| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| How would you rate the ability of unions to help foreign language teachers in Japan? |
| Excellent - Let's stick it to the Man! Solidarity, brother! |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
| Pretty Good - Nothing ever works out perfectly, but this is the best shot we've got. |
|
42% |
[ 6 ] |
| Average - It's okay, but I'm not sure whether it's worth paying dues to be a part of. |
|
14% |
[ 2 ] |
| Pretty Bad - Dude, why can't you guys get your act together? Stop getting your panties in a wad and let's do something! |
|
21% |
[ 3 ] |
| Awful - No f***in' way I'm giving you guys my money! Just leave me alone. You're all wasting your time anyway. |
|
14% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
| Author |
Message |
alexrocks

Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 75 Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:07 am Post subject: Unions - Pro and Con |
|
|
Okay, this thread is very straightforward and hopefully won't descend into off-topic chaos. Let's just simply have a mature conversation about the pros and cons of unions. I'll start with some ideas, though I admit to not being an expert on labor issues:
Pro: By showing strength in numbers, unions can effect real change in the workplace, in many cases more than a non-management individual employee could do.
Con: Sometimes the goals of unions may conflict with a majority of employees, such as the fact that forcing Nova to participate in shakai hoken in regards to its foreign teachers led to lower salaries and less working hours for teachers, including overtime opportunities.
Pro: Joining a union may be a good way to share information and learn the ins and outs of your industry.
Con: Unions which get too strong often make unreasonable demands, greedily seeking more for themselves without regard to the common good, thus possibly ruining a company and disrupting the lives of all involved (including union members).
I'm looking forward to hearing y'all's replies.
I've also added a poll which may help develop a clearer perspective on how we all feel about unions. (I hope it works as this is my first time to make one.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This is retarded. Who would divulge info about a union who was not anti-union? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lalalateda
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 72 Location: JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been reading some of these posts about unions and have a few questions:
I know that there are unions for those who work for the big 4 and interac, but are there unions for people working at small schools?
If there are unions for people working at small schools, how does one get involved?
Thanks and sorry if this is off topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 280
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alex: I can't answer your poll because the answers don't match the question. You are asking what is the ABILITY of a union to protect a teacher's interests, and the poll choices mainly refer to a teacher's WILLINGNESS to join a union. Those are two, seperate issues.
Without answering the poll, I will answer both questions.
1. The ability of ANY union to protect you is limited. A large part of this is because there aren't enough people interested in standing together united against corruption. However, you stand to gain many benefits ONLY given to you as a union member that you can never have as an individual -- such as the right to collective bargaining.
2. Even if a union isn't entirely EFFECTIVE in providing me protection, I'm WILLING to join, be a member and support the union. At the very least, it grants me additional benefits under the labour law. At best, it might save my job.
| lalalateda wrote: |
If there are unions for people working at small schools, how does one get involved?
Thanks and sorry if this is off topic. |
I wouldn't say this is off-topic at all. That is a very important issue. As much as I support the labour union movement, there are a few things that I am upset about. The following are from personal experience.
Fact: General Union will strongly discourage you from joining if you live in a geographical area they are unable to provide support to.
Fact: NUGW will give you the same answer. Note, they ARE willing to take your union dues but they are very honest in telling you NOT to expect much help when the crap hits the fan at your workplace.
Fact: Some labour unions will only allow you to join if you fit into their classifications. Eg. some unions are only for university teachers or high school teachers, etc.
Fact: Unless you live in a large city like Tokyo or Osaka, joining a union that will support you is a very difficult endeavor. Sad but true.
So, what's a person to do in such a situation? There are no easy answers. One possibility is to organize your workplace. If you have others in your school who are willing and committed to unionization, you can create your own union. In Japan it's easy to do. Once you've done this, it should be not so difficult to come under the wing of a larger, well-established union.
Otherwise, you have to do what I did -- hunt around and ask teachers (and co-workers) which union they are members of, then try to meet with their representatives to see if they can include you as well... I was rejected by several, but there was at least one who was more than happy to accept me as a member. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jim, you seem to want to speak with such authority here, but you have never been in a union in Japan, so you speak with no authority.
This is a major problem with these job forums. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big John Stud
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 513
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have to pretty much agree with JimDunlop2. A few years ago, I went to a union to see if they could help me get a company to pay me a month and a half of unpaid rages. The guy bluntly told me there were limited in what they could do. Since I have a lawyer I am better off with him. The lawyer is still making promises that we will go to court soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexrocks

Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 75 Location: Kyoto, Japan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Jim for pointing out the discrepancy in my poll. I was gonna alter the question to make it more general, but since it's already begun I can't! So, I guess we could just say it's a poll of our general opinions on labor unions. Sorry about that, everyone!
| Quote: |
| This is retarded. Who would divulge info about a union who was not anti-union? |
And Wang, I'm not asking for member lists or secret handshakes -- I just wanna see what people think. If you don't want to give us your input, then that's fine. If you do, then please let us know about the benefits of union membership, and perhaps then more of us would be more interested in joining. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wangtesol wrote: |
Jim, you seem to want to speak with such authority here, but you have never been in a union in Japan, so you speak with no authority.
This is a major problem with these job forums. |
wangtesol: if you had read my post carefully, you would have noticed that I mentioned that I was speaking from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.. And that is indeed IN JAPAN. Yes, I got turned down by GU and NUGW when I wanted to join. Are you trying to imply that I'm a liar?
I'm not about to start proving myself and the integrity of my posts to every clown who wanders by, but for what it's worth -- I still have the e-mails and names of those union officers who told me that I should not join their union. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yamanote senbei

