|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sinsofangels
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The script seemed to be part of the program, so I'm not sure you'd need Japanese installed on Windows, but I'm not sure. Just try it and see.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanKen
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 139 Location: Calgary, AB Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: Rosetta Stone |
|
|
sinsofangels wrote: |
I really didn't like the fact that they don't teach grammar in the program at all. You've got to deduce it from the sentences they give you, which could be good if puzzling it out means you remember the grammar better, but could be bad if you get it wrong. And while the pictures are pretty good at getting the meaning across, as a linguistics major, I can't help but wonder if what I'm saying is "The girl is riding a horse." or "The girl rides a horse." or something else I hadn't even thought of. |
Rosetta Stone works BECAUSE it doesn't teach you grammar formally but lets you deduce it naturally the way a child picks up English. Did you really study English grammar before learning to speak the language?? I didn't think so. Neither did I! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnyuehan
Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Posts: 22 Location: rural Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've used Rosetta Stone for about a year now & am satisfied with it; glad I made the purchase. Their advertising is a bit of a stretch. Best language learning software I've found yet, but still not nearly as good as studying with a real person. Not perfect, but if you can't study with a real person, it is a good alternative. It has helped my Japanese a lot, but studying with a private teacher is a much more challenging mental workout.
The order in which words are learned is a bit odd & doesn't follow most textbooks or for studying for proficiency exams. Numbers don't show up until lesson 4. Lessons do build on previously learned vocabulary, and old words are reviewed & build up upon; only a few new words are learned in each lesson. Sometimes I can fly through a lesson, while others are tougher; depends how much of the vocabulary I've learned in my other studies.
I've used Rosetta for Mandarin also; the lessons & pictures for at least the first few lessons are almost the same for each lesson. Wonder if that is the case across other languages, also.
I find Rosetta more interesting to study with than a textbook because of the different activities. My electronic dictionary gets a lot of use looking up words from Rosetta; throw in podcasts, web sites, misc. texts and speaking with Japanese people and you have my discombobulated learning methods. Sticking with one textbook's lessons is probably better; classes with real teachers are the best, I'd say.
And I agree with JaredW to buy just the first year; it has enough lessons to keep you studying for a long time. When you've completed all lessons, you may be tired of it & have other studying resources you like better. I'll study with it for a few weeks & get bored with Rosetta, using other studying materials for a while before coming back to it.
I'd suggest completing at least 5 full lessons online thru the library system to see if you want to commit to purchasing it, more while it's free. Spelling? Only use the kana or kanji if possible, avoiding the romaji. If your computer isn't letting you see the kana & kanji online, try using it at one of the libraries & hope they have newer computers that can do it (Ridgedale or Eden Prairie, perhaps - I'm from MN, too). I use a Mac & rarely have problems with non-English languages; any Macs at the libraries, or at a friend's place you could try?
A bit off topic, but in the lines of language learning with computers:
Jim Breen's page of language learning & more has probably been posted here many times before; here it is again.
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/japanese.html
http://www.kanji-a-day.com/ - another one of my favorites; divided by 4 levels.
http://www.japanesepod101.com/ - good learning in the free podcasts; paid subscriptions give you access to PDFs of the lessons, proficiency exam practice tests & more. Not cheap, but a nice competitor to Rosetta. Daily lessons range from newbie to intermediate. More real-life situations and much more entertaining than Rosetta. For someone coming here on a quick vacation (like my parents), I'd say this is much better than Rosetta.
Other favorite web sites or software for learning? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sinsofangels
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Rosetta Stone works BECAUSE it doesn't teach you grammar formally but lets you deduce it naturally the way a child picks up English. Did you really study English grammar before learning to speak the language?? I didn't think so. Neither did I! |
Learning for children and adults are two different things. Children's brains are far more receptive to learning languages than adults. And even then, that only works to a certain extent because English grammar classes are still necessary in school. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ACGalaga

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 5 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am a user of Rosetta Stone and am very fond of it.
200$ is way cheaper than taking a course in Japanese (that is if any local institutions even offer it) and I really enjoy it's 'immersion' technique.
