Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

N. Korea issue
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MrCAPiTUL



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 232
Location: Taipei, Taiwan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:01 am    Post subject: N. Korea issue Reply with quote

For those of you over there, how has Japan been responding to the N. Korea issue? Especially since they tested a rocket into the Sea of Japan. Has it been getting any coverage, any offical statements been made? What about every day people, any talk of it? Sorry, I'm an international relations geek. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wolfman



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 189

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20060706a1.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PAULH



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Posts: 4672
Location: Western Japan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:20 am    Post subject: Re: N. Korea issue Reply with quote

MrCAPiTUL wrote:
For those of you over there, how has Japan been responding to the N. Korea issue? Especially since they tested a rocket into the Sea of Japan. Has it been getting any coverage, any offical statements been made? What about every day people, any talk of it? Sorry, I'm an international relations geek. Very Happy


People in Osaka are building bomb shelters and learning Korean for the day when NK over runs the South.

Politicians are running around like headless chickens, as usual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
womblingfree



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone remember the Rainbow Policy between North and South Korea a few years ago? Madelaine Albright dancing in North Korea with school children?

People from the North and South were reunited after years, families that had lost contact were able to visit each other and a sense of optimism and reconcilliation prevailed.

The the Bush administration took power, stopped all talks with the North and declared them part of an axis of evil. Cue, Rainbow Policy collapse and North Korea launching missiles again and doing anything attention grabbing to get talks started again.

Good to see US militairy spending and the budget deficit back to Cold War levels again Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrCAPiTUL



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 232
Location: Taipei, Taiwan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As much as a dislike the Bush administration, that isn't a totally fair statement. In 1998 poo-poo hit the fan when N. Korea fired a missle over Japan, which landed in the Pacific Ocean. That was during the Clinton Administration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
womblingfree



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrCAPiTUL wrote:
As much as a dislike the Bush administration, that isn't a totally fair statement. In 1998 poo-poo hit the fan when N. Korea fired a missle over Japan, which landed in the Pacific Ocean. That was during the Clinton Administration.


That's why I said N. Korea launced a missile again. Also that pre-dates the moves towards normalisation of relations between the North, South and US.

You have to admit that the hard won improvements between North & South Korea have all but dissapeared since Bushes regime stopped the dialogue, against the Souths wishes by the way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrCAPiTUL



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 232
Location: Taipei, Taiwan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry mate. Missed the again part.

If you look at the bigger picture, everything is unfolding in a very predictable manner, to some extent. If China becomes a superpower, you can see who will be lined up on each side of the fence (I say If because they still do have very many domestic hurdles to overcome in terms of the disparity between the rich and the poor).

US, India, Thaiwan, S Korea, and Japan all in an attempt to balance out China, who will probably pull N Korea. China would probably also find a way to pull Vietnam and Laos as allies. The undetermined one is Russia. I haven't really been able to swing them in either direction. If they continue the backslide towards communism, one would assume they'd line up with China. Then again, historically they have not been allies. It could be a World War II situation all over again. People that know they don't like eachother lining up to defeat a common enemy and then going against eachother when it is all said-and-done. Either way, that region is a hotbed of growing activity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris21



Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 366
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why would China risk a war in order to align itself with North Korea? The US is the largest trading partner for China, and critical for their future prosperity. Any sort of conflict could result in a suspension of trade between the two countries, dealing a serious blow to their growing economy. Further, China certainly doesn't want to instigate a conflict on its border that might lead to destabilization within China. I would go so far as to suggest that China might be one of the US's strongest allies in the region because they have the ear of North Korea and desperately want to avoid conflict.

North Korea is a poor, third world country, and nobody is going to engage in a crippling war on their behalf simply because they are neighbors and have some shared history.

The weapons test was just the DPRK trying to improve its bargaining position for foreign aid and future negotiations with South Korea in the integration of the two countries (which is inevitable).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
womblingfree



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What would be best for everyone would be a normalisation of relations with N. Korea leading to a potential reunification in future years when Kim Jong Il dies. Unlikely? Well about as unlikely as a reunified Germany not so long ago.

What would be best for Asia in the long run is closer ties between China, Korea, Taiwan and Japan, an Asian Union like the European Union. Now this may seem unlikely as there is so much bad blood. Also this would significantly reduce US influence in the region.

The US already has to deal with this in the EU. It seems to be promoting discord already, see all those EU countries that went into Iraq? They were all small players or thought that they could get more world influence by allying themselves with the US rather than with their EU partners. The Conservative party in the UK is already talking of joining a fringe group of nuts and pulling out of mainstream European conservatism, neo-con anyone?

Anyhow I really hope that in the future we will see closer ties between asian countries and less of the scare tactics by all parties. Let's face it the Japanese have far more in common with the Chinese and Koreans than they do with the US.

