View previous topic :: View next topic |
If a boy of foreign parents was born in the U.S. and only lived there for 2 years is he from the U.S.? |
Yes! He is from the U.S. |
|
72% |
[ 16 ] |
No! He is not! |
|
27% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 22 |
|
Author |
Message |
Big John Stud
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 513
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:58 am Post subject: Where are you from? |
|
|
I was teaching counries the other day. As a warm up I asked them Were are you from?
One student who was born in the U.S. told me he is from the U.S. Hearing him say that with such a strong accent sounded strange. I've always gone by the model you're from where your heart is! But him saying he is from the U.S. sounded so funny, I thought he was joking at first.
His English is better than most of the other students in the class but he is not even slightly close to being able to express himself in English.
What do you fellow English teachers think? Since he was born in the U.S. do you think he should still continue to say he is from the U.S. ?
I just worry that maybe one day, he will tell an American he is from the U.S. and the American will crack up laughing thinking the guy is joking! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JimDunlop2

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 2286 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
If we was born in the U.S. he is American. He has American citizenship as his birthright.
Maybe you've been in Japan a little too long, John... Japan is one of the RARE countries in the world where being born here doesn't make you an automatic citizen... Most other places, your place of birth = citizenship regardless of how well / inept you are at speaking the language or whatnot. If knowing English were a pre-requisite for American citizenship, we'd have to deport half of all New York!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
John, Jim is correct that your student was from the US. It was also rather rude and insensitive of you to deny him his nationality because of how "funny" he sounded. No US citizen needs to sound like he is one. How someone sounds is irrelevant to whether or not someome is a US citizen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
japanman
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 281 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Would I be right in saying that the USA has no offical language anyaway? That being a language laid down in law, the UK has no offical langauge also. So wether or not he speaks English or not is of no importance. If he has a US passport then he is an American. Poor kid, ha ha ha. Only joking . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuck

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 1921 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
JimDunlop2 wrote: |
Japan is one of the RARE countries in the world where being born here doesn't make you an automatic citizen. |
Jim, this isn't exactly true. Look into it. It isn't rare at all! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
japanman
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 281 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would agree with Canuck there on that one. If the majority of countries gave instant citizenship to anyone living there, the whole world would be a topsy-turvy mess of all different people with citizenships that have no relation to their life at all. Also, if dual citizenship isn't possible then you wouldn't want to grow up in a country and have a passport of an entirely different nation. Imagine being born in Wales and having that on your back all your life. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
6810

Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 309
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
furiousmilksheikali wrote: |
John, Jim is correct that your student was from the US. It was also rather rude and insensitive of you to deny him his nationality because of how "funny" he sounded. No US citizen needs to sound like he is one. How someone sounds is irrelevant to whether or not someome is a US citizen. |
I agree but would be more precise in the sense that the student didn't "sound" like the "kind of America" being imagined/assumed...
There are many different kinds of AMericans, and they don't all have "American" accents. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JonnyB61

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 216 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
canuck wrote: |
JimDunlop2 wrote: |
Japan is one of the RARE countries in the world where being born here doesn't make you an automatic citizen. |
Jim, this isn't exactly true. Look into it. It isn't rare at all! |
Canuck is right on this. Many european countries have abandoned and are abandoning that premise in response to the numbers of heavily pregnant women from, especially but not exclusively, West Africa who were turning up in Europe, having the baby there, claiming residency for the baby and consequently for themselves and then the rest of the extended family.
This was all explained to me by the UK Home Office in 2003 when our daughter was born in London. Her mother and I were not married at the time and it was explained to me that under international law, the baby automatically gets the nationality of its mother (Japanese, in the case of our daughter). If we had been married she would have got automatic British nationality.
There are other examples where babies get the nationality of the parents as opposed to that of the country of birth. Consider babies born to diplomats or armed services personnel. I know several British people who were born in Germany because their fathers were in the army. They aren't Germans; they're Brits.
In the case of the example in the OP, unless the US usually gives nationality to all babies born there then I believe the answer would be no. It would have the nationality of its parents, especially the mother.
Last edited by JonnyB61 on Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:15 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
JonnyB61 wrote: |
In the case of the example in the OP, unless the US usually gives nationality to all babies born there then I believe the answer would be no. It would have the nationality of it's parents, especially the mother. |
Quote: |
Under the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of birthright citizenship, any person born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is automatically a U.S. citizen, regardless of the legal status or the citizenship of that individual�s mother or father. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States_of_America |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JonnyB61

