|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
McEFL (English Second, Economics First)
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
no_exit
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 565 Location: Kunming
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
First off vik, I never said I worked for EF for three years, so don't put words into my mouth. I worked at EF for one year, one contract. I've also worked for the biggest university in this province, for a school owned and run by a British guy and his wife, for a massive IELTS training school, and loads of kindergartens around the city (and have been a popular teacher with every school. Haven't been fired yet!).
There is nothing you say in regards to "methodologies" that I disagree with. In fact, we probably have fairly similar views regarding education (if you remember from the other thread, I was educated through Montessori and my entire family is involved with the Montessori movement), which is sad considering that you persist in demeaning me and everyone else who has been with EF, simply for having worked there and not found it to be a prison. I found that I had the most freedom in the classroom at EF out of any school I have worked for, are you saying that I'm a lier? A tool of the man? You think I like seeing young kids suffer? Do you seriously think that every class at EF is identical, and that it isn't possible that different teachers have different styles, and that some EF teachers actually care about children?
I am NOT saying that every EF is a freakin' heaven on Earth, but you persist in making huge generalizations about everyone who works there (does this include yourself, I often wonder, because you accepted a job with them afterall ...). Why not admit that some EFs might not be such bad places after all? Would that be like losing face or something? Because it just seems like you'll take any tack just to attack this school (or this type of school). When people spoke up for the working conditions at EF, you switched tacks and went after the methodology, and simply refuse to accept that there are creative and progressive teachers working at EF. Some kids enjoy learning language, whether it is hard or not, so are they going to be your next victims? Any kid who enjoys an EF class must be a brain-washed tool of the system, is that it?
To break it down for you:
1. I am not a backpacker and I take my teaching seriously.
2. I taught at EF and I found my employers to be fair and decent people.
3. I made my classes fun, creative, and gave them a positive learning environment, and they learned some English in the process.
4. My kids, for the most part, really liked class and many developed a true, and hopefully lifelong, interest in the language.
In those four sentences, what do you take issue with, besides the two letters EF? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ColinA
Joined: 31 May 2006 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: Re: McEFL (English Second, Economics First) |
|
|
Malsol wrote: |
Globalization, McDonaldization, EF? (EF could also stand for �easy f�� because that is what they think of anyone who accepts their McCrap jobs.
|
Gee Malsol, whenever I rubbish EF or ESL jobs and all that is wrong with China: politics, pollution, corruption etc I get howled down. The only losers are the drifters, dropouts, desperadoes and deviates who escape from whatever past life they would rather forget. I agree Officials are not stupid they know exactly the clientele that are attracted to McEF type jobs.
Malsol wrote: |
There has to be a better business model but complaining about EF is not going to change anything. |
On the other hand, I would consider going back but only when their education is brought up to 1st world standards and some effort is made to clean up the environment. Neither of which I think will happen in my lifetime. As you say complaining about it wont do anything! What would achieve a response I believe, is loss of face. Namely, for ESL teachers to stop applying for jobs at least in China and for current FTs to vote with their feet. Then, and only then might we see something done.
______________________________________________________
Everyone has a right to a university degree in China, even if it's in Hamburger Technology. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jolly good no-exit - 25 or so lines there but onlya couple that realy focuses on the pedagogical merits of EF -
Quote: |
3. I made my classes fun, creative, and gave them a positive learning environment, and they learned some English in the process.
4. My kids, for the most part, really liked class and many developed a true, and hopefully lifelong, interest in the language. |
if you're interested in making a worthwile contribution to the thread why not elaborate a bit on those two points, and tell how EF supported and aided you in your quest to use progressive educational method in your classes - otherwise just continue your diatribe against me, of course while yet again telling us more about your teaching history in China - since that is also a r sweet and amusing (although rather off-topic) subject  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Wouldn't you agree "the actual work of learning" pretty much anything, will likely be pretty far removed from running about in free and open space and playing football |
I just held a five day teacher training course for a kindergarten chain - the course titled - reflection, stimulation and playing English.
The reflection part handled on our role as thinking teachers and the effect modern over teaching and educational control had on young learners - the stimulation and playing English bits were very much to do with making the kindergarten classroom more like a football field than a prison for mini "would-be" scholars - how games, stories, crafts, free child initiated activities which center on concept of play etc etc were to be viewed as a vital part of a progressive kindergarten classroom - and were the key to unlocking those psuedoacademic chains which weigh so heavily on young kids here.
The most amazing part of the course that the workshops on the last two days of the course got the teachers to produce an English treasure hunt (completely their own initiative) that could be conducted inside or outside the classroom - and reflected their desire to take students off the chairs and away from the desks in the spirit of creative learning. Discussions before this had often centered on the fact that if they considering their own children then they certainly weren't happy with the way education is generaly meted out to small kids in China - and many wanted to be respected by parents as experts - so parents could be advised on the true nature of small child education, rather than the teacher feeling the servant of parent whims regarding the individual son or daughter. The course kinda gave me (and others running it) the feeling - that something somewhere was giving
this is of course pre-school - but much of the principles of a pedagogical practice that considers creative stimulation as a basis for an effective learning environment run true for all aspects of education - shizer wasn't it malsol who had one of his best lessons with his uni students on the pool- side
I a reckon a change is going on - Beijing , Shanghai have already have those parenting classes, which harp on about the value of play and the how social development is an essential practical foundation to an academic progression. I just wonder if those McCrap firms mirror these sentiments - or is there just not enough money in pedagogical principle to make it worth their while cleaning their - "pack 'em in - an' get 'em to learn sentences and few songs" - act up - and just remember this is all on top of a 40 hour+ kindergarten week !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by the way our new iniative is to target more parents with our ideas - my little spanner aimed at the machine  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
no_exit
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 565 Location: Kunming
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I won't vik, because this thread was never about me defending my teaching methods against your attacks, you're the one who turned this into "EF teachers methodologies vs. those of everyone else", which I think is a completely unnecessary topic, not even worthy of discussion. I don't have to justify myself to you. It was a thread about EF as a phenomenon, how it affects the job market, and its worthiness (or unworthiness) as an employer. I never read it as "hey, EF teachers(or ex teachers, as the case may be, which also includes yourelf Mr. Cast The First Stone, does it not? Or are you above reproach simply by default?), prove that you're not crap by writing a 200 word essay on your teaching methods for all of us to critique."
