|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sheikh radlinrol
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 1222 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: Ramadan in the Orkneys |
|
|
Now that Ramadan is almost upon us (you), I'd like to pose a question that many of you will have heard before but I never dared to ask in the Gulf.
What does a Muslim do if he finds himself in the north of Scotland during Ramadan in summer. Is he expected to fast for 18 or 19 hours and console himself with the fact that in about 15 years the shoe will be on the other foot? Even more difficult if you're in Northern Finland. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I asked this question of a Sheikh and was told that there are no places on Earth where this happens. Geography is not one of the strong points in Saudi education. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ootii
Joined: 27 Oct 2005 Posts: 124 Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
I asked this question of a Sheikh and was told that there are no places on Earth where this happens. Geography is not one of the strong points in Saudi education. |
You must have asked Sheikh al-Shawarma. It's a pretty common question. One stock answer is to fast according to the timings of Makkah. Another is to fast according to the nearest reasonable time.
I've never heard any comment from any Muslims living in the far north. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheikh radlinrol
Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 1222 Location: Spain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the reply ootii but I'm still intrigued. Why is it so important in Gulf countries not to break one's fast until the very moment when the sun goes down when Muslims in northern (or southern) countries can guide themselves by what you call ''reasonable'' times.
Equally baffling (at least for me) was the 80 kilometre rule. This may be nonsense but I was told that travellers were excused from fasting but that scholars had decided that only those making journeys of at least 80 kilometres were, in fact, excused. 80 kilometres in this day and age is a mere spit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps there are few muslims living in the far north? I'm curious as well what one would do in the face of the long daylight hours. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
trapezius

Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 1670 Location: Land of Culture of Death & Destruction
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I asked this question of a Sheikh and was told that there are no places on Earth where this happens. |
HAHAHAHAHAH
Thanks for LOL man, for like, the 3rd time so far?!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ootii
Joined: 27 Oct 2005 Posts: 124 Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
sheikh radlinrol wrote: |
Thanks for the reply ootii but I'm still intrigued. Why is it so important in Gulf countries not to break one's fast until the very moment when the sun goes down when Muslims in northern (or southern) countries can guide themselves by what you call ''reasonable'' times. |
It is partially due to the Quran's declaration that "Allah wants for you ease, not hardship", and also because all religious obligations are predicated upon one's ability to carry them out - which is repeated in the Quran both in the context of Hajj and fasting. And finally, because of the assertion that "God does not tax any soul beyond that which it can bear".
Muslims are attentive to the daily beginning and ending of the fast, timing it with the break of dawn and sunset because that is the sunnah. While it may seem to you that they are eager to eat, it is also important not to extend the fast beyond sunset lest the over zealous burden others "beyond that which they can bear".
Quote: |
Equally baffling (at least for me) was the 80 kilometre rule. This may be nonsense but I was told that travellers were excused from fasting but that scholars had decided that only those making journeys of at least 80 kilometres were, in fact, excused. 80 kilometres in this day and age is a mere spit. |
There is no 80 kilometer rule. The Quran grants a dispensation to travelers not to fast - although they do not have to break their fast if they do not want to. There is no guidance given, however, about who qualifies as a "traveler" and who does not. In the past, this was, apparently, fairly clear to everyone. Today, however, people wonder about flying off to Jeddah for a meeting and what not - is that travel?
Some scholars have stipulated a number of kilometers, some say that you must be away from home for at least one night. These are the opinions of people that may not be imposed on others. They are simply offered as guidance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:41 am Post subject: Re: Ramadan in the Orkneys |
|
|
sheikh radlinrol wrote: |
What does a Muslim do if he finds himself in the north of Scotland during Ramadan in summer. Is he expected to fast for 18 or 19 hours and console himself with the fact that in about 15 years the shoe will be on the other foot? Even more difficult if you're in Northern Finland. |
According to the European Council for Fatwa and Research states the following:
" The council discussed the topic of the times for Prayers and fasting (mawaqit) in the countries that are located at high latitudes and listened to the Shar`i and astronomical studies that were submitted by some of the members, and the illustrations of the relevant technical aspects recommended in the Eleventh Session of the Council, and decided the following:
The regions at high latitudes are divided into three zones:
A. The first zone: It is the region that lies between the latitudes of 45 degrees and 48 degrees north and south. It is characterized by the existence of the apparent signs of the time during twenty-four hours, no matter whether the times are long or short.
B.The second zone: It lies between the latitudes of 48 degrees and 66 degrees north and south, where some of the astronomical signs of time are nonexistent for a number of days during the year, as, for example, the case when the twilight does not disappear to indicate the beginning of `Isha�, and thus the end of the Maghrib time trails till it overlaps Fajr.
