issue a visa beforehand, a teacher's confidence can be much higher and many problems can be avoided.


I don't think that the likely problems are going to be due to a teacher's confidence or lack of. Problems upon arrival are almost entirely issues of practicality. For example, a teacher may learn upon arrival that the school is far more distant from the accomodation than expected; that their apartment is on the sixth floor with no elevator even though they have a bung knee; that the teaching conditions are not as imagined etc. These are all legitimate misunderstandings and are not breaches of the contract nor are they necessarily dishonest behavior on behalf of the school. A teacher who arrives on a Z visa is going to have to find a way to deal with the problem. A teacher who is beholden to the school yet could negotiate or walk away.

bearcanada wrote:
And in any case, the issuance of a visa is a good test of legitimacy and worthy on that count alone.


Yes it is the best way to ensure that the position is legal. I conceeded that above. Don't be under any misunderstanding though as it doesn't guarantee that the position is a good one.

bearcanada wrote:
You objection to my advice to try to have airfare paid before leaving or on arrival is astonishing.

You would be 'skeptical' of a school that gives you a contract, arranges your visa and pays your airfare up front?

FYI, this is how the expat business community has always worked. NO manager or accountant or IT professional or anyone else I can imagine would ever consider going to another country on his own dime without these things in place.


Well we are not talking about the other industries that you refer to, we are talking about teachers and teaching so your comments about other industries are not applicable.

In the case of teaching, some schools do indeed offer upfront payment for tickets and this is not automatically an indication that these schools are doing so for a reason.

It is not however standard practice for schools to pay for tickets upfront. The standard practice is for the teacher to pay for the tickets out of their own pocket and get reimbursement once they arrive. In some cases schools will pay upfront, but in most cases the school will pay part upfront and part upon completion of the contract. That is a fair and reasonable way of doing things and helps schools avoid being burned by teachers who run away.

bearcanada wrote:
And yes, to answer your questions, the advice is practical, I do know of schools that do this, and many teachers have made posts on ESL boards testifying to it. How much research have you done?


I know of schools who do it too, but they are in the minority. Maybe only 10% of positions if that will send you the tickets or the money for the tickets before you arrive in China. In my opinion that makes your advice impractical!

bearcanada wrote:
To suggest that a school who pays your airfare up front may be desperate or dishonest is insulting and foolish.


It's a fact in some cases. I have not suggested that every school that offers the money upfront is desperate or dishonest but some of them are and the offer can be a good indication that the school should be researched more. Just think logically. Why would that school make themselves vulnerable doing something that is not the industry standard?

bearcanada wrote:
As is your statement that a teacher who can't afford the airfare shouldn't come.


I stand by this statement.

I don't believe that it is a teachers best interests to come to China unless they have the means to support themselves for a period of time if things don't go right. This includes covering the cost of a ticket to get here. Bear in mind that if you do let the school pay for the ticket and then you find that you are not happy with the school then you are going to have to stay until you can afford to pay them back for the ticket. Putting yourself in that sort of position is not in the best interests of most teachers.

bearcanada wrote:
It is also a significant measure of self-protection because the shady schools inevitably refuse to pay it at the end of the term; the 'private' ones often dismiss a teacher just to avoid it.


That is a false win.

If you are working at a good school then you will get the money regardless of whether they pay up front or at the end.

If you are working at a shady school then you are probably best not to have the debt of the provided ticket hanging over your head. At least if you have footed the cost yourself and find yourself in a shady school you can leave for greener pastures elsewhere.

This is where research becomes key so that you can avoid schools that renig on these payments!

bearcanada wrote:
My recommendations are sound advice for new teachers to protect themselves from the unscrupulous. If it makes them excessively cautious, that's not a sin.


I don't agree.

I believe that your opinions are valid, but are based upon flawed logic and an oversimplification of the processes at work here in China. I believe that people could follow your advice and find that they have a troublefree run here in China, more likely though, anyone who followed your advice would never actually secure a job here in the first place as your advice is not practical.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YearOfTheDog



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:24 am    Post subject: Re: Why are we here? Reply with quote

bearcanada wrote:
Gentlemen;

Let's try to remember that the origin of these posts is to protect teachers, especially the new, young and inexperienced, from the dispiriting, empty, and sometimes almost tragic consequences of dealing with the unscrupulous.

These latter are recruiters and schools who, in the fine words of one teacher, ".... look on education as a lucrative variation on pirated DVDs."

In his words, "More tragic yet, is that the genuine hopes of the recently rich (though often barely literate) parents are exploited by the cunning sharks who understand these people's aspirations and know how to lie in just the right way."

In a context like this where thousands of trusting individuals have been cheated and treated badly, excessive caution is not a mistake.

