View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:57 am Post subject: Interchange - American English |
|
|
I'm looking at New Interchange- The yellow introduction book unit 11 and to me the grammar in the section is nonesense. The use of 'going to ' is not natural as far as I'm concerned . For example on Page 67 - Are you going to do anything exciting this weekend' is not as natural as 'are you doing anything exciting this weekend ' It's a plan with a time marker - Why use 'going to' ?
You're going to tell me it's because I'm English I bet but some of the crap in this book gets to me . 'Are the waiters going to sing to you ? ' It's just rubbish . When would anyone say such a thing ?
Is it me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kev7161
Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 5880 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can't tell you if it's an "American" form of English, but it's fairly common usage there.
"I'm going to the store." generally means I'm leaving right now or maybe even on my way.
"I'm going to go to the store." generally means I'm doing it later.
I agree that it's redundant to say "going to" and then give the actual time you will do said action.
"I'm going to go to the store tomorrow." is probably better said as "I'm going to the store tomorrow."
I remember teaching that unit (and then you teach it again in the red book!) and feeling a little turned around with it and not too sure of myself when introducing it to the students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh good , it's not just me !! I find the students always use 'I will' for absolutely everything future related . Often this confuses me as to the certainty in them doing something . I do find this area difficult to teach . I'm going to plan a lesson for tommorow with the 'diary future' .I thought about getting the students to go around the class and fill in a timetable of activities for next week to do with classmates. For example - 'what are you doing on Saturday night ? I'm watching England play football with Kevin '. Problem is when I turn to chapter 11 in the book they're gonna get mightily confused with going to and will probably bin it all and carry on using 'I will ' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Midlothian Mapleheart
Joined: 26 May 2005 Posts: 623 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
post deleted
Last edited by Midlothian Mapleheart on Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, our expert CHinese English teachers...
How often have I heard "girls are BEAUTIFUL but boys are HANDSOME!"
In Mandarin boys are "shuai" and girls are "piaoliang" - hence we must not confuse the English adjectives either! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Barufaldi
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 271 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
kev7161 wrote: |
"I'm going to the store." generally means I'm leaving right now or maybe even on my way.
"I'm going to go to the store." generally means I'm doing it later.
|
"I'm gonna to the store. I gonna back later!" generally means you need to backtrack a bit and review the fundamentals of infinitives and future tense with them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
China.Pete

Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 547
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:06 am Post subject: Future Tenses |
|
|
There are far too many future tenses in English for most Chinese students. They seem to prefer "will" in every instance, so are often both confusing and - grammatically speaking - just plain wrong. New Interchange does a pretty good job of presenting the various future tenses, individually, in their logical context. Once you and the students get through the present continuous, "going to," and "will" forms of the future tense, it should start to make more sense. "Going to" is perfectly correct for future plans, although "going to go" is somewhat redundant, and is generally shortened to the present continuous form in common usage; that is, "going shopping," instead of "going to go shopping," even when a future plan is indicated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Barufaldi
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 271 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Midlothian Mapleheart wrote: |
I've had Chinese English teachers totally reject the structures "going to go" and "have to have". They seem shocked when I tell them it's common usage. They seem to be stuck on "must" and "will" even though it sounds unnatural.
Middy |
Yeah, and once the students get the hang of it, they seem to enjoy using them.
In oral classes I do a lot work with phrases like gonna have to/ gotta get a..
Here's a sample of my opening lesson. Have them practice the final dialogue between Jack and Tom in pairs until they can do it smoothly.
Anyone is free to use this material in their lessons (but not to publish it):
I ain�t gotta do nothin I don�t wanna do �and I ain�t gonna!
�Ain�t� ain�t a word.
Ain�t = is/am/are not have/has not
He ain�t kidding. (he�s serious!)
I ain�t never been to India.
That ain�t right!
�Is he dead?�
�Well, he ain�t exactly alive!�
He ain�t gonna be happy when he finds out!
Gonna
Whatta ya gonna do?
Whatt ya gonna have?
What ain�t ya gonna do?
Why ain�t ya gonna do it?
Hopefully, I�m gonna get to _________.
I�m gonna get to go to Hainan and do some scuba diving.
I never got to ________! I�m so disappointed.
Gotta
I gotta go. (I must leave = I have got to go.)
I gotta go get _________.
Why da ya always gotta (do something annoying/bad)
I gotta tell ya (something you ain�t gonna like)
I gotta get a (something you really want)
Whatta ya gotta do tomorrow?
Wanna
Why would you wanna (do something stupid/strange)?
Whatta ya wanna do?
He�s gonna wanna have (something)
Talk in wanna/gotta/gonna
Jack �Whatta ya wanna do?�
Tom �I dunno. Whatta YOU wanna do?�
Jack �I don�t wanna do nothin.�
Tom �Why doncha wanna do nuthin?�
Jack �Why do I gotta wanna do something?�
Tom �Hey, you ain�t gotta do nothin if you don�t wanna, k?� |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Super Frank
Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
They talk enough bollocks without learning all that crap aswell.