C. The third zone: It lies at the latitude of 66 degrees north and south and extends to the two poles. In this zone the apparent signs indicating the time are nonexistent for a long period of the year both by day and at night.
..................
The ruling for the first zone is that its people observe the Prayers at their Shar`i times, and observe fasting for its Shar`i time, from true dawn till sunset, in compliance with the Shar`i texts indicating the times for Prayers and fasting; and if someone is unable to fast or complete his fast on a certain day because of its excessive length, he or she may break his or her fast on that day and compensate for it on some other suitable day.
The ruling for the second zone is that the times for `Isha� and Fajr Prayers are to be determined with the proportional measurement on the analogy of the corresponding times in the night of the closest region where the signs of the times of `Isha� and Fajr can be distinguished.
The ruling for the third zone is that all the times are calculated with the proportional measurement in analogy of the corresponding times at 45 degrees latitude, by dividing the 24 hours in the third zone in the same way the times are divided at 45 degrees latitude.
If the length of the night at 45 degrees latitude is 8 hours and the sun sets at 8 o�clock, and `Isha� is at 11 o�clock, the same times will be observed in the country where the time is to be determined. If the time of Fajr at 45 degrees latitude is 2 a.m., Fajr in the country where the time is to be determined will be at 2 a.m. and fasting will begin at that time and continue up to the estimated time of Maghrib.
........................
Third: The Council confirms its previous Decision No. 3/3 concerning the legitimacy of performing the Maghrib and `Isha� Prayers together on missing the sign of `Isha� or the delay of its time, in order to save the Muslims living in high latitudes inconvenience and difficulty. "
End of quote.
Source: http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503549482
For example for a Muslim living in the city of Tongue in north Scotland, and according to the Islamic calendar and prayer times, he will break his fast at 8:19 pm (using the WORLD WIDE PRAYER TIMES: http://www.islamicity.com/PrayerTimes/)
Quote: |
Equally baffling (at least for me) was the 80 kilometre rule. This may be nonsense but I was told that travellers were excused from fasting but that scholars had decided that only those making journeys of at least 80 kilometres were, in fact, excused. 80 kilometers in this day and age is a mere spit. |
The rule of 80 km is not used an excuse for not fasting.
The rule of 80 Km and, according to majority of Muslim scholars, is used to shorten the prayer from four 'rakaats' to two 'rakaats' for Muslim who is traveling more than 80 km of distance.
The Muslim traveler is allowed not to fast during his journey (but he has to compensate that day later), but if he wants to fast during his journey, then it is up to him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bebsi
Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 958
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I recall asking this very question once of an Islamic scholar, and the explanation I got was pretty similar to the way 007 explains it: in high latitudes, you basically go on the times of Fajr and Maghreb as they are at 45 degs (i.e. exact mid) latitude. This way, if Ramadan falls in June, the faster doesn't have as long a day as he would if he went on, for example, Narvik time. Likewise, when Ramadan comes round in December, he has a longer fast than he would on Narvik time, but overall, it balances out without exposing him to undue health risks. His number of fasting hours in a full cycle of 36 years (the time it takes for Ramadan to return to a given point in a solar year) remains the same.
Makes a lot of sense to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How nice to see such a reasoned description of the Islamic viewpoint on this.
Quote: |
I asked this question of a Sheikh and was told that there are no places on Earth where this happens. Geography is not one of the strong points in Saudi education. |
Actually, if you are referring to 24 hour nights the Sheikh would be quite correct as far as the next twenty-five years go, since we'd have to wait until Ramadan was in February for that to be a problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 614
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Muslims I went to graduate school, in Seattle, seemed to suffer greatly when Ramadan was in the summer months, but they did fast and they got really thin (no big family feasts to count on). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bebsi
Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 958
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, Stephen, it would be a problem from now on UNTIL Ramdan fell in february...well, actually April. The holy month is now starting to fall in the northern summer, which means a very long day indeed for a faster.
Mind you, any Muslims in Antartica will have an easy time for the next 15 years or so!!!!
The 45 degs latitude approach is actally the most sensible one. Of course, Muslims don't have to adhere to it, they can extend their day past that in summer if they wish, to bring it closer to real-time at their specific location.
If I were a Muslim, I think I would go for the 45 degs option. It would mean a 15 hour day (...ish) in summer, and a 9 hour day in winter. Manageable, I would think?
Any more Muslims out there reading this, can you help us on this question? Your insights would be appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|