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 216 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
JonnyB61 wrote: |
In the case of the example in the OP, unless the US usually gives nationality to all babies born there |
It seems Furious M has answered that little poser quite nicely.
Indeed, that used to be the case in many, many countries but it was being so badly abused that a lot of them, including the UK, have abandoned the policy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli
Some countries are restricting lex soli by requiring that at least one of the child's parents be a national of the state in question at the child's birth, or a legal permanent resident of the territory of the state in question at the child's birth, or that the child be a foundling found on the territory of the state in question. The primary reason for imposing this requirement is to limit or prevent people from travelling to a country with the specific intent of gaining citizenship for a child. The 27th amendment to the constitution of the Republic of Ireland was passed by referendum in 2004 for this purpose.
Recently, due to the influx of illegal immigrants, there have been moves (though unsuccessful, thus far) to abolish it in the United States. Amendment of US citizenship law to remove jus soli would require either a Constitutional amendment or a reversal by the Supreme Court. That is because the Fourteenth Amendment, as established in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, guarantees and protects the citizenship of any individual born in the United States.
The two paragraphs above were supposed to be quotes but I did it wrong!

Last edited by JonnyB61 on Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
A quick look through Wikipedia reveals that the US is indeed rare in granting automatic citizenship to those born on its soil (a principle known as jus soli ) whereas most countries either grant citizenship depending upon the nationality of their parents/blood relations jus sanguinis, as in the case of Japan, or a mixture of the two such as with the UK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big John Stud
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 513
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
furiousmilksheikali wrote: |
John, Jim is correct that your student was from the US. It was also rather rude and insensitive of you to deny him his nationality because of how "funny" he sounded. No US citizen needs to sound like he is one. How someone sounds is irrelevant to whether or not someome is a US citizen. |
First you are assuming way too much! I didn't say anything to the student in question. I try to be positive all the time with the students. So even when I do correct them I do so without them knowing they are being corrected.
Jim statement about deporting half of New York was funny!
I want to thank everyone. Obviously from this thread this is a complicated topic. I am just going to let the student believe whatever he wants. Deciding where he is from is not my place anyhow. Thanks again! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think he would be called a hyphenated American (Japanese American) but with heavy emphasis on the Japanese. If he left when he was two, do you know for sure that his parents didn't grow up there? Maybe they lived in the States from birth and returned to Japan to be with extended family or for other reasons. If that's the case, then it is entirely possible (though admitedly not probable) that his home life is very similar to that of kids with parents who came here to teach English and never left.
How many people in North America call themselves Irish though they have no living relatives there, have never been there, know really nothing about it other than stereotypes of beer and four leaf clovers on St Patrick's Day and aren't even aware that there actually is an Irish language outside of English? (hint: the answer is 'a lot!').
Also, many Japanese people will automatically call him American. I've been accused of being 'not even a real Canadian' (Canadians being seen as the booby prize for when they run out of Amelikans for ALTs in the JET programme) by Japanese people when they found out that I wasn't born there (I arrived when I was 2). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big John Stud
Joined: 07 Oct 2004 Posts: 513
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
GambateBingBangBOOM wrote: |
I think he would be called a hyphenated American (Japanese American) but with heavy emphasis on the Japanese. If he left when he was two, do you know for sure that his parents didn't grow up there? Maybe they lived in the States from birth and returned to Japan to be with extended family or for other reasons. If that's the case, then it is entirely possible (though admitedly not probable) that his home life is very similar to that of kids with parents who came here to teach English and never left.
How many people in North America call themselves Irish though they have no living relatives there, have never been there, know really nothing about it other than stereotypes of beer and four leaf clovers on St Patrick's Day and aren't even aware that there actually is an Irish language outside of English? (hint: the answer is 'a lot!').
Also, many Japanese people will automatically call him American. I've been accused of being 'not even a real Canadian' (Canadians being seen as the booby prize for when they run out of Amelikans for ALTs in the JET programme) by Japanese people when they found out that I wasn't born there (I arrived when I was 2). |
His parents were only in the U.S. for three years as part of a training program. Culturally he is very Japanese.
I am surprised by the poll! Maybe I put being from as the place you are more connected. Language is the root of culture. He can't express himself in English. He does try hard in class and just about always goes all out!
He like my son has dual citizenship, but once he reaches 21 legally he has to choice one. Mostly likely he will choose Japan. This is his home after all. Now the question would be do all of you who voted he is from the U.S. would still consider him from the U.S.? As I wrote in the above post, where ever he says he's from is fine with me. Again I do thank everyone for their perspectives, they made me realize this is a very complicated issue! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big John, perhaps the question is ambiguous. If by the question "is he from the US?" you mean is he a US citizen then the answer is definitively "yes". This is legally the case no matter what your opinion on the matter is.
For other interpretations of the question then I don't have enough knowledge of the person and can't have an accurate knowledge of his state of mind. But you asked him yourself: "Where are you from?" and he replied "The US." What more is there to say? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|