|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yesteacher!

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: Arrogant Students - Remedies? |
|
|
I have a group of MBA, stockbroker types who have very limited English.
Pretty standard story: University grads, excellent knowlegde of grammar, large, inactive vocabulary, total lack of fluency and terrible attitudes.
They challenge very bit of advice I give them like, "Reading aloud can improve your fluency." or "keep a notebook of your new words, use an English dictionary to look them up and make new sentences to practice these new words." Pretty basic, common sense stuff, but I am met with howls of protest from a very vocal, arrogant few and dead silence and nonconcern from the rest.
The sad part is that this group have the brains and the need to learn English, but...Nothing.
Is it me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
i've had students come up to me during breaks in class and tell me they either dont like what we're doing, or they think its a waste of time. i ask them to suggest alternatives, and until they do, we will continue with my program. usually they dont but sometimes they do.
just yesterday, a student came up to me during our break. first time i've heard her speak in five or six weeks of this term.... we spoke for five minutes and her english wasnt bad. then she suggested that i speak more in class so that the students can improve their english. sometimes i dont get it...... my english needs no practice, so how they think me speaking more is going to help their oral english is beyond me. but maybe they're just looking for the easy way out and want me to talk forever so they dont have to do anything.
sounds like the very vocal few might be resistant to learning while the rest of the silent ones, who may enjoy your lesson, are afraid to challenge them. maybe you ought to break the class into two groups and see them separately. if they keep it up, and continue to be difficult, i'd pass on seeing them if you can. let them find another teacher.
you're not alone i'm afraid..... 7969 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very few Chinese English students possess EXZCELLENT GRAMMAR SKILLS! That's a myth that should be destroyed! I wish I could talk about grammar to my students! They know "adj" and its CHinese equivalent but they cannot say the word "adjective", and thus won't understand any feedback I might give them.
And a propos READING ALOUD: we had a thread about this many years before. This is not a suggestion we should make to CHinese English learners because they actually grow up doing this from primary school on! To what purpose? IT's bad, fossilising their bad pronunciation and intonation.
They should not read aloud - you can hear such practictioners everywhere including in public buses! -
They should LISTEN to good English and try to emulate it. That they cannot do by reading aloud without even understanding what they are reading. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
we spoke for five minutes and her english wasnt bad. then she suggested that i speak more in class so that the students can improve their english. sometimes i dont get it...... my english needs no practice, so how they think me speaking more is going to help their oral english is beyond me. |
for some reason some Chinese put great faith in subliminal teaching type methods (something we associated with sleep-learning) - you know by being immersed in something it somehow gets connected to your subconscious - ie. listen to English hour after hour and hey presto you can talk it. In a kindy I work at they have an article pinned up on the wall telling parents to read shakespeare in English to their kids as bedtime stories - and hey presto...well you can guess. But so far no small bards spouting out iambic pentameters in my classes
Teaching method also fringed on this kind of BS in the west about 30 years ago - untill it was noted that students who actually experienced a subject in an interactive way rather than just being an empty vessel for knowledge to be poured into not only learnt more but also had a better chance of enjoying the lesson aswell. But the subliminal BS is still about even at home - because after all it has one big big advantage - all you have to do is talk talk and more talk - or if this gets hard, play a tape - sleeping students are of course encouraged in these classes - and untill they discover an English pill it will always be promoted by those kind of rip-off artists who con people out of good money with an easy way out of the tricky problem of learning a second language - hey that's why its so popular here  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Very few Chinese English students possess EXZCELLENT GRAMMAR SKILLS! That's a myth that should be destroyed! I wish I could talk about grammar to my students! They know "adj" and its CHinese equivalent but they cannot say the word "adjective", and thus won't understand any feedback I might give them.
And a propos READING ALOUD: we had a thread about this many years before. This is not a suggestion we should make to CHinese English learners because they actually grow up doing this from primary school on! To what purpose? IT's bad, fossilising their bad pronunciation and intonation.
