Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Protests??
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dmb



Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 8397

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:41 pm    Post subject: Protests?? Reply with quote

I've just been watching the news. An estimated 100,000 people went for a stroll in london today(at what cost to the British taxpayer) They put red dye in a fountain, built a couple of fires, waved signs saying 'Bush is a C***' and pulled down a paper mache effigy. Thats's really going to stop world terrorism. At least Bush is doing something positive to try and combat things like the latest attrocities that happened in Istanbul today.
Why don't people protest about terrorists killing innocent people rather than a democratically elected president. is it because they believe that terrorists won't listen to them and politicians will?
Disclaimer: I am in no way pro or anti Bush. I'm not even American
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shenyanggerry



Joined: 02 Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that people object to bullies deciding that they don't like a particular country and then slaughtering their citizens wholesale for the crime of being patriots. They also object to members of resistance movements being called terrorists. After all, even Hitler didn't find it necessary to bomb suspected resistance sites of countries he currently occupied.

Then again, maybe it was a nice day and they all decided to go for a walk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joe-joe



Joined: 15 Oct 2003
Posts: 100
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm very ambivalent on this issue; I do think it's wrong for governments, in the UK and US to impose their will on a foreign country for supposedly noble reasons, especially when the UN and the EU objected so loudly to military action without proof. BUT I do think people should realise that whilst having at a go at Tony and 'Dubyah', they should be thankful they are actually allowed to do so without being shot, tortured, run over by tanks, etc, as would happen in a place run by someone like Uncle Saddam for example.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
veiledsentiments



Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 17644
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bush doing something positive???????? Where???? Since when is bombing a country totally unrelated to the terrorist attack on America considered positive. Even he has admitted that NO ties to Al-Qaeda have been found along with none of the WMD that they also lied about to the American people. Everything he has done so far has only made terrorism worse. Welcome to modern life!!

I AM American and he was NOT democratically elected. Check your facts. He got about a half million less votes than the other candidate and was eventually given his position by the Supreme Court which was in a large part put into their positions by his father.

This is NOT democracy as I was taught in school.

VS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 10:47 pm    Post subject: Terrorists and public opinion Reply with quote

Dear dmb,
Perhaps people don't protest against terrorists killing innocent people for the same reason you don't try and reason with a rabid beast. They know it wouldn't do any good; such individuals are not subject to or interested in "public opinion". But elected - even, as VS pointed out, fraudulently "elected" ones such as Bush - are. I AM very grateful to be living in a country where peaceful protests against disapproved government actions are still possible (having spent 20+years of my life in lands where it wasn't).
Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nomadder



Joined: 15 Feb 2003
Posts: 709
Location: Somewherebetweenhereandthere

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right like saying you shouldn't fu**in swear. Works well. Nice try anyway England.

Nonetheless why don't more Americans protest? I try to stick up for them saying they can't help what their government does but as John says they can protest unlike the Iraqis. Not much happening on that front. Meanwhile abortion rights are being eroded and the whole country is sliding back into a scary right wing Religious fervor. Oh right they were too busy watching which girl the latest Bachelor picked. Laughing

And they must have the best PR in the world. Almost no part of the world untouched by them one way or another. Maybe they want to hang on to their Coca Cola and so let things slide.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 11:48 pm    Post subject: Free speech ain't always free Reply with quote

Dear nomadder,
Well, look at what's happened to some who spoke out against our "Iraqi policies":

http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/advocacy/protest/iraq/2003/0809americans.htm

But there are those who are protesting - they just don't get much media attention.

http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/march2.html

And let's not forget the many, many thousands (such as, ahem, me) who are "protesting" in what may be a more practical way: by getting involved in the campaigns of those who are running for the Democratic nomination and the chance to oust Dubya and Co. in Nov. 2004, less than a year from now.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjed9



Joined: 25 Oct 2003
Posts: 242

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's also not forget the fact that people might actually hate the American government for all the atrocities that it carries out under the guise of democracy when really we all know its because the fantastic US of A government is paranoid and money-driven.

The below link provides an amazing insight into the somewhat dubious foreign policy of the USA since WW2

http://cloud.prohosting.com/unify/blum.html

MJED

PS The UK is almost as bad ... thankfully just not as powerful!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
denise



Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 3419
Location: finally home-ish

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Americans ARE protesting, as johnslat pointed out.

