View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
zorro (3)
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
It also depends on what county you live in, in England. In Buckinghamshire the students still need to take the 12+ to get into grammar schools. I was led to believe that this was one of the only counties left to do this. Correct me if I'm wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilaria
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 88 Location: Sicily
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kent too, but we take the 11+ there. I failed
... and look where I am today!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kind of a strange term, don't you think? You failed the 11+...... so you're not allowed to be 12. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
11:59

Joined: 31 Aug 2006 Posts: 632 Location: Hong Kong: The 'Pearl of the Orient'
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's shooting off at bit of a tangent but anyone who claims that educational standards/levels/expectations/etc. are not falling in the UK would do well to look back at some of those old papers (11+, 16+, etc.) To judge from the ones I have come across and perused they demanded knowledge of, and abilities in, areas which today are not encountered until beginning A levels! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't say that the Grade 5 syllabus was any more difficult when I did it than it is now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2003
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Posts: 344 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was at school right when the system changed from the O level to the GCSE. I was in the advanced classes for maths and French so took them one year early (O level) whereas all the other exams I took were the GCSE. I failed the French O level (by 1/240th of a percent!) and retook the exam a year later. I didn't study or attend lessons at all that year but passed the GCSE easily. I think that says it all. I hardly think a year of inactivity would have improved my French.
Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Timster
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 6 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stephen Jones wrote: |
Quote: |
The way I heard it is that back in the days public schools gained there name as being schools open to the public as opposed to religious schools who were open only to those heavily affiliated with christianity |
You heard it wrong. Most Public Schools are heavily affiliated with Christianity, often have their own chapel and chaplain, and in the cases of the better known predate the church schools by many hundreds of years. |
You almost had me be doubting myself. The following is from
http://www.publicschools.co.uk/
"The term "public" (first adopted by Eton College) refers to the fact that the school is open to the paying public, as opposed to a religious school, which was open only to members of a certain church. It also distinguished it from a private education at home (usually only practical for the very wealthy who could afford tutors)" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You shouldn't believe everything that industry public relations websites say. Compulsory attendance at chapel formed part of Eton's regulations for most of its history.
Being a member of the Church of England was a requisite for entrance to the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge until 1873. As a large number of Eton students were Collegers, that is to say those promised entrance to the sister institution of Kings College Cambridge, it is obvious that non-conformists or Catholics, let alone Jews, did not get a look in.
To quote wikipedia: University College School, founded in 1830 as part of University College London, was unique in that it neither took boarders nor gave religious education; indeed, by not limiting its intake to a specific religious denomination, it gained the claim of being the first truly "public" school, open to all.
In fact most religious schools were formed to give an education to those who couldn't be educated in the Anglican Public Schools of the era. Not for the first time you are seeing British Public Schools reinventing their history in order to continue creaming money off the elite. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|