|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Greywolfe
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:46 am Post subject: Why! |
|
|
I've been looking into TEFL for years now and never got up the courage to persue it even now, one of the main things that stops me and drives me insane is the requirement for a Degree from most employers.
This is fair enough if the degree is relevant but they ask for a Degree in any subject, it could be agriculture, business, art... Why?
I personally have a Cert (2 years) whereas a degree is 4 years. What difference does it make that they have a degree in a completely irrelevant subject? What does an extra two years in college learning about something they have chosen not to do matter to teaching?
So someone who has a flair for teaching has done the TEFL course and has a passion for it but hasn't spent 4 years in college is completely disregarded offhand?
I know it's a requirement to get a Visa to teach in some countries but in others..
This is something which just drives me mad and I wanted to rant about to people who might have an opinion.
Thanks.
Grey |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joshua2004
Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 68 Location: Torr�on, Coahuila, Mexico
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think most people here would agree that the better teacher is someone with the drive and experience to make it work. Whether they have a 4 or a 2 year degree comes second. I think it is mainly an issue of visa and since schools get flooded with applications from all over the world, it helps cut out the vast majority that would not be good candidates.
The EFL world is riddled with stories about child-support-dodging felons and other troubling people. I remember hearing about a guy that flew to china one night and the next he was on a flight home because the school said they would provide broadband internet in the apartment given to him, but he didn't get it or it wasn't real broadband, I don't remember.
The point is a lot of schools out there want someone who can speak English and not have too high of expectations. They want someone who is not insane but is willing to accept the low pay and unproffesional work conditions.(Perhaps they can take advantage of the uninitiated) Therefor, they attempt to find this person by looking for someone with a degree but the don't really care what the degree is in.
I personally would never work in a place that didn't require a degree since it would more than likely be a low-paying, stressful, ungrateful, very unhappy place to work.(this of course being in a country that requires 4 year degrees for the visa)
If you don't have some education in the field of education, I suggest you get some and some practical experience. It takes more than knowing English to do this job.
Quote: |
This is fair enough if the degree is relevant but they ask for a Degree in any subject, it could be agriculture, business, art... Why? |
Do not be fooled by English school advertisments, recruiters, and TEFL certification programs. You are right, it does take a relevant education. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:22 am Post subject: Re: Why! |
|
|
Greywolfe wrote: |
This is fair enough if the degree is relevant but they ask for a Degree in any subject, it could be agriculture, business, art... Why? |
Because having a degree means that one actually kept at a long-term project and completed it. One of the biggest problems that schools have is that they hire stuff who, for good reasons or bad, bug out before the end of the contract, leaving the school high and dry.
Do I think someone needs a college degree to teach the difference between simple past and present perfect? No - but if someone has put in the effort to slug out a bachelors degree, then that same person likely has the perseverance to complete a one-year teaching contract. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think I can sum this up nicely. When seeking a position abroad, you are going to take a job away from a local. Often, it's a simple immigration numbers game. Government sets the standard...before the school does. Having the degree sets the minimum standard. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chasgul
Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 168 Location: BG
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
You want to work legally, you jump through the hoop. You don't want to work, you don't jump through the hoop. Immigration is a game of many hoops. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gregor

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 842 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Guy has it called.
Nevermind all this talk about a degree being representitive of such a level of committment, blah blah blah.
It may or may not be. If you lurk around this forum, you will read some very different opinions about that, mine included, so I'm not going to hijack THIS thread. I've done that because of this issue often enough.
It's been my personal experience that most schools don't really care whether you have a degree. If you can get the opportunity to talk with them and sell yourself as a teacher, they'll be delighted to give you the job...if they can.
Often they can't because of legal restrictions. In places where they could fudge a degree with relatively little legal danger, they'll do it. Teachers are needed everywhere. In reality, the degree doesn't represent anything other than itself. Especially a degree completely unrelated to the task or topic at hand. But governments are cracking down.
I understand how you feel, OP. I even agree with you. But it is what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gregor wrote: |
Nevermind all this talk about a degree being representitive of such a level of committment, blah blah blah. |
Gosh, thanks for your dismissive attitude.
If you disagree with me, fine, but post succinct arguments as to 'why'; I find your reply of "blah blah blah" incredibly rude.
Take a look at some of your own (often needlessly lengthy) posts: I may sometimes disagree with your comments, but I've never replied with anything so crass. Maybe I should start? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gregor

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 842 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man,
We've been through all this before. Do you really want to get into it again? YOU think the degree means something; I don't, and others are middle of the road.
You respond to me any way you WANT to. I'm just not interested in getting into it again. The argument is well chronicled elsewhere on this forum. if you wish to go after me about the same bloody thing AGAIN, feel free. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
This is fair enough if the degree is relevant but they ask for a Degree in any subject, it could be agriculture, business, art... Why? |
Was Question 1
Quote: |
I personally have a Cert (2 years) whereas a degree is 4 years. What difference does it make that they have a degree in a completely irrelevant subject? What does an extra two years in college learning about something they have chosen not to do matter to teaching?