Instead of directly translating phrases into you native tongue, this software has you to thinking in the language you are learning. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanKen
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 139 Location: Calgary, AB Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:48 pm Post subject: Rosetta Stone |
|
|
sinsofangels wrote: |
Learning for children and adults are two different things. Children's brains are far more receptive to learning languages than adults. And even then, that only works to a certain extent because English grammar classes are still necessary in school. |
Grammar books are useful, but having a good one will not by itself allow you to learn a language. Immersion is the best method, and Rosetta Stone does a pretty good job of that! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sinsofangels
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Grammar books are useful, but having a good one will not by itself allow you to learn a language. Immersion is the best method, and Rosetta Stone does a pretty good job of that!
|
Yes, that's why I said it would be better to use the program AND while reading up on some grammar to supplement it. I didn't say I wanted the program to teach only grammar, I just said it annoyed me that it didn't teach *any* grammar at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanKen
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 Posts: 139 Location: Calgary, AB Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:16 pm Post subject: Rosetta Stone |
|
|
sinsofangels wrote: |
Quote: |
Grammar books are useful, but having a good one will not by itself allow you to learn a language. Immersion is the best method, and Rosetta Stone does a pretty good job of that!
|
Yes, that's why I said it would be better to use the program AND while reading up on some grammar to supplement it. I didn't say I wanted the program to teach only grammar, I just said it annoyed me that it didn't teach *any* grammar at all. |
Sorry, but I didn't see any mention in any of your posts that "it would be better to use the program AND while reading up on some grammar to supplement it".
I only heard you lament the grammarless approach used by RS:
sinsofangels wrote: |
I really didn't like the fact that they don't teach grammar in the program at all. You've got to deduce it from the sentences they give you, which could be good if puzzling it out means you remember the grammar better, but could be bad if you get it wrong. |
Different people learn with different methods. That's a fact. The natural, grammarless, like-we-learned-language-as-a-child approach is what sets Rosetta Stone apart from other software. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sinsofangels
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try reading the ENTIRE post then...
Quote: |
I really didn't like the fact that they don't teach grammar in the program at all. You've got to deduce it from the sentences they give you, which could be good if puzzling it out means you remember the grammar better, but could be bad if you get it wrong. And while the pictures are pretty good at getting the meaning across, as a linguistics major, I can't help but wonder if what I'm saying is "The girl is riding a horse." or "The girl rides a horse." or something else I hadn't even thought of. It's probably better to practice with the program but read up a little on grammar online or something.
I do like how they have practice sections for all four skills - reading, writing, listening and speaking. Depending on what you need, it's very important to practice. Just because you can listen doesn't mean you can speak. But, don't worry too much about your scores in the speaking sections. I got a hold of the English lessons, and it said I couldn't speak English. The Arabic version, however, told me I spoke nearly perfect Arabic, which I'm pretty sure is a lie, as I have no idea how to pronounce a third of their sounds.
But really, the best way to figure out is to use it yourself. The best method of learning is the one that you stick to. Wink At least at the library, you won't be dropping $100 for it. |
I didn't tell him not to use it, I told him what I thought was wrong with it. (As well as what I thought was good about it.) Because that's what he asked for. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wintersweet

Joined: 18 Jan 2005 Posts: 345 Location: San Francisco Bay Area
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ballsrud wrote: |
I was mostly just concerned because of how some of the things are spelled in the program. I'll go over some of the vocabulary from the first lesson.
girl - onnanoko(but according to an online dictionary it should be "onna no ko")
boy - otokonoko(once again, otoko no ko)
woman - onnanohito (onna no hito)
man - otokonohito (otoko no hito)
dog - inu
cat - neko
car - kuruma
plane - hikooki
horse - uma
ball - booru
elephant - zoo
table - teeburu
I buess most of them are fine, but the first four are definitely split differently than how they appear in an online dictionary. Does it really matter this early in the learning if it means you can get the rhythm of the language? |
I don't think the orthographic issues have much to do with anything. It's just a matter of style. Different style guides romanize Japanese differently, particularly when it comes to things like ou/oo. Spaces are put in for the convenience of people who are used to languages that use spaces. (This can result in some really messed-up looking Japanese writing, as I had classmates a few years ago who insisted on putting English-style spaces all over their Japanese. Bad end result.)
Anyway, I recently found out that I can get at least the CD-based Japanese program from my library too, so I'm going to give it a shot. I found out when I went in today to see what kind of resources they have in their ESOL section. I brought home the English program to see what I think of it, too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|