They should not read aloud - you can hear such practictioners everywhere including in public buses! -
They should LISTEN to good English and try to emulate it. That they cannot do by reading aloud without even understanding what they are reading |
Roger does anyone talk in your classes - you know like in 2 way conversation. - was this the method you learnt during your teacher training
I'm afraid my mainstream thinking says the above method (of course combined together with your memorisation theories) kills any joy in English learning - or maybe I'm a big softee, and shouldn't think so much about education being linked to a good time - kinda doesn't go well with all those grammar classes  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
for some reason some Chinese put great faith in subliminal teaching type methods (something we associated with sleep-learning) - you know by being immersed in something it somehow gets connected to your subconscious - ie. listen to English hour after hour and hey presto you can talk it. In a kindy I work at they have an article pinned up on the wall telling parents to read shakespeare in English to their kids as bedtime stories - and hey presto...well you can guess. But so far no small bards spouting out iambic pentameters in my classes |
i've listened to enough chinese in my time here and my listening comprehension is getting better. so to a certain extent i agree. however, there is little improvement in speaking in some of my classes. the classes that make an attempt to speak, and who overcome that initial nervouseness, improve well and more quickly. the ones who only want to listen.... well, sooner or later they gotta say something. and many a student i've yet to hear a peep out of. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
i've listened to enough chinese in my time here and my listening comprehension is getting better. so to a certain extent i agree. |
Nothing wrong in listening that's for sure - but the key to learning a language as a tool for oral communication (and of course you have to listen to take part in that) is a little more complicated than lending an ear or two - and the proof of the pudding in that statement surely must come from out of the mouths of our students. They aint talking - then it could be a good bet they aint doing that much learning - but sure enough those personal factors (shyness/face loosing /not used to active participation/lack of interest etc etc) sure do get in way here - but that is the stuff we have to circumnavigate here on an every day basis - the sort of stuff a trained teacher makes allowances for - the sort of stuff that sorts of the good FT's from the rest.
Want to teach English as a dead language - well anybody who studied Latin will know how to do that  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tirelesstravelerasia
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 50 Location: Dalian, China
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd throw this kind of class into a task-based project of some kind that closely mirrors something they might actually have to do in English -- giving a presentation or negotiating a contract. Give them guidelines and parameters for the project, then have them do it -- presenting, writing out the powerpoint, etc. Everyone has to do some part of it and videotape it if you can.
They should be humbled by their incompetence upon seeing it; now you are the expert, the guy who can transform them from bumbling to sparkling -- using their 'real life' problems as your guide. Most of these guys sound pretty successful, and probably don't like it that they have to take English classes anyway. By putting them in 'real' situations, the lessons should have more meaning to them - and they'll respect your ability to sharpen them up.
It also helps to take charge of this kind of class from the beginning -- do your best Alec Baldwin on day 1, wearing a sharp suit and talking about all the flashy companies you've worked for -- sad, but image is everything in these kinds of classes.
I won't jump in on the 'reading aloud' vs 'listening to the teacher' debate - probably seriously need to take a CELTA if you haven't yet. Couldn't they read aloud alone at home? Or buy a tape for listening? Show them your value in the class, and they'll respect you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KarenB
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 227 Location: Hainan
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I concur with TirelessTravelASia (or whatever that name was) on giving the class a group project (closely related to real life needs) to do. I found this to be an extremely successful method when teaching highly educated, intelligent adult learners who are (or will) need English in real life. A few years ago I taught engineers whose company had sent them back for a semester or two of intense English in preparation for either going overseas or working with foreign experts in their jobs.
My experience was that the class worked enthusiastically on their projects, and often injected a lot of humor into their presentations. My role was to circulate around the room as they were preparing, listening and giving suggestions, etc., and then critiquing them after the presentation.
Also, I agree that image is important in teaching professionals. Dress like a professional when you go to teach this class. No unshaven face, flip-flops, t-shirt, and the like. Age and maturity also help. As a 40 year old, I got a lot more respect from my adult learners than my 22 year old colleagues.
I agree with Roger on reading aloud. I would only recommend reading aloud if one was listening to a phrase or sentence on tape (or to the FT reading the phrase/sentence), then repeating that, hopefully mimicking the intonation and pronunciation. That can be done repetively to produce fluency, especially if the FT listens to what is said and corrects it. But simply reading long passages aloud by oneself is probably not helpful. (Perhaps better to get a partner and read dialogs, which would be more natural and real-life -- the give and take). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
They should be humbled by their incompetence upon seeing it; now you are the expert, the guy who can transform them from bumbling to sparkling -- using their 'real life' problems as your guide. |
one important thing about teaching is of course gaining respect from your students as the class expert - but remember the project type exercise results in them hopefully being class expert for 5 minutes or so on their perticular topic. This is the essence of modern teaching methods from back home - a you follow me, but I am prepaired to follow you type approach - something that hopefully supports and nurtures confidence and enjoyment within the individual student.
Of course this BS is easier talked about than carried out - especially in the Chinese classroom - but using method based on this way of teaching, at least in my eyes, beats going into a classroom as Mr. Teaching God - I can't learn anything from you guys, 'cause I'm the expert, since such a type of teaching causes resentment, and doesn't allow that ohhh so important synergic empathy and relationship to develope between teach and class - something that is part and parcel of the productive classroom.
By the way this model is hard to achieve in a classroom full of very qualified learners - one of my ex-students years ago was a minister of agriculture for Afghanistan (from the commie days - and a doctor of vetinary science) - took me a bit of time to get used to him being my student - and establishing the student teacher ballance and rapour!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tirelesstravelerasia
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 50 Location: Dalian, China
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="vikdk"]
Quote: |
They should be humbled by their incompetence upon seeing it; now you are the expert, the guy who can transform them from bumbling to sparkling -- using their 'real life' problems as your guide. |
Haha! Perhaps this was a bit strong and easy to misconstrue. What I mean to say is that the OP has problems with condescending students; they are successful in their field, and want to criticize the teacher and his teaching methods.