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 435
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JimDunlop2 wrote: |
| Yes, I got turned down by GU and NUGW when I wanted to join. |
The GU is a union, the NUGW is a union federation not a union so there's no way that you could even join the NUGW directly. The GU is of course one of the unions in the NUGW federation.
Why did they turn you down, Jim? I know that they discourage people from joining if you live too far from Osaka. They like other regional unions have agreements with other regional unions not to recruit members in each others' areas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yamanote senbei wrote: |
The GU is a union, the NUGW is a union federation not a union so there's no way that you could even join the NUGW directly. The GU is of course one of the unions in the NUGW federation.
Why did they turn you down, Jim? I know that they discourage people from joining if you live too far from Osaka. They like other regional unions have agreements with other regional unions not to recruit members in each others' areas. |
The NUGW website disagrees with you, Yamanote. NUGW stands for National Union of General Workers (Tokyo South).
From their website: (http://nambufwc.org/about/): (bold emphasis =mine)
National Union of General Workers Tokyo Nambu
The National Union of General Workers Tokyo Nambu (Nambu), is, as its name suggests, a union which does not restrict membership to those working in any one industry, trade or workplace.
The union has a long history; almost as long as the history of legalized organised labour in Japan.
The union�s current membership numbers several thousand workers in the southern area of Tokyo. About a quarter of these members are foreign nationals. NUGW is one of only three or four general unions in the Tokyo area which has a large number of foreign workers.
Although NUGW doesn�t restrict membership, it is true to say that it has developed areas of concentration and specialisation. Regarding the Japanese members of the union, the publishing sector is a field employing many. With the non-Japanese members, foreign language teaching is the area in which the great majority are employed.
Perhaps what you MEANT to say was this: (also from the website):
The labour movement in Japan is currently fractured into three major blocks: RENGO, ZENROREN and ZENROKYO. NUGW Tokyo Nambu is within the ZENROKYO group.
The above excerpt also answers your question. I was turned down because of my geographic distance from Tokyo (about 2 hours by expressway). They told me that they would not stop me from joining but that they would not be able to lend me the same kind of support as someone living in Tokyo proper. So I suppose that they didn't turn me down as such, but I see it as a rejection in a way -- because I feel that I should ALSO be entitled to the same kind of union representation regardless of where I live. If they cannot provide that (for financial and staffing reasons is what they told me) then that's fine, but in that case I'm better off seeking out a local union (one without English support) but one that can represent me when the crap hits the fan.
When I called GU they said that I need to speak with NUGW, and when I spoke to NUGW they basically gave me a cool answer. Other unions turned me down also on the basis of geography AND on the basis of being specialized unions: eg. we only represent teachers working in "special needs" schools.
So, this being a thread on PROS and CONS of unions.... Those are my CONS.... That based on certain mitigating factors, you MAY face some difficulty finding adequate representation should you need it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yamanote senbei

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 435
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JimDunlop2 wrote: |
The NUGW website disagrees with you, Yamanote. NUGW stands for National Union of General Workers (Tokyo South).
From their website: (http://nambufwc.org/about/): (bold emphasis =mine)
Perhaps what you MEANT to say was this: (also from the website):
The labour movement in Japan is currently fractured into three major blocks: RENGO, ZENROREN and ZENROKYO. NUGW Tokyo Nambu is within the ZENROKYO group.
|
I don't see anything on there about National Union of General Workers (Tokyo South) on that page, Jim. It's called NUGW Tokyo Nambu. There are actually a lot of organizations in Japan, and even outside of Japan, that use NUGW and National Union of General Workers in their names, and use it as an abbreviation for their full name, even outside of Zenrokyo. Technically they shouldn't because it's really confusing and the English and Japanese names are not really the same when they should be in some cases different when they should not be.
If the General Union or Tokyo Nambu won't take you, because of where you live, there are a lot of other unions that represent foreigners in Japan. There's also the option of forming your own. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
True -- there is a lot of ambiguity, unfortunately. Just so there is no mistake, I was dealing with National Union of General Workers Tokyo South.
General Union's link site http://www.generalunion.org/links.htm says National Union of General Workers, Tokyo South and LINKS to http://nambufwc.org
My understanding of NAMBU was that it was Nambu Foreign Workers Caucus which is a special status organization within the National Union of General Workers Tokyo Nambu.
I think what happened is that the name of the organization changed, but is otherwise the same as before. A websearch for "national union of general workers tokyo south" ALL yields links to http://www.nambufwc.org/
I was able to find an OLD page belonging to "Tokyo South" here: http://nambu.generalunion.org/faq.htm but if you hit the "welcome" button it redirects you to http://www.nambufwc.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The unions want quality people, not just anybody. If you cannot understand the organizational structur then that is one strike against you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
angrysoba

Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 446 Location: Kansai, Japan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wang:
I thought the idea behind unions is that they are inclusive rather than exclusive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|