Hopefully when the current administration in the US leaves in the not too distant future all the bad blood and cold war scare mongering will go with them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wolfman



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 189

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

womblingfree wrote:
Hopefully when the current administration in the US leaves in the not too distant future all the bad blood and cold war scare mongering will go with them.


Unfortunately, I don't think it will. The scare mongering is mostly the doing of the media which, sadly, cannot be voted out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
womblingfree



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wolfman wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think it will. The scare mongering is mostly the doing of the media which, sadly, cannot be voted out.


The media just package the scares that the politicians feed them.

Here's a quote from the documentary The Power of Nightmares:

Quote:
In the past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.

The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media.

At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.

Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.

These two groups have changed the world but not in the way either intended.

Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful
Together they created today's nightmare vision of an organised terror network.

A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful.

The rise of the politics of fear begins in 1949 with two men whose radical ideas would inspire the attack of 9/11 and influence the neo-conservative movement that dominates Washington.

Both these men believed that modern liberal freedoms were eroding the bonds that held society together.

The two movements they inspired set out, in their different ways, to rescue their societies from this decay. But in an age of growing disillusion with politics, the neo-conservatives turned to fear in order to pursue their vision.


You could apply the same to North Korea, especially as it has been lumped in with Iraq, Iran and Syria as belonging to an 'Axis of Evil'. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wolfman



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 189

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

womblingfree wrote:


The media just package the scares that the politicians feed them.


I agree, but politicians feed the media that nonsense no matter which arbitrary political party has their allegiance. It's the media's responsibility to stop regurgitating that nonsense that the entire political spectrum is feeding them. I doubt whatever puppet holds the office of US Presidency next is going to do anything to stop the cycle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
womblingfree



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wolfman wrote:
womblingfree wrote:


The media just package the scares that the politicians feed them.


I agree, but politicians feed the media that nonsense no matter which arbitrary political party has their allegiance. It's the media's responsibility to stop regurgitating that nonsense that the entire political spectrum is feeding them. I doubt whatever puppet holds the office of US Presidency next is going to do anything to stop the cycle.


I do seem to remember a serious lack of scare mongering between the end of the cold war and the beginning of the faux 'war on terror'.

Politicians need to keep us scared, it gives them power, and in Bush's case kept him in power.

In fact in that time we saw peace in Northern Ireland, intervention in and a halting of genocide in the former Yugoslavia, and damn nearly a peace deal in the middle east!


Last edited by womblingfree on Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrCAPiTUL



Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 232
Location: Taipei, Taiwan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris, you are thinking too short term. The key to my comment was if/when China becomes a superpower. Right now, you are correct, China can not afford to make a move (much like it can not afford to make a move on Thaiwan). Do NOT be mistaken, though. The Chinese will not need the US in the future. Right now, the Chinese are utilizing the US for our technology, not our money, really. Don't get me wrong, the money helps for reinvesting initially, but it is really after the technology. I don't know if you ever realized this, but once China gets on its feet it can pull the rug out from under US companies. Allow me to explain.

The US became a superpower because of its strong domestic market and lack of internal trade barriers. That is how we can have a trade deficit yet still have the world's largest economy. The US has 1/5 of China's population. If China gets going well enough, it can kick out every foreign company it wants and not give a damn because it'll still be selling its products to, minimally, 1/5 of the world's entire population. The tables will be reversed and it will be the US and other countries that can not make a move because WE will not be able to afford to. The only way to balance that out is by creating strong ties with other Asian nations (who, believe it or not, also fear Chinese hegemony in the region). We've already started to take steps to neutralize their future power via development in India. We've been funelling shit loads of contracts to Indian companies, having bilateral nuclear trade talks, developing infrastructure, etc. Suddenly, India has become a potential player. After all, they have the worlds second largest population with approximately 1.1billion people. If they can develop like China has, they are the natural competitor in the region. Everything is going to take its course and in time, you'll see attitudes and opinions start to change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
womblingfree



Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 826

PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrCAPiTUL wrote:
The only way to balance that out is by creating strong ties with other Asian nations (who, believe it or not, also fear Chinese hegemony in the region). We've already started to take steps to neutralize their future power via development in India. We've been funelling *beep* loads of contracts to Indian companies, having bilateral nuclear trade talks, developing infrastructure, etc. Suddenly, India has become a potential player.


All true. Doesn't it make far more sense for asian countries to ally themselves with China though? Surely trade between China and Asia is already greater than with the US?

Not sure if trying to get India on board will work. They will be a superpower in their own right and with their history of colonial rule are highly suspicious of any attempts at manipulation of their resources. Theyll be in a simialir situation to China surely in that they can sustain a growth economy with internal trade.

I'm not sure if the US policy of divide and rule by keeping Japan in pocket and India on board is sustainable?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China