The only way around this is to do what the best advertisers do -- a) create a need and b) convince everyone that you're the one to fill the need.
By throwing them into real-life situations instead of doing fill-in-the-blank exercises in a book, you bring home the very real inadequacies they have -- in their English, not in their business acumen. You respect them and their positions - but they are your students, and you are the English guru. You must present yourself - and your lessons - as the answer to their English needs. They know what they're doing in the business world, you're the guy who will help them demonstrate that ability in English
Remember, they are businessmen, and if they don't see real value, they'll cut and run - or find a better-priced alternative.
And, yes, it requires real preparation and work for this kind of class, but I don't really see it as BS. That's why a properly run business English class should be paying 200-250+ per hour! But that's another topic! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yesteacher!

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 2:04 pm Post subject: ok... |
|
|
[quote="Roger"]Very few Chinese English students possess EXZCELLENT GRAMMAR SKILLS! That's a myth that should be destroyed! I wish I could talk about grammar to my students! They know "adj" and its CHinese equivalent but they cannot say the word "adjective", and thus won't understand any feedback I might give them.
Lets break this down:
Roger says: Very few Chinese English students possess EXZCELLENT GRAMMAR SKILLS!
I totally disagree. Not only with the abnormal spelling, but with the heart of the comment. Chinese students for the most part do have an excellent understanding of grammar, but have exceptional trouble in producing grammatically correct sentences mostly due to L1 interference.
Roger says: I wish I could talk about grammar to my students! They know "adj" and its CHinese equivalent but they cannot say the word "adjective", and thus won't understand any feedback I might give them.
This is your failing, not the students.
In regards, to the other feedback from other posters, I have to admit that my approach may have been incorrect. The idea of more task or project based class work seems to be fitting.
The notion of finding where I add value in this propositon is also fitting.
I think I will give them an activity where they have to make some critical business decision about a related industry or company.
BTW, I have an MBA, but never wear a tie or flip flops. But a tie and flip flops together maybe the wave of the future  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vikdk wrote: |
[
Roger does anyone talk in your classes - you know like in 2 way conversation. - was this the method you learnt during your teacher training
I'm afraid my mainstream thinking says the above method (of course combined together with your memorisation theories) kills any joy in English learning - or maybe I'm a big softee, and shouldn't think so much about education being linked to a good time - kinda doesn't go well with all those grammar classes  |
Viktoria Dee-Kay, you know we are TEACHERS, and as such work at schools and universities, NOT IN KINDERGARTENS.
While your input is seldom helpful it never fails to be hilarious. But you could save yourself some face by not butting into discussions every time when you clearly do not understand what anyone else is contributing.
My students, for example, do not have to memorise things mindlessly, and I am one of the first, if not the very first, teacher to tell them that learning things by heart is useless. My students, contrary to your biased opinion, do speak to me - though I feel it would be far better for them to speak to each other and to become teacher/monitors to their peers.
This is the only way I can see by which they can actually make significant progress as they could then learn to identify substandard English as well as standard English. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject: Re: ok... |
|
|
yesteacher! wrote: |
[I totally disagree. Not only with the abnormal spelling, but with the heart of the comment. Chinese students for the most part do have an excellent understanding of grammar, but have exceptional trouble in producing grammatically correct sentences mostly due to L1 interference.
Roger says: I wish I could talk about grammar to my students! They know "adj" and its CHinese equivalent but they cannot say the word "adjective", and thus won't understand any feedback I might give them.
This is your failing, not the students.
|
"Excellent" - to correct my "abnormal" spelling! But I stand by what I said. It is a dangerous fallacy to proclaim Chinese students to have such "excellent grammar skills" when they cannot use them intelligently. And few of them can. The only Chinese English students that have grammar competency usually are normal school leavers, and not even all of them are "excellent" at English grammar.
It too is just memorised data, not understood logic.
If their grammar understanding was anywhere near reasonable usefulness then they would notice their own incompetent handling of the language; for example students informing me "last week I no come English class". Or "he come too". The fact that hardly any educated decision is made in the use of proper tenses or SVA is an unambiguous statement on the lack of English grammar understanding of our students. If you tell them that this sort of English is not communicative enough they are stumped. They haven't acquired the analytical skills to go over their botched English in order to repair
This can certainly not be blamed on any FT. It is their own teachers that fail to pay attention to what is generally - even by many FTs - regarded as superfluous details - accuracy sacrificed on the altar of "fluency". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shenyanggerry
Joined: 02 Nov 2003 Posts: 619 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll take understandable fluency over perfect accuracy any day. When they reach the level of fluency that they can listen and speak at a normal speed, I'll worry about SVA agreement and correct tense use. I do insist that 'he' is a boy and 'she' is a girl. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|