| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
shuize
Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Several years ago I interviewed with a lady who ran a quasi-dispatch operation (Her language school plus dispatch to one other local junior high school). The contract "negotiations" remind me of what others have posted.
Her: "Here, sign this contract."
Me: "May I read it first?"
Her: "Well ..."
Me: "OK, I'll take it home and look it over."
Her: (Mad)
Me: (The next day) "I can't sign this, there are too many errors."
Her: (Mad) "Like what?"
Me: "Well, first, housing. The contract says I have to pay you Y 50,000 per month for housing. I told you I already have my own place. Second, the length of employment. This says I will work for a year and give one month termination notice. As I already told you, I'd only be staying for three months. Etc ..."
Her: "Just sign it anyway. We'll work out the details later."
Me: "You're funny." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
einsenundnullen
Joined: 07 Jul 2003 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sweetsee wrote: |
| surly they will take care of the people they want and only you know if you are one |
Sweetsee,
See, the thing is, I'm not confident that they really 'take care' of anyone. I don't think they make any effort to get certain people. They take who they can, of those who are available, of those who have visas, of those live in a certain place or are will to move at their own expensive, of etc etc etc. I think that's how this works. If they wanted certain people, don't you think they'd start (and finalize) the whole process a lot eariler? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've finally received two copies of the contract from Company A. Does it strike you guys as odd though that neither single-stapled copy has been signed or dated by them (by their Head of HR)? I was also puzzled to see that unemployment insurance is still listed as a deduction that they will make, even though I was verbally assured (when I queried the clause before, in the sample contract) that it would not be (that is, they didn't feel there was a need to tell me how much it would run to as 'they will be paying it'...and also didn't seem to feel the need to alter the contract accordingly...but hey, who keeps track of silly little conversations or emails, right? ).
I'm supposed to meet with the BOE people on Friday, along with the Head of HR, so I could get the signature in the bag at least. 
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:23 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
angrysoba

Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 446 Location: Kansai, Japan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Odd, yes.
But from a dispatch company, hardly surprising.
I wouldn't sign the contract until you have checked it out further. Is it written in Japanese or English? Definitely have someone read over the Japanese section if there is one as that will be the section that is legally-binding.
I certainly wouldn't sign a contract that hasn't been countersigned by the company or dated.
Don't sign anything that keeps you in the dark about how much they will deduct from your salary either.
Also, you have to ask yourself if it is worth signing for a company (an unscrupulous dispatch company, no less) that has already lied to you.
| Quote: |
I was also puzzled to see that unemployment insurance is listed as a deduction that they will make, even though I was verbally assured that it would not be (that is, they didn't feel there was a need to tell me how much it would run to as 'they will be paying it').
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
The contract is entirely in English (and actually a model of clarity compared to some I've read - no doubt it was written by a native speaker).
I've emailed the Head of HR asking if she can bring copies of a slightly altered contract (if appropriate/necessary) to the BOE meeting (where we can easily countersign in each other's presence). In the meantime, anybody know how much unemployment insurance ('rodo hoken') is per month (if it is deducted monthly), and who usually pays it etc. Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
womblingfree
Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 826
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 3:19 pm Post subject: Re: "On-the-ball" BOEs and dispatch companies |
|
|
| fluffyhamster wrote: |
| I was just wondering why things were taking so long (considering the process was begun earlier, it should also finish earlier, right?), and if anybody has any horror stories about possibly being scr*wed by companies going back on their promises of work. |
The schools always leave it till the last minute to sign contracts. I think it's because of last minute budget concerns.
I couldn't believe it when after a year at a school and with the promise of renewal I still hadn't re-signed a contract three days before the start of term. It usually comes through though.
Apparently American high schools do exactly the same to their non-tenured staff also.
Also remember that dispatch companies are often run by people with little knowledge of business practice and zero knowledge of education. They are in it for easy money at your expense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gaijinalways
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 2279
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fluffy,
DSon't feel bad, some of the unis are the same (and some of them use dispatch companies and langauge eikaiwas for adult classes ), I have started several university jobs where I received the contract after I started (though of course the general terms, schedule, etc. were already communicated to me before I decided to teach there) !
Never been a problem, just one of the facts of life, organization doesn't come easy in Japan! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yamanote senbei

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 435
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
What's the name of the company?
Most "dispatch companies" don't even have dispatch licences and you can't dispatch teachers or any other workers for that matter without a licence.
http://nambufwc.org/issues/dispatch/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wangtesol
Joined: 24 May 2005 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:49 pm Post subject: Ministry of Education's gyomu itaku advisement |
|
|
You can also check the Ministry of Edcuation's advisement (in Japanese) against using illegal gyomu itaku (outsourcing) contracts with dispatch outfits. Some of these outfits that call themselves dispatch companies don't even have dispatch licenses though. The advisement says that using illegal dispatch violates School Education Law since the company is then in charge of the ALT, not the principal. And the principal must be in charge of all staff, including the ALT.
http://alt.150m.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yamanote senbei

Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 435
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:23 am Post subject: Re: Ministry of Education's gyomu itaku advisement |
|
|
| wangtesol wrote: |
| http://alt.150m.com |
There's a scan of it there, and it's worth reading. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|