"Don't publish it"  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Barufaldi
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 271 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Super Frank wrote: |
They talk enough bollocks without learning all that crap aswell.
"Don't publish it"  |
Actually, I've found it quite useful. Not only does it aid thier comprehension, but in using it they establish a flow to their speech patterns. Obviously, in a western English class, a student is admonished for using "ain't". But that's only because it's already been become a part of the students daily language. In China, we can only dream of having this problem.
Of course, this is more of a *fun* type lesson, but, again, I think you may be underestimating its benefits. Sure, we can teach them to repeat all kinds of flowery sentence patterns and fancy words, but until they gain some ability to *play* with the language, they won't be able to come up with anything decent on their own.
Not to mention, they seem to get a kick out of tranlating the oral form to the written form, which is certainly something new and different for them.
Last edited by Paul Barufaldi on Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Going to" is perfectly correct for future plans |
See that's what I had the problem with . I don't think 'going to' is always appropriate but Interchange hammers it in Unit 11 .
I'm watching the England game on Saturday mate believe it !!! There's no 'I'm going to watch the football game ' about it ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Barufaldi
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 271 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sheeba wrote: |
I'm watching the England game on Saturday mate believe it !!! There's no 'I'm going to watch the football game ' about it ! |
Right, cuz orally it's "gonna watch the game" -and either way is good. Qualifying the present continuous with "on Saturday" sets it all up fine.
But without it, things get confusing.
"I'm going to (gonna) watch the game."
"Oh, when will you watch it? Soon?"
"No. I'm (probably) gonna watch it on Saturday."
"I'm watching the game."
"Oh, who's winning?"
"Nobody's winning! I haven't seen it yet."
"But you said your were watching it!"
"No. I'm not watching it now; I'm watching it on Saturday."
"Sheesh, why didn't you just say that in the first place?!"
So integrate your own "gonna" lesson into that Unit of New Interchange. And make sure you get them to practice each unit's grammar with some topics other than the theme of the unit -because a lot of them start associating the two and won't think to use it in other contexts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shan-Shan

Joined: 28 Aug 2003 Posts: 1074 Location: electric pastures
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Going to" is really a present tense structure that's used to talk about future actions and events that have some present reality. When we talk about something that is "going to happen", it usually means that the event is already planned, starting to happen, or we can see it coming now. (see Micheal Swan for this useful clarification)
For example: "Look at the clouds. It's going to rain". We obviously wouldn't say "Look at the clouds. It will rain".... or the difference between "We will buy a new car" and "We are going to buy a new car". The first lacks the decisive, "already decided-ness" of the latter.
We can also teach students how "going to" can be used in commands and refusals.
"You are going to attend this grammar class whether you like it or not"
"I'm not going to listen to a word of this dribble".
"Going to" is also often used for predictions about the future based on present evidence:
"Slow down. We are going to crash!" There's immediate, present evidence about crashing.
"Don't lend him your car. He's a terrible driver - he'll crash it" (the future aspect here is used based on knowledge about "him", though it's not guaranteed that the car will be crashed).
"He's going to crash it" of course means that crashing the car is already planned, and is most certain to occur.
That said, it can be difficult to teach these subtlties. I sometimes do a class on the "future perfect" and "future continuous". By the end, after controlled exercisies, and an extended role-play that requires the two future forms, students seem to get the idea of the difference between "will", "will be..." and "will have...". But when beginning, many question the necessity of the learning the two forms. Myself, I figure that since language is the base of every thought and expression, the more ways one has to speak at one's disposal, the closer one can come to accurately expressing those thoughts and ideas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't mean to sound like a textbook but -' The present progressive can emphasise the idea of 'fixed arrangement' ; 'going to' can emphasise the idea of 'intention', or 'previous decision '
'Are you doing anything this weekend 'is asking about arrangements and is more natural than are you going to do anything this weekend . Interchange clearly has different ideas .
Another Interchange grammar focus in Unit 11 - 'Are the waiters going to sing to you ? Yes they are . They're going to sing "Happy Birthday" No they aren't .But they're going to give me a cake .
What How much has J Richards made out of this?
Do you guys seriousely try to teach this rubbish . I find the Interchange series generally does not think of the broader use of English language . I have found it fails to consider different contexts , intonation and is not authentic whatsover . I guess as you say Paul adapting the book is the key but I find this Unit very difficult to do so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Barufaldi
Joined: 09 Apr 2004 Posts: 271 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting points about intention. As I recall, New Interchange teaches that "will" indicates a specific plan or intention and present continous and "going to" are more casual -an aspect of the lesson I usually encourage the students to disregard.
I was just thinking too that "going to" is the *only* way to express a future intention in terms of the past -mainly used for making excuses:
I was going to call you last week, but I was busy.
I was going to ask him about that during our meeting, but I forgot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|