As to why we don't protest the terrorists--I surely cannot speak for the growing number of Americans who are finally seeing through the charade, but I can say that perhaps, in a chicken-and-egg sense, we feel that the (insert your own adjective here--cruel/imperialistic/fascist/whatever) policies of the W. regime actually CAUSE terrorism--wipe out the cause of the terrorism, and the attacks will subside.

Yes, I know that there are other causes of terrorism, other Western targets, etc., (basically, I know I am grossly overgeneralizing by blaming everything on W) but the good ol' US of A has its hand in quite a bit of the current quagmire.

d
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Just a guy



Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 267
Location: Guangxi

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
He got about a half million less votes than the other candidate



Each State is allocated a number of Electors equal to the number of its U.S. Senators (always 2) plus the number of its U.S. Representatives (which may change each decade according to the size of each State's population as determined in the Census).

Whichever party slate wins the most popular votes in the State becomes that State's Electors-so that, in effect, whichever presidential ticket gets the most popular votes in a State wins all the Electors of that State. [The two exceptions to this are Maine and Nebraska where two Electors are chosen by statewide popular vote and the remainder by the popular vote within each Congressional district].

On the Monday following the second Wednesday of December (as established in federal law) each State's Electors meet in their respective State capitals and cast their electoral votes-one for president and one for vice president.

For example,
Tennessee has 11 Electoral Votes
Texas has 32
California has 55
Florida has 17
Hawaii has 4
New Yark has 33
Vermont has 3
& so on....


Total Electoral Vote: 538 Needed to Elect: 270

George W. Bush and Richard Cheney received 271 Electoral Votes
Albert Gore, Jr. and Joseph Lieberman received 266 Electoral Votes

I'm just clearing this up for any non U.S. folks who might not know.
I'm not saying one way or the other my opinion, just how the law is written.

here & here are where I got the numbers.

here is a fairly good explanation about the U.S. electoral collage.

Quote:
Check your facts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nomadder



Joined: 15 Feb 2003
Posts: 709
Location: Somewherebetweenhereandthere

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Mjed9 as said-no stone unturned. And now another military man looking for power too-sure John knows his name as its escapes me now. Scary militaristic government as only option and we used to think Latin America was bad. I'm sure that all these wars are not the way to go-bad karma if nothing else. True about the UK being potentially bad but not enough power as of yet. Funny to see Bush all dressed up looking terribly uncomfortable next to the Queen. Meanwhile my country Canada has become completely impotent. Perhaps our new PM will do something. Canada should have kept closer ties to the UK. So far the future looks scary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:44 am    Post subject: Hanging chads et al Reply with quote

Dear Just a guy,
For an excellent description/analysis of just how the electoral college votes in Florida were stolen, please read Michael Moore's "Stupid White Men".
Actually, you can start reading it here:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0060392452/ref=sib_dp_rdr/103-4167745-9711806#reader-page

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
voodoochild



Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 3:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Take a look at these photos of the protests....great!


http://www.rense.com/general44/brits.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
struelle



Joined: 16 May 2003
Posts: 2372
Location: Shanghai

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
As to why we don't protest the terrorists--I surely cannot speak for the growing number of Americans who are finally seeing through the charade, but I can say that perhaps, in a chicken-and-egg sense, we feel that the (insert your own adjective here--cruel/imperialistic/fascist/whatever) policies of the W. regime actually CAUSE terrorism--wipe out the cause of the terrorism, and the attacks will subside.


I don't think that Bush's policies cause terrorism, but they certainly exacerbate the causes that lead to terrorism.

If you were to take a global opinion poll, most people would not agree with Bush and his policies. Some of his biggest critics are even, in fact, Americans!

Bush's view of the world is extremely simplistic and exclusive, and the actions he takes tend to alienate others from him and create a further rift. He is also a terrible listener and does not adapt to the feedback which he receives on the world stage. Clearly, the majority of folks around the world disagree with him, but he stubbornly continues with his agenda. He does not seek cooperation and negotiation, and force is the way with which decisions are made.

I shudder to think about what kind of EFL teacher Bush would make Exclamation

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
denise



Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Posts: 3419
Location: finally home-ish

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

struelle wrote:

I don't think that Bush's policies cause terrorism, but they certainly exacerbate the causes that lead to terrorism.

I shudder to think about what kind of EFL teacher Bush would make Exclamation

Steve


Steve--

You're right--"exacerbate" is more accurate than "cause." The problems, or the roots of them, at least, pre-date him.

I have certainly changed my opinion of him over the last few years: I no longer think that he is too stupid to do any real harm.

Think of the fun his EFL students could have! They could get away with all manner of linguistic nonsensicalities!

d
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China