My comments stand, as does my advice:
Stay away from recruiters
Avoid 'private' schools
Don't go to an unlicensed school
Check references of recruiters
Check references of schools
Get your "Z" visa before you leave
Have your airfare paid before you leave or on arrival.

If these fundamentals are adhered to, probably a full 80% of all serious troubles would be avoided and, in the words of the same teacher above, "these useless and immoral operators would be consigned to the rubbish heap where they belong."

Regards,


Ok I have a couple of questions. It is my understanding by wondering around your site that you have never actually taught in China, you have never had to deal with headmasters and the industry at all? Is this true?? It seems that by looking at your site, your only experience with the EFL world in China is true people posting about their bad experiences.

So I have an excerpt from your site.

Quote:
Troubles seem to come not so much from the main schools in the large city systems (there are exceptions like English First, apparently), but more often the privately-owned schools especially in the smaller centres that take shameless advantage of teachers. And of course, from most recruiters



I agree with the recruiters some need to be avoided. Really they do, some of them are evil. But not all. It is like saying All Americans are War Mongers because of Bush. Which simply just isn't true.

Now for your comments about "Private Schools in rural areas" I am currently working for a private company that places us in poor rural communities in Inner Mongolia. We are treated like gold. I work 16 hours a week. Just weekends. I get full salary no matter the hours I work. My point is this. Do you have any idea how hard it is to convince people to come work up here, the weather conditions are prety harsh. It takes a lot of e-mails and phones calls to get people not to go to the Big cities. And here you are posting that schools in rural areas should be avoided.

Well I have to say thank you for posting a blanket statement making it even harded for us to get teachers.

You also state on your site that you should look for work with a government school. What is to say a government school won't screw you just as bad as a private one. Even if you do talk directly to them. The chinese will tell you anything to get hired. I worked at a public school for a bit before I came to my current position. And let me tell you. I was getting the royal screw job.



Hold on a minute...Clark Did you see this...



Quote:
Chinese recruiter Buxiban;

Main website: www.buxiban.com

I think also this Buxiban website should be treated as suspect. With their very short lists of 'great' and 'black-listed' schools, they have to be playing a game. There must be hundreds if not thousands of small private (and other) schools in China that should be on a black list, and these people would know more than we do. I can't say they're dishonest, but I would be careful and go slowly.


Taken Directly from your website. You are clearly stating that Buxiban is a recruiter. We have stated over and over again that they are not, and yet you are posting false information. I don't know what nationality Clark is, but he certainly isn't chinese. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
# SALARIES

# NEVER accept a low salary like 3,000 RMB per month because schools pay far more than that. Even 5,000 or 6,000 is not high, with accommodation and meals included. Many many schools pay 7,000 or more and, depending on location, 10,000 is not too high.

# The best arrangement is to negotiate ALL CASH for your work. The more additional or conditional payments someone must make to you, the more potential for you to lose them.

# Push the salary higher and pay your own travel expenses and find your own accommodation and eat out or cook your own meals. Yes, it's more trouble at the very start, but you will avoid much headache and maybe heartache for the rest of your stay.

# You should add at least 2,500 RMB per month for your living accommodations, about 1,000 RMB per month to recover your travel expenses, another 1,000 RMB per month for food and about 500 RMB for phone and internet expenses.

That will take you to about 10,000 RMB which is still less than the schools are paying anyway. The recruiters (or cheap schools) make money by finding you substandard accommodations for 1,000 RMB, not paying your real travel expenses, and so on. You don't have to let that happen.


Maybe you think everyone is looking for work in large cities. But where do you get this from? 2500 RMB for accomidations...my god man if I asked for that much I would own half the village I live in. Expenses are subjective to where you live, how big, what life style you live. "10 000 RMB is not to much" I think we should do a poll on these boards and see how many people make 10 000 RMB a month. You have to be kinding me. It is websites like yours that make it so hard to recriut people. The amount you get paid would depend on how many hours you work. Someone like Roger could explain this better, he has numerous time on this board, or maybe Clark. I am just a teacher, I get paid 6000 rmb for 16 hours of work. I save over 4000 of that. To me that is a grand deal. but according to your website I am getting ripped off.

Quote:
Your contract should include a one-month paid holiday DURING its term. This means if you are teaching a 10-month year you should be paid for 11 months, and the extra month's pay must NOT be conditional on anything. Also, there should be a small travel allowance per semester.


I am not sure on this, but I am pretty sure just Uni's in China offer anything like this. I would seriously doubt a government public school would offer you a paid month off like that. Saying stuff like this is really limiting where people will work. I am pretty sure there are hardly any jobs in China that meet your specifications.