So someone who has a flair for teaching has done the TEFL course and has a passion for it but hasn't spent 4 years in college is completely disregarded offhand? |
Were questions 2 and 3.
I think we've answered them? OP, to satisfy immigration requirements in most countries, you'll need the 4 year degree. To satisfy an employer's requirements, you'll have some choices. I too find it odd that a degree in agriculture (or somthing similarly bovine) has little to do with the job itself, but immigration departments play the numbers only. Korea may be different on this though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, that was much more polite. 
Last edited by ls650 on Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cdaniels
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 663 Location: Dunwich, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:30 pm Post subject: Value of a four year degree |
|
|
Guy nailed it on the head alright, but I'm gonna elaborate on ls650's idea. Not only does a 4 year degree show commitment (and a certain level of mental and emotional stability) but specifically a commitment to education and an exposure to professional teaching and learning. During any four year degree, one is exposed to a lot of teaching and different teaching styles, although it may be rather passively absorbed (or even just endured.) The idea of teaching without a degree sounds to me like a plumber who doesn't have indoor plumbing in his own house. Maybe that's a terrible analogy, but, I do see reasonable justification for requiring a degree. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good point that we can certainly all agree on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some might say that many of those who go straight to university from sxhool were running away from "real" work/delaying career decisions; and that once at university, quite a few seem to specialize mainly in DrunknDisorderliness 101 (these types take to bars in Asia after work like ducks to water)...then again, it's likely that a substantially higher proportion of those who don't go on to complete higher (university level in UK) education (or even further - 'A level' in UK - education) - that is, have little more than compulsory schooling for an "education" - are (in Immigraton's eyes at least) "undesirable riff-raff".
Myself, I think it is unfortunate that the language schools can't be left to decide for themselves who would or wouldn't make a good teacher, based not only on formal education but also informedness, experience, personal qualities, presentation etc, but here's a thought: if just anybody could become a teacher, what effect do you think that would have on the quality of teacher employers (at least, those who are foreign and still single i.e. without spouse visas etc)?! I wouldn't fancy working for e.g. the builder who did my roof back in the UK, perhaps suddenly fancying himself an English school owner here in Japan...having to have a degree at the first port of entry is reassuring for the rest of us, no?
I didn't quite understand Guy's point about taking jobs away from locals - there must be a few who also have degrees (possibly in English) who don't go into public school teaching and who'd make quite reasonable private language school instructors...I mean, it is student expectations rather than pure linguistic ability (and certainly pedagogical knowledge or expertise) that influences schools wanting to hire natives rather than locals or "non-English" nationalities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joshua2004
Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 68 Location: Torr�on, Coahuila, Mexico
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fluffyhamster wrote: |
but here's a thought: if just anybody could become a teacher, what effect do you think that would have on the quality of teacher employers...?! |
What we in the EFL field are experiencing right now is the first steps in the professionalization of our work. As noted in this article: http://www.acebo.com/papers/profslzn.htm I highly suggest reading section 2.3, the three phases of how an occupation becomes a profession. Here is phase I of III of that Tseng model.
"Practitioners in the market cannot keep outsiders from entering practice. They themselves may have started practice as outsiders or quacks. Recipients of the service either have very little understanding of what practitioners do or very little confidence in the services they receive."
Some points I found interesting in this articles are:
"In such a situation[phase I], practitioners have little incentive to obtain specialized training. As competition increases, however, they may view training as a means of obtaining a competitive edge. Ironically, Tseng views training as a source of both cohesion and disturbance of the market. He explains that initially, "training schools vary considerably in admission standards, duration of training, curricula and the qualifications of graduates and instructors." Training institutions may end up competing for students to stay afloat, and as a consequence, they "may oversupply the market with excessive numbers of practitioners." The increased competition makes it difficult for practitioners to convince clients "to respect their job descriptions and consequently their control over the working conditions." The result is a vicious cycle of unprofessional behavior and mistrust of practitioners by their clients.""
"Morris cautions, however, that certification or accreditation alone does not guarantee professionalism." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I didn't quite understand Guy's point about taking jobs away from locals - there must be a few who also have degrees (possibly in English) who don't go into public school teaching and who'd make quite reasonable private language school instructors...I mean, it is student expectations rather than pure linguistic ability (and certainly pedagogical knowledge or expertise) that influences schools wanting to hire natives rather than locals or "non-English" nationalities. |
What I meant was to look at it from government's point of view, and not language schools, and indeed, across any field. Government in every country would prefer to fill positions locally, and not outsource to foreigners. As business thinks of business first, immigration applies limits in order to protect the local population.
This is more prevalent in a place like Canada, where when an employer seeks to hire a foreigner, the burden is on the employer to prove that every effort was made to first find a Canadian to do the job. Mexico is the same, though they don't have as rigorous a regime in place. This is why immigration requires a degree, and notably, any degree, in order to meet the basic requirements of obtaining working papers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|