Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teaching Fahrenheit 451 and To Kill a Mockingbird

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sunrader



Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:51 pm    Post subject: Teaching Fahrenheit 451 and To Kill a Mockingbird Reply with quote

I've been assigned to teach these two books at two different US intensive English programs. There will be Korean students at one with TKAM, and Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Middle Eastern (haven't been told where) at the other with 451.

When I've taught outside intensive English programs in universities, we've been instructed not to cause any kind of discomfort or conflict for students of other cultures, so these issues seem problematic to me.

Has anyone taught these books? How did you talk about racism and censorship with these populations? What kinds of prompts would you use for classroom discussion if you're trying to avoid conflict between the groups? For instance, do you mention Salman Rushdie if you have Muslim students? Do you avoid conversations about internet use in China? All the students are pretty advanced and close to entering the universities themselves, but I doubt the administrators think we should use the same critical studies approach we might use with American college freshmen.

Both programs are good, so I'm sure the schools will have some instructions. I'd just like the opinions of experienced teachers, particularly those involved with these populations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't only the Mockingbird book about racism? I thought 451 was about book burning and censorship.

Someone made an attempt to teach Mockingbird in a high school class of Japanese first year students when I was there. Pretty high level students, but nonetheless, it was pretty lame. Moreover, it detracted from their overall English studies, but I digress.

How old are your students?

For Mockingbird, you may want to focus a lot more on crime and discrimination than on discrimination as a whole. Compare the Mockingbird story with Rodney King, for example. Still stays within the bounds of the USA (even thought the topic itself is very emotionally charged). Or you could get students onto studying the Deep South, past and present.

Both books come with movies, so you could use those at times for listening practice and comprehension. The usual stuff with video and book material apply. That is, have them read a chapter, write or talk about a description of a character or scene, then compare to what they see in a clip from the movie. Discussion ensues.

Just what is the purpose of teaching these 2 books, anyway? And, what is the length of this intensive course (daily and overall)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sunrader



Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenski wrote:
Isn't only the Mockingbird book about racism? I thought 451 was about book burning and censorship.

Someone made an attempt to teach Mockingbird in a high school class of Japanese first year students when I was there. Pretty high level students, but nonetheless, it was pretty lame. Moreover, it detracted from their overall English studies, but I digress.

How old are your students?

For Mockingbird, you may want to focus a lot more on crime and discrimination than on discrimination as a whole. Compare the Mockingbird story with Rodney King, for example. Still stays within the bounds of the USA (even thought the topic itself is very emotionally charged). Or you could get students onto studying the Deep South, past and present.

Both books come with movies, so you could use those at times for listening practice and comprehension. The usual stuff with video and book material apply. That is, have them read a chapter, write or talk about a description of a character or scene, then compare to what they see in a clip from the movie. Discussion ensues.

Just what is the purpose of teaching these 2 books, anyway? And, what is the length of this intensive course (daily and overall)?



Thanks for the suggestions. Yes, one has a racism subject and the other has censorship. Both subjects seem problematic to me in this context. I agree that TKAM is quite difficult from a linguistic standpoint, but I look forward to discussion of its use of subtle language and allusion.

IMO, the better theme for TKAM is that of innocence lost, etc. The children find out that people aren't always good, etc. but I don't see how to avoid the racism, etc. (The book contains racist language which I wouldn't choose to introduce, but there it is.) Yes, the South and the depression are good topics, too.

I've been told we use Raiders of the Lost Ark - The Last Crusade as a companion to 451 because of the book burning scene, not the movie of 451. I don't know, but I wonder if that's because the Nazis burning books is maybe seen as a "safe" thing to talk about or maybe it's just a fun movie??? I've ordered the play script for 451 to give them another way to work with the language, too.

I have no idea what the purpose of teaching these books is. It's what I was told to do. I wouldn't have chosen them, but I have seen a fair bit of mention of teaching them on the internet, so I think it's not uncommon in these intensive programs, and, don't get me wrong, I think it will be a very interesting experience. I'm just wondering what other teachers find the appropriate attitude to be. I mean, when we teach these to young Americans (in freshmen comp, for instance), we are clearly supposed to be sending the message that racism and censorship are bad things. I'm not sure what we are supposed to relay to students from countries whose governments probably wouldn't agree with that assessment. I mentioned to a colleague that I'd thought of talking about Salman Rushdie (which I would certainly do in an American classroom) and was told that would be a very bad idea given that I might have Muslim students. I thought that was a good point, but it's what made me start questioning how this should be handled.