You didn't answer my question by the way. Do you disagree with any of my points, or is your argument against me based solely on the fact that I defended EF?
If you really want to discuss ideas and methodologies, start another thread, and I'll be happy to share what I know and where I learned it, but not here. If you don't understand why then you're really thicker than I ever imagined.
I will indulge you just a bit though, and tell you that your games, stories, crafts, artwork, etc. are all a major part of my teaching. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that little kids don't respond well to rote memorization, formulaic repetition, and mindless drilling. I don't know a single kindergarten teacher that doesn't incorporate your *radical* ideas into a typical lesson plan. How could you possibly teach kids and not try to make the lesson as enjoyable for them as possible? Isn't this pretty basic when we get right down to it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No-exit if you don't want to share your first hand EF experiences with us - and how the EF method allowed you to carry out the kind out practice that we associate with progressive style western kindies - well that's ashame - we could surely have learnt much about how EF in kunming seems to be a trail blazer in the field of Chinese pre-school education
By the way how is your hunt for an English text-book for kindy kids going  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: McEFL (English Second, Economics First) |
|
|
I cannot believe that you guys keep on going here. Some have actually come up with ideas of “I have worked for McEF before”. What a bull…. Providing a lot of words about a lot of cr*p will never give much to the ones contemplating about teaching at McEF in China. To you guys that have little clue to what McEF is about, it is rather shameful to confront those that share their McEF experiences here.
This thread has become a trolling example of some with their high egos and lonely lives.
Dear McEF interested ones, paying attention to those trollers-loners might prove to be a rather costly one in your future. So, please take your time and read on longer and carefully through all those junks of irrelevant info on, search for more EF English First threads on boards and focus on the EF relevant stuff more, before you make your decisions.
Peace to all
and
cheers and beers  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey EG - EF is about teaching - why not talk about McCrapness of that - or is this thread just to do with your sacking
what about giving us an account of the pedagofical principles behind the EF teaching method - now that would be another way of judging if we were had a krap product wouldn't it - or is teaching ESL here just about work for FT's  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
no_exit
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 565 Location: Kunming
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
vikdk wrote: |
No-exit if you don't want to share your first hand EF experiences with us - and how the EF method allowed you to carry out the kind out practice that we associate with progressive style western kindies - well that's ashame - we could surely have learnt much about how EF in kunming seems to be a trail blazer in the field of Chinese pre-school education
By the way how is your hunt for an English text-book for kindy kids going  |
Here's a hint. There is no "EF method." At least there wasn't where I worked.
As I have said repeatedly, any school is only as good as its teachers. I never had anyone at EF telling me I had to teach this way, or had to teach that way. My goal was to make the kids happy and teach them something, period. Why would EF want to interfere with happy, learning children? Why vik? It isn't a Chinese public school afterall, the kids aren't trapped there for 12 years with no way out, it is entirely up to them and their parents whether they take English lessons or not. Do you honestly think there was someone standing over me during class saying "put those crayons away! No creativity here! Is that a STORY you're writing? Who told you to let the children think for themselves?!"
I will tell you (although I'm repeating myself here, I've said this before), the nice thing about EF Kunming which made it conducive to good teaching were the resources. We had all the paper, scissors, glue, markers, and assorted craft materials we could ever want, supplied by the school. We had a library of English books and magazines, CDs, DVDs which the students could choose from, and toys, balls, dolls, games, etc., all right there at our disposal. I've never worked for a more well-supplied organization. But what I'm wondering is this: if EF, as whole, is so anti-creativity, why would they give us these things in the first place?
Could it be, perhaps vik, that I just worked for a decent center, and you worked for a crap one? Or does it have to all black and white for you? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Malsol
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 1976 Location: Lanzhou
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you would work for McEF, what makes you think you are any different than those who take the McCrap jobs at McDo?
Flippin burgers may be more McFun! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KES

Joined: 17 Nov 2004 Posts: 722
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I just held a five day teacher training course for a kindergarten chain |
OMG! A chain. According to some posters here, it must be McCrap. After all, it's a chain.
Seriously, sounds like a chain can have some quality with the kind of teacher training you provided.
Training matters.
Glad you could help them.
How did the teachers (students) respond? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
no_exit
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 565 Location: Kunming
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Malsol wrote: |
If you would work for McEF, what makes you think you are any different than those who take the McCrap jobs at McDo?
Flippin burgers may be more McFun! |
Where do you get off saying crap like this? You're taking it way too far with this statement. Get off the high horse, you're no better than anyone else, and don't you dare judge my teaching unless you've seen it in person.
*beep*. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
evaforsure

Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Posts: 1217
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
This thread has become a trolling example of some with their high egos and lonely lives.
|
Whats wrong EG, your right hand getting tired.
I would think that many have high lives and lonely egos only to become good examples of a troll.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|