Quote:
You can't protect yourself completely here because private 'schools' have been known to send photos of a high-rise in Hong Kong or Vancouver, BC as 'your new home', which lovely buildings seem to be 'full' when a teacher arrives. Public schools should be ok; so far as we know, it's only the scam recruiters and private schools who do this.


So government schools don't lie? Give me a break man and wake up. That is a riduculus statement. Maybe you need to do more research.

In order for a school to get blacklisted all you need apparently is one teacher posting about the place. Is this true? If so, you need to rethink your policies. I don't believe that the schools are always to blame. What is to stop a rogue teacher from posting about a good school and then you black listing them?

I know for a fact that a former teacher from our company tried to get Clark to blacklist our school. Clark, told him that he needed more than just his random complaint in order to blacklist the company. And let me tell you Thank God. Clark didn't blacklist our company. I think that people need to be careful about who is blacklisted, good companies could get harmed.

Also judging by your blacklisting standards, how come DAVESESLCAFE isnt' black listed? There are sure a lot of bad companies posting here.

All your advice seems to be catering to people who are money hungry. Let me let you in on a little known secret. People don't come to china for the money, the come here because it is China. And until you come here you will never really understand.

Telling people to push for more and more and more, is only going to make the rural communties I work in lose out on the chance to employ good qualified teachers and to me that is really sad. Our company charges 800 RMB a YEARS TUITION. I don't want to do the math but to pay a teacher 7000 - 10 000 rmb a month would be almost impossible.

I know or assume you have good intenion but they are ill researched and ill advised in some cases.

Peace


Last edited by YearOfTheDog on Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YearOfTheDog



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roger wrote:
Bearcanada owes us a rational explanation why he elects to call chinatefl a rogue website; such blanket statements reflect bias.
I do add a disclaimer, though: if you post your CV there you will certainly be contacted by agents with no legal business basis, working with a mobile phone and possibly during office hours at an university.
Alin Buur is one of those that poach their victims there.


I think I have it figured out Roger...

One bad apple ruins the bunch. Basically he works on the the premise one bad link then the website should be avoided. So all the new teachers can foget about the 1000's of good things that come from that site, because of one or two bad links.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bearcanada



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:36 am    Post subject: My God Reply with quote

Post Deleted

Last edited by bearcanada on Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:55 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bearcanada



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear YOTG;

I appreciate your sincere comments. Your first question is well made. FYI, my experience in China spans 25 years including teaching English. However, I was never part of the school system and didn't have to deal with recruiters then, though I do have a comfortable amount now of dealing with them personally.

I have never been burned by a school recruiter, but a Chinese agent is a Chinese agent. Through my dealings with the Chinese Consulate here, I have been successful in having some agencies in Mainland China shut down for fraud. I don't know if the owners went to jail, but the local consulate did have them put out of business on my documentation. They DO care.

In one such discussion about a scammer, I mentioned to the Consul that I had lived in Rome for 7 or 8 years (where every Italian has a reputation as a con artist), and he said to me, "Oh, then you know what it's like to do business with the Chinese". Very funny.

It is true that not all recruiters (or indeed all Chinese agents) need to be avoided, but there is no easy way for an inexperienced person to know the good from the bad from a distance. To deal with them in any field is to be burned until you learn, unless maybe you're just lucky.

The 'private' schools that I was referring to are the "Guangzhou International Economics University" or the "Slappy Happy English Kindergarten" located in a seedy walk-up and run by a guy who had his DVD-burning factory closed down 3 weeks ago.

It's the scam money-spinners I worry about, not the legitimate privately-owned schools like Wall Street et al. I don't know how else to categorise them; if you have a suitable term, I would welcome it. I was not referring to a "private company that places teachers in rural schools". If I have accidentally lumped a good one of these in with a bad of the other, I regret that.

My suggestion about government schools follows from that. It seems at least more likely they will be licensed and will offer fewer problems, although I believe what you say about your earlier experience. It really doesn't seem possible to tell in advance without lots of work and reference checking, and the posts of people like yourself to warn others who come after you.

I do believe that one is generally safer in Beijing or Shanghai in this regard, and partly because our Embassies and Consulates are near to hand. But for eg., I've seen many stories of EF franchisees (and I don't mean to slam EF) running clone EF schools and using their teachers as unpaid extra help for the clones. That isn't as likely to occur in the large cities as in the farther-away places.

You may have noticed that my reference to buxiban has been removed, as I have already told Mr. Griswald, and I do regret anyone's having been misled in the interim. My experience with buxiban was in fact a personal one but perhaps misunderstood, in part because there are jobs "offered" by schools or recruiters and jobs "offered by buxiban". Maybe I'm just thick.