These are intensive programs for international students attached to universities. They meet daily for about 7-9 hours for 8 week sessions. Most students stay for a number of sessions. The students are mostly young college age, but that can vary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fancynan



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 77
Location: Kaiserslautern, Germany

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found it interesting that you touched on the theme of innocence lost in TKAM. When I was in college (26 years ago), I wrote a paper on the loss of innocence in America, using this book to draw comparisons between Jem and Scout and American society as a whole.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mondrian



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 658
Location: "was that beautiful coastal city in the NE of China"

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two thoughts:
Teaching controversial topics: in China to mention media censorship is a risky business. It can get you fired, if there is a young cadre in your class taking notes. You certainly don't criticise the CCP, but that is more because we don't have the knowledge or experience to do so. (How do you govern 1.4bn people?!).
So I would introduce the nature of the controversial topics at the beginning of the session and get your students to discuss with you what their existing views are. Then put it to them that there is Western literature dealing with such topics from perhaps different viewpoints to their own (e.g. why did these authors write what they wrote?).
An example: I have taught my students "not to reinvent the wheel" and to seek existing sources before considering they have fully grasped their assignment. Wikpedia is such a source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/ (and type in TKAMB or F451).
Unfortunately in China this site is blocked so we have to use a proxy.
I make no big deal about Chinese censorship. I just tell them to look the information up for discussion and to come to me privately if they want to know how to use a proxy (which they never do!).
I hope that they have given you enough preparation time as well as class time to be able to give what could be very interesting classes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

subtle language?
allusion?

Listen, unless those international students have TOEFL scores through the roof, you aren't going to be doing a heckuva lot of "discussions" on those two things.

Best to just throw some short reading material at them (5-10 pages a day), make some comprehension quizzes (T/F, cloze, fill in the blank, etc.), and hope for the best. Unless you have done a fair amount of reading skills teaching, I wouldn't hope for much more.

If you want to get brave, do more. Have students look up certain related things on the Internet. Have discussion groups about planned topics, then have the groups make reports. Do Reading Circles (Google it). Teach massive amounts of vocabulary (taking care not to make them understand that some of it is inflammatory or just plain old).

FIRST THING, though, is to go to the administration and ask for the PURPOSE of the darned course. Without that, you are just shooting in the dark. And, will this be a mandatory course for them, or an elective. (Helps you know their motivation.)

SECOND THING, is to get a handle on the level of the students. What exactly ARE their TOEFL scores?

What you saw on the Internet about people using these books... was it for native English students, or HIGH LEVEL ESL students? Big difference compared to what you are probably going to get.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eslstudies



Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Posts: 1061
Location: East of Aden

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mockingbird is a complex novel. It will be out of the realm of the students you describe socially, historically and linguistically.
I think its more about wisdom than racism. The children observe, and are victims of, hatred, but come to appreciate the wisdom and strength of Atticus and Calpurnia. Its a tale of lessons learned, eg Jem and Mrs Dubois, and of course Boo Radley.
You'd have as much success teaching Grapes of Wrath, another great American novel!
I wish you luck. A study of the film may be a better bet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jr1965



Joined: 09 Jul 2004
Posts: 175

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
All the students are pretty advanced and close to entering the universities themselves, but I doubt the administrators think we should use the same critical studies approach we might use with American college freshmen.


With F451, perhaps you can get around talking directly about censorship (how ironic), but then other issues which are just as charged will come up: how the media, technology, and (legal) pharmaceuticals (e.g., sleeping pills, prozac, etc) are used to shape "reality" and pressure people to conform and be "happy." Recall that in F451, people at first chose to self-censor and give up books, so that they could be "happier" and not think so much! Montag's wife refers to the actors on TV as "the relatives" but she can barely relate to or understand her own husband. When he tries to tell her how he feels...that he's unhappy & confused, she doesn't want to hear it b/c it's too depressing.

There's a line in the book in which Montag says, "Nobody listens any more. I can't talk to the walls (television screens are as big as walls in the future) because they're yelling at me. I can't talk to my wife; she listens to the walls. I just want someone to hear what I have to say�

We have everything we need to be happy, but we aren't happy. Something's missing."

These are themes many students will be able to understand and relate to, though again, they can be emotionally charged. Anyway, I would start by exploring this idea of happiness rather than focusing primarily on censorship and the book burning.


Also, when I read your post, I, too, had the same question as Glenski: what instructional objectives are you working toward? Developing reading & vocab skills? Critical analysis of piece of literature (plot, character, theme, etc)? Will a writing component accompany the reading? This will also inform how you approach both of these books.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deicide



Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 1005
Location: Caput Imperii Americani

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teaching novels to benighted EFL students...sounds like stand up comedy to me...or English lit....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sunrader



Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These are some really great suggestions. Thank you all so much. Today I'm watching To Kill a Mockingbird and comparing it to the book. I start tomorrow and will let you all know how it goes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sunrader



Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 101

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just wanted to let everyone know how it went this week. This week I started at the school where we are doing F451. It turns out this school takes a much more, what I would call "American" point of view than the last one I taught at. The school had no problem talking about censorship with students whose countries practice it pretty strongly. I was told to have the students do impromptu speeches on censorship and given four prompts to let them choose from, including "Tell something about censorship in your country." Ok, all well and good.

Not a single student recognized the word censorship. Smile

That was a little funny, given that it's the theme for all the classes in the whole session.

But after twenty minutes of us talking about what it was, they understood and were able to tell some really interesting things about it. So, we're off. Seven weeks to go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China