Certainly you are vey correct in saying that one complaint cannot form a basis for blacklisting and that caution is necessary to avoid harm to good sites and people.

My blacklisting information comes from personal experience where recruiters have proven their con artistry to me, but even then it is supplemented with more than adequate documentation from teachers and ESL website administrators, international ed people of various kinds, and so on. It's unfair for you to suggest otherwise without asking for facts. However, your observations hold.

The odd scam link on a website don't especially bother me, although a responsible site manager should be doing some self-editing to avoid throwing a perfectly good teacher's site into disrepute. I mean, if Dave's "job board" were to consist largely of ads from scam recruiters it wouldn't be of much value to anyone, would it?

However, to refer to your specific point, posting a CV on a site will obviously leave you open to approaches from anyone - hardly the website's fault. That was never my point - I was referring to ESL 'teacher's' sites that accept JOB ads from recruiters who are widely known to be con artists - like James Zhang aka Alin Buuer, for eg.

And the reason I came down hard on some of the "tefl.xxx" sites is because they had his and other ads openly displayed. And, according to me, should have known better. After all, if I know and you know, how can they not know?

Your comments about your own school were much appreciated. I have not been there and can appreciate only in a general sense the difficulty you have of finding good teachers. I don't believe I have specifically mentioned 'rural' schools anywhere, but my reason for mentioning small centers is that there are so many more reports of scams coming from there. People seem more ready to do things there, than in Shanghai or Beijing, it seems; maybe more pull with the authorities. I don't know.

And of course, no 'list' or 'recommendation' or bit of advice can cover every eventuality. Just as there are good recruiters, there are good private schools and bad government ones. And bad teachers too, for that matter.

So, especially if you are young and inexperienced, you go slowly with lots of caution and try to avoid the trouble other people have identified.

Again, your comments are appreciated.

Cheers,


Last edited by bearcanada on Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:07 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bearcanada



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear YOTG;

An additional comment, if I may. I missed the last part of your last message - about the money and so on.

I guess yes, I am thinking more of the larger cities in my comments, though I have seen enough confirmed reports of a school paying 8,000 and a recruiter offering 4,000 or so for the same job (and pocketing the difference, as well as the advanced air fare - they cheat schools too).

Certainly in the tiny towns and villages things will be very different, but that may not be the best place for a first-timer with no knowledge of the language or customs and far from friends and help.

I couldn't know how many teachers earn 10,000 a month, but I do know that many schools pay about that much when you add in all the extras. My point in asking for the cash is that you can choose your own apartment and pay your own bills, and if the amounts are in your monthly salary they can't be withheld at year end.

I do know that in the large centres people like Wall Street, Language Key or Clark Morgan pay as much as 14,000 per month for top teachers.

A nice apartment in Shanghai or Beijing costs 4,500 or more; a passable one, not too handy, is maybe 2,500.

Just so you know, all of the things I suggest on my website (that teachers should receive) have come in large part from the Western country Embassies in China (US, Canada, UK, etc.). They were kind enough to research teaching contracts in several places in China, and sent me the contents of what, in their experience, "standard" contracts include.

Cheers,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
YearOfTheDog



Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Peterborough, ON, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Just so you know, all of the things I suggest on my website (that teachers should receive) have come in large part from the Western country Embassies in China (US, Canada, UK, etc.). They were kind enough to research teaching contracts in several places in China, and sent me the contents of what, in their experience, "standard" contracts include.


Yes, but that doesn't mean it is realistic.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree about working in rural areas vs. urban. It matters what you are looking for. I would say it is easier working here then in a large city. But some might not agree.

You said your comments have been removed about Buxiban. But your apparent warning is still on the website. It is 2:30 pm China time. And they are still here....

Peace.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bearcanada



Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Calgary, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 7:06 am    Post subject: Humble Apology Reply with quote

Dear Readers;

I have a couple of apologies to make.

First, in a couple of posts as well as in one of my website pages I got a tefl.xxx link wrong. I was commenting on Frank Zhang aka Alin Buuer and his 'copycat' websites, and got a couple of the URLs backward.

One was identifying tefl.com as a bad site instead of tefl.cc, and I believe that one was fixed right away. However, the other was a transposition of chinatefl.com and chinatefl.net, and I wasn't aware I'd done this a second time.

I have changed these now, on my website and wherever else I can recall putting them, and I apologise to any of Dave's readers on these. It was a stupid mistake to make. I knew the facts but got them scrambled.

Many thanks to those who pointed them out to me.

Also, I want to apologise to Clark Griswald for my suspicions of his buxiban website, and for the aggravation I caused him. I have deleted any references to his site wherever I am aware of their existence.

Cheers,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> China (Job-related Posts Only) All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China